Where does the football money trail lead?

By bshine11 / Roar Rookie

The JFK assassination. The moon landing hoax. The diminishing portion sizes served at Oporto. Whatever it is, we all appreciate a good conspiracy theory.

While some may dismiss the following as ‘conspiracy-talk’, it is undeniable that there are some curious things going on behind the scenes in modern sport and in particular football.

What I am talking about is how large sums of dirty money are increasingly used as a vehicle to advance nefarious financial or political objectives through the guise of a football club.

Take one look at footballers’ wages and transfer fees and it is clear there is a lot of money in professional football.

This is partly down to the trend in recent years for football teams to be bought by rich oligarchs, who then invest huge amounts of money into these teams. Given this level of investment the teams are generally successful, but run at a huge financial loss. This also has an inflationary effect on the market for players, hence the huge wages.

Think Manchester City, who after being bought by Sheikh Mansour spent hundreds of millions acquiring some of the world’s best players (and paying them a motza) and as a result won the English Premier League in 2012, yet also recorded a yearly loss of £197m, the biggest in English football history.

There are commonly two attitudes towards this situation.

The first is acceptance, as in ‘Yeah, my team is winning and I don’t care if some rich oil baron lost a lot of money in the process’.

The second attitude is disgust, with the sentiment that this trend is ruining football – and its corollary, ‘I wish my team got bought by a rich oil baron and enjoyed this level of success’.

Both of these reactions avoid the critical point: why is some outrageously wealthy individual prepared to foot such massive losses in order to see his team win trophies?

Make no mistake, this is not about some diehard fan throwing his money away so he can see his boyhood club achieve their dreams. British journalist Matthew Syed, who recently appeared on Sky Sports News to discuss the 10th anniversary of Roman Abramovich’s purchase of the Chelsea Football Club, shed some light on the motivations behind the billionaire’s investment.

As is well documented, before purchasing Chelsea, Mr Abramovich made his wealth through a series of dodgy privatisation deals with the former Yeltsin Government in Russia. Some people in Russia, including the Putin Government, resent this.

By associating with a highly-visible British institution like Chelsea Football Club, Mr Abramovich has bought security and insulated himself from political retribution or any attempts by the Russian Government to reclaim their money.

The take-home is that massive football clubs are not bought for business reasons. They are bought by rich people for political reasons, and often with dirty money.

But what does all this matter if you can still turn your TV on to watch Wayne Rooney launch a 40-yard through ball for Robin van Persie to dispatch a volley into the top corner?

It matters because sport needs integrity.

Sport is enduring because it’s pure. In a hectic world governed by blurred rules and no simple answers to life’s most vexing questions, sport gives us something simple to appreciate. Two teams. A rigorously enforced set of rules. A final outcome.

When you start messing with that fabric by corrupting the rules and distorting the parameters of the game, then you ruin something beautiful.

So instead of sitting back and trying to enjoy our sport on face value, maybe we should think a little harder about what goes on behind the scenes.

Just like hyper-conscious inner-city hipsters asking if their $300 distressed wool pashmina was made in a factory that uses slave labour or if the coffee beans in their $4.50 large piccolo latte is free-trade, perhaps it’s time we starting asking where the money behind our football teams come from and what effect it has on the game?

Maybe it’s too hard to uncover the nefarious motives driving this huge financial investment in professional sport. Maybe the entrenched interests are too strong to be broken down.

More likely is that we can’t be stuffed confronting the painful truth. There’s probably just no audience for these types of stories. The viewing public just want to watch sport and not think about bigger issues.

Don’t bother us with the harsh realities. Let us get back to enjoying our delicious bread and delightful circuses.

The Crowd Says:

2013-07-20T08:23:59+00:00

Professor Rosseforp

Guest


Like previous contributors, I can't see how sport and integrity can be used in the same sentence, unlessyou put the words "has no" between them. I know nothing about finance, but I would love to know if any of these huge sums are ever actually handed over, i.e does the wealthy purchaser ever stump up several millions, put it in the bank accunt of the club and get a receipt? Or is it all done by promissory notes that are then passed around in ever-increasing inflationary circles? Does the purchaser have a lazy billion sitting in his account, or does he take out a loan (credit created by the bank from non-existent funds?). I only ask these questions because each step in the payment process allows for some sort of corruption, threats, bribes to take place. Even in the relatively low-finance area of rugby league, we seem to have clubs going broke after an entrepreneur has bought them -- how can this happen if the dosh was actually handed over?

2013-07-17T08:56:55+00:00

Titus

Guest


; ) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0o0uWJbS1s

2013-07-17T01:20:05+00:00

nordster

Guest


Hahahahaha yes great point Fuss there on paper currencies....like your (inadvertent) style....the forex market really is a whole bunch of nothingness. Maybe thats why there is such resistance to sound money! Would take away the chance for traders to skim profits by moving money around a market of nothingness. I dont know if the alternate PM is with me there though! :D The ETS or 'floating price' approach i guess is also similar to paper currencies in that the supply of permits (like paper) is centrally rigged as well is it not. More opportunity for some Libor style scandal down the line or at the very least more skimming by sophisticated, high finance types.

2013-07-16T22:44:01+00:00

Fussball ist unser leben

Roar Guru


So what if it's an invisible product? Every day, transactions worth trillions of dollars are completed involving invisible products. In fact, the Foreign Exchange market - the biggest market (based on transaction value & liquidity) on the planet - involves 'invisible products'. Heck, the world of global commerce would grind to a halt if we didn't trade "invisible products" ... I can't believe the alternative PM of AUS doesn't understand this basic concept of global business.

2013-07-16T16:08:37+00:00

nordster

Guest


Financial fairplay is just window dressing that will fuel another shadow economy to keep the pay of footballers off the books. Will be good for keeping the mitts of the common statist away from their bank balances i guess. Hey maybe they could start paying them in bitcoin or gold and silver, eh? ;)

2013-07-16T16:06:14+00:00

nordster

Guest


And which is the long outdated system thats blindly producing war, poverty, collusion, corruption etc? Im guessed you'd say its capitalism...id say its corporatism and statism...we are probably both identifying similar issues and calling them by different names. Partly due to folks like Fuss who co-opt terms like 'free market' and 'capitalism' i would guess...i know i fell for that trickery for a long time myself! :)

2013-07-16T16:02:43+00:00

nordster

Guest


Well he is technically true i guess....and besides, they're all 'dog-whistling' on every issue, its the job of the populist aint it? ;)

2013-07-16T11:39:03+00:00

Freddie

Guest


Financial "Fair Play" is actually nothing of the sort. It's a mechanism put in place to protect the big clubs from failure,and make the rich richer. Read this fascinating interview with Michel Platini. Martin Samuel of the Daily Mail gets the truth out of him a few paragraphs into the interview. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2329745/Martin-Samuel-meets-Michel-Platini--read-FULL-transcript-interview-UEFA-president.html

2013-07-16T10:02:00+00:00

Titus

Guest


Now, I don't know about you, but I don't think the primary purpose of your life, of my life and the entirety of the human race's is just to blindly consume to support a failing economy and a faulty system, forever and ever until we run out of every available resource and have to resort to blowing each other up to ensure our own survival. I don't think we're supposed to sit by idle while we continue to use a long outdated system that produces war, poverty, collusion, corruption, ruins our environment and threatens every aspect of our health and does nothing but divide and segregate us. I don't think how much military equipment we are selling to other countries, how many hydrocarbons we're burning, how much money is being printed and exchanged, is a good measure of how healthy our society is but I do think I can speak for everyone when I say, we're sick of this.......schhhh...

2013-07-16T09:13:55+00:00

Fussball ist unser leben

Roar Guru


"Finally a Strayan politician who speaks my language!" So, did you come running when Tony dog-whistled his dismissive thoughts on "trading invisible products"? ;-)

2013-07-16T08:22:59+00:00

nordster

Guest


Yes those finance schools have really done great by us of late....i think its more Projected ROIs that get sophisticated financial modellers and their cheerleaders into trouble. Everyone telling each other what they want to hear :) I nominate u for the next chairmanship of the US Federal Reserve, Fussball ist unser leben! And true "free market capitalist economies" should not require the magical hand of the Fed and their bond purchasing, nor bailouts/bailins...nor the helping hand of the state. Tony Abbott has at least a sceptical eye on statism... “The Rudd-Gillard government has been a highly statist government, the Brown government reverted to statism with a vengeance in Britain, and Obama is the most left-of-center government in at least half a century.” Finally a Strayan politician who speaks my language!

2013-07-16T07:26:15+00:00

Midfielder

Guest


The money power may shift to Asia over the next 30 or so years... as it's Asia where the money is...

2013-07-16T06:48:02+00:00

Australian Rules

Guest


The equally simplistic speculating on possible ROI ignores the fact that most of these clubs are not *making* more than they are spending, a reality proven by the fact that up to 8 clubs in the La Liga are either in, or facing, administration. We all know what it means when you can't pay you're debts as they're due - you're insolvent. If it wasn't for the Spanish Government ignoring or papering over the debts, many Spanish clubs would be. The Esp.Govt has even acted as guarantor to some of these clubs. It's the house of cards way to run a football competition.

2013-07-16T06:01:06+00:00

Brent Ford

Roar Guru


That is good for City then! It's good to see that the owners are putting money into developing their own talent rather then buying it. This must be a good thing for football?

2013-07-16T05:35:57+00:00

Fussball ist unser leben

Roar Guru


It's naive to simply mention "debt" without any context. In any reasonably competent business school, school of economics or applied finance you will be taught that the most important thing to consider is "ROI" = Return on investment. So, just to spew the idea that "debt is bad" is unsophisticated business analysis ... something that I only expect from the leader of the Liberal Party of Australia & his bunch of incompetents. :-) The truth is, in free-market capitalist economies, every organisation should strive to maximise return on investments. Investments can be sourced from debt, or equity; or a mix of both. Provided the ROI on an investment is greater than the cost of the investment (i.e. interest payments for debt, dividends & cost of dilution of ownership for equity), then a rational business owner/investor will accept the investment. I'm not saying that the levels of debt in every football club is acceptable. But, without analysing the return that the club is getting on each investment & the overall financial health of the entity (balance sheet, cashflow, P&L) it's impossible to reach any sophisticated conclusion about the level of debt at a football club, or any entity.

2013-07-16T05:25:32+00:00

Australian Rules

Guest


Interesting article. It's a theme which has been widely written about in the past few years - including the amount of debt that European clubs have amassed...with total debt levels for football clubs trebling in the past 5 years alone. Frightening. Obviously, clubs like Man City & Chelsea are big perpetrators of this endless debt, but the Spanish clubs in particular, would be in major trouble if the Spanish Government actually called in their debts. It's the highest display of arrogance from these clubs, particularly when it can be done successfully and sustainably...see Bayern. This article touches on it: http://blogs.blouinnews.com/blouinbeatbusiness/2013/04/09/a-red-card-for-spains-debt-ridden-soccer-clubs/

2013-07-16T01:52:40+00:00

nickoldschool

Roar Guru


It's hard to disagree with your piece bshine. Problem is we have had utopists wanting to change the world for ever and look where we are now. If your employer offers you tomorrow twice as much as what you are earning now you won't probably ask him why he does that, where does this money come from, is he being fair all across the board with all employees etc. You'll say thank you very much and book a trip to Brasil next year. Same in football really. It doesn't mean we should sit down and watch. We all have different ways to address this, in football or life in general. As a PSG supporter from the start, of course I miss the Borelli and even canal + years of the 80 and 90s where the club was owned by passionate Parisians. thing is those guys are simply too small in today's world. We need the Russian or in our case, Qatari, if we want to attract the best players and coaches. Sure I don't see my club the same way I did 30 years ago but it's still my club. And it's the same for many other supporters all around the world. But I welcome Platini's financial FairPlay. It might not resolve everything but it's a step. If we don't have clubs spending money they don't have in the next decade or so I will be happy with that. IMO Leeds or Portsmouth fans are the real victims, not Chelsea, PSG or Man city. Not yet at least!

2013-07-16T01:14:07+00:00

Chairman Kaga

Guest


Chelsea. Owned by a bloke who was at uni in the 1980s and a communist state where possesions are against the law. Then a decade later he miraculously owns a corporation worth billions. He doesn't even know the first thing about drilling for oil or tapping gas. Odd, no one bothers asking how you would do it. Maybe I should just turn up with a Smith and Wesson at BHP Biliton hq and tell the management to leave, I am the new boss. It is quite acceptable the Grand Theft Auto way of climbing the ladder.

AUTHOR

2013-07-15T23:41:04+00:00

bshine11

Roar Rookie


Hard to see UEFA's Financial Fair Play making much of a difference, but I guess it's a start. The Economist had a good article about money laundering and other dodgy activites in football last week (http://www.economist.com/news/international/21581724-football-clubs-can-easily-be-used-stealing-machines-here-instruction-manual?fsrc=nlw|hig|7-11-2013|6104736|124384653|AP) - no doubt this has been going on for generations so difficult to root out overnight.

AUTHOR

2013-07-15T23:36:25+00:00

bshine11

Roar Rookie


I agree. Waching park sport is one of life's great joys. I caught an u18s football match on the weekend and it had everything: long-range goals, penalties, a stand-in referee that was someone's dad and an all-in brawl to cap it off. Definitely worth the price of admission! Free, that is.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar