The key KPIs for a Wallabies clean sweep

By Who Needs Melon / Roar Guru

Key Performance Indicators are tricky things. I struggle with them in the workplace and I struggle with their application in sport.

It feels to me they can be counterproductive in many instances, stifling enterprise by discouraging the risk-taking. Nevertheless, they seem to be the norm in business, and in at least some cases professional sport is following suit.

We have seen two very different games from the Wallabies over the past two weeks. While some of the differences can be attributed to the quality of the opposition, I feel that is far from the whole story.

What KPIs would you want Wallaby players to focus on this weekend to ensure a more dominant display? I’ve offered my thoughts below but keen to read the thoughts of others on this.

Percentage of (not out) kicks that are contestable
On Thursday, fellow Roarer Die hard wrote that “Every kick should end in a contest or gain ground either going out or in open spaces”. I agree with that but I’ve broken it into two metrics – this one and the one below.

If you’re not going to kick it out, you need to make sure the kick is contestable. Ideally, that means giving it enough height that Wallabies can contest in the air.

If not, the kick should be into enough space that by the time the French players get to it they have Wallabies breathing down their necks.

This isn’t always possible. There are times when you have taken the ball back into your 22 so you can’t kick it out and the safest thing actually is to just hoof it downfield. So we’re not after 100 per cent on this one, but you want it as high as possible.

Percentage of ‘good’ kicks
For the purpose of this, I’ll define a good kick as either contestable (see above) or out when you want it to go out, bouncing before going out when you want that and gaining good ground.

What’s the definition of ‘good ground’? Pretty flexible, but you probably want to be making at least 30 metres upfield.

Kicking out on the full when you don’t want to is a huge kick in the guts for a team. Ditto not finding touch when kicking out of your own 22, and also kicking hard-won ball to the opposition.

Again, you’ll likely never hit 100 per cent with this one, but you’d hope to get pretty close.

The scrum
I read on another site that our pack will outweigh the French by 85 kilograms, which to my simple mind is almost like having a whole other person pushing in your scrum.

We’ve done pretty well in the scrums except for that penalty try, which I think we’ve all agreed never to speak of again. Nothing would please me more than to see us push the French scrum around a bit. We have some consistency in the front row and hopefully know the French nuances.

We should be aiming to win all our own scrums, give no scrum penalties away and to win at least a couple when the French are putting in. That’s achievable, and we need to send a signal for games to come this year.

Breakdown turnovers
We’ve been pretty good with protecting our own ball at the breakdown. The very good French back row really haven’t been able to pilfer much, and for the most part we’re not being driven back off our own ball.

Where we have turned it over in a tackle it’s either been the player taking it not having a good handle on it, running too upright or running away from support. Breakdown turnovers conceded is a difficult stat to keep to zero, but that should be our target.

I prefer to see turnovers won at the breakdown as players hitting breakdowns in numbers and driving over the ball. Focusing on trying to pilfer can often be counterproductive and lead to less turnovers won if the pilfering player gets knocked off their feet or concedes a penalty.

The other way to win a turnover is holding the opposition player up until a maul is called and then not allowing it out. We’ve done that a few times, but it can be a dangerous ploy.

Setting a target for breakdown turnover wins is always a bit problematic. Flankers can have blinders but never get a single pilfer. We did get a few last match though, and I’m hoping we can get a few again this weekend.

As with most KPIs, there is a degree of subjectivity in all of these measures. And the above alone will not of course guarantee a win – we still need to hold onto passes, not miss tackles, kick penalties, and so on.

I’m not aiming to list all possible metrics, but the above are key. Do the rest right and perform on these key metrics and the Wallabies will romp it home.

The Crowd Says:

2014-06-21T05:35:56+00:00

Daz

Guest


Pk you are spot on with your kpi's though I hate the idea of them. As they say in business those that can, do, those that can't develop kpi's. Accountants and human resource specialists have taken all the fun out of it. Your first kpi of runs with support play, like defence, is really just an indicator of team morale. How hard you are willing to work to support a team mate when he makes a break.

2014-06-21T05:04:17+00:00

Daz

Guest


Percentage of passes in front and percentage of catches in motion. The two are inextricably interlocked. If you pass the ball in front of your support he has to run to catch it. How many times do you see a ball passed too far in front of a player so he can't get to it as opposed to balls behind or too high or straight at the player not anticipating where he will be on the run? At a conservative estimate I'd say 100 to 1. Maybe that's why they stand flat footed because they know they are going to have to stop or reach behind them to get the pass they are going to get.

2014-06-21T04:54:10+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


1. # of phases / set 3. Average recycle time in attack 4. # metres made in centre+10/12 channel 5. Maintain same defence / turnover stats as last game Lineout requires scrutiny, due to limited options

2014-06-21T03:33:12+00:00

AdamS

Roar Guru


Runs and meters made by forwards with pick'n'go/offloads to supporting runners. More of this. One up runs by forwards that end in a ruck. Less of this.

2014-06-21T02:39:44+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


Hate KPIs

2014-06-21T01:34:18+00:00

PeterK

Guest


WNM - good stuff. at least 3 more metrics should be added. Percentage of Runs with Support play. This should be close to 100% except for intercepts. Far too often a player makes a mini break an no one is in support. Preferably more than 1 person in support on either side is required. Percentage of Passes in front Far far too often the ball is passed right to the player instead of in front. This means if the player is in motion they have to slow down, or if they are stationary it gives the defence time to get to them before they start moving. Percentage of catches caught in motion Far far too many players receive the ball while they are standing still. Why on earth do the fowards stand there still instead of running onto the ball, they would make a far bigger impact. The same for backs they should stand deeper and run onto the ball.

2014-06-21T01:12:12+00:00

Johnno

Guest


The only KPI's that count is winning big games.

2014-06-21T01:09:19+00:00

Qldfan

Roar Rookie


Non-specific KPIs 1. composure - leads to more good decisions 2. consistency - individually and teamwise 3. confidence - again individually and of the others in the team. Trust them. I have long held the opinion that many/most kicks should be into the contestable area. I fail to see anything positive in booting kick-offs so far downfield that they are uncontestable. It's free possession for the opposition with time to do what they want.

2014-06-21T00:07:08+00:00

bigbaz

Guest


Agree with all that Melon. I reckon one of the areas we've really missed Moore is in the turnovers, stats wise he is one of our best.

2014-06-21T00:02:59+00:00

Squirrel

Guest


Great article. We will meet these Kpis for a20 point victory. It will be running rugby at its best.

Read more at The Roar