Can Australian cricket turn things around in three weeks?

By Glenn Mitchell / Expert

Australia entered the Champions Trophy as the titleholder and bowed out without a whimper. It now has three weeks ahead of the first Ashes Test at Trent Bridge on 10 July to try and turn around the nation’s cricketing fortunes.

It is a Sisyphean task and recent history does not augur well.

There are two four-day warm up matches to be played – against Somerset and Worcester – and for some an additional Australia A fixture against Gloucestershire.

While the Champions Trophy was never going to be an ideal start to an Ashes campaign it did nonetheless give

Australia’s batsmen a chance to experience match conditions and hopefully gather some much-needed form.

That may have been the expectation but the reality was not pretty.

Shane Watson had three opportunities at the top of the order – his stated preference at Test level – and faced 54 balls in compiling scores of 24, 5 and 5.

Potentially even more worrying than his form in the middle is coach Mickey Arthur’s comments that Watson’s relationship with skipper Michael Clarke – fractured when he was suspended for a Test during the India tour in March – has yet to fully heal.

He resumed bowling in the recent IPL season and sent down 14 overs across his three matches at the Champions Trophy.

As a batsman exclusively Watson’s tenure in the team is by no means guaranteed given the lean run he has endured of late – 627 runs at 24 in his past 14 Tests.

He needs some big scores in the lead-in matches to restore a modicum of confidence.

Phil Hughes, reinstated to the Test side last summer, was another who failed to flatter at the Champions Trophy where he opened alongside Watson.

His three knocks lasted a combined 69 deliveries during which time he scored a meagre 43 runs.

Much has been made of the changes Hughes has made to his technique during his exile.

It will be fully tested in the swing and seam friendly conditions in England – his last appearance in The Old Dart in 2009 saw him axed for the first time just two Tests into the series.

Coming off a poor series in India, his performances in his five Tests against England do not make happy reading – 154 runs at 17.1.

Such is the concern over his current form, Hughes will be given an extra warm-up match ahead of the first Test with his inclusion in the Australia A side for tomorrow’s fixture against Gloucestershire.

Interestingly, Matthew Wade – supposedly Australia’s back-up ‘keeper – will also join Hughes at Gloucester.

Incredibly, David Warner, according to chairman of selectors John Inverarity, is still in the frame for the first Test despite the fact he will not play for a month in the lead-up to the opening Test.

His early form on the tour has been nothing short of disastrous with a pair of ducks in the warm-up games against West Indies and India ahead of the Champions Trophy and just nine in his only innings in the tournament before his early-morning swing at Joe Root.

Surely you more likely spot a woolly mammoth in the tropics than you would Warner marking his guard at Trent Bridge.

The other two opening candidates in the squad have been playing county cricket.

Ed Cowan has been turning out for Nottinghamshire where he has scored 478 runs in 13 first-class innings at 43.4.

One of the blights on his Test career to date, his inability to convert starts into substantial scores, has plagued him again this county season – his highest score is 81, one of four half-centuries.

It has been a different scenario for 35-year-old Chris Rogers who is at the doorway of the last chance saloon as far as a Test recall is concerned.

As captain of Middlesex and headquartered at Lord’s, Rogers is the highest run-scorer so far on the county scene this season.

His 790 runs in 15 innings at 65.8 includes two centuries with the best of them a knock of 214.

In the wake of Warner’s antics he will surely stride out for his second Test appearance at Trent Bridge.

With Clarke’s ongoing back problems, Rogers’ experience and coolness under pressure will be much needed.

It is imperative that Clarke turn out for both first-class warm-up fixtures.

As the linchpin of the batting line-up he needs match practice under his belt.

Usman Khawaja has been touring with Australia A and in matches against Scotland and Ireland has scored 59 runs at 19.7, hardly likely to evoke confidence among the selectors.

The bulk of the Test bowling attack has also been under Brad Haddin’s stewardship with Australia A.

James Pattinson has captured 9 for 141 in his two outings while Nathan Lyon has collected eight wickets at 19.8.

So far, Ryan Harris is yet to be unleashed.

Perhaps he is being nursed through as a result of his injury-laden history but he needs to be on the field at Gloucester tomorrow.

The key over the next few weeks will be just how the Australian quicks come to terms with the English Duke ball.

The inability to extract consistent and controlled swing over recent England tours has been a major Achilles heel.

Whilst Australia has made headlines for all the wrong reasons through the early part of its England odyssey, the hosts have been steadily building towards their Ashes defence.

Arthur and Clarke have both spoken of the need for a cultural change at the top of Australian cricket.

The talk in fact started in India in March.

Heading towards July and the onslaught from a rampant England side the time for talking is over.

Petty squabbles and immature off-field shenanigans have to be a thing of the past.

After suffering the ignominy of a historic 4-nil drubbing in India, Australian cricket’s pride is on the line.

The next three weeks and how it is approached will tell us a lot more about the current status of this Australian squad ahead of the Ashes opener.

The Crowd Says:

2013-06-21T06:28:28+00:00

Aakash bhat

Guest


Well Thats a confidence booster@the passionaite aussie

2013-06-20T18:09:45+00:00

nickyc

Guest


Kerry O'Keefe and Bob Holland were leggies throughout their state and test careers.

2013-06-20T13:54:33+00:00

Passionate_Aussie

Roar Rookie


Glenn, Well written and very informative. Enjoyed the read. First and foremost - I don't think Australia will win, but that's based on form. Secondly, the wonderful thing about cricket is the numerous statistical analysis provided to assess a particular match. England vs Australia - Trent Bridge Matches played: 20 England wins: 4 Australia wins: 7 Draws: 9 Somewhat of a happy hunting ground for the Aussies. England - Trent Bridge Matches played: 58 Won: 20 Drawn: 22 Lost: 16 - 7 of which were to Australia Overall winning % = 34.48% Overall winning % against Australia = 20% Last match played was 2005, test match 4. England were the victors. Their previous win before 05' was 1977. England have not won two matches in a row facing Australia at Trent Bridge. Disregarding form... The result will be a draw or win to Australia, based on facts provided. One more fact: Out of the 11 matches won, there has never been any a winner by runs or wickets three times in a row. Therefore, if a winner it will be by runs for the past two matches have been won by wickets. That's my maiden for the evening, Passionate_Aussie over and out!

2013-06-20T13:45:54+00:00

Aakash bhat

Guest


Since when o keefe and holland are leggies @nickyc

2013-06-20T12:40:16+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


I would suggest Lancashire that we dont underestimate the credentials of Chris Rogers. Any batsman with a 50+ average at his age deserves respect and his present contract with a UK county team is far from his first. In fact he was well suited to UK conditions and generally scores better in England than Australia over many years in county cricket including several double centuries and at times averages over the 70 mark in some years. He may have batted against lesser bowlers but he's also batted against some of England's best. Every batsman has their slow years, but its apparent that at present he is well in form. I would suggest in the batting ranks Rogers is very much the dark horse England has to face and he just may embarrass them

2013-06-20T11:38:54+00:00

Lancashire

Guest


Be careful about bigging Rogers up too much. He's played most of his county cricket in Division 2, which almost by definition has lesser bowlers, he didn't have great seasons in 2011 and 2012, and while yes he's now in Division 1 and scoring well it's asking a lot of a 35 year old with one Test to immediately come in and score big.

2013-06-20T11:36:12+00:00

Malo

Guest


100% agree I would like to see him retire to injure and new blood to come in with a new culture. He can then be pals with Warnie in the Manscaping business

2013-06-20T11:28:44+00:00

Arthur Fonzarelli

Guest


I will not bowl any leg side rubbish. I will not play loosely across the line early in my innings. I will not dabble outside the off stump. WHO AM I ??????????

2013-06-20T10:56:52+00:00

nickyc

Guest


It's a bit of a myth to simply say that England struggle against leg-spinners. More accurately they have struggled against top quality leggies, eg. Warne, McGill, Abdul Qadir, Chandrasekhar and to a lesser degree Intikhab Alam and Mushtaq Ahmed. Between the Benaud and Warne/McGill eras Oz had a raft of leggies, eg. Gleeson, Jenner, O'Keefe, Higgs, Holland, Sleep, Hohns and others who rarely caused too many problems to the Poms. The question is in which category does Fawad Ahmed fall?

2013-06-20T10:47:33+00:00

Pete B

Guest


I'd be having Smith in my first XI, if only he were in the Ashes squad. He's a much improved batsman from the one the English first encountered. As Channel 9 are picking the squad Warner will probably get picked.

2013-06-20T10:45:08+00:00

Nick Richardson

Roar Guru


With the CT weather. Australia might walk away with 0-0.

2013-06-20T10:22:24+00:00

nickyc

Guest


Not sure that Mickey Arthur's statement today that Oz "have the best all-round bowling attack in world cricket" fits in with your sensible proposal!

2013-06-20T09:38:21+00:00

Tom Callaghan

Guest


And facing Finn in nets is not the same as facing him in the middle. Rodgers won't have seen much of Broad, Anderson, Swann. His 'success' in English conditions is illusory.

2013-06-20T09:08:56+00:00

Aakash bhat

Guest


Tom mate I think Ahmed will be picked bcoz he is a leg spinner and english batters are vulnerable to leg spinners but ahmeds performance against ireland was dissapointing to say the least.I still think he has as good a chance to be selected for the ist test as lyon. The ist practice match will be played from 26th june onwards and i think only the players who perform well in that game should be picked. And as far as rodgers is concerned i think he may have not played against anderson nd broad but he has great experience in english conditions.

2013-06-20T08:52:27+00:00

Buckets74

Guest


Any chance Adam Voges for a call up? At least he's been

2013-06-20T08:19:29+00:00

AnthonyDArcy

Guest


Finn's in his team, so he's probably faced him in the nets a bit.

2013-06-20T07:14:40+00:00

Tom Callaghan

Guest


Too much has been made of Rogers runs in English domestic cricket . He won't have faced the likely English test bowlers very often. They don't play often in domestic cricket.

2013-06-20T07:12:37+00:00

Tom Callaghan

Guest


Aakash Mate, Don't pin your hopes on Rogers. He won't have batted much against Finn ,Broad, Swann ,etc .His runs in England won't have been scored against international bowlers. What about Ahmed? He didn't seem to have caused the Irish batsmen many problems.

2013-06-20T06:49:19+00:00

John 360180

Guest


Sorry for slow reply. At work. Yes I'm very serious. No doubt he is the best bat in the team and the only Aussie who would make the English top 6. However what he has done to this team,its culture and it's reputation speaks for itself. I believe we would be better off with him out and Hussy, Katcich etc still there. Just my opinion and the way I feel.

2013-06-20T06:46:38+00:00

davos44

Guest


wasn't he from the wrong Era...imagine if he was at his peak now...besides Clarke he'd be our gun bat

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar