Super Rugby review began with the wrong outcome in mind

By Reddog / Roar Rookie

I have a confession to make. I am a rugby tragic, to the extent that I even inserted “permission to watch Rugby, including reruns” into my marriage vows.

The photo of my son Angus and I at the commencement of the 2011 Rugby World Cup is something I will always treasure, as he is rugby’s true stakeholder – the next generation.

In my role as a financial adviser, I regularly see the impact of vested interests and actually wrote about why I thought the Australian Government’s Future of Financial Advice had been hijacked.

Financial planning aside, I am very disturbed to report that I am seeing the same pattern in Super Rugby. How can Super Rugby be like financial planning or why it is being hijacked I hear you ask?

Begin with the end in mind
When assisting our clients to create financial certainty, we always commence the process with their goals, priorities and comfort zones. Only when you have articulated these can you define your strategy.

In the case of Super Rugby, it seems that SANZAR commenced the review with the wrong end in mind.

Super Rugby to be expanded from 15 to 18 teams
A few weeks back it was announced that Super Rugby would expand from 15 to 18 teams, with the overall structure and design of the competition being changed at the same time.

We will now have an additional South African team, one team from Argentina and a tender process for the final team, most likely to come from Asia. The existing competition will be altered to four conferences, which translates to less games between South African, Australian and New Zealand teams, more finals berths for South African teams, and the likelihood that some teams may never have the experience of playing each other.

To those involved in approving this restructure, I ask: “How is this in any way respectful of the investment made to date by Super Rugby fans (the ultimate stakeholders), broadcasters or the remaining foundation partners in the ARU and New Zealand Rugby?”

With a sixth franchise, SA Rugby will receive what they want, along with preferential finals treatment and the economic benefits associated with closer ties to Argentina and the soon to be appointed new team.

In reviewing the new structure, I believe that the issuance of a sixth Super Rugby franchise to SA Rugby by SANZAR was the end goal.

SANZAR have put the desires of SA Rugby before the goals of the collective fans of Super Rugby. ​Instead of three conferences with five teams each, we will now have two conferences with five teams and two with four teams.

Are you serious? Let’s keep it simple. Here’s a hint​ to Mr Greg Peters​, the CEO of SANZAR – you won’t need to pay millions of dollars to Price Waterhouse or BCG to analyse this, as my son could probably grasp the mathematics and logic.

The Reddog Plan
The Reddog Plan begins with the principle that South Africa, New Zealand and Australia have agreed that they would like to expand the game and that they must each have equal representation in the Super Rugby Competition.

If one party wishes for an additional team, they should use a Premier League-style relegation system until such time as all members wish to or have the required talent pool to expand.

Eighteen teams fits nicely into three conferences of six teams.

1. Fans get it and broadcasters get it.

2. Approve one team each from Argentina, Japan and the Pacific Islands

3. If unsure, refer to point 1.

It’s concise and easy to understand and rewards those that have invested in rugby, most notably the Pacific Islands. In short, it is the right thing to do.

Conference 1 Conference 2 Conference 3
Blue Bulls NSW Waratahs Auckland Blues
Golden Lions Queensland Reds Canterbury Crusaders
Eastern Province Kings ACT Brumbies Waikato Chiefs
Natal Sharks Western Force Wellington Hurricanes
Western Province Stormers Melbourne Rebels Dunedin Highlanders
Argentinian Team Japanese team Pacific Islands team

 

Each team plays all teams in their conference once, and two teams in their conference twice.

Each team plays four teams from the other two conferences once.

To ensure player welfare and reduce travel costs, teams can only travel to Argentina or Japan every other year, and not to each in the same year.

The top two teams in each conference gain entry to the finals, with two wild card entries based on competition points.

If you want to attract supporters from other codes, you need to bring back the geographical reference to each team.

There will no doubt be hundreds of permutations to the above, including having some of the new teams playing in the finals of a Super Club series involving the winners of the ITM Cup, Currie Cup and NRC. All I have sought to do is commence the review process with the right end in mind, and adhered to the view that much like financial planning, rugby should be simple, easily understood, and based on sound principles with proven outcomes.

Leadership often involves admitting that you have made a mistake. To all members of the SANZAR Board, now is the time to display this quality and implement The Reddog Plan.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2014-05-20T04:01:41+00:00

Reddog

Roar Rookie


I beg to differ Ozee316, as do the majority of those that have made a comment on this site or blog. Should you wish to provide an alternative (that's based on logic not emotions) let me know - it might take a few hours due to your timezone being different to mine by about 10 hours.

AUTHOR

2014-05-20T04:01:28+00:00

Reddog

Roar Rookie


That's gold Mark, thanks for commenting.

2014-05-18T13:53:15+00:00

Ozee316

Guest


You are not proposing anything markedly different to SANZAR. So I'm not sure why you rubbish their leadership.

2014-05-14T20:01:09+00:00

Nobrain

Guest


You sre right with the situation of Argie players. I think the Pumas will not be calling players like Bosh, Ayerza, Figallo, Albacete, Fernandez Lobbe, Imoff, Agulla, and some others. The promblem is that those are the best players they have and Pumas will not be able to offer any better than the had in RCH wich was not much. I do not think Argentina is capable, from rugby quality and economics, to come out with two SR sides a the moment. The rugby in Argentina has been getting better in its base but it will take some years to mature these new breeds. Everything will be new, the traveling, the money, ect.. It will take some years of adaptation and most the players are students or have a jobe which it will be dificult for them let it aside just to play rugby. The better players will be still aiming NH teams not only for the money but also for the experience of living a few years in a different culture, learning a language or seeking new opportunities. Take a look a the Italian squad the last ten years and you will learn that there are a lot of players from Argentina, this means that they have choosen to be abroad rather than play for the Pumas.

2014-05-14T15:04:00+00:00

paul craggie

Guest


2nd South American team. What else can you do with such a rediculous mess, in fact a "Super" mess.

AUTHOR

2014-05-14T10:14:26+00:00

Reddog

Roar Rookie


Cunny Funts I love the concept of everyone playing eachother once. It's the simplest and most straightforward concept - the only reason I went with the model I did was to replicate the number of games that SANZAR had agreed upon for the new competition.

2014-05-14T10:14:10+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Midfielder on a side note today, I thought Ange was picking the Olyroos not the socceroos.

AUTHOR

2014-05-14T10:06:30+00:00

Reddog

Roar Rookie


Hi Midfielder, thanks for reading and your feedback, much appreciated mate. Before I delve into it I want to state that my article was submitted with the plan named The Angus Plan, after my son, as I believe that generation are the games future and true stakeholders. This article also appeared on my blog and the poll currently runs at 94% of respondents stating an SA team should not have been included - just go to the website on my profile to vote. :) One of the best aspects of the current system is that as a supporter we get to watch our teams play teams from all three conferences and therefore test ourselves against different styles - thankfully we don't have to watch two teams playing Jake Ball too often. It's also important to not overlook the tremendous experience this provides our players to expand their horizons and see the world - Israel Folau has been quoted stating playing overseas is one of Rugby's biggest drawcards - maybe this needs to be explored more. The challenge with your question is that SA, NZRU and the ARU will each have their own short, medium and long term goals and the unfortunate thing is that they do not overlap. In Super Rugby both South Africa and New Zealand are reasonably mature from a market viewpoint, both in terms of players and supporters, with minimal competition from other football codes (except perhaps soccer in South Africa). That leads us to the question of how to expand the game? Midfielder you are bang on in saying there are there are significant opportunities in Australia, particularly in Western Sydney (you only need to take note of the Wanderers success) as well as foreign markets most notably Japan. I question whether we have the depth for a sixth team, however perhaps it is like the Field of Dreams and if it's built with infrastructure at the grassroots, school and NRC level the talent will develop. Perhaps the idea of seeding a sixth franchise with players from the Pacific Islands and basing it in Penrith is something that needs to be considered, as it certainly would allow the team to quickly gain traction with the communities of Western Sydney - maybe some of their away teams could be in Samoa, Tonga and Fiji? We could also allow Australian players playing in an Asian team to be considered for Wallabies selection. Without strong leadership from the ARU, the goal of expanding the domestic rugby will remain unfulfilled. Getting rugby on free to air, might be a good start as well. Thats it for now, will ponder more deeply.

2014-05-14T09:57:17+00:00

bobby

Guest


and all three countries have their own interests as a starting point and from that you expect SR to grow? thats how SANZAR ended up in this pickle, of corse SR goals need to be the starting point otherwise SR goals won't be achieved, and some embers of SANZAR will be happy and others not - which is were we are now.

AUTHOR

2014-05-14T09:37:46+00:00

Reddog

Roar Rookie


That's a good alternative 7/8s- whilst I really would love a team or two from the Pacific Islands region I can't help but think the powers that be just don't want to share the talent pool. NZR and the ARU wouldn't be keen, not to mention the fact the damage they would cause - who will ever forget the contact and hits when there was a Pacific Islands team in 2004! It would be the right thing to do though, as they have given so much to world rugby.

AUTHOR

2014-05-14T09:33:43+00:00

Reddog

Roar Rookie


Hi Darwin Stubbie, by the 13 team reference I can only take it you are referring to some of the names used for the teams. The background to this error is that I had all the teams listed, and in my haste to included location references for each team at the last moment because I thought it would better illustrate my intent. Little did I know that the Blues aren't located in Auckland and the Crusaders must come from a region other than Canterbury - I do note an error or two with the South African teams and I must also ask for leniency in calling the use of Dunedin Highlanders instead of Otago Highlanders - that happens when its late and you have had a big day. I must admit Sheek and soapit I did have a chuckle at the reaction. Sorry for late responses, massive day and only noticed the Roar notification on my way home.

AUTHOR

2014-05-14T09:23:00+00:00

Reddog

Roar Rookie


That's more like it! Sometimes the simple solution is the correct one Eddard.

AUTHOR

2014-05-14T09:22:10+00:00

Reddog

Roar Rookie


You are quite correct Michael. I had all the teams listed, and in my haste omitted the wrong team - much the same with some of their names as well. I had them listed as they are now known, and at the last minute I popped in the location reference and made a couple of typos or errors - I can only trust that my Rugby brothers and sisters can look past these and gain a sense for both the issues raised and some options to improve the game structure.

AUTHOR

2014-05-14T09:20:05+00:00

Reddog

Roar Rookie


Thanks Johnno, great to know I will have good company if I am ever relegated to the doghouse! Would love to see a super club finals series with the best of Currie, ITM and NRC along with a few other ring ins. Thanks for the feedback.

2014-05-14T08:37:19+00:00

Mark

Guest


Or you could just do away with the stupid conferences altogether and just have all teams play each other once and the top whatever make the finals... This whole moronic solution is just to appease the loser jappie teams that can never make the playoffs because they are rubbish, but blame travel for their ineptitude

2014-05-14T08:07:56+00:00

seveneighths

Guest


I agree with comments above that any new regions should have at least 2 teams to enable them to create strong rivalries and followings which is great for the game as well as being rational in terms of travel; it could be argued it is even more important in the pacific region so the sides don't become nationalistic. Does anyone have any insights into how the argies and japanese sides believe they would best be represented within the competition - I am yet to read anything from these quarters? Midfielder is running hard and straight with this seminal question; will it only be when a european model vies for a n american conference that we give serious consideration to this. I imagine there would be some great and rewarding opportunities for coaches, managers, players and support staff to assist in the development of new franchises.

2014-05-14T07:14:21+00:00

Midfielder

Guest


Reddog Good read ... if I may ask a question and it just bugg's me no end... you are obviously a thoughtful and intelligent person.. yet you seem to put SR goals as the starting point and I wanta know why???/... BTW your structure is about the best I have seen... My staring point would be well down from SR ... how does Rugby grow in Australia..meaning I would swap your PI side to Penrith to get some presence in WS ... more over I would engage a competition that involved your Australian conference with the broader family of Australia Rugby ... The burning and unanswered question is how to grow rugby and IMO this should be your starting point ...

2014-05-14T05:40:56+00:00

AdamS

Roar Guru


It makes sense, though I would still have more derbies. But, why not as stated have two argie teams to avoid SR teams from having to play the Pumas. One to the SA conf and one to NZ. As for a sixth SA team, let them have it. Since the comp isn't a round robin, it doesn't really matter how many teams are in each conference does it? With an extra side they start the season a week or two earlier.

2014-05-14T03:57:52+00:00

IronAwe

Guest


Exactly what I was thinking. Hopefully the undecided team for the SA conference will come from Argentina. Having it come from Asia defeats the entire purpose of giving the Saffas their own conference.

2014-05-14T03:22:31+00:00

Darwin Stubbie

Guest


no wind up really - i just think it is sloppy ... and insulting a country - are you serious - what by questioning the quality of the private school sysytem ?? ... if that was the intention I wouldn't beat a bush and just say that all it really does is continually display that the Aust rugby public are thick - and then that's still not a statement on the country as a whole

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar