SPIRO: Wallabies need to stop whining and start winning

By Spiro Zavos / Expert

Israel Folau’s runaway intercept try towards the end of the second 2013 Bledisloe Cup Test at Wellington provided the Wallabies with enough points and a 27-16 score line to avoid a third successive 18-plus point loss.

That is the good news.

The previous two Tests had seen the Wallabies go down to the British and Irish Lions at Sydney and then to the All Blacks with successive losses of 18-plus, the first time in 60 years that this has happened.

The bad news is that the Bledisloe Cup has now been retained by the All Blacks for the 11th successive year.

The All Blacks have won eight Rugby Championship matches in succession. They play the Pumas at Hamilton in two weeks time.

A victory to the All Blacks will enable them to draw level with the previous best, nine successive wins, a record also held by the All Blacks.

The All Blacks have now won their last 27 home Tests. The home record for successive wins is 30, which was established by the All Blacks between 2003 and 2008.

All this suggests that it was a folorn hope that the Wallabies win the Bledisloe Cup this year, as two of the three Tests are in New Zealand, at Wellington and Dunedin.

Next year, two of the Tests will be in Australia, at Sydney and Brisbane. The All Blacks are certain to play their Bledisloe Cup Test at Eden Park, the fortress where they have been undefeated since 1994.

Since 2003 the All Blacks have established a dominance over the Wallabies that resembles a similar dominance that Queensland have consolidated over New South Wales in State of Origin contests over the last eight years.

There are similar reasons for the dominance, too. Both the All Blacks and the Maroons have a group of players in critical positions who are among the greatest ever to have played their game.

Around this great core there are a much larger group of player, virtually everyone else in the team, in fact, who are among the best players in the world in their particular position.

If you go through the Wallabies and the All Blacks, player by player and position by position, who would you play from the Wallabies in the composite side?

Before the Tests, Will Genia would have been a certainty to be selected for a composite side. But at Sydney and Wellington he was comprehensively outplayed by Aaron Smith.

Smith (Aaron) made the third most carries (seven) in the Test of any All Black. Genia was not in the top three Wallaby carriers (Jesse Mogg 12, James Horwill 10, Ben Mowen 10).

Mogg vs Dagg? No contest for the All Black.

Israel Folau vs Julian Savea? Folau was slightly busier than in the first Test. He scored an intercept try and he contested several kick-offs, with some success.

But, in the totality of the Test, he was missing rather than leading the attack. Savea popped up all over the field and was involved in both of Ben Smith’s tries.

James O’Connor vs Ben Smith? O’Connor, in my view, was the Wallabies best on the ground. He made the most metres – 95, Folau had 91 – with some great breaks. He cover-tackled well. But Ben Smith has scored five tries in two Tests marked by O’Connor.

Adam Ashley-Cooper, Christian Lealiifano and Matt Toomua were all out-played by their opposites, although Toomua did take the ball to the line more than in the first Bledisloe Cup Test.

In the forwards, the only Wallaby with any pretensions to be better than his opposite was James Horwill. Horwill made seven tackles and 10 ball carries.

His opponent, All Black Brodie Retallick, won six lineouts, the most of any forward with Sam Whitelock also having six and Ben Mowen four. Retallick also made 12 tackles, second to Richie McCaw 16, with Keiran Read third on 11.

Michael Hooper made six tackles, with exemplifies the dominance of the All Blacks loose forwards. Steve Luatua with 48 metres was the leading forward runner in metres gained.

The Wallabies also lost two scrums and had great difficulty with other scrums. The point here is that with the new regulations, as with the old regulations, it is Australian teams that are finding it hard to scrum successfully.

The Australian props go to ground far more than other props.

Ewen McKenzie, a former prop, says he can’t understand why the Wallabies are being penalised in the scrums. The answer is obvious from watching the Springboks-Pumas and the ITM matches in New Zealand.

Australian props/second rowers aren’t scrumming very well. They don’t seem to be able to absorb pressure and stay on their feet, rather than collapsing the scrum.

This brings us to McKenzie’s comments after the match. He was critical of the refereeing of the scrums. If he can’t see what everyone else can see, there is no hope for the Wallabies going into the future.

The answer is to toughen up and tighten up, as the Pumas did at Mendoza after they were smashed in Johannesburg.

McKenzie, too, was irate that the referee Jaco Peyper did not go to the television match official for Stephen Moore’s attempt at scoring a close range try.

Peyper was in a good position to see what happened. It did seem to me that Moore spilled the ball as he was planting it for a second attempt.

There was also criticism of the way the All Blacks gave away penalties near their try line. James Horwill made the same point early in the Test pointing out that this had happened in Sydney, too. ‘That was another Test, James’ Peyper told him, correctly.

I thought at the time that Horwill was taking a risk making this sort of complaint and calling for a yellow card because the Wallabies did the same thing as the All Blacks when they were under pressure near their try line.

The penalty count was 16-8 in favour of the All Blacks, and it could have been even more with Stephen Moore being on the wrong side, deliberately, of the most of the rucks and mauls he was engaged with.

I think that coaches should not complain about the referees. It smacks of making excuses, and this in turn does not create the environment for the coach and the team to put right what needs to be put right.

The All Blacks never criticise the referees, for example.

Even after the quarter-final of RWC 2007 at Cardiff between the French and the All Blacks where Wayne Barnes (and the touch judges) gave probably the worst refereeing display in modern times, Graham Henry kept quiet for six years before unleashing on Barnes.

Henry was no longer the All Blacks coach when he made his devastating critique of Barnes’ performance.

The current All Blacks coach, Steve Hansen, made this point after the Wellington Test.

“I think you can pick holes in every decision mate, but where does it get you? … They just need to be consistent and I thought Peyper was consistent from whoa to go,” he said.

How can the Wallabies solve their scrum problems, which are real as was obvious in the later stages of the Test, when McKenzie says, “I used to be able to work out what a scrum penalty was, and now I can’t – and I used to play in the front row.”

Here is what the New Zeand Herald’s rugby writer Gregor Paul wrote about the scrums:

“By the second half, the Wallabies were in danger of having someone seriously hurt in the scrums – especially on their own put-in.

“The Wallabies were on toast when it did – buckling, bending and generally not being overly fussed about where the ball was at that point. No one was too sure about the new scrum laws last week – now they are.

“The All Blacks got their rewards for being stronger, technically better and mentally tougher.”

Memo one to Ewen McKenzie: If you can’t work it out bring in someone who can work it out, or else get smashed by the Springboks scrum at Brisbane.

Memo two to Ewen McKenzie: Get some variety into the Wallabies’ attacking plays. Where are the shifts, the double-arounds, the inside balls, and the wingers and fullbacks into the line?

The Wallabies had 104 ball carries and made only 16 tackle busts. They only occasionally threatened the All Blacks tryline and only occasionally offered tricky questions to the defence.

I like the Fox Sports coverage of the Tests. Greg Clarke is an accurate and informed caller. Tim Horan and Nathan Sharpe offer what former Test players should, which is detailed, impartial observations about what is happening.

Their explanations allow viewers to see more than what they would with only their own eyes.

Rod Kafer is generally terrific with his explanations about the various ploys and why they work or don’t work. But for this Test he lost it by claiming that Peyper was the ’16th man’ on the field.

Kafer got carried away when Phil Kearns started blaming every play that did not favour the Wallabies on poor refereeing.

His incessant and generally often observations were like a toothache just adding misery to the misery the Wallabies were going through as the All Blacks out-played them.

My objection to this sort of obnoxious chauvinism in the guise of commentary is that it does not give viewers an acceptable interpretation of what actually happened.

We will find this morning, for instance, that many Roarers will be blaming the referee instead of focussing on the distressing fact that the Wallabies have lost four of their five Tests this season, and they have fallen from number three in the world at the end of the Robbie Deans era to number four, and falling fast.

Marc Hinton, a NZ rugby writer, summed up the Test this way:

“There was not much positive for the Wallabies on the night when they were almost always chasing. Their kick game was again sub-par, and they fell off too many tackles to be happy with their defensive effort … This was New Zealand’s night again.

“Too good, too strong. One more year, Australia.”

There will have to be changes in the forwards and backs to take on the Springboks at Brisbane. Despite the fact that it was a close match, the relevant fact for the Springboks is that they won their first Tri Nations/Rugby Championship away game since 2009.

They will be primed for Brisbane and the Wallabies need to get rid of the notion, promoted rather bizarrely by Kafer after the Wellington Test, that the Wallabies have somehow turned the corner in their performance.

This attitude will lead the Wallabies up a blind alley.

The hard fact is that in his first two Tests, McKenzie has not added anything to the Wallabies that wasn’t there under Deans except to whine about the referee.

Can anyone (Kafer? Kearns? anyone) explain why towards the end of the Test when points were needed in terms of tries rather than penalties that Quade Cooper and Jesse Mogg kicked the ball away instead of running it back at the All Blacks?

And where were James O’Connor and Israel Folau when Cooper and Mogg fielded the ball inside their own half?

Why weren’t they dropping back to be in position to launch an attack?

The players need to have the riot act read out to them, and not to the referee.

The Crowd Says:

2013-08-31T09:42:25+00:00

In Brief

Guest


I still maintaint that the refereeing was poor, something we seem to accept is ok in rugby. There were several inexplicable decisions, such as the penalty against Hooper for obstruction. If Peyper also made poor decision which went against the All Blacks, then this just supports my view. I think Austraila played terrible rugby, and lost the game fair and square. . but I still think the referee was poor.

2013-08-28T02:08:49+00:00

Zero Gain

Guest


Yes, the problem is, the commentators were accurate, the refereeing was terrible. The decision not to refer Moore's possible try, unfathomable and could have made a massive difference. AB's constant fouls in the red zone, nothing unusual there, run of the mill and probably a very good tactic with impotent referees in control. AB's far better than us, but referees absolutely shocking and they should hear about it.

2013-08-27T10:13:46+00:00

Ben.S

Roar Guru


The Pumas didn't toughen and tighten up their scrum, they simply selected a loosehead in the 1 jersey as opposed to Figallo playing there 2 weeks ago. McKenzie has had 2 games. I've not been hugely impressed, but what massive changes could he effect in such a short space of time? If he drops Mogg, for example, then fair enough, but all coaches try out new players in their first season. Henry tried out a number of journeymen like Jono Gibbes and Xavier Rush. His whining about the scrum is incredibly irritating, though.

2013-08-27T08:52:05+00:00

bennalong

Guest


But it's not Deans I was talking about ! I was talking about managing the changeover and any way you look at it it's a balls up and the players shouldn't cop the flack

2013-08-27T08:37:46+00:00

jeremy

Guest


Leroy, On Horwill, I think he is the right captain for the Wallabies, however he needs a group of solid senior forwards around him. McCaw said something that rang very true on Saturday night, 'You want blokes around you that have got your back when you go into battle, and I know Woodie (Tony Woodcock) will be there to the death'. A bit melodramatic for my taste but another example of why the ABs are such a hard nut to crack. It's not just the leader, it's the leaders. ABs are stacked with them, Read, Nonu, C Smith, Woodcock, the Franks... Horwill has Moore...Hooper...and that's about it. When Bam Bam is back he should be i a better position but at the moment he looks to be lacking a solid crew.

2013-08-27T02:18:15+00:00

Mike

Guest


True. The kiwi commentators used it on Saturday to describe this incident (as in, they didn't think there was one).

2013-08-27T01:50:51+00:00

Jerry

Guest


I dunno why everyone gets so picky about the phrase 'double movement'. It's not in the laws, but neither is 'lazy running', 'truck and trailer' or 'blocking' or a multitude of other phrases that illustrate what has actually happened rather than the exact technical offence. No one objects to anyone saying 'forward pass' and that's not in the laws either. The penalty is for not releasing/playing the ball on the ground but 'double movement' is a perfectly valid shorthand.

2013-08-27T01:49:21+00:00

Garth

Guest


You obviously haven't heard about the Czech woman in Britain who was convicted of hurling racial abuse at her neighbour. According to British law, it is racist to refer to a New Zealander as a Fat, Australian . Vice versa would also apply.

2013-08-27T01:48:12+00:00

Jerry

Guest


To be fair, Justin, other than the AB's every other team must have lost at least twice and the other two semi-finalists both lost 3 times.

2013-08-27T01:42:29+00:00

Garth

Guest


He's a rugby league nut who likes to pretend to be a genuine rugby writer, but only when he isn't slagging off rugby.

2013-08-27T01:39:28+00:00

Garth

Guest


Julian Savea, Israel Dagg, Ben Smith.... to name just three reasons.

2013-08-27T01:26:28+00:00

Mike

Guest


Kuruki, you are still on another planet. You are talking up the pre-RWC Wallabies as though they were gods. They differed little from the Wallabies at RWC and the Wallabies after RWC. "He took one of the most dangerous backlines pre world cup and absolutely destroyed their ability and willingness to play effective running rugby within one tournament." What a load of rubbish. If you are going to comment on Australian rugby at least learn something about it first. The Wallabies backline was a work in progress and always has been, no more so before RWC 2011 than after. That includes in the three years that RD had had it prior to RWC, and in the years prior to RD. Yes, a number of things came together in 2011 and we actually won a game against the ABs, but the rest of your talking up is hogwash. We did (and still do) have a good backline on its day. And always it looks much better against non-AB sides. "Other Nations did not force the change on Australia, the changes in approach to the games were instructed from within. QC said it himself, he loved playing for the Reds because he was allowed to express himself. Robbie Deans knocked that out of his players ..." You give the distinct impression that you are a soccer fanatic who has moved onto the Roar to have a rant. And yes I know you have posted on the Roar for a while, but your bleatings on this topic show a lack of basic competence. Both Ewen and Robbie supported Quade. They also both made changes to their game plans as time moved on, Ewen no less than Robbie. The 2011 Reds success was not based on some sort of mythical "running rugby" but on a fairly balanced approach. Believe it or not, other teams analyse Australia's game, and they could see our strengths and weaknesses, which existed long before RD, and could work on ways to exploit them. Assuming you are a kiwi, read some of your compatriots' posts. They generally show a much higher level of understanding than yours. "Australia failed to make the World Cup final." Wow, that's deep. Definitely a reason why the coach is hopeless, given that we met ABs in the semi. Please stop wasting everybody's time.

2013-08-26T23:44:00+00:00

scottmit

Roar Rookie


It's a bit unbecoming for McKenzie as the coach to have a spray about the ref. He did it a couple of times during the S15 too about the same thing - something of a sore point for him. In fact it appears to be affecting his teams as they stubbornly bash away at the line when they get to 15 metres out without too much imagination. That said, a whinge about the ref by somebody else is probably warranted :) The WBs didn't get much joy from the 50-50 calls. In particular, the no-try would probably have been given by the video ref (it would be nice to know what the ref had decided), and the shoulder charge by Nonu cost us dearly as Slipper was making a difference. Nonu is looking increasingly like an old bull leaguie who is getting cranky because he's not as quick and limber as he used to be. The ABs are getting value from him though, even though the S15 teams don't want him.

2013-08-26T22:29:14+00:00

Sage

Guest


I'm with you Maxlord but best not get in the way of this feeding frenzy. And Kuruki, at no stage did EM claim to be a messiah. He didn't claim anything actually off his own bat. His record was pointed out by a few, including David Lord and he responded to questions about that Super success against NZ and why he thought it was the case. It all becomes hyperbole in an article like this especially when so many are fighting over scraps of the Wallaby carcass. Let them eat their fill.

2013-08-26T20:07:33+00:00

peterlala

Guest


bennalong, no matter how you define my opinion, it's my opinion. I have the wisdom of those who select the All Black coaches on my side -- because they didn't want Deans either. And they were more smart, than smart arsed.

2013-08-26T19:30:29+00:00

dwayne

Guest


2066

2013-08-26T16:21:04+00:00

Brendan Hope

Roar Guru


Quite right Rusty. Ruan should've been whipped off early on. I find the whole Ruan situation quite sad. He was used as a utility back for however long and never really found his place until now. Now that he has found his place, he is not up to speed. He could've made a genuinely brilliant flyhalf. I've heard calls from fans for Rory Kockott to be called up. Apparently he is doing very well in France. In any case, some vital changes are needed before we go into the next game!

2013-08-26T14:36:49+00:00

Jereme Lane

Roar Guru


from a southern hemisphere perspective i wonder how you come up with a double movement which doesn't exist in the sport of rugby...

2013-08-26T13:55:40+00:00

darth vadar

Guest


chip on his shoulder for never winning a RWC

2013-08-26T13:48:13+00:00

hakwa

Guest


you said it Wardad!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar