NRL conspiracy theories exposed (and a few debunked)

By Con Scortis / Roar Guru

Do you remember back in 2005 how the Origin records showed the Blues and Maroons had won the same number of matches – 34 each to be exact?

Even the total points scored by each team between the first match in 1980 and the final game from the 2005 series were virtually the same.

For many, this showed how great Origin is (or was) – very few sporting rivalries anywhere in the world are this tightly contested, or so the argument went.

These stats were especially talked up by Channel Nine and its commentators at the time as highlighting the closeness and intensity of Origin rivalry.

Imagine it – 20-odd years of Origin battles and nothing could separate the Blues and Maroons!

And do you also remember how at the time there were a significant number of (deluded) fans from both states claiming this was in fact evidence that Origin was ‘rigged’.

This particular conspiracy theory argued that, if Origin was in fact the real deal, then there is no way the records would be that tight.

According to conspiracy theorists at the time, this was ‘proof’ the powers that be were conspiring to keep the contest tight in order to maintain the fan’s interest in the Origin concept.

For these conspiracy theorists, State of Origin was no more ‘real’ than World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE).

This was probably the first time I had heard of a rugby league conspiracy and at the time I thought it all seemed rather ludicrous.

Apart from the fact that hundreds of individuals and dozens of organisations would need to be involved in the conspiracy to make it work effectively, it was an insult to the great combatants of the era (like Alan Langer, Andrew Johns, Mal Meninga, Brad Fittler etc.) to suggest their efforts were in fact pantomime.

After eight years of Queensland dominance you no longer hear this conspiracy theory. After all, it no longer makes sense anymore, given the record books are no longer as close as they once were.

Great way to ruin a conspiracy theory, Queenslanders!

However, this year we have been inundated with a new range of conspiracy theories, which are each as ludicrous and unfounded as the Origin one.

The NRL + Channel Nine + Sydney + the world versus North Queensland Cowboys has been done to death, so I won’t add anything here (like most Roarers, I’m over it).

But in the interests of truth, justice and the Australian Way, I will discuss the other main conspiracy theories from season 2013 and expose finally whether they are in fact true or false.

The NRL and Channel Nine are actively working to make a Rabbitohs v Roosters grand final
While I have no doubt the NRL and Channel Nine do in fact want this to eventuate, this one is false.

As many have pointed out, a grand final between these fierce rivals would boost interest in the match, enhance TV ratings, and so on.

Of course, many fans would love to see this match as well. It would be great to see these two rivals in the final match of the season, something that hasn’t happened since 1935.

However, is this really proof of a conspiracy? Of course not.

The fact the NRL or Channel Nine or Phil Gould may hope or wish for a Rabbitohs v Roosters grand final does not automatically follow they are actively conspiring to make this happen.

Without evidence the individuals or organisations involved are actively and deliberately involved in changing and managing events, then the conspiracy theory has no legs.

As Hanlon’s Razor states, “Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity”.

I prefer to accept this adage and regard refereeing blunders as an example of ineptitude and stupidity, rather than of maliciousness.

Ricky Stuart has an unexplained power over club administrators and the media
The man they call Sticky has mystical powers, similar to that Emperor Palpatine had over Darth Vader, and this explains how he managed to acquire yet another coaching gig even though his club record is diabolical.

This one is true.

Nick Politis and the Roosters are (indirectly) running the game
I hear and read this one a lot from a variety of fans. This theory alleges the NRL always does the bidding of Mr Politis, and is false.

The acquisition of Sonny Bill Williams is put forward as ‘proof’ the NRL kowtows to the Bondi mob, especially since Parramatta, in contrast, had to jump through various hoops in their failed attempt to acquire Israel Folau.

This conspiracy theory also argues the Roosters are well and truly rorting the salary cap and contends that as Ian Schubert was a former Easts player, he is obviously turning a blind eye to their alleged shenanigans.

This is a nice detail, as conspiracy theories with inside jobs (like the assassination of JFK) are the juiciest kind of all.

Of course I am a Rabbitohs fan and therefore genetically disposed to loathe the Roosters, however my objective side acknowledges the Bondi club is arguably one of the best-run establishments in the league and has been for many years.

Their recruiting of Sonny Bill, James Maloney and Michael Jennings (among others) are not a sign of a club rorting the cap – rather they are simply an example of arguably the best buys of the season by an exceptional recruiting team.

Much as it pains me to say it, kudos to them.

Wayne Pearce has an unexplained power over the NSW selectors and the media
Not quite as sinister as Sticky’s sith-esque power, Junior’s is more akin to the mystical power Mary had over Ted in There’s Something About Mary and this explains why his son, Mitchell, continually gets selected for the Blues, even though 11 appearances is more than enough.

This one is true.

The NRL is against Souths and will do anything to make sure we don’t win the grand final
This conspiracy theory has actually been around for several years and is put forward by a minority of my fellow Rabbitohs supporters.

It is also patently false.

As a Rabbitohs fan I always find this one pretty silly (especially as it contradicts the earlier, equally silly conspiracy theory, above).

George W Bush said, “You are either with us or against us.” Apparently, according to these opposing conspiracy theories, the NRL is both for and against the Rabbitohs. Go figure.

This conspiracy theory harks back to Super League war, when the Evil Empire aka News Limited and Kaiser Soze aka Rupert Murdoch, booted Souths out of the comp.

But yet again, cause and effect is often ignored when promoting conspiracy theories.

Is Rupert Murdoch a greedy tyrant who will stop at nothing to enhance his octopus-like reach over the planet and stomp over anyone who gets in his way? Probably.

Has Rupert Murdoch ever even heard of Souths? Probably not.

The Murdoch press (Daily Telegraph, Courier Mail, etc) has it in for the NRL (and particular clubs)
This isn’t a conspiracy theory as such, more an observation.

I haven’t made up my mind as to whether the Murdoch newspapers’ coverage of rugby league is an example of a concerted effort to drive the game down, or simply an example of piss poor, gutter journalism.

I think I’ll go with piss poor, gutter journalism.

The Crowd Says:

2013-09-22T23:04:17+00:00

Nomad

Guest


I think Keynes said "When I get new facts, I change my opinion what do you do?? ((live in denial?) I added the last bit as a bonus for those who believe Ryan Tandy was framed..

2013-09-22T17:19:59+00:00

robdowney

Roar Rookie


four traits of those who believe: patternicity, or a tendency to find meaningful patterns in random noise; agenticity, or the bent to believe the world is controlled by invisible intentional agent; confirmation bias, or the seeking and finding of confirmatory evidence for what we already believe; hindsight bias, or tailoring after-the-fact explanations to what we already know happened.

2013-09-22T08:48:59+00:00

Geronimo

Guest


Get the top line refs on sodium pentathol or a lie detector test. By top refs I dont mean Archer or Cummins, I mean the refs that gets the top games no matter how many mistakes they make. Interestingly look it up under H its a shame its not carrigan. The first one hired by super league whose boss pinpointed RL because of the big hits, 2 dimension action and "close" games. .

2013-09-22T00:27:26+00:00

up in the north

Guest


It must be a coincidence that SOO is going to 3rd game deciders. I don't doubt there is corruption in the game at the higher levels. There are a lot of cases over the years to give this theory traction. But how to prove it?

2013-09-21T08:33:31+00:00

Silvertail

Guest


Kosta "pride of the league" that's never won a truly national comp , talk about ego

2013-09-21T07:54:27+00:00

Epiquin

Guest


The NRL wanting a souths v Easts GF couldn't be more false. NRL relies in Nine for revenue and they would get far more ratings for a Melbourne v Brisbane GF than an all Sydney. Sydneysiders will watch anyways, Melbourne and Brisbane would up the ratings in both those cities.

2013-09-21T07:52:20+00:00

Epiquin

Guest


A record year for both crowds and ratings would suggest it has not gone hill at all Quite the opposite in fact...

2013-09-21T06:23:48+00:00

Nomad

Guest


Next time we talk about attracting criowds try this SONY TV Competition – we have a winner! To celebrate the last round of rugby league at Allianz Stadium this season, we entered all SFS Members who swiped their membership card through the turnstiles at the Sydney Roosters v Titans match, in to a draw to win a SONY 40inch television. Congratulations to our winner, Mr Stephen Seymour of Coogee! We hope you enjoy your new TV. What next - naked girls...

2013-09-21T06:21:56+00:00

Pest

Guest


I did watch it con, the timing in the ruck was even for both sides, my comments on Souffs refer to the unevenness of the wrestle which always goes your way , anyways , let's see if you can get out of ya 20 without the refs help come Friday, and even if you win , which you should you'll never get past Easts , which will make it 43 years ,,, back to your black n white beta tapes ,,,,,

2013-09-21T06:07:16+00:00

Nomad

Guest


Roger, There was plenty of press about the TV rights deal across TV and press and the big amount

2013-09-21T05:53:13+00:00

nopuritan

Guest


I have to disagree with the author's premise that in 2005 to rig SOO would have required the complicity of "hundreds of individuals and dozens of organisations". I think it would take (in 2005) as little as one person to rig a SOO match - the referee. Naivety is cute but misplaced in this day and age.

2013-09-21T05:49:59+00:00

john badseed

Guest


Know fully sick bro doggies woulda capped their a$$. Why jump on the protected species bandwagon doggie? At least Manly would let you come to the beach

2013-09-21T03:08:38+00:00

Geronimo

Guest


MM I agree when News ran the game and owned the Storm and then sat in judgement on their clubs failures and ignored their own governance they paid off their harshest critics by giving with Gyngells help an extended role for Caroline Wilson on Channel Nines footy show and paid off gerard Whately by giving him a job as Fox Footy host. Bizarre

AUTHOR

2013-09-21T02:43:30+00:00

Con Scortis

Roar Guru


Haha, I was looking forward to your contribution Pest (the most aptly named contributor to the Roar). Agree 100% with Doggies Bro. Did you even watch the match last night Pest and see how much holding down was done by both sides? It's call wrestling, Pest. I hate it. It's a blight on the game. Don't you love how people like Pest deem a bad call favouring Souths (like the Slater no try) proof of favouritism, whereas a bad call favouring Manly (the Tafua try) are "just the way it goes" or "just footy" or "just the rub of the green". As I said in the article, a lot of refereeing sucks. That's just how it is. Incidentally, Manly were phenomenal last night - they showed great vigour and determination running on empty and deserved the win. DCE in particular was brilliant and Lyons and Watmough showed great courage in playing on with injuries. Next week against my Bunnies will be a great match. Hoping for 3 from 3.

2013-09-21T02:17:19+00:00

Doggies Bro

Guest


Did you see how long manly where able to hold down last night

2013-09-21T01:53:30+00:00

Roger

Guest


I agree that Murdochs papers are killing us. Last year i'll never forget, the day after the biggest TV rights deal in our history and all you could find in the papers was the Kieran Foran hand of god try last year even though it was about 4 days afterwards. About 5 pages on it and one on the TV rights deal. The fact we're still talking about the 7th tackle try is proof. The fact Daniel Anderson did the review of the referees from that game and found that in the whole game the referees made 4 errors - 7th tackle to NQ and 3 penalties all awarded to the cowboys. Moral of the story is the cowboys got 18 extra tackles, the sharks got 1. But all you hear about is the sharks extra tackle and not the extra 18 the sharks did. One eyed & over dramatic media is killing this game

2013-09-21T01:38:12+00:00

MM

Guest


Why not explore how News Limited could have no knowledge of the salary cap rorting at the Melbourne Storm? Amazing there was no linkage and News came out with its governance reputation intact..........just before the tv rights were renegotiated.....

2013-09-21T01:21:50+00:00

Geronimo

Guest


Channel Nine want SOO (and other RL games) to be close and in SOO case to have a 3rd game decider and refs notice this and if they want to be picked they deliver (this year is a good example). If Storm win tonight and Shame gets their game next week we will see whether the NSW GF theory holds up or Nine want the Vic based Qld team Storm to max GF ratings and advertiser interest. Masters has written often about this but with zero reaction and no legal action so i assume it has some legs.

2013-09-21T01:20:27+00:00

V.O.R.,

Guest


No-one North of the Tweed thinks it has gone downhill. Quite the contrary, we are witnessing something very special in the games history but you wouldn't know it from the Sydney Centric media....if a NSW team had dominated 8-0 we would have plaudits at every chance coming out of every orifice.

2013-09-21T01:13:31+00:00

Seb Vettel

Guest


What about the reality of why origin went down hill. Overseas and cross-state poaching. That's all there is to it. Origin is no longer origin. A bit like international RL is a joke. That roosters vs rabbitohs game and the roosters vs manly were the most origin like games I have seen in a loooooong time. Origin needs to get back to its origins and keep the rule of play where you are born (to a degree e.g. moved to that state before 10 if an outsider.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar