Australia's batting options for the Ashes

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Three batting spots in Australia’s next Ashes squad are wide open. While Chris Rogers, David Warner, Shane Watson, Michael Clarke and Steve Smith are locked in, Australia must identify a number six as well as two backup batsmen.

Following on from the piece analysing Australia’s pace options for the Ashes, we run the ruler over Australia’s batting stocks.

This list consists of only those players who are competing for roles as a specialist batsmen, not all-rounders. Each player has been given an “Ashes rating” based on how likely his selection is.

Phil Hughes, 24-years-old

First-class record: 7832 runs at 45

Ashes rating: 7/10

Hughes’s last six Test matches have seen him return just 209 runs at 21, including eight single-figure scores.

His numbers against England are even more depressing – seven Tests for 237 runs at 20.

Yet, it would not be a least bit surprising to see him get selected in the next Ashes squad, mainly due to the selectors’ apparent faith in the fickle left handed batsman.

He remains suspect against both pace and spin, although he is more comfortable in Australian conditions, where the quick, bouncy pitches favour his pet cut shot.

Usman Khawaja, 26-years-old

First-class record: 4425 runs at 41

Ashes rating: 6.5/10

Having been dropped three times in his Test career that spans over nine matches, Khawaja will be uncertain where he sits with the selectors.

He is not alone – it is difficult to get an accurate read on how the selectors view Khawaja.

They manifestly recognise his talent but seem to have little faith in his ability to bat himself into good form.

Like all the players on this list, he needs to produce dominant touch early this summer in order to make it to the squad.

Nic Maddinson, 21-years-old

First-class record: 1863 runs at 41

Ashes rating: 6/10

The flamboyant left-handed batsman has made a robust run for the Ashes squad after dazzling at the recent Australia A tours to Europe and Africa.

Maddinson piled up 528 runs at 75 in the first-class games, including two belligerent tons, scored at a phenomenal 109.

More impressive than that pair of hundreds were his twin rescue efforts in the second unofficial Test against South Africa A.

He scored 88 runs out of a team total of 146 in the first dig and 90 out of 277 in the second innings after twice coming to the crease with Australia in peril.

Originally drafted into the NSW side as an obdurate opener, Maddinson would benefit from finding a balance between his current hyper-aggression and that discarded circumspection.

Alex Doolan, 27-years-old

First-class record: 2953 runs at 38

Ashes rating: 5/10

Doolan would have been close to making the last Ashes squad after a strong Aussie summer, in which he made 715 Shield runs at 42 and cracked an impressive ton against South Africa in a tour match.

However, unlike Maddinson, he failed to capitalise on the recent opportunities he was offered playing for Australia A.

On the two tours, Doolan made 336 runs at 37 with a highest score of 56 not out in nine innings.

The fact he was the only batsman to play in all five of Australia A’s first-class matches suggests the selectors are very keen on the classical Tasmanian.

George Bailey, 31-years-old

First-class record: 5936 runs at 38

Ashes rating: 5/10

Bailey scuppered his chances of playing in the recent Ashes by stumbling in the Shield last summer, when he averaged at just 18.

But as the captain of the Australian T20 side and an integral member of the ODI team, he is clearly held in high regard by the selectors.

That respect, together with his continual crucial innings at ODI level, may over ride the selectors’ concerns about his form slump last Shield season.

Prior to that, he had averaged 43 over his previous three Shield campaigns despite being based on the most difficult pitch in the country at Bellerive Oval.

Bailey averages just 33 in domestic 50-over cricket and yet, has churned out 1061 runs at 46 in ODIs, displaying an ability to take his game to a new level in international competition.

Adam Voges, 33-years-old

First-class record: 8204 runs at 41

Ashes rating: 3.5/10

Similar to Bailey, Voges has displayed a capacity for quickly adapting to international cricket, cracking 721 runs at 48 in ODIs.

Similar to Bailey, Voges blew a possible chance to make the last Ashes squad with a poor Shield season last summer, when he averaged 26 runs.

Also similar to Bailey, Voges will rely upon the selectors weighing his considerable experience and great ODI form over his recent first-class performances.

Jordan Silk, 21-years-old

First-class record: 423 runs at 42

Ashes rating: 2/10

Possessing a pure technique and sound temperament, Silk is arguably better suited to long form of cricket than any other young Aussie batsman.

After debuting at first-class level just six months ago, the patient opener played match-defining roles in two of his first three Shield games for Tasmania.

He scored 52 and 127 runs in a must-win match against Victoria and backed that up by grafting 108 in the final, defying a Ryan Harris led Queensland attack for six hours.

Silk faltered on the Australia A tour of Europe, reaping just 76 runs from four innings.

He should be given at least one more Shield season to develop before being exposed to Test cricket.

But if he starts the Shield season in blazing form, he could be a surprise selection for the Ashes squad.

The Crowd Says:

2013-09-24T20:56:31+00:00

Klee Gluckman

Guest


Warner averages 50 in his own conditions he must be picked.

2013-09-23T11:29:51+00:00

talentmanager

Guest


Do not pick Warner. Pick Hughes and a better all rounder plus Maddinson and Burns

2013-09-21T23:51:31+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


For mine I'd have Warner Rogers Watson Clarke Khawaja/Hughes Smith Haddin Siddle Pattinson Harris Lyon I think having Hughes or Khawaja further down the list takes the pressure off these youngsters. Hughes showed when he was given a chance at 5 that he could succeed well. Either are a better option than Bailey in my mind despite their recent form. I think the bowling make up speaks for itself.

2013-09-21T08:06:44+00:00

crows2

Guest


I think our best lineup has both Hughes and Bailey in it, with Smith out, but since Smith is a lock to play the first test, I'd probably put Bailey in the team and give Hughes more time in the Shield to build his confidence back up. If Pattinson, Harris, Siddle and Lyon are all fit, we'll have our strongest bowling lineup in a long time. We won't have to watch Starc spray it to all sides of the pitch! Warner Rogers Watson Clarke Bailey Smith/Hughes Haddin Siddle Pattinson Harris Lyon

2013-09-20T00:29:34+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


Is there a move afoot to have our own County team in the UK, where we send our best young cricketers to learn how it is that Oz has fallen so low in recent years and pick up a few winning Pom skills for a change. Maybe Burns is next in line. I mean they picked up Rogers from county cricket didnt they.

2013-09-19T22:29:59+00:00

Red Kev

Guest


I'm not sure Burns was overlooked. He played for Aust A against the Lions when they toured Australia and then may have been left to play County Cricket. There is every chance someone said that County cricket is more valuable than an A-tour.

2013-09-19T17:29:00+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


But they didnt Ronan. They didnt. No cream drifting to the top there. Their overall averages finally seemed to show them for the quality they are. They may have scored a couple of good ones in the ashes tour if they had been selected like Marsh, but like Cowan we would then have had a batsman with media support again, occupying a position with a 30 odd average over a potentially long period while some potential star cant get a look in. Their averages at mid 30s for 30 plus ages implies the very strong likelihood that their test performances would be comparable but about 3-4 runs on average less....seems to be the trend. Hardly winning support for Rogers and Clarke.

2013-09-19T12:51:59+00:00

Cricket113

Guest


What about Michael klinger? The guy keeps piling up there runs year after year in nearly all 3 forms plus in England conditions... Yet is always overlooked! Doesn't make sense!

AUTHOR

2013-09-19T11:41:51+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Haha ya thought ya had me!

AUTHOR

2013-09-19T11:37:14+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


As I said, to get selected Bailey needs to play very well in the Shield and Aus A games he will have prior to the Ashes to prove he is no longer in the poor FC form of last summer and is back to his touch from the previous 3 seasons when he averaged 43 batting a lot on a very tough deck. The funny thing about that second list of players is that 4-5 of those would have been very strong chances of playing in the Ashes had they averaged 40+ for the Shield season - Bailey, Hussey, Voges and Quiney, in particular, would have been very closely considered had they put together decent figures.

AUTHOR

2013-09-19T11:30:46+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


I still have a lot of faith in Bird...he is a far different bowler when he's swinging it and we know he consistently does that with the Kookaburra but couldn't manage it with the Dukes.

2013-09-19T11:03:07+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


Wow, to be honest even the good ones aren't great, but some of them most bowlers would be embarrassed by. Maybe the bowling is just at such a high level, the batting can't keep up.

2013-09-19T10:14:23+00:00

Hookin' YT

Guest


Harris and Bird (I grew up in WA and Alderman grew on me). Bird and Copeland have Stu Clark and McGrath about them. Clark took 26 wkts Ashes 5-0 06/07. Ahead of Warne 23, McGrath 21 and Lee 20. Clark DID NOT bowl fast, nor did Pigeon. They did bowl 80s not 90s. Let the Shield decide?

2013-09-19T10:08:47+00:00

Hookin' YT

Guest


Doh.

2013-09-19T09:00:41+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


Ronan I bow to your expertise in these matters. I am certainly at best an interested observer. But, despite what may be apparent, I dont play favourites. If I choose someone its because of performance and the longer the performance the better. I also am not impressed by ODI and T20 performances as I've stated. Look around the World at short form cricket teams and they often have only a few test players because the translation from one form to another is obviously difficult. That is why I'm surprised with your perseverence with Bailey and for that matter the predilection of others for one day players. Now you mentioned the Shield form in the past year as an important indicator, but you seem to be using it for one player and then ignoring it for another. Last years Shield batting form all round was pretty average except for Ponting (75), Sillk (58)Wade and Haddin both in the 50s and Phil Hughes (56) But its the rest of the batsmen and in particular the one day players in first class cricket that is most revealing.. These were some of the averages in the last Shield season of batsmen in the mix Doolan 42 Ferguson 40 Khawaja 40 Cosgrove 39 Smith 37 Maddison 35.5 Burns 33 these were the top scores. But now for the pretenders Quiney 27 Voges 26 David Hussey 24 Maxwell 22.5 Christian 22 Cowan 21 Klinger 19 Maxwell 19 S. Marsh 19 Bailey 18 North 15 Finch 11 Now criticism has been aimed at Khawaja, Burns, Maddison and Cosgrove for 'failing' in this past Shield season. But realistically they are giants compared to some of those being suggested based on the Shield season. David Hussey's 'failure' in that season is moderate compared to Bailey, Marsh, Finch etc. And yet Hussey still has a 52 average. these others are struggling in the mid 30s. Sorry Ronan but I cant see it. If you rely on the figures presented Bailey isnt even close. Top one day player but as I said most teams around the world dont have many test players in their side because either they're too young or they're not suited. What say you then old friend.

AUTHOR

2013-09-19T06:04:52+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Katich as well all know is zero chance of ever playing again and Dave Hussey's FC form has been awful for a year. Bailey at least has awesome ODI form and is 5 years younger than Hussey.

AUTHOR

2013-09-19T06:03:03+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Who would your other two quicks be?

AUTHOR

2013-09-19T06:02:17+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Doolan is on the list in my article Hookin!!

AUTHOR

2013-09-19T06:00:28+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Haha

AUTHOR

2013-09-19T05:59:46+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Yep really looking forward to the start of the Shield season for the first time in years.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar