Tim Sheens' era still haunting Benji Marshall

By Nick Campton / Roar Pro

The Tigers played tough in their win against Penrith on the weekend. The chips were down, they were missing their best player, but they showed a lot of heart and courage and managed to claw out a 20-18 win.

The fact that they didn’t collapse in a heap was surprising. The fact that Benji Marshall, apart from one cut out pass to David Nofaluma, was unsighted was not so surprising. The Marshall that has been playing this season, and indeed last season, is not the Marshall I remember.

A team cannot thrive while its marquee player is so out of form. Marshall is more than just the face of the Tigers, he is one of the faces of the game.

If I just mentioned a player named “Benji” there is no doubt everyone would know who I mean. For such a big name to be so out of sorts is bad for Wests and bad for the game.

Personally, I think Marshall is burned out and lacking ideas. His ongoing form loss since the 2011 finals series has been abrupt, and one that could have easily been prevented earlier in his career.

The root of the problem is simple. Ever since Scott Prince left for the Titans at the end of 2006, Marshall has not had a real halfback.

His halves partners have consisted of outside backs being shuffled in (Tim Moltzen, Blake Ayshford, Chris Lawrence and *shudder* Daniel Fitzhenry), back-rowers with a little ball playing ability (Liam Fulton), converted hookers (Robbie Farah and John Morris) and youngsters that never kicked on (Blake Lazarus and Jacob Miller).

No Scott Princes in that group. The best football Marshall has ever played was in 2005, when Prince was running the show, and in 2010 and 2011, when Rob Lui was briefly able to plug the gap.

Marshall is not, and has never been, an organising half. His strengths are the flashes of sublime skill he shows, whether it be a wild sidestep, an outrageous pass or a deft kick.

When Prince and Lui were able to run the team and call the plays, Marshall was able to float in and out of the games as he saw fit, applying his skills and unpredictable brilliance wherever they were needed.

It is highly uncommon for a successful club to go for more than a few seasons without either developing a young halfback, or poaching one from another club.

As a Canberra fan, I am required by law to believe that Tim Sheens is a coaching genius, but the failure of such an innovative and experienced coach to develop an adequate partner for his greatest attacking weapon is plain bizarre.

It is my belief that Tim Sheens wanted to show how clever he was, and build a successful team without relying on having a traditional halfback. He tried to use Robbie Farah in the playmaking role, but mismanaged the team appallingly and the repercussions of that decision are now being felt.

Don’t get me wrong, I love Robbie Farah. I think Cameron Smith, Robbie Farah and Danny Buderus are the three great hookers of the NRL era. Smith and Farah are possibly the most skillful hookers of all time, and both play a significant role in the structure of their teams attack.

But Farah cannot do it all. As good as he is, he can’t run the team from the middle of the scrum. The concept of a spine has become common parlance in the past decade or so, and without the right combination at fullback, five-eighth, halfback and hooker it is difficult to remain competitive.

The baffling part of the whole episode is that it would have been easy to fill the gap. All the team needed was a relatively competent halfback who would take a little pressure off Marshall, act as a link between Farah and Marshall, throw a good pass here and there and steer the team round the park (There are so many candidates for this role it’s ridiculous. Luke Walsh, Daniel Mortimer, Isaac John, Brett Finch and Liam Foran would all be perfect)

Sheens tried to fit a square peg into a round hole by turning Marshall into a organising half, committing the classic error of weakening a strength to strengthen a weakness. The ill-fated experiment of placing Robbie Farah at halfback is another example of Sheens’ inability to adapt.

Of course, there are other mitigating factors. Marshall has developed a tendency to crab across the field, to the point where it becomes a major detriment.

This is balanced out by having Blake Ayshford and Chris Lawrence as his centres. Both are direct runners of the ball, and Lawrence in particular developed a deadly combination with Marshall.

But ever since Lawrence dislocated his hip early in 2011 he has not been the same. The pace, the zip, and acceleration that made him such a dangerous weapon are now diminished.

Joel Reddy can tackle, but on his best day he is not half as dynamic as Lawrence.

Marshall still has a lot left in the tank. He is 27, and could potentially play until his mid-thirties. But he needs a proper halfback and he needs one soon.

Curtis Sironen, for all his potential, will be a back-rower before long. He should be hitting holes off Marshall passes on the fringes of the ruck, not feeding him the ball from the scrum-base.

Perhaps the answer is Luke Brooks, an 18 year-old prodigy who is tearing the under-20s apart. I saw him play in a trial match early in the year, against fully grown men, and he more than held his own.

Then again, people said the same of Jacob Miller, who has since been shipped off to Hull without a second thought.

The bare facts are these: Since the 2005 premiership, the Tigers have made the finals just twice. I would hate for the last years of Benji’s great career to be wasted due to more mismanagement and coaching deficiencies.

The Crowd Says:

2013-06-15T04:23:43+00:00

Gavin Cooper

Guest


Nick, that was a clear and detailed summery of a situation I have been wondering about for some time too. Well stated. Most coaches want it their way or the highway. And maybe Benji should consider his options after all, the road outa town is free.

2013-06-13T12:31:31+00:00

Pete75

Guest


So add an additional turnstile to the Tigers defence? No thanks! :-)

2013-06-13T04:16:40+00:00

Haz

Guest


Exactly. Compare with how having Jeff Robson inside him has solidified Todd Carney's game. Jeff Robson will never make anyone's list of top ten halfbacks, but he's a great organiser, and that allows Carney's creativity to come to the fore.

2013-06-12T21:23:31+00:00

eric

Guest


I honestly thought that the Tigers would of made a play for Jamie Soward. He would of fit in perfectly with his strengths of kicking and organising. sowards running game would not be an issue playing inside benji. Also, sowards speed is an advantage in broken play. Sowards defence has improved over the years. He also has won a premiership. Perfect match. I think Panthers will make a play at Benji (if they haven't already)

2013-06-12T13:47:17+00:00

Maborlz Ez Hari

Guest


yeah well you might be right and in hindsight Tim Sheens may agree, but Tim did identify Rob Lui and if he were as responsible and professional as he ought to be things could of developed for the Tigers, but endless injury after injury and other spanners thrown in there such as player coach relationships got things strained and unpleasant lets hope Tim Sheens is back again soon and the Tigers also.

2013-06-12T07:43:21+00:00

ferret

Guest


Interesting article. I agree that you just need a steady half-back. The Broncos won the premiership with the brilliance of Lockyer at 5/8th and the steady journeyman, Shane Perry, at half-back. We have a "steady half now (Pete Wallace) but alas, lack a brilliant 5/8th.

AUTHOR

2013-06-12T06:58:01+00:00

Nick Campton

Roar Pro


Thanks mate Benji for sure could have been a great fullback if they switched him their early, or even when Brett Hodgson left. If memory serves me right he even used to defend on the wing, and return a kick now and then. I jumped on the Brooks bandwagon so fast I nearly pulled a hammy. Thanks for reading

2013-06-12T06:28:46+00:00

Mark Young

Roar Guru


Great stuff Nick Nicely captures the scenario. I have thought for a while that Benji would have been a great Fullback, instead of bulking up to remain at 5/8. One of the things that always strikes me about his golden year 2005 is his ball running in open field, his step and guile, and as fullback, ablet to inject himself into the attack - boy! Hope you are right about Brooks!

AUTHOR

2013-06-12T00:54:51+00:00

Nick Campton

Roar Pro


Mate, don't forget the mighty Will Robinson! Or Michael Gillett! Thanks for reading mate

2013-06-12T00:14:15+00:00

Obbig

Guest


Finding a halfback was a chronic problem for the tigers after Gary Freeman. That combination for the 2005 grand final win was undoubtedly the best the Tigers had ever had. And I agree with Pete75. Why are we buying backrowers when we have truckloads of them? Now we are talking Benji. But we have no backup plan for life after Benji too or Farrah for that matter. I doubt there was anywisdom in the purchase of Anasta too. I think the only reason the Roosters kept him was because of the 'C' beside his name. He could have been another regular backrower. Blair was the 'buy of the decade' for the decade. And again, it was money spent unwisely. A disappointing buy not worth every cent. That money could have been used to retain Fifita and Heighington and if I can add Beau Ryan. Mick Potter needs to learn thing smarter. Writing is on the wall for the Tigers. Unless we find a specialist number 7 to partner Benji, one does not need a crystal ball predict future of the Tigers. And please, no more backrowers!

2013-06-11T22:41:01+00:00

Will Sinclair

Guest


"It is highly uncommon for a successful club to go for more than a few seasons without either developing a young halfback, or poaching one from another club." To be fair, and as you correctly point out, the Club did develop a young halfback - Robert Lui. Sadly his subsequent actions meant he wasn't fit to wear the Tigers' jumper (although he's apparently perfectly fit to wear the Cowboys jumper, which might say something about the culture of that club).

2013-06-11T19:24:14+00:00

brett the manly fan

Guest


there best bet is marshall and anasta in the halve (didnt they start winning when they were paired)

2013-06-11T16:49:56+00:00

Pete75

Guest


Great article and I couldn't agree more. Half-back is arguably the most important position on the park, and demands a specialist. That isn't to say that you can't win the competition if you don't have an outstanding one, but a competent half-back is a must. Tim Moltzen was actually shaping up as a decent half-back there a few years ago, but seemed to want to play full-back, and was, for some reason, preferred there by both Sheens and Potter. It is difficult to see Moltzen salvaging anything of a career after his most recent knee injury. I like that Curtis Sironen has been playing very direct, which has given Marshall more time in space with the ball. There's no doubt that Benji is a better runner than passer of the ball, and if all Sironen does is attract a couple of players with his size, he'll have gone a long way to doing his job of giving Marshall more space on the outside. It will be interesting to see what recruitment looks like from hereon. A journeyman half-back would suit very well, and allow Luke Brooks to mature as an understudy. I don't believe that the Tigers actually need a champion half-back to be a threat in this competition, but it has to be one of their priorities. God help us if they do their usual and buy another crop of back-rowers....

Read more at The Roar