Scrap City versus Country for a genuine State of Origin trial

By Conor Hickey / Roar Pro

If the objective of the City versus Country clash is to hold a genuine State of Origin try out for NSW, then let’s make it one.

Every year we hear the same debate about whether the game is still important.

People like myself like it, others, for example the Daily Telegraph‘s Phil Rothfield, think it is just an excuse for Origin bolters to be injured.

I believe the game does have merit as an Origin trial and it could be better utilised to achieve this by scrapping the City versus Country concept, but not the game itself.

By splitting the selection pool for NSW into city and country teams, you restrict who can be picked for either team.

This means players, in particular the halves, could be restricted from playing with each other, and gaining experience and familiarity with each other.

There are a number of different ways you could structure the sides so that players could gain valuable experience playing against a level of competition higher than the average NRL game.

The NSW coach, Laurie Daley, could appoint the coaches, grooming one of them to be his eventual replacement. He could teach them the system the Blues will play with, and generally establish continuity within the NSW program.

There could be a NSW A and NSW B side, where players in the A side are the reserves, and the B side would be the reserves for the A side.

You could simply pick sides with the future of NSW in mind, and try to identify future play making combinations and give them a run together once a year.

It could simply be an excuse to give Origin bolters a chance to play against a higher level of competition, without throwing them into the cauldron that is Origin.

The ability to develop halves partnerships, something NSW has clearly struggled with over the entirety of our drought, is what made me think of this idea as I watched Sunday’s match.

Adam and Josh Reynolds, for example, have widely been touted as the play making future of the Blues. This year they played together for the first time in the City side.

Hopefully, these two stay together, irrespective of short term form slumps. Sides should not be picked purely on who has been hot over the first few weeks of the NRL season, as has been the case over the past few years.

Last year Adam partnered Curtis Sironen for City, the year before that it was Jarryd Hayne and Mitchell Pearce in the halves, and the year before that it was Pearce and Kris Keating.

The Country halves have been a bit more settled with Jarrod Mullen partnering a different player each year since 2011.

Mitchell Pearce, as we all know, has been the incumbent NSW halfback for a few years now. But he hasn’t partnered any of the five-eighths he played with in the City side, for NSW.

Part of the reason is because he was not eligible to play alongside them. James Maloney, Todd Carney and Jamie Soward all play for Country.

If the eligibility rules were to be scrapped and teams picked purely based on NSW eligibility, Pearce could have played alongside all three.

Now in Pearce’s case, he already played with Carney and Maloney at club level, so one game apart wasn’t going to hurt him, but it could benefit future partnerships.

Even guys that are successful together at club level could gain experience playing with teammates they aren’t used to.

Albert Kelly and Aidan Sezer could play alongside their future Blues team mates for example, not merely their Titans ones.

So could Adam Reynolds and John Sutton, if it was decided Josh Reynolds wasn’t up to scratch.

Or Josh could play alongside Trent Hodkinson; Mitchell Pearce could even play alongside James Maloney.

Or you could partner Sutton and Mullen, or any other combination you cared to, in case selectors decide to drop both incumbent halves or they became injured.

The hookers picked for this year’s game are yet another reason why the format should change.

This year we saw Beau Falloon and Mitch Rein start at hooker for City and Country, and unless one of them is a shock admission, I think it is fair to say they probably won’t get picked for NSW this year.

Robbie Farah’s most likely replacement, Michael Ennis, didn’t feature. Neither did former Blues captain Kurt Gidley. Neither of them are listed as injured by their clubs.

We saw Michael Lichaa come off the bench for City, and he ended up having a pretty good game, but he isn’t even the first choice hooker in his club team right now.

Lichaa, who plays NSW Cup, got picked, yet Shaun Fensom, the man who currently holds the record for most tackles in an NRL game, could only make 18th man in the Country side.

Scrapping the City versus Country concept doesn’t have to take the game away from the bush though.

The game could stay in the bush, but the rules could simply be modified to put on a great show for all the fans, while also preparing some of NSW’s future players for an Origin jersey.

The Crowd Says:

2014-05-08T04:32:05+00:00

mushi

Guest


The issue is that a trial game, outside of just being one piece of info, will probably give a false impression unless the teams are perfectly equal, which is of course a paradox as if the teams are perfectly equal none can separate themselves anyway. Taking the small amount of information (the trial) over the large (the rest of their career weighted by age) is a recipe for disaster. I hope NSW use it for every single game!

2014-05-07T02:47:15+00:00

code 13

Roar Guru


To be honest Conor if the City vs Country match didn't exist I really don't think NSW's performances would adversely affected. That said I wouldn't want to see it scrapped unless the NRL makes a committment to taking NRL games to regional NSW & QLD.

AUTHOR

2014-05-06T11:14:11+00:00

Conor Hickey

Roar Pro


Haha you're the first one I think! Precisely, why not give these guys who play for different club teams a chance to train and play together, I really don't see the drawback. Someone much smarter than I will figure that out, and I think in the long run it will provide a pathway to the Blues team.

2014-05-06T08:47:05+00:00

Andy

Guest


I like the idea. I don't like possible/probables/anything, just pick two teams, and if you want to see how people play together like Farah and Mullen, then put them together. Or pick 2 players for each position then they get allocated a team. The Fittlers v The Barretts.

AUTHOR

2014-05-06T08:26:19+00:00

Conor Hickey

Roar Pro


I'm confused as to exactly what your point is. You don't want it scrapped, but you think it is a flop. You keep saying that it hasn't sold out, but then again, do any League games sellout? Maybe Origin and the GF, that is it. Should we scrap them too because they don't sellout?

2014-05-06T07:41:19+00:00

turbodewd

Guest


We dont need to scrap it. Just dont expect rural area sellouts. The game is a flop. Stars pull out of it all the time.

AUTHOR

2014-05-06T04:41:25+00:00

Conor Hickey

Roar Pro


What is the point of that though? That is more an exhibition type game at the end of a season, sort of like the All Stars concept. Using the match as a trial allows players to get used to each other, become more familiar with each other, which in time will pay dividends.

AUTHOR

2014-05-06T04:40:17+00:00

Conor Hickey

Roar Pro


I love taking the game to the country too. That's why I say we don't need to completely scrap the game, just change it a bit to make it more worthwhile to NSW Rugby League. Recently yes they have been lucky, but they simply have phenomenal talents in their team right now, they won't always have such a deep talent pool to pick from, there is no reason why NSW shouldn't be preparing for the future as well as the present.

AUTHOR

2014-05-06T04:36:43+00:00

Conor Hickey

Roar Pro


The name isn't important, I've no doubt someone somewhere can come up with a clever name. Artificial in what way? I think there will come a day when Qld do need it. It may not be for a decade but at some stage in the future Qld will need to blood some new halves and they might come to rue the fact they don't have one of these trial games.

2014-05-06T03:11:54+00:00

turbodewd

Guest


Well what are you going tocall it? Its going to be artificial. Qld dont need it. I see no need for it.

2014-05-06T02:50:49+00:00

Epiquin

Roar Guru


Why not a "fan favourites" v "fan's most hated?" But seriously, we don't need trials. Just pick the underperforming players with a dad on the commission...

2014-05-06T02:28:37+00:00

code 13

Roar Guru


For mine the biggest benefit of City vs Country is taking NRL players to a regional town, promoting the sport and playing high class rugby league. However if the NRL were to institute a Country Round or take multiple regular NRL games to these strategic areas each year then it's only remaining purpose is as a probables vs possibles match. However it's clear given Queensland's recent string of performances that its benefit to NSW has been minimal at best. If the NRL instituted a Country Round or took other NRL games to the bush then I would rather see City vs Country played as a second tier rep game (Under 20s, State Cup players etc vs regional group players) only and the rep week removed.

AUTHOR

2014-05-06T01:39:25+00:00

Conor Hickey

Roar Pro


Why not have a trial? There will always be more than one contender for the spot, and playing against players who are all Origin contenders means selectors will see how the guys go against a team of players who are all reasonably good. Some players struggle taking that next step up, and the only way you're going to know if they will struggle is to put them in and hope.

AUTHOR

2014-05-06T01:36:56+00:00

Conor Hickey

Roar Pro


Precisely, and no matter who you partner with Pearce this year, the most games they will have together is 3.

2014-05-05T23:43:50+00:00

bryan

Guest


Probables vs Possibles is always fun, and at least gives a halves a chance to bond. The simple fact that the QLD spine has played over 40+ rep games together now is a huge advantage.

2014-05-05T21:40:43+00:00

turbodewd

Guest


Why do we need a trial? You judge players from first 10 weeks of the comp. City Country is a joke. Dubbo didnt even sellout!

Read more at The Roar