Orica-GreenEDGE won't be a GC team any time soon

By Phil Anderson / Expert

Like all Australian cycling fans, I’ve been tuning in to this year’s Giro with increased anticipation every day, such is the momentum that the Australian riders have produced.

2010 saw Australians take three stage wins (Evans, Lloyd, Goss) and fill three of the four final classification jerseys (Porte in White, Lloyd in Polka Dot, Evans in Red) and was probably our most successful Grand Tour effort to date, surpassing, on balance, even Cadel Evans’ Tour de France win the following year.

This year we have already had three stage wins (if we include Orica-GreenEDGE’s team time trial win), and are still in for a chance of claiming the jersey that has thus far eluded Australia: the Maglia Rosa.

Of course it’s a long way with many very challenging climbs get to Trieste, and Thursday night’s time trial was a blow to Evans’ standing, but he still looks like he’s returned to some of his best form. He looked confident and calm in the first week and that has shown in the way he has always been at the front of the peloton when he’s needed to be, sometimes as the only GC contender capable of it.

It will be a huge challenge to make up the time he lost to Rigoberto Uran, but on the upside BMC’s pressure to defend for two whole weeks has been alleviated. This could actually improve the racing for us watching at home.

Unfortunately the departure of a number of Orica’s key riders including Luke Durbridge and Michael Matthews means that the chance of further stage success for Orica is looking slim, but that shouldn’t detract from the stellar first week they’ve had.

On the other hand, by taking a step up this season, Orica has put on display just how lacking in GC strength they are. They’ve come to specialise in small tours and smart riding to maximise time in leader’s jerseys, but have left everyone wondering when they are going to take the next step and become relevant at the highest levels of the sport.

Everyone was looking forward to something of an Aussie showdown with Richie Porte and Cadel Evans focusing on the Giro, but it wasn’t to be. It’s certainly a shame that Porte couldn’t ride this year’s tour but perhaps his fans will be rewarded with a good showing at the Tour de France instead.

There have been murmurings that Porte may be dissatisfied with Team Sky excluding him from the Giro and that this may lead him to seek a place on a team more supportive of his personal ambitions.

To be honest I think this talk might be overrated, but we’ll have to wait and see.

The importance of a strong team to build slowly to GC aspirations shouldn’t be underestimated. There’s no point in jumping ship if it means fighting for a few years on a second rate team that can’t mount a serious threat to the big names.

Recent articles in the cycling press have suggested that Porte is a logical fit to fill Orica’s shortcomings next year. Failing that, another theory put forth has been that Evans could ride for one more year, moving to the Australian outfit after his current contract expires.

Unfortunately it seems extremely unlikely that either of these situations could eventuate.

For one, Orica Orica-GreenEDGE’s budget does not appear to stand up to the requirements of a proper GC campaign. I’ve already mentioned how important this is for a rider serious about stepping up to Grand Tour leadership level.

Secondly, anyone familiar with the system of Australian cycling will also know that at times there is quite an inside club at work. Unfortunately for us, neither Evans nor Porte have ever been a part of this club and have both repeatedly fallen victims to the negative effects of such an exclusive culture.

Neither has come through the Australian system in an orthodox way, and both have an element of the outsider to them as a result.

Evans has obviously been around for a long time but he started from less than conventional roots in mountain biking.

It’s well known that he has been a polarising figure in his various teams, including the Australian National Team, which reputedly lacked faith in his ability to lead the team prior to his world-championship victory in 2009.

Porte was also a latecomer to cycling and missed the support of the Australian Institute of Sport and its associated benefits, including national team starts in UCI races.

He fended for himself for years in the Italian Amateurs along with some racing in Australia with a local team, but was repeatedly overlooked by national selectors early in his career and his potential was clearly underrated for far too long.

Many of the same people responsible for selection and institute funding allocation back then are now involved with Orica-GreenEDGEPro Tour team, and the same exclusive club mentality appears to pervade the new venture. Despite appearing to be fresh and independent, Orica-GreenEDGE is basically an extension of the traditional national system.

As much as we’d all love to see Porte racing with the full support of an Australian Team, I have to say that if I were him, at his age, I wouldn’t be at all interested in being welcomed into the fold so late in the piece, and as a professional would focus on my own career.

At the inception of the Orica-GreenEDGE campaign for pro-tour status there was pressure to sign Aussie riders and a lot of money was on offer to them. Many teams in Europe were shaking their heads, unable to compete on that market. Euro teams had to let riders go as they could no longer afford Aussie domestiques.

In my last years as a pro I rode for Motorola, which evolved from 7-Eleven, an all American team built on similar lines as Orica-GreenEDGE. By the end of my time at Motorola most of the Americans were gone as they were just not good enough and the salaries paid at outset were just far too high for the return they actually gave.

The team ended up folding under the financial pressure, the remnants moving across to US Postal Service who let go of the national approach to filling every spot in the team. The old management of Motorola are now the driving force behind BMC.

