Bulldogs dodge a bullet on Fifita deal

By Ryan O'Connell / Expert

The Canterbury Bankstown Bulldogs have completed a dramatic backflip by terminating contract negotiations with prized recruit Andrew Fifita.

The current Cronulla Sharks prop was due to join the Dogs for the 2015 season, after agreeing to a massive deal just a few weeks ago. It was worth a reported $3.5 million over four years.

However, the Bulldogs released a statement yesterday stating that they had advised Fifita’s management that he would no longer be joining the club, as the final terms of his contract couldn’t be agreed upon.

The conspiracy theories immediately surfaced, starting with whispers that third-party deals couldn’t be guaranteed. They then quickly moved to reports that the Dogs may have been wary of signing a player who had stated last week that he regretted the contract, and wanted to play rugby union instead.

Whatever the reason, the bottom line is that it’s a blessing in disguise for the Bulldogs.

As a Dogs fan, I was never impressed with the acquisition of the 24-year-old Australian and New South Wales representative forward.

Though an undeniable talent, there were a number of reasons why my excitement over the signing was less than enthusiastic. First and foremost, as damaging a player as Fifita can be, the Dogs didn’t need him. They just wanted him.

There is nothing wrong with the desire to have a player of Fifita’s calibre at your club, but the truth is that the Dogs forward pack was already a strength of the team. Fifita wouldn’t have exponentially improved the side.

With a forward pack that includes James Graham, Aiden Tolman, Sam Kasiano, Tony Williams, Frank Pritchard and Greg Eastwood, there was no requirement to boost the engine room. The Dogs’ needs lie elsewhere.

Despite posting a couple of 40-point games this season, the Dogs lack flair and potency in their backline, primarily due to the absence of Ben Barba at fullback.

Barba’s absence is compounded by the fact the Dogs’ other spine players – Michael Ennis, Trent Hodkinson and Josh Reynolds – aren’t brilliant ball players.

In that regard, addressing the backline issue should have been a much larger priority for the club than signing another forward, regardless of how good he is.

We then get to the elephant in room, which incidentally is the animal that would have needed to carry Fifita’s wallet around.

The Dogs reportedly signed Fifita for $850,000 a year. Although a large portion of that was due to come from third-party deals, so wouldn’t have counted against the salary cap, it was a lot of money that could be spent on another player or players.

No disrespect to Fifita, but he simply isn’t worth it, especially not at a club that has holes elsewhere in their roster.

Then there were Fifita’s staggering comments soon after signing the contract with the Dogs: “If I could go back now, I wish I chose rugby and then I wouldn’t be getting all the s*** I’ve been catching now,” he said.

“I grew up playing rugby so it was one of the best things. It’s always going to be there and I will eventually go to union. It’s another dream and I just want to chase another dream.”

Though Fifita’s comments didn’t come from a place of disrespect towards the Bulldogs, they were nonetheless disrespectful. The club had just committed a lot of money to him, and he almost immediately showed little to no respect for the jersey.

It’s understandable that Fifita didn’t welcome the increased attention that came with signing a big contract, but that comes with the territory of accepting a truckload of money. He needed to be a little smarter with how he responded to the increased scrutiny, because his comments would have set alarm bells ringing out at Belmore.

Loyalty is a vital part of all rugby league clubs, and though it is purchased in this day and age, the fact remains that once bought it needs to be demonstrated. Fifita’s comments didn’t do that.

Whatever the details, the Dogs dodged a bullet. They ended up not getting a player they didn’t need, who they were going to overpay, and who didn’t really want to be there anyway.

That’s win, win, win from where I’m standing.

The Crowd Says:

2014-04-01T23:51:08+00:00

stumpy

Guest


It's not that complicated. Fajita signed the memorandum then tweeted he's going to the dogs, knowing he hadn't signed a players contract yet. Goes on the footy show a says he hates the Bulldogs. Next week said he wished he'd gone to rugby instead and will eventually end up there. The Bulldogs cancel his contract - everybody wins ! Very uncomplicated.

2014-04-01T23:19:49+00:00

eagleJack

Guest


All outside backs Rocket Scientist. They effectively play the exact same position as they did in League, and only have a small number of areas to learn. Fifita wouldn't be an outside back in Union.

2014-04-01T23:05:05+00:00

peeeko

Roar Guru


I don't believe he was ever getting 850k, raelene castle denies it was this much but everyone seems to quote 850k because it sounds better. I've yet to hear a source for the 850k

AUTHOR

2014-04-01T21:47:33+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


All those guys played for the Wallabies before playing Super Rugby?? C'mon now!

2014-04-01T18:07:13+00:00

Rocket Scientist

Guest


Lesser players like Joe Tomane, Cooper Vuna and Ryan Cross have??

2014-04-01T18:01:25+00:00

Mon Ami

Guest


+1000

2014-04-01T12:50:02+00:00

Christian D'Aloia

Roar Guru


Hopefully they'll spend that cash wisely this time. Resigning promising juniors like Templeman and Lloyd Perret, or finally getting an established fullback should be their top priority.

AUTHOR

2014-04-01T12:17:01+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


He may well do, Kevin, but the question was where would he start, and there is no way he'd walk into the Wallabies team.

2014-04-01T09:44:54+00:00

Worlds Biggest

Guest


Absolutely agree the Dogs dodged a bullet. Interesting half his contract would be 3rd party payments. He won't get this sort of coin from any team be it League or Union. I think he could be a handy Number 8 should he persue Rugby.

2014-04-01T08:48:25+00:00

eagleJack

Guest


Plenty enjoy multiple sports Storm Boy

2014-04-01T08:25:35+00:00

Storm Boy

Guest


My bad. I thought i was reading something under the Roar's league section.

2014-04-01T07:36:36+00:00

mushi

Guest


There was the tweet in a roar article saying the third party deals weren't working out

2014-04-01T06:58:05+00:00

eagleJack

Guest


Fifita would be an 8 in rugby which is far more difficult to adjust to than an outside back. The intricacies of forward play are quite complicated. Super level would be ok. But Test level is a greater step up. Having said that he could potentially be the missing piece the Wallabies have been after. Palu is one of the few strong ball carriers we have but he spends a lot of time on the sidelines.

2014-04-01T06:32:39+00:00

Kevin

Guest


Ryan what makes you think he wouldn't play for the wallabies in his first year or two like all the others?

2014-04-01T04:10:51+00:00

planko

Guest


Fair price. I think Fifita had his packer/bond moment. Should have held it together and got it done.

AUTHOR

2014-04-01T04:04:02+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


Personally, I wouldn't pay him a cent over $400k. And even then, I'd be nervous giving him that much.

2014-04-01T04:00:16+00:00

planko

Guest


So what are you suggesting Fifita should play the world game and try get start with ADP at Sydney FC. I reckon he might make a good wall for free kicks just outside the box.

2014-04-01T03:49:02+00:00

planko

Guest


Now that is a good question Ryan I don't really know i just don't think most clubs are even close to 850k or even in a position to offer 500k to him. I surpose my problem with him is that you are not getting even close to a full game and he does seem to have a problem at doing the hard work in defence. I think we agree also that the bulldogs should be spending this in the backs or halves. I see interest and affordability as being the same.

AUTHOR

2014-04-01T03:44:22+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


Fifita actually grew up playing rugby. He was backrower, switching between 6 and 8. He was pretty handy too, apparently. I think he would walk into move Super franchises in Australia, but I think he would have to earn a Wallaby jumper.

AUTHOR

2014-04-01T03:38:01+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


Yes, but what was Fifita's 'worth' before the Dogs offered him $850k? My point is that every team in the NRL would have been interested in Fifita. Then one-by-one they drop off after they assess their own roster, their salary cap, Fifita's asking price, etc, etc. Diggercane asked why the Dogs were interested in him, and my point was that every club would be interested in him. It's just that the Dogs weren't just interested, they also had the money to afford him.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar