Moving the AFL grand final

By SportsFanGC / Roar Guru

Is it conceivable that, one day in the future, the AFL could shift the biggest game of the calendar to another stadium elsewhere in Australia?

The biggest game of the AFL season is scheduled to unfold on the last Saturday of September every year. The game is played at the spiritual home of Australian Football, the Melbourne Cricket Ground, better known as the MCG or simply ‘The G’.

I have been to the stadium numerous times to watch AFL (both home and away fixtures and finals) and I have also been lucky enough to witness Manchester United, the Socceroos, the Wallabies and the All Blacks – among other teams – grace the hallowed turf.

It never ceases to amaze me just how impressive this iconic stadium is.

It all starts with the walk from Flinders Street Station and Federation Square, you can see the stadium sitting in the distance down by the Yarra River.

When you enter the gates and catch your first glimpse of the playing surface, there is a special feeling about the place and this is amplified tenfold when you eventually get to your designated seat and take in your surroundings.

You look around at the enormous stands, gradually filling as the first bounce draws ever closer.

For a big occasion, the energy, anticipation and excitement that flows inside the cauldron is really something that needs to be experienced and my words will not do it justice.

The rebuild of the Ponsford, Northern and Member’s stand is fantastic and a great legacy from the 2006 Commonwealth Games hosted by Melbourne.

Do yourself a favour, get yourself to a game next year at the MCG, even if you are a neutral fan, and enjoy all it offers.

But I digress. Getting back to the premise of my article…

A sport that the AFL Administration often looks to for ideas on how to best manage the game into the future is the NFL.

For those of you unfamiliar with the NFL, the biggest game of the calendar each year is the Super Bowl and this is rotated between cities across the country.

The biggest difference between the two sports is the stadiums available to host the biggest game of their respective seasons.

The USA has any number of quality stadiums available across the country, which you would expect with a population approximately 320 million strong and growing.

Cities bid for the right to host the Super Bowl, ensuring there is an opportunity for your city to host it.

An article by Mike Krumboltz on Yahoo Finance, in which he cites a reference to a New York Times article, explains that the NFL administration looks at a few things from a host city including the following:

“Build or improve your stadium. Run a good franchise. Play well with others. Beg a little.”

Now I am not for one minute advocating the AFL should move the grand final from the MCG for the sake of copying the NFL – far from it.

Rather, I would have a look at the options that are available if the AFL did ever go down that road.

The options available are as follows:

Sydney (ANZ Stadium)
It has an official capacity of 82,500 when configured to suit either AFL or cricket and is the next biggest stadium in the country.

Criticism of the playing surface comes up every year and many a rugby league fan will complain endlessly that it is ‘soulless’ and ‘devoid of any atmosphere’.

In addition to this is the location, a 30-40 minute train ride from the city.

From a positive perspective, the stadium does have the capacity the AFL hierarchy would desire and does have the runs on the board in running big ticket events.

One only has to look to July earlier this year, in which the Wallabies played the British and Irish Lions (third Test), State of Origin (third game) and Manchester United played the A-League All Stars – all games were played to capacity crowds.

Brisbane (Gabba)
It has an official capacity of 42,000, which is on the small side compared with other grounds.

The playing surface is generally excellent, as is the weather in south east Queensland during the month of September.

The Brisbane Lions have played to some great crowds at the ground, particularly during the years of the three-peat a decade ago.

A slightly smaller venue will still generate a ton of atmosphere for the biggest day on the AFL calendar.

Adelaide (Adelaide Oval)
Construction on the new Adelaide Oval is continuing as we speak and it will boast a capacity of 50,000 when complete.

It is a hop, skip and a jump away from the city centre and the Crows and Port will open the 2014 AFL season at the new ground.

South Australia is a heartland for the game and has produced countless superstars. You can count on the South Australian public embracing the day with as much fervor and passion as they support their two teams during the season.

Perth (Burswood Stadium)
It has been stated that the capacity of this new stadium will be 60,000 initially, with the ability to be expanded to 80,000 in the future.

It is slated to be completed in time for the opening of the 2018 AFL season.

From all that I have read, and from the design features discussed, it will truly be a world class stadium for Perth and Western Australia.

It is another heartland area of the game, has also produced its share of superstars and would be a welcome host city, especially so if either of the local teams make it to the big stage that year.

If the grand final were to be held in either Sydney or Brisbane, the AFL would give access to the all-consuming nature of grand final week in the very markets they are trying to grow the game.

The sight of a packed Queen Street Mall in Brisbane or a packed Darling Harbour in Sydney for the end of the grand final parade and the captains’ speeches would no doubt put a smile on the AFL administration’s collective faces, considering the amount of money currently being spent on second teams in those areas.

The four cities discussed above would do a fantastic job hosting the event and the respective local economies would receive a massive injection leading up to, and on, the big day.

It won’t be happening anytime soon though. A contract between the Melbourne Cricket Club, MCG Trust, AFL and Victorian State Government sees the AFL grand final being played at the MCG until at least 2037.

The history of Australian Football at the MCG is impressive and the VFL/AFL grand final has been held at the venue every year since 1902, with the exception of 1924, 1942-45 and 1991.

As current and past players will tell you, it is the grand final and the MCG where you want to prove yourself, the biggest game at the biggest venue.

History and tradition play a huge part in Australian Football and the MCG is inextricably linked to the game from the very beginning.

I love the last Saturday in September and tuning in to see a full house at the MCG for a traditional 2:30pm start.

Will this always be the case in the future? Over to you Roarers…

The Crowd Says:

2013-09-28T18:08:10+00:00

Dom from FREO

Guest


Simple stadium allocation 2012 highest ranked club after home and away season holds the grand final in 2013..... and so on. This eliminates - coaches resting up to 11 players in the last 4 rounds....

2013-09-28T17:53:34+00:00

Dom from FREO

Guest


Fair Share of the "one day in September" Walking around the mcg to find most statues being of great west australians makes me ask - why doesnt each state have a stadium like the MCG. the answere is- this stupid and selfish contract between the MCG and the AFL. I ask all Australians to get behind breaking this contract and support this movement and it can easily happen. The afl - will have no option but to withdraw its grand final exclusive commitment to the mcg because: 1. It is not in the national interest - as BHP have had to surrender access to their infrastructure. We need some high flyer barrister to support this move on this same basis - the mining boom is over - the country needs tourism - a would cup or Olympic event will never happen in this country with this current stronghold of the MCG. 2. On the basis of item 1. The current stronghold of the MCG is anti- competitive behaviour to other codes of football, the likely hood of a FIFA world cup will definitely put a dent into the afl junior participation along with afl household spend. 3. Afl run risk of "Going Broke" - lets say the eagles and FREO next year make the grand final - and tell the afl - we're not going to play in Melbourne. What could the afl do? They could do nothing! They would be sued billions by every local and international broadcaster with budgets bigger than them, the Melbourne locals would turn on their own and seek compensation. By taking action against the 2 clubs will see the downfall of the national afl and be detrimental to the game. The afl will not do anything about this move until they are forced, the "Hawks" talk about being a family club - lets see how family they'll be when it costs $6000 to bring your 2 kids to a grand final including flights meals and accommodation. The grand final is not about Melbourne, nor the MCG - it's about the team and clubs. The Victorian clubs are so short sighted it begs me to ask - would the afl be seeking to relocate clubs to other parts of the country under a fair grand final stadium structure - or stack the cards of it being played at the MCG??

2013-09-25T13:57:58+00:00

david

Guest


Wembley is a neutral stadium only big matches are played there in the epl. it is not used as a home ground for London based sides

2013-09-23T04:44:26+00:00

Robbie

Guest


Until another venue in Australia is able to hold over 100k people, the AFL Grand Final (as well as the final of any ICC World Cup we host) will be held at the MCG. However this discussion will get more and more heated over time, especially if we are to see a Adelaide vs. Port Adelaide or West Coast vs. Fremantle Grand Final anytime soon

2013-09-22T11:44:01+00:00

Jsteel

Roar Pro


MCG is the nations premier venue and home of football. No debate, unless a major redevelopment is taking place it should host the Grand Final

2013-09-22T03:44:19+00:00

Strummer Jones

Guest


One thing you missed from the article was the number of MCC members and corporate types that are not supporters of the two finalists. Whilst MCG holds 100,000, on GF day how many of these people are supporters? For Collingwood/Geelong grand final I would suggest a high percentage, but for Brisbane v Port it would be low. The point is, shifting the GF around would also accommodate the real supporters of the two finalists. Notwithstanding the above, I cannot imagine it will shift from the MCG in my lifetime. The politics, let alone the hit on revenue, attached to such a bold move would be massive.

2013-09-22T01:37:56+00:00

Moorey

Guest


It's a 5km walk from the city and the transport would need to be seriously upgraded for it to be viable for the amount of ppl... How they haven't got crown to pitch in is beyond me! They will be the main benefactors!

2013-09-21T10:44:18+00:00

SportsFanMelb

Guest


Duncan - in 1991 the Grand Final was moved to Waverley because the MCG Great Southern Stand was being rebuilt and at that time Waverley had a bigger capacity. -- Comment from The Roar's iPhone app.

2013-09-21T10:40:48+00:00

SportsFanMelb

Guest


Australian Rules - great analogy re:NFL and Wembley. It's exactly what I had in mind when I wrote it. -- Comment from The Roar's iPhone app.

2013-09-21T08:49:11+00:00

Stavros

Guest


I'll take that bet. I hope you live in a nice area.

2013-09-21T08:38:37+00:00

kraftbier

Guest


While half the crowd at an AFL Grand Final are corporates only the biggest ground in Australia will host it. Even if Homebush gets to a similar capacity it looks very odd in its oval configuration, while the MCG looks more natural. If it ever moves, I can only see it moving west, not north.

2013-09-21T08:08:49+00:00

Martyn50

Roar Rookie


Until other stadiums can hold 95,000 plus the GF will be held at the G.

2013-09-21T07:50:44+00:00

duncan

Guest


The afl did take the final away in 1991 when hawthorne beat west coast at waverly but that ground no longer exists and etihads capacity just isnt big enough and anz is the most soulless ground in australia but can see why the idea is attractive as the melbourne clubs only have two stadiums to play at in melbourne since the afl took the clubs away from their surburban grounds

2013-09-21T06:47:50+00:00

Australian Rules

Guest


Good post dd.

2013-09-21T06:46:39+00:00

Australian Rules

Guest


It's a travelling-Superbowl vs traditional home of Wembley argument. Both appeal to me - though I would bet my house that the AFL GF will move around from the MCG after the current agreement expires. Good article SFM.

2013-09-21T06:20:55+00:00

Floreat Pica

Guest


The G maxes out at 100,018 not 96,000

2013-09-21T06:07:21+00:00

joe blackswan

Guest


As I understand, because the burswood stadium is located next to the river the cost of stadium foundations is very high...but it is in a more transport friendly location and is even in walking distance from city.

2013-09-21T06:03:35+00:00

Swampy

Guest


The Cowboys stadium holds 100000 and is indoor. The Super Bowl was there a couple of years ago. The majority of NFL stadiums are 80k plus so their very similar to the capacity of the G which is 96k depending on how corporate seating gets allocated.

2013-09-21T05:30:01+00:00

brian

Guest


Such is the non partizan nature of gf crowds that vuctorian clubs get no advantage from playing at the mcg for gf. Hence in 10 grand finals between a victorian and an interstate side the ledger reads 8-2 in favor of the interstate team.

2013-09-21T05:05:22+00:00

TW

Guest


Off topic but related -- The WA Govt has got itself into huge trouble with big budgetry problems. Two projects coming under scrutiny on todays local paper front page. 1/ Elizabeth Quay on the Perth Swan River foreshore - Looks ok because it has gone too far in construction to halt, and is Barnetts personal legacy item. 2/ Burswood Stadium - Only the initial land clearing and basic stuff has had contracts actually awarded. Could be a prime candidate to be halted. It all depends on the Govts nerve, which is now under huge pressure to fix a lot of stuff such as "major" traffic congestion which was unheard of 8/9 years ago in Perth. If it gets halted it will never be built is the general opinion in the media - Labour opposition only wants Subi redeveloped because of their anti Packer casino stance and say it will be cheaper.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar