On-bike cameras should stick around for the Tour

By Tim Renowden / Expert

The UCI’s experiment with allowing video cameras on bikes during races is absolute gold, and it should be pushed into broadcasts as quickly as possible.

The UCI is an organisation that we’re often happy to criticise for its lack of innovation, which can at times produce farcical outcomes – like mandating a minimum bike weight well above what non-pros can buy in the shops.

So it deserves some credit for relaxing its rules banning cameras on bikes – strictly for an experiment, mind – at both the Tour of California and the Tour de Suisse.

So far, the experiment is a success. Everyone I’ve showed the videos to, cycling fan or otherwise, has been blown away by the pace and intensity of the footage from within the bunch. It’s a viewpoint that has until now been completely out of reach for all but elite cyclists.

This is the first time we’ve been able to see inside the peloton when the fur is really flying, not just from a safe distance on a moto or helicopter. It’s the difference between cricket’s camera behind the bowler’s arm, and stump-cam.

Used judiciously, it makes the action feel that much more personal. You definitely wouldn’t want to watch the whole race from within the bunch, but as a supplement to the current coverage, it would definitely add some extra spice.

Watching Giant-Shimano sprinter John Degenkolb fighting for teammate Koen de Kort’s wheel in the run-in to the finish of Stage 5 of the Tour de Suisse, you see exactly how much skill and white-knuckle resolve is needed to stay at the pointy end of the race.

Or this video from Stage 6, where you can see riders bombing down a mountain at high speed, carving through a crowd and climbing out of the saddle.

It really gives a strong sense of what it’s like in bike races, seeing as not all of us can smash a 53-11 gear at 65km/h surrounded by 150 of our best friends and worst enemies.

I reckon it’s bloody grouse.

The videos we’re seeing are not perfect, of course. The video is in HD, but these little action cams still don’t produce video quality to rival a proper broadcast camera, or even most decent digital still cameras.

The other big stumbling block is that nobody in cycling has yet managed to produce a live feed from one of these cameras. It takes someone to copy the video off the camera, edit it, then upload for viewing.

There must be a way to get this video into live TV broadcasts. If Formula One can get a signal from a turbo-charged carbon-fibre missile travelling at 300km/h, I’m sure a bicycle doing 45km/h is a relative doddle.

Many of these cameras have WiFi and the ability to live-stream their output. Perhaps the broadcast technology experts could route this signal to a camera moto and bounce it to the broadcast producers for some near-live action shots.

There is probably a better professional broadcast option that doesn’t rely on what is effectively a consumer product being marketed by a bicycle component manufacturer (the model used by InCycle TV is made by Shimano). Accomplishing a live feed might require some extra weight for camera and batteries, but so many riders have to add weight to their bikes to comply with the UCI’s pointless mandatory minimum bike weight that this would be easy enough for most to cope with.

There are glitches. The footage can be problematic when the road gets bumpy or when the riders get out of the saddle to sprint or climb. I’ve had the same problem using on-bike video cameras myself, as I wrote recently for The Roar‘s sister publication Techly.

But I can forgive a bit of shaky video and dodgy sound, if it means I get that extra insight into the action in the bunch. Even for someone who watches a lot of cycling, it’s exciting hearing the yells, seeing the road furniture flash past, and watching John Degenkolb gently shoving a rival off a wheel.

The UCI should take this to the Tour de France.

How good would it be to see Marcel Kittel ripping along the Champs Elysees at 70km/h, right up close? How amazing to see Alberto Contador launching an attack on the road to Hautacam, from the point of view of the rider on his wheel?

And does anyone else feel a guilty frisson when you think of what it would be like seeing a big crash happen in front of you, from the comfort of your couch?

With all the doom and gloom with sponsors quitting, TUE shenanigans, intra-team squabbles, ongoing suspicion and all the rest of it, it’s bloody refreshing to have something cool and new in pro cycling which really makes people at home go, “Whoa, cool!”

More of this sort of thing.