Once again, we can only wait and see, but I think it very unlikely that the current crop of Australian riders to be part of Orica-GreenEDGE will ever be capable of taking leadership at the biggest races on the calendar.

Meanwhile, those who might have the talent to do so, such as Porte or Evans, are not likely to ever be involved with our national Pro Tour team, and that’s a real shame for Australian cycling fans.

The Crowd Says:

2014-06-06T12:31:50+00:00

Carol Shawcross

Guest


Hey Phil, I found it fascinating to hear your comments on the insider club at ORICA, working against the possibility of Evans or Porte joining up. I'd heard that Porte was out of the AIS clique, but am stunned that ORICA would not see the advantage of signing up Evans. Support for Australian cycling and for ORICA would rise phenomenally with Evans in the team, and if he was really supported he might well remain Australia's greatest cyclist for some years, while mentoring and helping to train the next one!

2014-05-28T16:57:24+00:00

Tony M

Guest


I am probably too late to get in on this discussion?Only today caught up with the Roar last few days. But its an interesting topic-OGE/GC potential.The Australian outfit must surely be as close to GC potential as all but 6 WT teams that have already confirmed GC winning contenders Only Sky,Astana,Tinkoff, BMC,Movistar and OPQS currently have a rider who WILL win this years Grand tours !

2014-05-27T00:33:51+00:00

Phil Anderson

Guest


Hello Billy(?), It is true that my tour company had a minor, one-off business connection with OGE last year, and that if such a connection were on-going then an article such as this could perhaps be compromising of it. However, as no such connection—or any other—exists, I feel I am free to make known my personal views on the team and Australian cycling more generally. That your comment goes no way towards addressing the issues I raised, instead degenerating into name calling and accusations of "sour grapes", is indicative of the very culture that this article alludes to. Your response seems to suggest that only those on the inside have a right to criticise, which I think is untrue. All cycling fans are free to have an opinion on these matters and, as a significant amount of public funds feed into the national system and eventually into the OGE team, this particular case goes beyond even that. In any case, it's unfair to say that all I do is criticise OGE. In fact I'm always interested in their progress and my articles are, on the whole, positive and excited about their achievements. Calling anyone outside of the system "jealous" has become a standard response, but forms a sadder reflection of those who choose to be blind (!) to the damaging effects of such an exclusive culture than it does on those who choose to speak up about it. Phil

2014-05-26T21:53:52+00:00

Billy

Guest


Phil, Are you not ripping on OGE due to the fact that you have had no involvement in the team? sour grapes old boy perhaps? or maybe just a coincident that they your previous involvement with OGE and your touring company isnt happening for this years TDF? its sad when all you can do is critisise the team in every article mate. Anyway anyone but blind freddy can see your jealousy. Sad coming from a man who put cycling on the map in this country,

2014-05-26T06:10:03+00:00

Aljay

Guest


The two obvious examples I can think of are Mark Renshaw not getting selected for Worlds a couple if years ago and Scott Sunderland not getting selected for the 2000 Olympics. Anyone got any others?

2014-05-26T05:03:13+00:00

Phil Anderson

Guest


Hi George, I have never been part of the system and do not owe anybody. Times have changed and riders still have to earn their place on the AIS but more often than not there is more talent outside this stream than in. Thanks for the feedback.

2014-05-26T00:30:08+00:00

Ben of Phnom Penh

Roar Guru


I've never watched the Giro before (beyond the nightly highlights package) yet with all the Australians producing good rides have found myself catching as many stages as possible. It has been a real joy thus far.

2014-05-25T22:27:03+00:00

James

Guest


What about Dennis or Haas, what's their standing with the "club"? what are their contracts like? Would love to see both of them at orica.

2014-05-25T05:57:25+00:00

George

Guest


Nice article, refreshing and a little brave to see someone with the standing that Phil Anderson has in the sport to speak the unspoken for once and mention the "club" at the centre of the sport in this country, revolving around the AIS and personalities associated with this programme and how much harder it is if you aren't part of the club.

2014-05-24T22:19:59+00:00

liquorbox_

Guest


Even if OGE manage to get one of the so called GC competitors, it is still a long way to getting a winner. Every Grand Tour that starts brings us a new list of potential GC winners, but very few really have a shot at winning. There is an elite GC contender list and then a list that is reliant on others withdrawing or crashes allowing them to win. OGE at best can expect to be in the running for one of these second tier GC contenders, they will never get Froome or Contidor.

2014-05-24T02:06:24+00:00

Steve

Guest


Yes, good read, hard to argue. I'm excited for their long term prospects given some of their younger riders development but can't see them troubling GC in the big tours for years to come

2014-05-24T01:58:44+00:00

Aljay

Guest


The recent climbing additions they have made seem like they are building towards being a GC contender in several years, but of course they are all overseas riders. Nevertheless if their development continues for a few seasons then a team with Yates, Yates, Santoramia as climbers, Durbridge, Howson and Hepburn as time trialists would be a reasonable crew to support a GC rider. Of course the question is, where would the GC rider come from? Don't think he will be Aussie.

Read more at The Roar