Geoff Lemon's Ashes Diary: Rogers gets home, but what to do with Watson?

By Geoff Lemon / Expert

Like Nemo, Otis, or whichever Milo didn’t drown in the waterfall scene, Chris Rogers has found his way home. Like a Depression-era grifter with a lazy eye, Shane Watson remains itinerant.

The two combined to rescue Australia’s chance of winning this Test and of drawing the series, as their 129-run partnership compensated for yet another batting collapse in which the rest of the top six mustered 26 runs between them.

Much like a Japanese kitten survival story, Rogers’ tale has taken many years to produce, involved a lot of unnecessary cruelty to its blameless ginger protagonist, and still managed to contrive a heartwarming end.

Batsmen are not supposed to break into Test sides at close to 36 years of age. Four matches on, Rogers has his first Test century.

It is the most implausible of late bloomings, but it should never have been so timed. For years it looked like Rogers’ ascent to international cricket would be a formality.

Season after season, in Australia and England, the workmanlike left-hander collected runs in the thousands and averages in the 70s. He racked up big centuries, won central contracts, and was seen to be the man in waiting.

For a moment 2006/07 looked like it: Rogers topped the Sheffield Shield runs list and was named State Player of the Year, while the same summer one of Australia’s great openers, Justin Langer, retired.

But the call never came.

“[I]t just felt like there was always one bloke in the way,” said Rogers after play today. “It was [Langer and Hayden], then it was Jacquesy, then it was Katich, and then it was Phil, and then Watto went and opened…”

Only once was Rogers asked to present for national duty, as short-term injury cover for Matthew Hayden in 2008. Like Mike Hussey on debut, he opened the batting, was nervous as hell, and made two low scores.

Unlike Huss, he wasn’t given another chance.

Imagine the loss to Australian cricket had Hussey been similarly dispensed with.

Perhaps because Rogers was an unassuming player, his season tallies became part of the landscape. His contract disappeared. Somehow he was simply regarded as someone who didn’t fit the bill.

Until now.

On this website’s Roar Radio commentary of the recent India tour, we betrayed our studio’s Melbourne locale by constantly and almost facetiously arguing for Rogers’ inclusion in the Ashes squad. The call was scorned by interstate listeners.

But with Australia’s batting stocks only thinning, and its frailty becoming endemic, Rogers’ stability took on a whole new appeal. Age was no longer a liability for the selectors. Patience prevailed.

Like few of their recent innovations, it was worked right away. Today’s century has been threatening since the start of the series. John Townsend noted that Rogers has improved his Test high score in six of his nine trips to the crease.

52 at Trent Bridge presaged 84 at Manchester, before flowering into the 101* compiled today.

It wasn’t pretty, it was always close, and Graeme Swann’s last spell gave Rogers the aspect of a man wearing sandpaper jocks. But like Tim Curry in a set of fishnets, it was beautifully ugly.

“After all this time, you just don’t think that this opportunity is going to come up, and you want to believe you’re good enough – I’ve wanted to believe I’m good enough, but never known.”

Rogers’ wistful statement could twinge even the hardest journalistic heart. After such a long exile, though, Rogers has not only been selected, but has finally made that Test opener’s spot his own.

The man with no place to call home, though, was Rogers’ companion. These days, it appears Shane Watson gets his place in the batting order by lining up at the deli and pulling a number.

Before the series, Darren Lehmann publicly stated that Watson was one of Australia’s openers, that he was their best option, that he preferred opening, and that he was being backed 100 percent.

That percentage lasted all of five innings, and suddenly Watson finds himself down at No. 6. Earlier this year he was being asked to become a No. 4.

No-one can decide where Watson belongs. He has bowled a lot this series, meaning batting him down the order gives him more rest. The Australian management is also dead keen on having David Warner open.

Warner, though, would make a more natural No. 6. He’s fast between the wickets, plays with urgency, and stays calm under pressure. He’s the sort of batsman who could marshal the tail, where Watson may become wooden with nerves.

It all worked out well today though. Whether or not he still wants to open the batting, Watson looked more comfortable at the crease than he has this tour, and his 68 was sorely needed.

The problem is, we’ve no idea if that will mean anything when it comes to the next team sheet. At this rate, Watson could be named captain or head chef or goalkeeper.

For now at least, after the longest wait, Chris Rogers knows exactly where he is, and where he should be. He’s found his way home.

Watson, unfortunately, is still out there in the wide world, just trying to find a place where he belongs, and wishing like hell he could just go and hang out with his ginger mate.

Watch all of Geoff Lemon’s video diaries.

The Crowd Says:

2013-08-11T14:29:56+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


Blewett's problem was that he couldn't play spin that hit his average hard. Other then that he was more then just fine against pace.

2013-08-11T11:21:00+00:00

T Bone

Guest


Tony Hill is the worst umpire ever to grace a test match field...

2013-08-11T09:44:35+00:00

anfalicious

Guest


Are you starting to get a groan from the other media in the pressers yet? "Not this crazy bloke again?" :P

2013-08-11T09:42:39+00:00

anfalicious

Guest


I think I've got a Mr. Fusion in the shed somewhere.

2013-08-11T09:21:07+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


Great article Geoff, even us Poms were willing him to get to his ton, although now he's got there we'd appreciate it if he shouldered arms to a straight one.

2013-08-11T08:25:38+00:00

AnthonyDArcy

Guest


If anyone has a spare flux capacitor, I'd be willing to jump in the Delorean and bring all those players back to the present.

2013-08-11T08:05:31+00:00

AnthonyDarcy

Guest


Great article. Chris Rogers could potentially have a big role to play in the team for the next two or so years. Besides being an opener with good fighting traits who can give us a spine, he could tide us over for a year or two until the likes of WA's Harris or Tassie's Silk are ready to step up. More time in the shield is important for them to make sure their techniques are sound. If we were to push them in too early like we did with Hughes, they could lose confidence in themselves, as we've seen with Hughes. So hopefully he can continue to make up for lost time, because it's a great story.

2013-08-11T07:40:40+00:00

Silver_Sovereign

Guest


blewett had over 30 matches and averaged only 34. Compared to the others, he had his chances

2013-08-11T06:30:32+00:00

WherethebloodyhellRya

Guest


Terrific article Geoff that highlights the test selection chook raffle that results in an opportunity for some while others are spurned, without explanation, justification, discussion or the chance to heard. The clandestine random test selection raffle is messing with the future careers and lives of young blokes who have committed themselves to cricket and continue to strive to secure a test spot. Surely at the very least they deserve to be told honestly where they stand, how they rate relative to their peers and, if they are in the mix, what they should be working on to maximize their chances of selection. To not even bother to give such essential feedback, is contemptuous and arrogant implies that the selectors are beyond reproach. For every one Chris Rogers, there must be 99 who threw in the towel as hope and a realistic path to a test spot, seemed nigh on impossible. Players with a test berth such as Wato for example, is told to bat responsibly, patiently and to rotate the strike etc. In the next test if he displays a contemptuous disregard for the instructions he has been given, he is dropped for the next test, no ifs, no buts, no maybes. Selecting a test team invariably is not an unequivocal black and white process, however there can be specificly tailored non-negotiables that if not satisfied, will see a player or players dropped from the team. The 'transitional' Australian Test Team has been on a road to nowhere for over half a decade now without a map to guide it out of purgatory.

2013-08-11T04:27:45+00:00

Peter

Roar Rookie


Watson belongs at 5 or 6. Don't get injured, average 30 with the ball, 35-40 with the bat. Most teams need 5 bowlers and our strategy these last two tests of bowling tight is a perfect fit for Watson.

2013-08-11T03:34:11+00:00

Osmo

Guest


Law, Love, Blewett. What a batting line-up of 'rejects'!

2013-08-11T01:56:08+00:00

Johnno

Guest


That century a touch of that century Chris Rogers in his heart would of dedicated a touch of that knock to Katich,Brad Hodge, Matt Elliot,Micheal Bevan,Dean Jones and even Darren Lehmann, players who were all mucked about by the selectors who really deserved more respect, than the contempt and disdain they got.

2013-08-11T01:53:07+00:00

Holgate

Guest


Spot on

Read more at The Roar