The Sharks can still make history in 2014

By Armand van Zyl / Roar Guru

An headline statement seems outrageous, considering that the Sharks are probably the least likely team to win the Super Rugby 2014 tournament. But there is reason for my insanity.

Make no mistake, neither I nor Jake White are under any delusions of grandeur. We know full well that the Sharks face mission impossible, but after the Highlanders game there is a lot to be considered when pondering of the Sharks’ odds. After careful consideration, I have come to the conclusion that while it is bleak, there is still hope for the banana boys.

One must remember that this is a team that has achieved a lot through the years. The most recent being their 2012 campaign.

Getting into the play-offs was considered a long shot by most Super Rugby viewers but that’s exactly what they did. They squeezed into sixth place after a terrible start to the season and they meant business.

They travelled to Brisbane to face the Reds first and subsequently obliterated them. After that they hopped onto the nearest plane and travelled back home to face the in-form Stormers outfit of 2012.

They dealt with them with relative ease as well, though I don’t think Bismarck du Plessis remembered much of that game after running into the Etzebeth Express.

But we all knew what happened to them against the Chiefs in Waikato.

I have no doubt that the Chiefs still would have won that game had the Sharks not been drained due to their travel, but in the same breath I also have no doubt that the score would have been within a range of a three-point deficit had the Sharks been fully charged come game time.

Fast forward to 2014 and the same team with a different coach has done a few things similar, albeit in the beginning of the series.

The Sharks dismantled the Waratahs in Durban and they pulled one over the Crusaders in Christchurch with a total of 13-14 men. These wins cannot be underestimated in any context.

Those are causes for belief, for confidence. They built character but more importantly they provide enlightenment.

The Crusaders of 2014 are a quality side, take nothing away from them but they are not the supernatural beasts of crusades past. I’m not predicting a Sharks win, at this point I’m not predicting anything at all but I remain adamant that the Sharks can to the best of their ability beat the Crusaders again – only this time we hope it’s with 15 men on the field.

I do however predict that the Waratahs will defeat the Brumbies this weekend and I imagine it will be by about seven points.

This leaves me with a Waratahs versus Sharks final and personally that would be a dream come true for me.

I am a South African, I have lived in South Africa all my life but that’s not the main reason I want that match-up to be the grand finale. I want this to be the final because it would be the perfect advertisement for the classic running rugby versus Jakeball feud.

Winner takes all.

The Waratahs under Michael Cheika have perfected the running style of rugby. Their forwards switch between gears every five phases of play. One second they are pinning their ears back and head into contact like demons, crashing it up, gaining the hard yards, laying the platform. Then in the next instance you see these locomotives running off of 10 or 12, hitting the gaps and offloading to their skilled backs.

The backs sum up these instances in perfect synchronisation. They run in support with great lines off their hard working forwards and they cash in on the spoils. But that’s not all they do.

A free-flowing back line move isn’t a rare sight, neither is a good tactical kick. But they know when to perform these and where.

This is not an easy style of play to defend against. The highlight of this Waratahs side in my view is their diverse play. Seldom do you see a team strike a great balance between forward orientated juggernaut play and silky smooth back line nous. That is why it would actually do the game justice if they win this year.

The Sharks’ game plan is not so diverse. Jake White takes any hope of seeing a great, expansive Sharks game by the scruff of the neck and boots it firmly into touch. Jakeball is the name of the game and Francois Steyn is it’s star player.

This does not mean that the Sharks are necessarily a weaker team than the Waratahs. Jakeball is awful to watch but one has to commend a team that performs it as brilliantly as the Sharks do.

It is in no stretch of the imagination an easy style to play, it takes an abundance of practice. I stand by what I said, the Sharks can win the trophy.

They highlighted the Waratahs’ one great weakness in Durban – physicality.

When a team matches the Tahs’ pack physically it gobsmacks them. The Sharks did this and won handsomely. The Waratahs like any other side in rugby relies on a strong forward performance from which they can attack and defend from.

When they don’t have it it tends to frustrate them and causes them to act rashly. Nothing goes according to plan and their perfect game plan becomes neigh on impossible to perform.

Matching the Tahs’ physical presence is key to defeating them and few teams have accomplished this. But the Sharks have.

Ah, but there is a flip side to this coin. The Sharks have the very same weakness to their game.

Jakeball’s sacred and most obsolete rule is physically dominating the opponent. If this doesn’t happen then the team looks lacklustre and Jakeball crumbles. If there is one team that can accomplish this, it is Cheika’s men.

Power would be the common denominator. The Waratahs possess the likes of Will Skelton, Jacques Potgieter and Wycliff Palu. The Sharks have power galore in Bismarck du Plessis, Willem Alberts, Jean Deysel, Marcell Coetzee and Tendai Mtawarira.

The Sharks came out on top the first time, but this won’t be Durban it will be Sydney and one does not simply “walk into Mordor”.

The final between the two prominent sides would be one of the greatest in the rugby arena. Who has the stronger pack? The Waratahs certainly have the better back line, the Sharks have the better lineout. The scrum is a gamble. Israel Folau will break the defence, but will Steyn’s 60-plus metre cannon reign supreme?

But most importantly, it will be rugby versus Jakeball.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2014-07-24T20:34:58+00:00

Armand van Zyl

Roar Guru


Thanks DC, can't wait till game time!

AUTHOR

2014-07-24T20:33:44+00:00

Armand van Zyl

Roar Guru


Thanks Buk, glad you found it to be good. You make a very good point, White has the ability to kick his teams into shape.

AUTHOR

2014-07-24T20:32:12+00:00

Armand van Zyl

Roar Guru


Hey Riccardo, you're probably right there. I think the loss earlier the season will serve as a motivation to both teams.

AUTHOR

2014-07-24T20:30:49+00:00

Armand van Zyl

Roar Guru


Thanks, glad I could peak your interest. I think it'll be a cracker.

AUTHOR

2014-07-24T20:29:40+00:00

Armand van Zyl

Roar Guru


At least I can wash my hands in innocence to that.

2014-07-24T14:33:59+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Can't wait. Love it that he stuck with Reinach at 9. Serious pace advantage over Ellis. In fact, I'm noticing that the Sharks are a faster team than the Crusaders. Not just big and strong. Fast. Marais-JPP-Mvovo is faster than the Sader back three. Jordaan has serious wheels; as does Sbura and Chavhanga off the bench. Lambie faster than Slade; Reinach a flat out sprinter--big edge over Ellis at 9. Kanko is one of the fastest 8s anywhere. At this stage, McCaw v. Deysel maybe even for speed. Coetzee faster than Todd. At lock, Alberts is a very mobile 4. Lewies is athletic. Bismarck is deceptively fast. Jake might have something here! Flip the narrative. Speed!

2014-07-24T13:38:04+00:00

Boomeranga

Guest


Thanks Mr.G, and legitimate thanks to Harry. For only four words, it was strangely informative. There are some serious locks roaming around Durban at the moment so I can imagine its a position where the bar is pretty high. On your last sentence MrG, personally I just don't think there is much future in the mass import approach that the Brumbies and Force have taken. I can see it work for the players that get a good run as playing would make the effort and challenge of uprooting themselves feel worthwhile. It won't suprised me if quite a few head back.

2014-07-24T13:08:22+00:00

Mr.G

Roar Rookie


@Boomeranga, We've not been able to see much of Etienne, so can't pass judgement on him yet. One thing is obvious, he is rated VERY HIGHLY by Jake (JW jettisoned the talented home grown Marais brothers (Peet and Jandre)in favour of him and that initially didn't go down well with supporters here) He has been good in parts, his best game was against the Crusaders in May. Lewies and him were HUGE that day. Did some real extra work, forced a couple of vital turnovers when the Crusaders were in our 22. He played against the Stormers, and his handling was quite poor that day. Probably behind Lewies and Bresler in the pecking order, and we also have Pieter Steph Du Toit and Marco Wentzel. Bresler is however off to Edinburgh, so we should see more of Etienne in the Currie Cup. For what it is worth, there is talk that Jake is going to bring Conrad Hoffmann and Lionel Cronje back.

2014-07-24T12:08:00+00:00

Boomeranga

Guest


Thanks Harry. I appreciate a good succinct answer.

2014-07-24T11:33:45+00:00

Harry Jones

Guest


He is just okay.

2014-07-24T11:33:16+00:00

Harry Jones

Guest


Lambie starting. Alberts to lock with Lewies. Deysel start at blindside. Five big ball carriers.

2014-07-24T10:55:47+00:00

Chris

Guest


I wish this game was after the Brumbies v. Waratahs game so I knew which team to cheer for.

2014-07-24T10:49:41+00:00

Boomeranga

Guest


How's Etienne Oosthuizen been going? Is he turning out to be a good player?

2014-07-24T10:39:48+00:00

Charging Rhino

Roar Guru


Good team! That's the back line I suggested to you the other day. Great backline having Jordaan & Lambie back in the fold after they missed a big chunk of the season. Plenty of pace there. Pack = Awesome. I like that Jake is starting with Alberts, Deysel and Coetzee with Kanko running the line outs and the loose-tight!!

2014-07-24T09:06:32+00:00

Mr.G

Roar Rookie


Sharks announce team. Alberts at 4, Deysel and Lambie to start. JP at wing. LOTS OF POWER in that pack- Bismarck, Alberts, Deysel, Coetzee. 15. SP Marais 14. JP Pietersen 13. Paul Jordaan 12. Francois Steyn 11. Lwazi Mvovo 10. Pat Lambie 9. Cobus Reinach 8. Ryan Kankowski 7. Jean Deysel 6. Marcell Coetzee 5. Stephan Lewies 4. Willem Alberts 3. Jannie du Plessis 2. Bismarck du Plessis (Captain) 1. Thomas du Toit Replacements 16. Kyle Cooper 17. Dale Chadwick 18. Lourens Adriaanse 19. Etienne Oosthuizen 20. Tera Mtembu 21. Charl McLeod 22. S’bura 23. Tonderai Chavhanga

2014-07-24T04:52:59+00:00

carnivean

Roar Rookie


I agree, but the physicality of the #10 rarely wins or loses matches. :)

2014-07-24T04:42:47+00:00

Jerry

Guest


I reckon the physical presence of Carter is a fair bit different to Slade, but other than that I agree with you.

2014-07-24T04:36:04+00:00

carnivean

Roar Rookie


The difference in the team that lost to the Sharks in the round robin and the team that play the Sharks in the semifinal is entirely in the top 2 or 3 inches. The physical presence of McCaw, Read, Flynn and Carter is not significantly different to that Taufua, Whitelock, Furnell and Slade, but the mental presence is amazingly different. The Sharks didn't deserve to win the first game, in terms of gameplay. The Crusaders were mentally unable to control the match once they had a numerical advantage. That absolutely will not happen with McCaw, Read, Flynn and Carter playing. Those guys know how to control a game and convert advantages into points. Therefore the Sharks will need to improve a number of areas of their play from that match to win. It's not beyond them by any measure, but makes a Crusaders win the more likely outcome.

2014-07-24T02:31:29+00:00

Harry Jones

Guest


If you beat defenders and "create" missed tackles; sure. That's really good rugby. But if it's 20...that's probably also bad tackling. When you watch some Top 14 games, even the tackles made, are weak enough, that offloads are easy to complete. So, I don't like that kind of rugby.

2014-07-24T02:28:28+00:00

Jesus

Guest


Crusaders will win this match easily.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar