AFL luxury tax aims to keep footy fair

By Ben McKay / Wire

Andrew Demetriou leaves the AFL a happy man after overseeing a raft of measures designed to keep footy fair.

With a goal to ensure “any team can win on any given day”, the league will introduce a luxury tax on exorbitant football department spending, end the veterans and cost of living allowances but increase player wages.

“At the heart of these measures is the fans’ experience. A determination to ensure each club has the on-field capacity to compete and potentially win each week,” AFL chairman Mike Fitzpatrick said.

In effect, the luxury tax will stop runaway football department spending in the name of fairness.

It’s socialism AFL-style – the most significant attempt to foster a more equal league since the introduction of the AFL draft in 1986 and salary cap a year later.

The tax works by setting a “soft cap” at the “projected industry average spend plus $500,000” in 2015 and increase according to inflation in 2016.

Clubs exceeding the limit will be taxed by the AFL at 37.5 per cent in 2015 and 75 per cent in 2016, to a maximum of $1 million each.

The architect of the changes, Demetriou’s successor Gillon McLachlan, said spending was just not sustainable and damaged the ability of poorer teams to compete.

“Non-player football department spending has been growing at about ten per cent a year for ten years now,” he said.

“There’s an acceptance (the luxury tax) is necessary.

“We’re trying to find a complex way through.”

The package was crafted by McLachlan in consolation with six clubs representing the top end of town to struggle street.

The behind-the-scenes negotiating was hotly contested, with McLachlan saying Collingwood president Eddie McGuire was a strong advocate for his club.

“Eddie is well-known to be passionate and he protects Collingwood’s interests as a priority,” he said.

“But he is always also keeping an eye out for the game.”

McLachlan said increasing payments to players while curbing non-player football spending was justified.

“If you were given an extra dollar to the less strong clubs, the best way you could spend that would be on players,” he said.

While players will see increased payments, Sydney-based players will lose the controversial cost of living allowance, with below-average waged players receiving a direct rental subsidy.

The on-field salary cap will be upped to $10.07m in 2015 and $10.37m in 2016. In 2017, the veterans allowance will be scrapped.

The AFL will also introduce a new “banking mechanism” for the salary cap, allowing clubs to exceed the cap for a season if they spent below the limit in any of the preceding two years.

Demetriou, on his last day as AFL chief executive, agreed the changes were vital to the future of the competition and to “redress the imbalance” between clubs.

“We do want our supporters and players … of clubs to think that every year they get a chance to play in finals,” he said.

The Crowd Says:

2014-06-05T07:10:16+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


without those 'less well managed' teams there is no one left for those 'well managed' teams to play. That $1 billion TV deal didn't come about because of the alleged 'well managed clubs', it came about because there are 9 games a week, and to do that you need 18 teams. There are plenty of ways to 'strive for excellence' without having to buy it.

2014-06-05T06:15:12+00:00

Rudere

Guest


ergo....better managed But not ipso facto...we’ll end up with a piss-boring league without it! Should we not strive for excellence? Gone are my days freezing my nuts off at Aberfeldie Park watching mediocre footy

2014-06-05T05:01:38+00:00

Sam J

Guest


I'm happy with this being introduced. Fact is, a lot of the bigger clubs aren't rich due to being any better managed, they're rich due to having more supporters and therefore making more money on attendances and merch, and making them more attractive to sponsors. If this doesn't happen we'll end up with a piss-boring league like the Premier League where the same 4 or 5 teams will be the only ones with a shot of winning the flag each year.

2014-06-05T02:42:33+00:00

Dogs Of War

Roar Guru


That's the next tax. You score too many points each week, and some will be given to your opponents. They can choose to use them in that match, or stockpile them and use them in a future match.

2014-06-04T23:13:28+00:00

Rudere

Guest


Oh I get it; tax the successful clubs for being better managed Here I have an idea: Let's not keep score so each game finishes as a draw When did the AFL drop the term elite?

Read more at The Roar