Will Deans utilise Wallabies' impressive depth?

By Jiggles / Roar Guru

The last time I was this optimistic about player depth in Australian rugby, John Eales slotted a last minute penalty goal to sink New Zealand in Wellington.

It was in the middle of a fantastic period of Australian rugby between 1998 and 2002, where Australia won eight of 11 Bledisloe Cup matches contested, won a Rugby World Cup, and finally prevailed over the Lions. True domination.

I was optimistic because Rod Macqueen had installed a sense of pride and privilege in the Wallabies jumper that was rarely seen before.

Every player knew they had worked hard to wear gold and knew that if they didn’t continue to work hard, the next cab off the rank would snatch that gold jersey off their backs. A prime example was the rise and fall of Wallaby Tom Bowman.

Flash-forward to the period between 2009 and 2012 and Robbie Deans, rightly or wrongly, has a select bunch of favourites who are marched into the Wallabies regardless of form or off field behaviour.

While Deans certainly does play favourites, I concede in some situations there just hasn’t been a viable option, ie. Wycliff Palu at number eight.

What the Brumbies, Reds and a smattering of players from both the Rebels and Force have shown throughout 2012, and now in 2013, is that Deans finally has those extra options.

Whether he chooses them is another matter altogether.

A perfect example is Kurtley Beale. His form at fullback at the beginning of the 2012 Test season was diabolical. I have never been so embarrassed regarding the performance of a fullback for Australia as I was that night against the All Blacks in Sydney.

But in all honesty, who else would you pick?

This year I don’t think we have to indulge Beale and the lack of responsibility he shows with regards to his own body and personal fitness.

We have Jesse Mogg who has kicked on from 2012 with an excellent start to 2013. He has the huge kicking game of Latham with the deceptive speed of Joe Roff, coupled with the ability to play the ball both sides of the body.

Sure his defence was suspect at times in 2012, but he has never ever been bad as Beale was that night against New Zealand.

Quade Cooper is another. I have defended this guy no end, and I believe he is still the best option for the Wallabies at 10, despite starting slowly this year.

But you cannot deny that the Brumbies player-makers, Christian Lealiifano and Matt Toomua are developing into true alternates.

This is only healthy for Australian rugby. It means Cooper has to pull his finger out and improve his decision making around the park, or risk being overtaken by the other two contenders.

On Saturday night, when the news came through that David Pocock would miss the Lions series, I was disappointed for him as a person, however I wasn’t too concerned about the open-side flanker replacements we have on offer.

This isn’t 2011, and we now have Michael Hooper, the indisputable form Wallaby of 2012, and Liam Gill, arguably the form player in Super Rugby this year so far.

This is before we even begin to speculate over George Smith, who made a triumphant home coming after stints in Japan and France.

Whichever way Deans decides to go, I think it would be hard to argue the impact on the Wallabies would be as great as it was in 2011 at the Rugby World Cup.

This situation is playing out in most positions across Australian rugby. The contenders in many positions are hungry and are putting in huge efforts to force Deans’ hand when it comes to selection.

Perennial starters in positions we formally lacked depth are going to have to lift their game to overcome other contenders who have been putting their hand up for a number of seasons now.

For example, Benn Robinson is no longer a guaranteed walk up, and he is going to have to work very hard to discover form we haven’t seen since 2009, and prove he is worthy.

It is nice to speculate on the depth, which I believe is developing in Australian rugby. However the question remains, will Robbie Deans have the ‘big ones’ to pick in-form contenders if the incumbents don’t lift their game?

After all, what’s the point of depth if you don’t utilise it?

The Crowd Says:

2013-03-24T02:28:42+00:00

mpm

Guest


Cummins and AAC don't have the distribution skills.

2013-03-17T23:34:53+00:00

Tipene Roar

Roar Rookie


lol.will never happen.

2013-03-17T23:24:22+00:00

Tipene Roar

Roar Rookie


Super coach?Crusaders were the best team not to win thanks to a certain ref.

2013-03-17T06:00:57+00:00

Barbara Bagley

Guest


Time to stop playing old favourites and reassess especially in light of Brumbies successes. Rebuilding a team can be done. Just ask Jake White

2013-03-17T05:34:18+00:00

Jerry

Guest


Well, they don't 'dictate' because it's NOT absolute - to dictate is to give an order. What they do is request, but the Super Rugby coach has the authority to deny that request. To answer your first question, Cory Jane was a fullback full time for the Canes right up until last season. Ma'a Nonu was a fill in at wing for the Canes due to Conrad & Tana being the first choice midfield. Piri was a stopgap at 10. 8 is probably Vito's natural position and with Shields at the Canes it makes sense for Vito to stay at 8, but he's not gonna get past Read for the AB's.

2013-03-16T10:52:55+00:00

stillmatic1

Guest


how long did any of those players play in these positions though jerry? were any of your examples first choice players in those positions, or just stop gap? so although not absolute, the implication is pretty clear that NZRU do in fact dictate where their prospective squad members play (which is obvious anyway!!).

AUTHOR

2013-03-15T02:10:12+00:00

Jiggles

Roar Guru


Well that's just incorrect.

2013-03-14T11:35:46+00:00

johnson

Guest


x 2 high tackle

2013-03-14T08:54:06+00:00

Rob

Guest


Using tapui, faiinga, cummins and AAC as examples of depth just highlights the argument.... Against you. Not one of those would come close to making 13 for a NZ super team. Let alone international standard.

AUTHOR

2013-03-14T06:27:31+00:00

Jiggles

Roar Guru


Development takes time, effort and money. And at the end of it all you could still end up with a dud. It's far easier for nsw to pick up the QLD blokes who've been left out or poach back a player once the Force/Brumbies/Rebels have played him a bit.

2013-03-14T06:04:11+00:00

Sage

Guest


And as an Aussie I would anticipate your comments white cloud........

2013-03-14T03:30:27+00:00

Jerry

Guest


And even if what you said is true, which it's not, it doesn't actually disprove my point.

2013-03-14T03:19:20+00:00

Jerry

Guest


When did Ben Smith last play centre for the Highlanders?

2013-03-14T02:20:46+00:00

Cynic

Guest


I would back the Brumbies to beat that team.

2013-03-14T01:21:47+00:00

Paul Carroll

Guest


The biggest disappointment was Deans hesitation at using players that starred last year. If anything the Brumbies should have rivaled the Reds for players and not the Horrortahs. Christian Leailifano .White and Mogg deserve their chance. They and the Brumbies have looked the most steady under pressure, which has been missing from the Wallabies as they haven't been able to consistently regroup and reverse that pressure. The chip kick has been the go gifting the opposition with the ball. I am one who saw Deans as having had his chance and change was needed before the Lions tour.

2013-03-13T21:42:45+00:00

maximillian

Guest


not true, the AB coaches are deadset on picking primarily specialists in their best 15. All the players you mentioned above are now playing the positions the AB asked them to play. The Abs see the versatility as a bonus but nothing more. I guarantee if a bloke like Vito played all season at 8, he would not be in the running as a 6 for the ABs.

2013-03-13T21:42:06+00:00

Simon_Sez

Guest


I agree Koki, Fotu Aelua (115 kg) is an excellent No.13 and has the capacity to keep Tuilagi quiet.

2013-03-13T19:07:36+00:00

Justin2

Guest


Well said Jerry. The nz myth was growing by the minute.

2013-03-13T17:15:31+00:00

Mick

Guest


I'm an aussie, I don't hate Deans. I agree Deans has done 'pretty well' with what he's had at his disposal, but not great by any means. He was seen as a 'great' coach when he was hired, so I want great results (i.e. what he's done, without the home losses to Scotland and Samoa, Ireland (in the WC) and a couple more wins against NZ). I agree we were probably never going to win the last World Cup, but Deans' decision to not have a proper backup 7 was terrible, and probably did cost us a spot in the Final (i.e. we may have beaten Ireland, then been on the other side). Then, as France almost showed, anything can (almost) happen in the Final.

2013-03-13T16:45:16+00:00

Mick

Guest


haha well put mate.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar