Oar and Sarota out of position and low on form at Utrecht

By James Anderson / Roar Guru

Tommy Oar and Adam Sarota are two of Australia’s higher class of players leading into the World Cup. Playing regularly in a strong European league, these two former Brisbane Roar youngsters are expected to feature against Ecuador, and, if fit, should be two of the first names going to Brazil.

I’ve always been a fan of Tommy Oar. He has good pace and is able to whip in a wicked cross with his venomous left foot.

Playing in Europe has almost certainly improved him as a player – one would think.

Of Adam Sarota’s talent I am less aware. He is deployed as a right sided midfielder at Utrecht, in what is more often than not a diamond midfield.

On Sunday night I watched the full game of Utrecht versus Groningen in the Dutch Eredivisie. Both Tommy Oar and Adam Sarota featured; the latter substituted off in the 83rd minute.

Despite conceding a large amount of possession for periods of the game, Utrecht managed a win with an 88th minute strike from substitute Johan Martensson.

It was a rather unimpressive match. Neither team seemed to have a real edge over the other, and especially in midfield, Utrecht were often lacking a player or two.

I am struggling to believe Utrecht had 55 percent of possession overall, as statistics suggest, such was the scrappy nature of the game.

Sarota and Oar both played well in the positions assigned to them. I’ve seen enough of their games to know that the positions they took up – Oar on the left and Sarota on the right – were their regular positions.

The coach, somehow ignorant of Oar’s talent up front, deploys him almost as a wing back. He always has two strikers ahead of him, so he is rather limited in the space available to him on the wing.

The 22-year-old Socceroo, who, going into the World Cup, will be one of Australia’s main attacking outlets, looked quite uninspired, though there were small glimmers of his ability throughout the match, when he would find a small amount of space and run at the defenders with pace.

In defence, both Sarota and Oar tuck in centrally to defend narrow, and then in possession spread wide, but always behind the attacking midfielder.

The coach of Utrecht has used this formation in every game I’ve watched. This indicates he chooses this particular style to suit the players he has, and not to counter the opposing formation.

And yet Tommy Oar is played out of position, where he is unable to do much damage.

What I saw of Sarota, he looked comfortable on the ball, and his distribution was one of his better assets. He also looked like a hard midfielder, capable of playing a creative role but most suited as a true number 6.

Whatever the case, Sarota and Oar were two very different types of players, and yet they are used in the same position, on opposite sides.

Playing regularly in a top European league means nothing if you are not playing well. Unfortunately for the Socceroos, Tommy Oar, one of Australia’s bright lights in an otherwise gloomy looking World Cup campaign, is playing poorly through no fault of his own.

The youngster is gaining experience in an unfamiliar position and adding different elements to his game, but he is not getting enough attacking freedom to cause enough damage at Utrecht.

You could argue a good player would manage to play well despite being played out of position, but Utrecht’s midfield was so crowded and overpowered, there was no room for creativity.

Playing in the Eredivisie is a wonderful accomplishment for both these players. But in a team that has won just eight matches of 25 this season, and sitting just four points clear of relegation, a winning mentality will be lacking.

It’s saddening to watch players abroad performing poorly, especially when they’re deployed in positions far from their comfort zone.

I don’t doubt Oar’s ability; anyone who has seen him in a left-attacking position, or even as an attacking midfielder, cannot deny his potential.

But in an Eredivisie squad, you would expect the coaching ability to be far better then what has been on display in recent performances.

I fear this will damage his ability to get around players, as he so often does when playing well at club level.

The Crowd Says:

2014-03-01T22:49:15+00:00

Adam

Guest


Champions league winning Milan used a set up quite like a diamond featuring, Pirlo, Gattuso, seedorf et al.

AUTHOR

2014-02-25T12:42:40+00:00

James Anderson

Roar Guru


Not at all what I'm suggesting. If it were about national teams then Oar and Sarota would sit on the bench every game. Batou, my point is what you say, that they're trying to win games and avoid relegation. The Diamond midfield is not working for them. They are in danger of being relagated because of poor performances this year. Perhaps I should have suggested that Oar push up as an attacking winger, and Sarota drop more centrally. This would create a 4-3-3 with the same players in much more suited positions. "It's not all about whats good for Australia". I'm not sure how you got that from my article, I think you may have missed the point?

2014-02-25T08:49:01+00:00

Stevo

Guest


Agree. It's not all about 'us.' Pretty much was thinking exactly as you put it.

2014-02-25T07:48:26+00:00

TheMagnificent11

Roar Guru


AC Milan under Ancelloti played the Christmas tree; 3 deep midfielders (Pirlo, Gatusso, Ambrossini), 2 attacking midfielders (Seedorf, Kaka) and a striker (Shevchenko or Inzaghi). Sometimes he played 1 attacking midfielder and 2 strikers. It's a variation of 4-3-3 where the attacking midfielder can play wider and cover the opposition fullbacks when defending.

2014-02-25T06:56:59+00:00

melbourneterrace

Guest


AC Milan under Ancelloti played a Diamond and won a league title, the champions league and were runners up two years later.

2014-02-25T04:29:38+00:00

Harry

Guest


Not looking good!

2014-02-25T03:23:48+00:00

TheMagnificent11

Roar Guru


The natural position for Oar is left-back when play a 4-4-2 with a narrow diamond midfield. This is because the width, overlapping runs and crossing comes from the fullbacks. Oar is not a striker and not a central midfielder. So, the Utrecht coach is no muppet, he's put a good winger in a position where he can best use his talents. Sarota is a midfielder who is good on the ball. He doesn't strike me as player who plays high-up in between the lines, preferring to use his passing range from deeper where he receive the ball facing forward (unlike an attacking midfielder who will receive the ball with their back to goal a fair bit). He also isn't a renown ball winner so isn't best suited to the bottom on the diamond. So, again the Utrecht coach appears to have got it correct by playing him on the right-side of the diamond. What is correct is that 4-4-2 diamond is not the ideal system for most players, Oar and Sarota included. It's difficult to adapt to defensively because you have no width in the midfield or forward line. The sides of the diamond tuck in but have to move out to the opposition fullbacks when the ball goes out there. It requires the rest of the midfield to shift and cover the remaining opposition midfielders. This requires a lot of communication and understanding. It's mentally draining and makes attacking concentration difficult because you concentrating so much on defence. I played a season on one side of the diamond and hated it. I can't think of any teams that have had major success playing the 4-4-2 diamond.

2014-02-25T02:32:35+00:00

Ben of Phnom Penh

Roar Guru


Nice analysis, James. It was an enjoyable read.

2014-02-25T01:34:20+00:00

The Bear

Guest


Picture is a bit wrong?

2014-02-25T00:04:02+00:00

Batou

Guest


I think that it's a bit rich to say that the manager is ignorant of Tommy Oars attacking ability. He's seen a lot more of Oar than any of us have. The manager has to use the squad that he has to get the best result for the club. Maybe he has more (or better) options further forward and Oar is the best option he has in the position that he is playing him. At least he is getting game time. While we really care about our Aussie players leading up to the World Cup, their club is trying to win games and avoid relegation. It's not all about what's good for Australia! (especially when one of our group opponents is the Netherlands...)

2014-02-24T23:44:28+00:00

Genghis

Guest


Good review

2014-02-24T23:16:34+00:00

scott

Guest


thanks for the article James. It's interesting to note that both Utrecht and Tommy had excellent seasons last year. Utrecht finished 5th and Tommy, playing in a more attacking role, was one of their best players. They have the same manager this year so it's not like he's unaware of what Tommy can do. Do you know if Utrecht's been hit heavily by injuries this year? Or if they had a huge turnover of players during the summer?

Read more at The Roar