Australian Ashes squad: who was unlucky?

By Scott Pryde / Expert

It seemed before the naming of the Australian squad for the first Ashes Test in Brisbane only the number six batting position was up for grabs.

It also seemed there were more candidates for the number six spot than you could poke a stump at.

However there are most certainly other players who could have batted at number six or another place in the batting order that seem very unlucky to miss out on the final team.

Here I am going to have a look at those who have missed out.

Firstly, let’s list the squad so we can understand who won’t be on my list of unlucky omissions and why each player made the squad.

Chris Rogers
A clear choice for the opening position. Brings heaps of experience to the Australian top order and had a reasonable Ashes campaign in England.

Has also started the Sheffield Shield season strong. No way could he have missed out.

David Warner
The man who just a short time ago was overlooked for a one day tour after a string of incidents over the last six months and a massive lack of form.

He turned it around here in Australia with three big centuries in the Ryobi Cup, one being 197, and then followed it up with a century and an unbeaten half century in Round 2 of the Sheffield Shield.

An obvious choice after recent form.

Shane Watson
What to do with Shane Watson? His last Test match he scored a sensational 176 and reconfirmed his status in the Australian team after some less than average form with the bat.

However keeping the man away from injury has to be Australia’s biggest concern, as it seems he won’t be able to bowl in the first Test.

However Watson bowling is pivotal to the balance of the team and maybe he shouldn’t have been selected without being able to bowl?

Michael Clarke
The captain, the back injury, the run scorer… Need I say more?

Steve Smith
Clearly a massive talent and only young, has been identified as a possible future leader of Australia.

He hit 138* in his last Test match and has made a strong start to the state season.

A reasonably obvious choice at number five.

George Bailey
Bailey gets the spot up for grabs in the side after some incredible one day form in India and some good leadership skills on display.

Even though his Sheffield Shield average was terrible last year it seems the selectors value his form and leadership.

Brad Haddin
The Australian vice-captain, missed a lot of time out of the Australian squad with Matthew Wade as the keeper but came back to bring some valuable experience to the side and take over as Clarke’s deputy.

Will need to have some big innings to keep his spot in the side after a shocking away Ashes series with the bat

Mitchell Johnson
He could be Australia’s bowling X-Factor. He has pace, swing, bounce and all the rest of it. However accuracy will be Johnson’s biggest problem.

Like George Bailey, seems to have confirmed his spot in the side with some good work in India.

Peter Siddle
Has been the leader of the Australian attack for a number of years now. Always tries his heart out and never gives up.

The fittest player in the Australian squad and has been Australia’s quiet achiever who certainly has his critics, however an absolute no brainer for selection.

Ryan Harris
Has been in and out of the Australian side for a number of years due to injury. Played the last Ashes series and was probably Australia’s best bowler.

Like Siddle, an absolute no brainer for selection. Will be important for Australia’s chances of winning back the Ashes and he needs to stay away from injury for the full five Tests.

Nathan Lyon
The off spinner who needs to be given more credit. He bowls tight and consistent and has way too many critics.

As much as he may be the best out of a very bad talent pool when it comes to spin bowling, he averages just over 30 per wicket in the Test match arena.

James Faulkner (12)
Has performed well in the Australian colours whenever he has been called on in any form of the game.

Sometime in the near future Faulkner deserves a prolonged stint in the Australian team so he can really push to lock down a spot, however I don’t feel it will be during this series.

He might get a game if Shane Watson breaks down but I don’t think Australia can have Brad Haddin batting at six unless he displays some incredible form.

Will probably carry the drinks in Brisbane but has been named in case Watson either can’t play or Australia decide they need the extra fifth bowler, which is a possibility when you consider Ryan Harris could break down at any time and losing a bowler in the middle of the Test match is certainly not an ideal situation.

Now we have the squad, let’s have a look at the players who were unlucky to miss out on the side and could come in later during the series if players who have been selected don’t perform.

Phil Hughes
Has had a very rough last couple of years, trying desperately to cement a spot in the Australian Test side every time he gets an opportunity. However it just doesn’t seem to happen for Hughes.

He was given a shot at opening in the one day Tour of India but, while playing well with consistent scores, was outshone by Bailey.

Either way, with the top order locked down, it may not be the best option to have Hughes batting at six.

However he needs to stay in form because at the first sign of a top order injury he should be the first one to come in.

Usman Khawaja
Like Hughes has struggled to cement a spot in the Australian top order whenever he has received a chance.

Has had a strong start to the State season though, with a big hundred in the Ryobi Cup final and some may argue with this form he is a more than a little bit unlucky to be missing out.

However he could get his chance during the series or in the near future, with some older and injury-prone players in the top order.

Alex Doolan
Doolan has been talked up by the media and Cricket Australia for most of the last two summers after being able to put up a lot of good numbers in State cricket.

Doolan has also managed to play the last two summers in the Australia A tour game. There are certainly enough arguments for why he should be there on November 21.

Shaun Marsh
Played some Tests a couple of years ago and looked promising with a big century early in his Test career.

It was all downhill from there for Marsh, after he averaged less than three versing India and was dropped out the back door and almost forgotten about.

However he seems to have made a resurgence and be back with a chance of playing at some point during the summer.

Matthew Wade
Wade seemed to have cemented the Australian wicketkeeping spot. He was in good form with the bat and seemed to be set.

However Australia then decided they needed experience and brought the shelved Brad Haddin back from the wilderness to play as the vice-captain.

Harsh on Wade for sure but if he can manage to stay in form, then all he will need is an injury to Haddin. Or to just wait for Haddin to retire.

The only chance he will get to play this summer will be if Haddin gets injured.

Fawad Ahmed
The leg spinner who is being talked about as the saviour of Australian cricket.

However since bowling his way into contention by taking six wickets in an inning in the first round of the Shield, he has collective figures of 1/166.

Certainly not anything good and you could almost say he has bowled his way out of contention while Nathan Lyon has been taking wickets for New South Wales.

No way he will get a game without an injury to Nathan Lyon.

Ben Cutting
Bowled really well for Australia A, especially on day four, which should certainly have caught the selectors’ eyes if he hadn’t already with a really strong Ryobi Cup campaign.

There was really only one bowler’s spot up for grabs, which went to Mitchell Johnson, as Siddle and Harris were locked in a long time ago.

Cutting could get some game time during the summer if there is a lack of form or major injury to any of the pace bowlers.

Chadd Sayers
It has been argued a lot, especially here on The Roar about whether he should make a debut.

He seems to be a big hope for Australia in the future but while many will disagree, it won’t be starting this summer for Sayers.

Ben Hilfenhaus
Displayed some good form during the Ryobi Cup and has a lot of experience. Could be picked if injury of lack of form occurs throughout the summer and he is in form.

The experience he would bring to the Australian team would be invaluable.

Doug Bollinger
Like Hilfenhaus, Bollinger is a pretty experienced player and has performed in the baggy green before.

If injuries and/or form affect the Australian bowling line-up he would certainly be up there as a possibility to play a game or a couple of games during the summer.

There you have it, Australia’s squad for the Ashes has pulled no major surprises, and there is certainly plenty of players that want the baggy green if a lack of form hits the Australian team.

The Crowd Says:

2013-11-17T07:57:03+00:00

Timmuh

Roar Guru


Historically, Pietersens' weakness to left arm orthodox was exploited by O'Keefe, handing Doherty his Test debut on the strength of two (might have been three) wickets aganst Sri Lanka in an ODI.

2013-11-17T07:09:40+00:00

Slartibartfast

Guest


"Keepers have to be able to score runs these days!!!" Only if the batsmen fail - in which case they're not doing their job. A wicketkeeper's job is to keep wicket - his ability to bat (if he can) is merely a bonus. Haddin and Wade can't fulfil that role, both have dropped Test matches.

2013-11-17T06:56:05+00:00

Armchair Expert

Guest


Or Peter Sleep in 86/87?

2013-11-17T06:44:54+00:00

Armchair Expert

Guest


Do you remember Jim Higgs in 78/79 or Bob Holland in 85?

2013-11-16T16:42:22+00:00

Slartibartfast

Guest


Australia have won or drawn a Test series in England without a specialist leg-spinner in the squad precisely once in 100 years - in 1964. Ok, technically we won in 1975 when neither Jenner nor Kerry O'Keefe played the Tests, but both were in the squad. 1920s - Arthur Mailey. 1930s - Clarrie Grimmett and Bill O'Reilly. Grimmett's strike rate was better than Warne's. 1948 - Doug Ring. 1950s - Richie Benaud. 1968 & 72 - John Gleeson. We didn't have a leggie after 1975 until 1989, and we lost every series in England during that period, too. 1989 - Trevor Hohns 1993-2005 - Shane Warne So play Ahmed - and for God's sake Pup, toss the ball to Steve Smith and let him KEEP it for a dozen overs. So far he's bowled fewer career overs than he should have bowled overs per Test - and he did brilliantly at Lords (more wickets than Pattinson and Agar combined), the nut that got Bell was unplayable and the flipper that did Prior was a gem that Warne would have been proud of.

2013-11-16T16:34:17+00:00

Slartibartfast

Guest


What the hell did Ed Cowan do wrong? Before Rogers ton in Durham, the last Australian opener to score 100 in a Test was - Ed Cowan. He also had a rapport going with David Warner, which Rogers hasn't been able to develop. I'd play Cowan and Warner as openers with Rogers at 3. Dump Watson, he's too injury prone, erratic at Test level and has a serious flaw in his technique (he was lucky to survive an LBW shout before he'd scored at the Oval - he still walks across his stumps. Not a problem in ODIs as the bowlers can't afford to stray down leg, but it's poison in Tests). Keep him as an ODI specialist.

2013-11-16T16:27:52+00:00

Slartibartfast

Guest


Tim Paine is a better keeper than either. Haddin and Wade are batsmen who only THINK they can keep. CA are trying to find another Gilchrist, which they won't - Gilly was a once in a generation player. Until then, pick the best keeper rather than the best keeper-batsman, for God's sake (although Haddin did rather well in England recently, had he gloved that one from Broad in the first the umpire probably would have given it out).

2013-11-16T04:38:37+00:00

Armchair Expert

Guest


Second innings Nick, O'Keefe 3-60 vs Lyon 1-50.

AUTHOR

2013-11-15T05:31:54+00:00

Scott Pryde

Expert


Thanks for that Nick! :) Its true the keeper should be able to keep but he MUST be able to score runs, and at times alot of them. O'Keefe is good however maybe not international quality? Im unsure but everyone else has had a crack and he must be next on the selectors radar behind it would seem Ahmed?

2013-11-14T23:02:17+00:00

Nick Potter

Guest


Interesting article Scott. Nicely done. I am in agreement with those who say WK should be a keeper first. And Wade is not that. He missed crucial wickets on the South African tour that could have won us the series, and would have cemented Nathan Lyon's place in the team. I didn't see Peter Nevil here in discussions. He's an outstanding keeper and when selected as Wade's backup in WI after Haddin came home was one of leading run scorers in SS. Moved from Vic to NSW and excelled. He's also 28. Also I know there's a big SOK fan club on the Roar but in the head to head in Brisbane on a flat deck this week both Lyon and SOK scored 20 odd and the bowling figures look like this SOK 11-2-35-0 Lyon 8-3-10-2 I've never been a fan but Lyon has earned his spot

2013-11-13T23:15:26+00:00

Armchair Expert

Guest


A leg spinner like Warne, who could control over 90% of the balls he bowled only comes around every few generations, so good luck to the selectors in finding him, but at least O'Keefe has a better 1st class bowling average than him.

2013-11-13T06:31:49+00:00

Hookin' YT

Guest


Ryan Carters is Victorian (ACT actually) and is a better gloveman than Wade. 84NO against England as I write.

2013-11-13T06:30:26+00:00

Hookin' YT

Guest


Unfairly NOT unlucky. Rumours abound about him being on Atilla the Bingle's naughty list.

2013-11-13T06:24:17+00:00

Hookin' YT

Guest


2nd Test Lords 2013. Haddin misses Root on 9. Just watches the ball sail between him and the slip as he often does. Root goes on to 180. Haddin makes 7 and 7 with the bat. England go 2-0 up. Over the series Haddin averages 22.89 Good huh?

2013-11-13T05:16:35+00:00

Dan Ced

Roar Rookie


You know what, at least they have turned back to searching for the next Warne rather than soiling out test team with weak all arounders (i.e. India test series) I'm not aboard the Ahmed hype train. I'm more focusing on the Zampa's and Boyce's.. but I agree O'Keefe has been unfairly dimissed by the selectors.

2013-11-13T05:03:42+00:00

Deccas

Guest


they do, they do indeed. But most important they need to keep the runs down, they need to complete runouts, and take catches and stumpings. The extra 20 runs from a good batsmen who keeps a bit are handing, but but extra 50 you're chasing because they aren't doing their job properly isn't worth it.

2013-11-13T05:02:09+00:00

Straight Ball

Guest


Said it in 3 words. Unfair for bowlers to have to bowl in his direction.

AUTHOR

2013-11-13T04:42:14+00:00

Scott Pryde

Expert


Yeah but in the modern game, you need a lot more runs than the olden day games. Keepers have to be able to score runs these days!!!

AUTHOR

2013-11-13T04:40:54+00:00

Scott Pryde

Expert


Very good pick up!

2013-11-13T03:31:53+00:00

Hookin' YT

Guest


I wasn't a fast bowlers bum but please explain how you swing the ball with a scrambled seam? Where did Taber and Grout bat? Wasn't 7 ;) Missing catches off top order batsman costs what? In Roots case 171.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar