Tamou got what he deserved

By Greg Prichard / Expert

The NRL was right to throw the book at James Tamou. Presumably, he will be hit hard in court as well, but that doesn’t mean the NRL shouldn’t have taken the action they did.

I thought about describing the penalty of a $20,000 fine and suspension of one club game for North Queensland and State of Origin II for NSW, which effectively means a further fine of $30,000 since that is the match fee, as ‘harsh, but fair’.

But I didn’t want to look even remotely like I thought the league, which acted in consultation with the Cowboys’ management, had gone even just a little bit over the top.

Penalising footballers for off-field indiscretions is not an exact science, and this is probably one of the more difficult incidents to judge since there is obviously the potential for further strong penalties when Tamou faces court on July 2.

But if the league and Tamou’s club wanted to go this hard, I’ve got no problem with that.

NRL chief executive Dave Smith’s description of the matter as a “high level, high risk, high penalty situation” summed it up pretty well.

Tamou was charged by police after recording an alcohol concentration level of 0.197 when he was pulled over and tested at about 3.30am in a suburb of Townsville on Monday. Tamou was unlicensed as well. It has been reported he has indicated he will plead guilty.

That’s drink-driving with four times the legal limit in your system.

There is no excuse for it, and anyone who drives under those circumstances puts his or her own life and the lives of others at risk.

Some people will argue it is unfair to penalise Tamou so strongly when the vast majority of drink-driving charges against normal citizens don’t attract publicity or cost those who are charged anything outside of what the courts may impose.

But there is a clear difference in that Tamou is a high-profile representative of a major sport and his actions have brought that sport into disrepute.

You can’t expect the NRL not to act, and leave it all up to the courts, when the matter is so serious as to threaten the sport’s integrity if it doesn’t act.

Remember how it was just a few years ago, when there were regular off-field incidents, usually alcohol-related, in which players let the game down?

The league started coming down hard with penalties and now we don’t hear of nearly as many incidents.

It is no different to when the league judiciary started handing down massive penalties in the 1980s for violent conduct on the field – it acted as a deterrent.

The vast majority of people out there – footballers or otherwise – don’t need a deterrent from driving with four times the legal limit of alcohol in them, but it will nevertheless act as one.

Those experienced in the area of trying to attract sponsorship to sport will tell you as well that bad publicity caused by off-field incidents drives potential financial backers away.

That obviously wouldn’t be the major consideration in a case like this – there is a human safety issue here – but every sport has got the right to do what it can to protect its brand.

It didn’t seem likely anything would trump Paul Gallen punching Nate Myles as the Origin news item of choice – at least not until Origin II – but Tamou has sure managed to do that.

And, for what it’s worth, I believe Wests Tigers prop Aaron Woods is the man who should come into the NSW squad for him.

Woods has only recently turned 22, but don’t let that worry you. He talks and plays like someone much more experienced.

I would have said Tim Grant had he been available, but he is dreadfully unlucky to have been injured at the worst possible time.

Amazingly, referees’ boss Daniel Anderson said in the wake of Origin I he was “comfortable” with the decision by the referees not to sin-bin Gallen.

It was as open-and-shut a case for a sin-binning as you will get.

Then, sensibly, NRL boss Smith said violence wouldn’t be tolerated in the remainder of the Origin series and if there was foul play the referees would be expected to enforce the rules, which included the use of the sin bin.

So, if Queensland decide to get square with Gallen, they risk such action coming at a cost.

It just adds more intrigue to a game that already promises to be enthralling to watch.

The Crowd Says:

2013-06-14T03:46:30+00:00

Positive Rugby

Guest


Ballymore, a lot of guys also lose their job if their licence is required for their job. So their loss could be a lot more than an extra $30,000. Court granted work licences are only available for low range readings.

2013-06-14T03:42:41+00:00

Positive Rugby

Guest


So if I lose my job because I lose my licence then the court should take into account my loss of income in deciding on the fine? Don't think so.

2013-06-14T03:42:34+00:00

Damn Straight

Roar Rookie


Yes, that's right PR, the NRL fine relates to contract law/commercial law. The DUI relates to criminal law. 2 completely separate beasts. A lot of people on here have trouble making that distinction.

2013-06-14T02:13:43+00:00

Positive Rugby

Guest


There is a contractual agreement that allows the fine and suspension to be applied. Obviously. The obligation to the NRL should not be confused with the obligation to society in general. One arises because of the contractual agreement the other arises by statutory law. The obligations are seperate and the consequenses and punishments are seperate. To say that it should only be dealt with by a court is like saying if you cheat on your wife that should only be dealt with by a court. Or if you breach a contract to buy a car then that should only be dealt with by a criminal court. In either case a criminal court will have no power to apply a penalty but your wife in the first case and a civil court in the second case will.

2013-06-14T00:29:54+00:00

rae1

Guest


Maybe he was showing the THREE girls he had in the car how much he could handle the grog, Not!!

2013-06-14T00:24:31+00:00

rae1

Guest


Yep,what goes around comes around,BOOM! LMFAO!

2013-06-13T14:37:18+00:00

Griffo

Guest


Also on the sort of coin he's earning a $6,000 fine is not going to hurt him as much as it would your average Jim. Maybean inconvenience for this week but I like that this fine is will take account of the fact that it will take a bigger fine to have the dame effect as would on most people

2013-06-13T14:22:34+00:00

Griffo

Guest


I live in Townsville and although I don't know where Mr. Tamou resides I doubt it would have even cost him that much for a taxi

2013-06-13T12:21:06+00:00

Jake

Guest


XXXX is the highest selling beer in Aus, EJ.

2013-06-13T10:38:14+00:00

Dave

Guest


So oikee does that mean we can blame Meninga for Myles pooing himself in a motel hallway because he may have consumed food with him over a meal in Qld origin camp?

2013-06-13T10:10:45+00:00

Mango Jack

Guest


Lol. Except that tool on Ch10 in sydney. He makes me look good!

2013-06-13T10:09:03+00:00

Mango Jack

Guest


Ballymore, dozens of people die on roads each year due to alcohol, and remember he was 4 times the legal limit. That nobody got hurt is good luck and does not justify his action or support a more lenient penalty. He's a public figure of the game and a role model to lots of kids. The consequences of these actions would have been drummed into them so many times. The NRL was right to fine and suspend him.

2013-06-13T10:08:38+00:00

AJ

Guest


I think if you're 4 times the legal limit you probably aren't going to be making very good decisions. Maybe someone should try to fix the first bit that went wrong with him as well. He probably cant control his grog.

2013-06-13T09:49:58+00:00

Damn Straight

Roar Rookie


Because they are not contracted to the NRL Simon. They work for News Limited.

2013-06-13T09:28:17+00:00

Simon

Guest


It's not the NRL's responsibility.These matters should be dealt with in court, not by the NRL. 50k is a hell of a lot of money too. If you can be fined for bringing the game into disrepute how are Paul Kent and Phil Rothfield able to afford to eat?

2013-06-13T09:01:54+00:00

Ballymore

Guest


Unfair. If you or I did that we get fined a maximum of $6600. He gets a maximum of $56,600. Who got hurt? Nobody. -- Comment from The Roar's iPhone app.

2013-06-13T08:33:58+00:00

The eye

Guest


Just as interesting is the fact that it was his own club that pushed for his suspension,which could suggest parallels with Barba,both were suffering with form and both were taken out by their own clubs.Ireally cant believe there is a person on earth so stupid as to risk EVERYTHING like James did unless victim to psychological suffering of some sort.I wonder.

2013-06-13T08:25:58+00:00

Jason

Guest


He had 3 girls with him, probably thought it was his lucky day and he was going to get to do a reverse bun.

2013-06-13T08:24:23+00:00

Jason

Guest


Well, he was pretty much guaranteed to be there for SOO game 2 and a 30K paycheck so year by banning him it is effectively a fine.

2013-06-13T08:22:51+00:00

Jason

Guest


No one is slamming him for drinking, its the drink driving that has got everyone up in arms.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar