Declining MotoGP must change to suit riders

By Chris Dennis / Roar Rookie

MotoGP has come along way since the inaugural 500cc category in 1949 when the first championship was held but arguably no more so than in the last 13 years.

2001 saw the end of the two-stroke era and a new one begin, and you’d be forgiven for feeling apprehensive about the change.

Especially after watching the final 500cc championship and if, like me, you’d witnessed MotoGP history at Phillip Island where Valentino Rossi took out the last 500cc championship in style.

2002 proved another a great year in MotoGP even though some of 500cc machines were entered into the championship, mainly due to team expenses.

However they quickly proved no match for the four-stroke engines, especially that of Valentino Rossi and the new Honda RC211V, and by 2003 were phased out.

Since then, in my opinion we have witnessed the slow decline of MotoGP, especially in the last four years.

To me the 2002 year of the championship was not unlike today, where we have superior factory prototype machines among the slower and less evolved CRTs (Claiming Rule Teams).

In a nutshell the CRTs are not restricted to the amount of engines they use per season, unlike the factory prototypes, which are restricted to five per season.

They’re also allowed a larger fuel allowance for each race; this was created to give an advantage to the CRTs but has made little difference.

One of many problems with the CRTs is under the ‘claiming rule’ teams agree to sell up at least four of their engines per season to one of the major manufacturer teams.

This is now the subject of a possible rule change within Dorna (the governing body of the MotoGP) and one that CEO Carmelo Ezpeleta discussed at the Catalunya round of the season, with Yamaha as of 2014 allowing teams to lease their engines and Honda rumoured to do the same.

Obviously these manufacturers do not want their technology getting into the wrong hands.

Through the years and modifications one thing is certain, gone are the days where a bad qualifying session didn’t cost you victory on the Sunday and when a rider could come from almost anywhere on the grid to take the win.

Rossi had done this on numerous occasions both on two-stroke and four-stroke engines, this being in that ‘crazy’ era when the better rider mattered more than the bike.

The Grand Prix races are now usually divided between two groups, the factory bikes and the CRTs, and the leading CRT rider even gets to join in on the celebrations after the race and the post race interviews as if there are now two separate races.

Even the riders have called the racing boring to watch and this is partly the reason Australian former MotoGP rider Casey Stoner retired.

He had been increasingly unhappy with the way his sport was evolving and the constant rule changing brought in by Dorna, but also the premise of the CRTs.

He also commented countless times on the ‘Rookie Rule’ where by a rider coming up through the ranks of the lower categories was unable to go straight to a factory supported ride and forced to join a satellite team for their first year.

However this ruling was changed on account of the entry of Spanish superstar Marc Marquez, who straight after the rule was scrapped signed a lucrative contract with factory outfit Repsol Honda that Stoner had left.

This caused distaste among other riders when at the time Yamaha rider Ben Spies tweeting fellow American and MotoGP rider Colin Edwards saying, “heard the rookie rule is being changed back again, sometimes I guess we need a different passport”.

Edwards quickly replied “Complete joke!! No wonder Casey has lost his passion when you see all the cards stacked against ya…ridiculous”.

Spies later added, “not hating on Marquez at all. The kid is fast. I’m just stating facts that no matter where you’re from it shouldn’t hinder or help you”.

The sport has also taken a leaf out of the book of Formula One in recent times with a controlled tyre rule introduced in 2009 and a new and improved qualifying set up this year, which in fairness wasn’t such a bad idea.

It was becoming more dangerous every qualifying session with the factory riders getting involved in altercations with the slower riders.

One example was that of the infamous ‘slap’ given by Casey Stoner to then Satellite Ducati rider Randy de Puniet in 2011 with Stoner claiming De Puniet’s indifference on the track could have cost him his life, with a nearby concrete barrier ready to take his fall had he been forced off the track.

They haven’t got it all wrong though in Moto2 at least, they are supplied only one type of manufacture engine throughout the category, which is basically a Honda 600cc CBR, the races are entertaining but like in MotoGP there are still teething problems.

With all this change and evolution to our sport it would be nice if for once the powers that be at Dorna headquarters thought less about what they can do to make it more difficult for riders and teams and more about how they can make the show better for MotoGP fans.

One thing is for sure though, if changes aren’t made, we will continue to lose the passion of great riders and inevitably great racing.

The Crowd Says:

2013-06-25T12:54:55+00:00

trent

Guest


BSB's actual racing is very good, the points system and how it determines the champion via the the shootout, is awful and for myself this total devaules the series. The sooner they get back to the old fasioned way the better for me.

2013-06-23T06:10:40+00:00

atlas

Guest


For a spectator who wants close racing, I'd watch British Superbikes, followed by World Superbikes, ahead of MotoGP. Few surprises in who finishes in top 5, if we're lucky the order changes a little, the small field rapidly becomes a procession with such a gap between riders that the only hope of moving up a place is someone crashing out from a higher position I've traveled to Sepang every year since 2009 for the Malaysian GP, but won't this year. It's not the entry prices (cheap!), simply that the day's racing has become dull, Long gaps between races, no support events before races, transport to/from KL remains a shambles though has improved since 2009, silly things such as them running out of bottled water to sell in both 2011 and 2012 can make it unpleasant. Pay for grandstand seats but no numbered seat allocation - unless you can leave a 'guard' when you need food. toilet, lose your seat. The race itself - qualifying determines the podium. How long since anyone from the third row won a race? Sadly, has become a zzzzz Moto2 offers better racing

2013-06-23T02:39:13+00:00

nordster

Guest


Yeah id rather more than one tyre that mixes it up over a contrived level playing field, which is seemingly where all motor sport and sport wants to head.

2013-06-21T18:36:22+00:00

Frankie Hughes

Guest


I think all Motorsport needs to have multiple tyre suppliers. It adds to intrigue and I wouldn't be against teams split their drivers on different tyre suppliers

2013-06-21T13:42:22+00:00

trent

Guest


Its a shame there is a contral tyre, would much prefer to see michelen, dunlop and even pirelli fighting bridgestone for tyre supremacy, alas another one of Carlo's ideas which have set MGP back in terms on interest.

AUTHOR

2013-06-21T01:53:20+00:00

Chris Dennis

Roar Rookie


Yeah very true mate, I didn't see riders on different tyre manufactures having that much of an advantage anyway really, especially because like you say, different bikes, different chassis I think it even help others be competitive and level the playing field, you have to wonder if the Ducati would benefit from another manufacture.

2013-06-20T15:31:53+00:00

Stumpy

Roar Rookie


With the one tyre rule it leaves a very narrow window to effectively design a bike frame and a motor that works, which is why the tyre and weight changes last year were grossly unfair. It also favors certain riding styles, it's extremely difficult for riders to effect improvement via their own skill without extreme risk. Moto GP is a pale shadow of it's former self sadly.

Read more at The Roar