Do the Wallabies pose a serious threat to the All Blacks?

By Scott Allen / Expert

The mid-year Test series for both the Wallabies and All Blacks concluded, the next time we’ll see both teams in action is the first Bledisloe Cup match for 2014 in Sydney on 16 August.

Rugby in this country needs as much positive press as it can get and a series whitewash against the French, winning seven matches in a row, a capacity crowd at the final Test, the performance of Israel Folau, and the size of the big bloke, Will Skelton, have all contributed to good rugby headlines this week.

The Wallabies were good against France and the squad appears to be developing well.

However, let’s be realistic about the quality of the French opposition – they weren’t anywhere near the level the Wallabies will face against New Zealand and South Africa, or even England later in the year.

The All Blacks weren’t at their best in their series against England, but showed periods of complete dominance. England provided much better quality opposition for them than than the Wallabies faced.

The preposterous suggestion from some in the England media that the All Blacks are in decline was shown to be nothing more than an attention-grabbing headline.

Already this week we’ve seen articles in various outlets, including on The Roar, talking up the prospects of the Wallabies and individual players against the All Blacks this year. Even if there are genuine prospects, I still cringe when people talk up performances before we’ve seen whether the Wallabies can actually deliver.

If you look at the Wallabies’ performance against France from a New Zealand point of view, what are the key areas or key players you’d focus on in preparation?

Here are my six.

1. Israel Folau
One of the biggest threats in world rugby, he’s one of only two Wallabies who are world-class players and the All Blacks will be very focussed on him.

2. Michael Hooper
The other world-class player the Wallabies have poses a big threat for the All Blacks. He isn’t a significant threat in the ruck and the All Blacks will target him physically in this area. However, the All Blacks will be threatened by his speed, his ability to pop up everywhere and his skills in attack – he’ll be heavily marked.

3. The Wallabies’ scrum
The performance against the French scrum was patchy at best. The tighthead side of the scrum continues to be a real weakness for the Wallabies and the All Blacks will target this.

4. Tevita Kuridrani
The Wallabies are building their attack around Kuridrani being able to get the ball over the gain line in the wider channels. If that’s achieved, they can get quick ball and try to catch teams on the back foot on the next phase. The All Blacks will target Kuridrani, knowing if they can neutralise this key element of the Wallabies’ game plan, they’ll revert to Plan B, which involves too much kicking.

5. Nic White
White’s form deteriorated as the French series went on and the All Blacks will target him. If they can put him under pressure, they’ll go a long way to shutting down the Wallabies’ attack and probably force some of the poor kicking we’ve seen from him recently.

6. Rob Simmons
The Wallabies’ lineout is currently too reliant on Simmons. The French were slow to recognise this but targeted him much better in the third Test. The All Blacks are the best in the world in defensive lineouts and they will be all over the Wallabies if they rely too much on Simmons, or any other player. They also know Simmons is the only genuine defensive threat the Wallabies have, so won’t be calling the ball anywhere near him to negate the threat.

Some of you will be suggesting I’ve missed one from my list – Will Skelton. The All Blacks won’t see the need to focus on him at all. He made a good debut against France but the headlines suggesting he’s a superstar or the key to the Wallabies defeating the All Blacks are an over reaction.

Skelton had a number of highlights in the match.

Firstly, his try in the eighth minute, but that was dreadful defence by the French. If he runs without support and high like that against the All Blacks, he certainly won’t be scoring and will likely be driven backwards and see possession turned over.

Secondly, he drove into a French maul in the 33rd minute and made a good impact.

Thirdly, he set up Israel Folau’s try in the 42nd minute, which showed fantastic skills.

It was this last impact on the match that was by far his best. He’s very skilful and I’m sure we’ll see plenty more similar plays for the Wallabies as he’s going to be in the setup for many years to come.

I’m not suggesting he didn’t make a good debut, but those highlights don’t make it anything more than solid. Sam Carter’s was a better overall debut in the first Test of the series.

Wycliff Palu poses much more of a threat to the All Blacks than Skelton does. His game in the third Test against France was the best I’ve seen from him in attack in many years, but while the All Blacks will be aware of what he can do, they won’t see him as a significant threat who needs to be focussed on.

So have we really seen anything from the Wallabies that suggests they pose a serious threat to the All Blacks in 2014? 

I hope I’m wrong, but no, based on what we’ve seen in the last three weeks the Wallabies still need to make significant improvements to challenge the All Blacks.

The Crowd Says:

2014-07-02T20:49:04+00:00

SAVAGE

Guest


Of course the Wallabies do, the minute the ABs think that they don't, is the minute the Wallabies beat them.

2014-07-02T05:44:22+00:00

Simon Bedard

Roar Pro


Hi Scott, A very good summary of the recent tests, and what the ABs are likely to be considering. I am a big believer in under promise and over deliver. At this stage, I think the Wallabies have the ability to beat the ABs, but we should be considered underdogs (even at home). My question to Ewen would be....given the information in this article, what is your 'real' Plan B? I don't believe the kicking/territory game will work for the Wallabies, so what else can you do should things not work the way you want them to. We need to show we can be a more dynamic if we want to win the Bledisloe back. Thanks again for a good article.

2014-06-27T00:57:22+00:00

Buk

Guest


Wazza brought up an important point - the mental uplift Skelton gives his team mates; Palu looked back to some of his best days, did Skelton's presence inspire him and others to lift their games - quite likely. I also tend to like Kuridrani at centre, because of the psychological factor of having a big guy there

2014-06-25T12:53:47+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Nice 3D video Scott, thanks!

2014-06-25T12:47:27+00:00

44bottles

Roar Guru


"Agree. If you are running a 5 man lineout with Skelton at the front, whoever opposes him is always going to be shorter." Retaillick? :P

2014-06-25T01:34:43+00:00

Farmer

Guest


I am yet to be convinced Kuridrani is the real deal. Sure he is big, looks as though he should be the real deal, but has he really delivered? The ABs play each game with the intensity and urgency that it is the last game of rugby ever. Wallabies do not seem have that urgency or aggression (individually or team wise). Cheers

2014-06-25T01:11:53+00:00

wazza perth nz ex pat

Guest


Really... he is the bloke who clearly screwed McMenimans head around in a maul putting McMenamin out for a few months with a neck injury .. and you want him as Captain !! .

2014-06-25T01:06:38+00:00

wazza perth nz ex pat

Guest


Perhaps he should have said 'cycle' !!

2014-06-25T00:38:18+00:00

handles

Guest


Scott, if you are facing backwards, then the All Blacks are over your shoulder because they are in the future, see?

2014-06-25T00:38:04+00:00

Jerry

Guest


I said it was barely a dive. Wilson's foot was still on the ground when the ball was knocked out. Like I said, it wasn't the best example of going over in contact, but there would be about a hundred examples just as bad this season alone. It was just a great tackle with an element of luck.

2014-06-25T00:31:17+00:00

handles

Guest


Is it always all about what you said, James?

2014-06-25T00:29:17+00:00

handles

Guest


I have heard that somewhere else.

2014-06-25T00:24:35+00:00

handles

Guest


Hooper over Pocock? Don't want to win any turnover ball?

2014-06-24T23:46:55+00:00

Chivas

Guest


It was a good tackle, I won't take that away from Australian fans.but poor positioning is now the word for it. Occupied territories, disputed. My foot is sore, someone else's is more sore, mine clearly isn't sore. Who cares about logic. We'll just change some words about and say it isn't. I'm not even sure why I'm arguing it. It is irrelevant. My coffee is now my tea and who is to say otherwise. According to Jerry, it wasn't even a dive. So players don't even dive now, although I thought going head first (ball first) was diving. You sure got me beat. Fk knows how people dot down these days. Seriously, it is dry outside apart from the rain. I think I might go walk in it for a bit.

2014-06-24T23:35:04+00:00

Chivas

Guest


Watch for the banner :-)

2014-06-24T22:52:07+00:00

Old Bugger

Guest


Suzy Good points and just an additive to each, then I suggest: 1. If Skelton plays, Fardy will be the other WB lineout jumper. 2. AB's very rarely commit to sending a forward runner into opponents HB/FH for a couple of reasons. It runs the risk of being isolated in a tackle and lose a turnover and it goes away from the core script which is to go wide, off-load & pass and have support to retain the ruck ball in a tackle to go the other side. Give the ball some air and challenge the opposition defence out wide and fitness. 3. Agreed 4. Again, the ABs rather pick and choose which rucks to flood or not. Most of the time we notice they stand off and allow the ooposition to retain the ruck but always waiting to pounce when opposition support looks thin...then, they strike. Other than that, have we provided enough suggestions to confuse the hell outta Link and his game plan???

2014-06-24T22:51:02+00:00

PiratesRugby

Guest


Bet you don't.

2014-06-24T22:50:20+00:00

PiratesRugby

Guest


2014-06-24T22:36:13+00:00

bennalong

Guest


Pretenders? This is a negative take Sheik, and pointless if you're a Wallabies supporter three weeks or so out from Bledisloe 1 This Wallabies team is capable of winning that game! No-one that I've heard is saying we're number 1, but that doesn't mean when facing the ultimate test you should have to carry with you a pack of negative so-called supporters, intent on deflating any hint of the positive. What a bunch of downers!

2014-06-24T22:29:13+00:00

Combesy

Roar Guru


Hey chivas, as I said it is very hypothetical. But it is used in sport the main analysis is on players themselves not the team as a whole. They use it to measure when a player/athlete will 'generally' hit their max performance curve. Like EG I agree any team can win on the day, but at the end of the day I team can only have supremacy for so long e.g QLD in SOO

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar