England’s Ashes: a premature post-mortem

By Daniel Keane / Roar Rookie

“It’s not the despair,” implores John Cleese’s character in the movie Clockwise as he slumps on a roadside while wearing a monastic frock, in one of many memorable moments of farce.

“I can stand the despair. It’s the hope.”

There is an echo here of Nietzsche, who thought hope “the worst of evils because it prolongs the torments of man.”

But the German’s grim sturm und drang is absent – in Clockwise, it is an unmistakably English sentiment, prompting Bill Brysonesque ruminations on the national character.

Who other than the English could prefer the certainty of gloom to the distant promise of glory; steady showers to the tantalising chance of sunshine?

Why England Lose was the title of a book about England’s football team, shrewdly released before the last World Cup in anticipation of the inevitable disappointment.

Defeat, it seems, is a safe bet where England is concerned.

In cricket, it is much the same story. Notwithstanding its recent run of Ashes success, England has over the years played so feebly that there is a feeling of bitter relief once another game is lost.

The last wicket or losing runs might even be said, in the jargon of pop psychology, to ‘bring closure’, putting any absurd optimism safely to rest.

Remembering his painful hope after the stunning first day of the Edgbaston Test of 1997, with England 3/200 after dismissing Australia for just 118, Andrew Hughes wrote:

“The curtains came down with an hour to go. Going home, big fat jolly raindrops spattered the windscreen. None of us had been drinking, but we all had silly grins on our faces. Could this be the year?”

The hubris is palpable; the question rhetorical, even mildly tragic. Hughes composed those lines more than a decade later, in full knowledge of what actually transpired – England won by nine wickets, but was soundly thrashed in the third, fourth and fifth Tests.

Coming eight summers after relinquishing the Ashes in 1989, and another eight before regaining them in 2005, the 1997 series was in fact the bleakest, blackest midwinter of the Waugh era; the Edgbaston match the cruelest of false dawns.

It was the only Ashes Test England won during that 16-year period when the series was still ‘alive’. All of the remaining six occurred when the urn was out of reach.

Watching and listening to the Barmy Army in full voice on the doomed fifth day in Adelaide earlier this week, even Australians in the crowd might have felt a pang of sympathy.

Theirs was not, it should be said, the spontaneous, soulful song of passengers aboard a sinking ship (although some no doubt later ‘drowned their sorrows’!)

It was more a case of ‘no hope, just principles’, to borrow a line from that modern English classic Brassed Off – a decision to carry on singing because it is what they do best, regardless of the situation. Whatever people say about the Army, no one can deny they possess a deep, comic nobility.

In his peerless Fever Pitch, Nick Hornby describes a similar feeling watching Arsenal fans prepare to journey to Liverpool on the last day of the 1988/89 league season, with the Gunners needing to win by two goals to claim their first title in 18 years:

“Their positiveness… on this beautiful May morning made me sad for them, as if these chirpy and bravely confident young men and women were off to the Somme to lose their lives, rather than to Anfield to lose, at worst, their faith.”

What makes England’s current predicament so hard to swallow is that the team arrived on these shores with such high hopes and a not-so-quiet cockiness.

As Jonathan Agnew observed, with a touch of melancholy, at least previous England teams knew they were going to be thrashed.

It didn’t take long, however, for that old despondency to show itself again.

There was something almost willed about England’s first innings implosion at Adelaide: the batsmen seemed eager to share the shame, to at least make a ‘good show’ of making a very bad one. If anyone doubted it, here was conclusive proof: no-one does ‘woeful’ quite as well as England.

Such defeatism sits uneasily with the nation’s self-image as a place of unusual pluck and resilience.

There is a whole literary (or perhaps oratory) tradition, from Shakespeare to Churchill, emphasising English steadfastness.

But England’s batsmen in Adelaide proved as meek as field mice. “Wee, sleekit, cowran, tim’rous beastie/O, what a panic’s in thy breastie!” wrote the poet Robbie Burns after uncovering a family of the tiny creatures while farming.

He could have been describing any member of England’s XI, with the possible exceptions of Carberry and Root. (Fittingly, a statue of Burns stands outside South Australia’s State Library, not far from the Oval).

There was a stomach-wrenching inevitability about the first and last wickets of the final day. After pulling a Siddle short-ball for six, Stuart Broad attempted to repeat the feat next ball but instead picked out a prowling Lyon.

Panesar, on the other hand, fell to a fuller delivery just as the Barmy Army started to reach peak decibels.

The chorus had got as far as “Migh-ty Migh-ty Eng-land,” belted out with gusto and rubato, when Monty drove straight to short cover, prompting an artless cheer that drowned out the chant.

One of the Army’s chosen tunes that morning was the upbeat anthem ‘Go West’, with the doctored lyrics “Four more to the England!”

Now that the series has pressed on to Perth, it would be fitting to return to the original version, especially the couplet: “If we make a stand/We’ll find our promised land.”

After all, England did just that in 1986, with Chris Broad and Bill Athey, and then David Gower and Jack Richards, combining for two of the top ten highest partnerships on the WACA Ground as England compiled 8/592 dec, then a record score for the venue.

That performance, however, will be hard to emulate.

The England of ’86 was buoyed by beating Australia in Brisbane.

The current team, on the other hand, has failed dismally in its first two Tests.

While they would no doubt claim, in Monty Python-style, that they are not dead yet, they would also probably concede that the pacey Perth pitch seems an unlikely place to launch a revival.

As the players sat back in their seats on the plane that took them west on Tuesday, more than a few must have wondered whether their chances would shortly be heading in the same direction.

The Crowd Says:

2013-12-13T10:45:21+00:00

SandBox

Roar Guru


great article. Well researched, or do you know this stuff from memory?

2013-12-13T01:56:31+00:00

Johnno

Guest


England team after Ashes gonna have a big clean out, and new blood. Gone Carberry, "he's 33 been around for ages a county journeyman Ed Cowan style hardly the future" KP I think he lacks hunger for test cricket now, and now 33 Matt Prior Swann Anderson to retire from test cricket but stay on as ODI and T20 Tremlett gone

2013-12-13T01:45:34+00:00

Jak

Guest


What??? No mention of 1966? Wow, so 1 world cup each in rugby and soccer plus 1/2 world cup in T20. Outstanding. If I were a pom i'd be proud too. Certainly much better than Australia's 2 x RWC, 10 x RL world cups and 5 x Cricket world cups.

2013-12-12T23:05:30+00:00

Eddy Bramley

Roar Pro


I agree Daniel. England often talk themselves up and do not deliver and rarely live up to the high expectations that they are set. Nevertheless, I don't think it is in any way accurate to directly couple England with defeat.

AUTHOR

2013-12-12T23:00:21+00:00

Daniel Keane

Roar Rookie


The proviso here is "it seems." Of course England don't always lose... who'd be literal-minded enough to believe that? But England has a habit of giving that impression - the team raises expectations and then utterly dashes them. Adelaide 2006 is only the most striking example - there are plenty of others. Why else do England fans - of both cricket and football - sing 'the Great Escape' theme? England has a tradition of celebrating escapes and 'strategic withdrawals' (a la Dunkirk). You yourself wrote, in a previous post on Joe Root's defiant innings, about the inconsistency of England's batsmen. That is precisely the problem. For a more detailed contrast between the sporting spirits of Australia and England, I recommend the essay 'On Australianism' by that great English cricket writer and commentator, John Arlott.

2013-12-12T22:08:21+00:00

Eddy Bramley

Roar Pro


"Defeat, it seems, is a safe bet where England is concerned." I can't begin t describe the ignorance of this statement. England have won the last three Ashes series, a RWC in 2003, T20 Cricket World Cup in 2010. I'm sorry but I don't know what you're talking about. When was the last time Australia won something worth noting?

2013-12-12T21:44:51+00:00

sixo_clock

Roar Guru


+1 England need to learn street smarts, forget sportsmanship, take it up to them. When being harangued by Mitchell they should ask him questions like "you're always blabbing, which girl school did you go to?", or "yack, yack yack, how on earth will you find a husband?". Get him mad then his deliveries will take on the spray pattern of a few years ago. Unfortunately the British still believe in decorum and manners. Perhaps the Barmy Army should get the drift and get on their cases writing songs songs like "handbags at 22 paces" or "show us yer tits bi_tch". When on attack they should treat the batsmen with motherly concern, praising and applauding even little moments and the Barmies need to get the pens out and write appropriately reworded nursery rhymes. I want to watch great cricket with the series decided on the last session of the last day and only fighting fire with fire will achieve that.

2013-12-12T21:02:43+00:00

AlanKC

Guest


Thank you Daniel, a good read and you've given me a good chuckle to start the day! Cheers

2013-12-12T19:47:47+00:00

FTR

Guest


"Defeat, it seems, is a safe bet where England is concerned. In cricket, it is much the same story. Notwithstanding its recent run of Ashes success, England has over the years played so feebly that there is a feeling of bitter relief once another game is lost". What a truly ridiculous statement. The Ashes series all-time head-to-head currently stands at 31 versus 31.

2013-12-12T19:31:59+00:00

Johnno

Guest


I don't know about that. I think the post-mortem is fine. This team has got off to a worse start than both 1990 and 2006 tours. In 2006 they lost in Brisbane, but put up some fight, and in 2006 how England lost the 2006 Adelaide match vs a great aussy team, I will never know. Like faulty towers, and Monty Python, only the England cricket team or England football team could of lost that match in Adelaide in 2006 after the position they were in, couldn't even sneak out a draw vs a great aussy side. They were not that great to lose after being in such a commanding position, a draw surely should of happened. But this 2006 side lost way harder than the 1990 and 2006 sides overall. The 1990 side did lose Brisbane in 3 days though, Terry Alderman got 6 wickets in the 2nd dig, and Bruce Reid whipped them at the MCG 2nd test, but it didn't seem as calamatous as this, and there was a less talented team in 1990, which was an awful tour by the way, far worse than 2006 too, phil Tufnell's fielding anyone vs Mark Waugh in the ODI match lol, the look on Graham Gooch's face at both Tuffers bad fielding and David Gower's extravagent batting to get out just before lunch in day 3 at the Adelaide oval was priceless,. England in 2006 game 3 at the WACA were in a good position to win that test. Monty got picked, and got 5 wickets on day 1 vs aussies, knocked em over for about 240, but the batting let them down once again and got out for 170. And in the 2nd innings Gilchrist and Symonds put on a show and stole the game when the game was there for the taking, and England 2nd innings collapsed chasing 550 for victory in the end but made 350. But they were in the game until 2nd session day 4.

Read more at The Roar