Balance of power in the Rugby Championship: Status quo or changing of the guard?

By Harry Jones / Expert

No disrespect to Argentina, but the most compelling subplot of 2014 leading into next year’s World Cup in England is the balance of power between rugby heavyweights New Zealand, South Africa and Australia in the Rugby Championship.

Will the All Blacks stay ahead of their two challengers? Can they add to their weaponry, maintain edges in fitness and stay healthy? Do Richie McCaw and Dan Carter’s young competition (inside and outside their camp) smell weakness?

Can the Springboks continue to improve? Will they accelerate? Will their youth provide enough punch, and can they solve the halfback conundrum?

Is Australia rising? Will they miss David Pocock, Quade Cooper, Will Genia and Stephen Moore more than expected? Can they muscle up enough to avenge the 8-28 and 12-38 drubbings by the Springboks of last year, yet find enough angles of attack to win back the Bledisloe?

Form in last twelve months
The form sheet is fairly clear, with New Zealand on top, followed by South Africa and then Australia.

The All Blacks have won 13 and lost none. Their closest margins of victory were five (against England) and two (in Dublin). Head-to-head against their two main SANZAR rivals, the Kiwis built a 62-point margin in five Tests.

South Africa went 10-2, with the only losses coming against the All Blacks. In truth, while the Ellis Park classic was one of the best displays of rugby this century, the Boks were beaten by the better team.

However, the Boks did not struggle to beat any other team, except for the recent comeback win over Wales. Heyneke Meyer’s team scored a lot of tries, and looked untroubled on the end of year tour.

Using a dynamic big pack with four players getting over the loose ball, straight hard lines by their midfielders, accurate kicking from hand and ruthless finishing, South Africa cemented their number two spot. Australia never looked like prevailing in Brisbane and Cape Town, en route to a 66-20 aggregate scoreline.

Super Rugby form cannot be translated into the prospects for the national side, and this is particularly true of the Boks, with five very independent provincial unions who are currently quite competitive with each other, and a vast overseas contingent. All we can go on is the performance of the actual Springbok team, and they have not lost to anyone except New Zealand in a while.

Australia lost six times in the last twelve months, but the loss to a team ranked lower than them was to England (the scoreline of 20-13 flattering the Poms). In the last six Tests, the Wallabies have won a variety of ways by scoring in bunches, or showing serious defensive chops.

It certainly does not hurt Australia to have several players coming off a brave win over an All Blacks-filled Crusader team, but Link McKenzie will know he has a tougher task than Michael Cheika had.

Missing personnel
As is usual for rugby, some players are missing due to injury, and Australia is missing Henry Speight until his eligibility is resolved.

I suspect Australia will miss its big four injured world-class players (at the critical positions of hooker, openside, scrumhalf and flyhalf) more than New Zealand will miss Victor Vito, Luke Romano, Tony Woodcock and Dan Carter, merely because Steve Hansen has like-for-like replacements groomed.

This is no insult to Carter, who would make many or most World 15 squads. It is a compliment to the forward-thinking policies of New Zealand rugby, whereby Aaron Cruden and Beauden Barrett are ready (and if they are injured, Colin Slade or Tom Taylor are also blooded).

I actually think Woodcock will be missed more, with possible issues at scrum time for the All Blacks against the Boks’ front row, which is now not suffering from the Coenie Oosthuizen experiment.

The Boks might even go with the trio that I think could dominate scrums in 2014 and 2015 – Tendai Mtawarira, Bismarck du Plessis, and Frans Malherbe. They are big, mobile and nicely matched for size. This requires Meyer to relegate Jannie du Plessis to the bench, but this is actually where he belongs, if the Boks are to actually try to outscore the All Blacks five tries to four.

The Boks may have the least problems with injury, except for the worst problem of all – Fourie du Preez is out and Meyer has not groomed a replacement beyond the over-thinking, less-than-confident Ruan Pienaar.

This could prove to be a blessing in disguise. The Boks might benefit from giving Handre Polland or Patrick Lambie more of a green light to play flatter, take it to the line and give the Stormer centre duo of Jean de Villiers and Damian de Allende more seams to attack.

Flip van der Merwe, Pieter-Steph du Toit, Jaque Fourie, and Arno Botha are still hurt, but of those, only Fourie would clearly get the starting jersey against New Zealand.

South Africa is missing J.P. Pietersen and Schalk Burger for the first part of the Championship due to Japanese contracts, but they will play in the latter rounds when the Boks exorcise demons at the Cake Tin, and then the All Blacks revisit Ellis Park.

As far as selection misses, the All Blacks might have picked the wrong open-sider in Sam Cane, over Matt Todd. The rest of the squads look fairly non-controversial, except there are some in South Africa with a fascination with Heinrich Brussow (he is forever fighting niggles, though).