The Crowd Says:

2014-07-23T14:00:49+00:00

Constantine

Guest


People need to see this from the front and back views so they can see just how fast and dangerous this sport is. It also makes people realise how there is tremendous skill, timing, communication and of course luck involved. I will be mostly interested to hear and see the communication on the mountain stages between the teams preparing for their attacks. I think the TV footage will be priceless, a hell of a lot better than listening to Paul Sherwin and Phil Liggett, sorry guys I have listened to you guys especially Mr Liggett since 1984 and I think these boys are getting a bit boring and old. Kind regards haha...

2014-07-01T19:42:15+00:00

jim

Guest


totally agree, my bike group has been discussing awesome footage since it came out. This could zoom cycling into one of the elite spectator sports.

2014-06-24T11:34:21+00:00

Felix Lowe

Expert


Is that "own" as in: "Struth Daryl, that tackle was absolutely grouse - he completely owned him there"?

AUTHOR

2014-06-24T10:36:12+00:00

Tim Renowden

Expert


Yes, absolutely this is something that the broadcasters need to own. Grouse = great, in 1980's Australia.

AUTHOR

2014-06-24T10:26:51+00:00

Tim Renowden

Expert


Ha! We'll all be puking on our carpets.

2014-06-24T09:27:58+00:00

Felix Lowe

Expert


Nice article, even if I'm unfamiliar with the term "it's bloody grouse". Is "grouse" Aussie street-speak for "great" or (as the youths of the UK say) "well bear"? The problem with bike cams at the Tour is that ASO have total control of the images (through Euro Media France and France Televisions) and there are issues with broadcasting rights. Unless it's something that France Televisions adopts for their own production of the host broadcast feed then it won't happen, because ASO won't let anyone else profit if they haven't paid their fair slice. That said, not that we've used drones etc then the next logical step does seem to be bike cams. Given the tech ingenuity of the people behind the Tour international broadcast, you can bet that they'll be targeting a way of doing this themselves and at an even better standard before they roll it out. As it is, though, I imagine InCycle (or whoever) would receive a stern letter from the ASO lawyers were they to put bike cam vids up on YouTube that include footage from the Tour...

2014-06-24T09:09:57+00:00

liquorbox_

Guest


I hope they work out a way to use them on Cobbles, this would give an insight to how bumpy it is

2014-06-24T04:02:13+00:00

Andrew Graham

Roar Rookie


Agreed. Live feed ASAP. The sprint videos would particularly useful - imagine those big bunch sprint crashes from the perspective of the rider going down!

2014-06-24T03:49:59+00:00

Hutchoman

Roar Pro


Yes I thought about the F1 broadcasts when considering this piece. I'm not quite sure how the F1 broadcast works in terms of which ones go to air and the timing of them ... I've been led to believe there is some delay on the timing. That said, I'm sure these are issues that can be worked out with a little thought and the concept is worth experimenting with.

AUTHOR

2014-06-24T01:49:05+00:00

Tim Renowden

Expert


Agree on the team tactics, but this would be another one of those situations where a bit of directorial discretion would be needed (also, as one of my Twitter followers has pointed out, when 'nature breaks' are taken). But then again, F1 often broadcasts radio messages between drivers and the pits, and publishes some telemetry data and sector times which give rivals a chance to see when rivals are having problems with tyres etc, and the teams just had to get used to it. Certainly makes things more exciting for the spectators.

AUTHOR

2014-06-24T01:44:44+00:00

Tim Renowden

Expert


Lee, this is still the UCI we're talking about. They've probably been wondering where the film goes.

2014-06-24T01:18:10+00:00

Lee Rodgers

Expert


My question is, how did it take this long to get them on the bikes?!

2014-06-23T23:07:41+00:00

Hutchoman

Roar Pro


Agree this was fantastic footage and more experimentation with this sort of thing should take place. Clearly there is a method to get this into live broadcasts, per some of the umpire/referee cameras doing the rounds in cricket and some football codes. One issue that may need to be dealt with is the teams probably not wanting tactics being broadcast.

Read more at The Roar