If I was ranking this category, I’d put New Zealand a the top, once again followed by South Africa and Australia.

The draw
Speaking of the draw, Australia starts out with the toughest matches (Bledisloe), then faces the Boks, who will give them nothing easy, and then finish with the beleaguered Argentines. It is not hard to imagine the Wallabies losing four in a row, but if they can win in Sydney and Perth they would have a very good path to the Championship, with bonus points against the Pumas.

On the other hand, South Africa’s path starts out easy (Argentina visit the High Veld, where they lost 73-13 last year), and builds to a crescendo of challenges, in a replay of last season. Travel is a constant obstacle, but nobody seems to like that topic so I’ll ignore it.

The All Blacks have more of an alternating draw – tough, then relief, then tough and then relief.

The All Blacks once again top the rankings in terms of schedule, while Australian are once again at a disadvantage and South Africa sandwiched in between.

Keys
Australia will need a few players to show they can play better against their two most difficult rivals.

Michael Hooper is bringing top form into the tournament. He outplayed McCaw and Todd in the grand final, however he has yet to outplay Francois Louw in a Test. Nor has he been at his best in the Bledisloe Tests that actually mattered.

Wycliff Palu will need to play as well as he did in Sydney against Kieran Read when he faces him in a black jersey, and Duane Vermeulen in green and gold.

Israel Folau will have to show that he has learnt his position in defence and when the ball is kicked diagonally, as well as in attack (where he is very comfortable now), because the Wallabies may still struggle for front-foot ball against these two ruthless packs.

Bernard Foley showed he is not just a placeholder for Quade Cooper. But can he impose his will on the Boks and All Blacks? It is in the second row that the Wallabies still face a dilemma. Will Skelton creates questions, while he answers others.

And at hooker, Australia is in trouble. Nathan Charles, if he is the answer, will face lineout thieves like Victor Matfield, Eben Etzebeth, Sam Whitelock and Brodie Retaillick. And at scrum time, he will have to deal with Bismarck, who Spiro has called the best forward in world rugby.

New Zealand has good problems. Do they go with Israel Dagg, the most complete fullback, or Ben Smith, the best and luckiest outside back in the world, at number 15? Do they go with an 168-cap duo in midfield, or bring in the unstoppable Malakai Fekitoa? Which loose forward trio works best for specific Tests?

The only hole is almost plugged. Dane Coles is looking comfortable at set piece time, finally.

South Africa has the same debate this year as last year. When do we move on past the security blanket of Morne Steyn? I get the feeling that Meyer is more comfortable with Pollard taking the reins than with Lambie, because Pollard has the bigger boot.

Also, Meyer spotted Pollard at an early age, and believes he has leadership intangibles. Johan Goosen has been axed, which says a lot, because Meyer was his advocate at first.

At scrumhalf, Fourie du Preez has won the argument as to whether he is worth it, and he will be Meyer’s starter at the World Cup. This year, Ruan Pienaar has an excellent chance to prove he can play fluidly from the base of the ruck, and use his skillset to attack the opposition, not just kick accurately.

Francois Hougaard and Cobus Reinach are more similar – a bit ragged in their service, speedy, unpredictable (to foes and teammates) and above all, athletes.

Willie le Roux still seems to be growing, and we still do not know how good he can be. Also, Marcell Coetzee added to his game this year, and will push Willem Alberts hard for time on the field. I would like to see Louw, Coetzee and Vermeulen on the deck (with Bismarck, as well), because this could tip the balance in a tight game with the All Blacks.

The classy Stormers pair of Etzebeth and Jean de Villiers return, and have no doubt rested and are raring to go.

Again, the same rankings apply to this section, with the All Blacks pipping the Springboks and the Wallabies.

The margins may have narrowed, and it seems unlikely that New Zealand will go unbeaten in both South Africa and Australia. South Africa still has to show that it has the recipe to cook the All Blacks, and Australia may win one Bledisloe but counter-intuitively may not have solved their mongrel problem enough to beat the Boks.

The Bledisloe is almost here!
Tickets are on sale to what will be a blockbuster at ANZ Stadium (get yours here). After a cracking Super Rugby final, this promises to be epic.

There’s also plenty happening in the lead-up, with the Bledisloe Cup Festival a chance for true rugby supporters to get together.

Want to introduce yourself to a few of the players? The Bledisloe Bay is your best bet on Thursday 14th August from 5pm. Check it out!

The Crowd Says:

2014-08-08T12:30:57+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Folau in Brumbies semi. It may seem a small thing, but I thought it was noteworthy. This was for the third try that nailed the Brumbies to the mast: - Everyone noticed Beale, Skelton to Foley for the five pointer. - That raid was started by Folau as receiver from a Foley cross-field pass. - He put the Tahs on the front foot and over the adline by changing the point of attack inwards - and putting to Hoiles into space - I think Folau made 1 metre for that play.

2014-08-08T12:11:28+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


This will be argued either way, ad infinitum. Generally re Folau. I believe he attacks more like a 13 than a 15: - Produces line breaks, and bust through tackles, a lot of mid channel runs - Doesnt chip-kick. Doesnt Garyowen. Long pass is suspect. Not generally a playmaker who would graduate towards 5/8, which has been an Aussie 'tradition' - I believe he runs in a gallop like a warrior's steed, hard to stop when in full flight. Where as the classic 15 is like a Cheetah that takes off and turns 'on a dime'. Cheetah's WLR is a good example. - Hes v useful at fullback to deter aerial attacks. I believe Folau will be the next Jason Little, Herbert, Stirling Mortlock (with interest) once he gets his full Rugby wings: - But this will only happen with Oz comes up with a classic 15. I dont see one from any of the five franchises, except maybe JOC. So its fullback for Folau for a while it seems.

AUTHOR

2014-08-07T14:48:28+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


I think NZ should have to play the Boks at Eric Louw High School in Musina, Limpopo, on the border of SA and Zimbabwe. We could call it the Malaria Cup.

2014-08-07T14:22:41+00:00

Chivas

Guest


The box kick wasn't wrong though and Folau didn't make a huge play off it. The fact that the Crusaders made a meal of it does not suggest that it wasn't the right option or that Folau was deserving of being singled out for praise. As I said at the time, the reason a box kick is often used there is because those 10 metres can easily be chewed up with a box kick and is more reliable than trying to wrestle it up from that position. A dropped ball or screw up puts you in a very vulnerable position. So a box kick to get some distance up field and take the fight for possession out of your danger zone is a smart and common play. The intent is not necessarily to get it back. If that happens, that is even better. The fact the opposition catches the ball is not unexpected or particularly praiseworthy IMO. As for the AAC tries. It could have been anyone running outside AAC. It was poor marking rather than a fear of Folau. And that is not to take anything from AAC who is outstanding at wrong footing or breaking tackles in those situations.

2014-08-07T12:48:56+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Hi Chivas. I recall that play. - Tahs just conceded a penalty (Hooper over Carter) and restarted - Saders boxed it back as phase 1 play - Fonotia chased the kick, and the rest of the Sader d-line to rush up to pressure the Tahs - It to goes to Folau who Cazaly's it. Fonotia contest was somewhere between weak to terrible - As such, Fonotia also wasn't in any position to tackle Folau after the catch - Folau moves it up, recycles. Saders rushes up offside - They give away a soft 3 pointer. The exact opposite effect of the desired outcome from the box. They should have either rucked it up a few, and looked for better opportunities to clear. Or better still, just kicked it out on the full and pressured the Tahs lineout and ad-line. re Folau and AAC tries. If you have a closer look at the both tries: - Crotty vs AAC was wrong footed because he stepped out to defend outwards, towards Folau's direction - who was already marked. By the time Crotty stepped back in, it was too late. - The 2nd try was all AAC. All the Saders defence were sliding towards the wing. AAC angled back inwards and scored.

2014-08-07T12:29:15+00:00

Harry Jones

Guest


If NZ, OZ, and SA all sweep ARG and only win against each other at home, who is the best bet for bonus points?

2014-08-07T12:27:47+00:00

Harry Jones

Guest


The best cards--IMO--are for repetitive cynicism in the red zone. Hate it when it's for a rough but relatively typical tackle that has an anomalous result.

2014-08-07T12:09:24+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


I hope so Harry. But the June test showed there's a risk

2014-08-07T11:35:38+00:00

Harry Jones

Guest


Australia's best chance in a while to give NZ an all-black eye. Hansen will have his men ready, but they may have no supremacy at scrum. To me, the problem is the locks and loose trios. NZ is a lot better at the "back five."

2014-08-07T11:26:43+00:00

Harry Jones

Guest


I hope that this year, cards are just a footnote

2014-08-07T10:33:27+00:00

Rainbow Nation

Guest


Great article Harry! The Rugby Championship sure looks great this year! Im not sure of what to expect from Argentina with a lot pf players that play locally as opposed to Europe. Sounds like a great move for the future but they could be exposed this year! Then again, some of these unknowns can be quite difficult to play against. Next week we will know whether the Aussies can stop the Kiwi's getting an unbeaten run record. Whilst I dont favour one team over another, I'll be rooting for the Aussies this time! At the time of your article, Vic was still in play, now Its Juan Smith thats been added - looking forward to see what he can still bring!

2014-08-07T04:01:02+00:00

djackedinc

Guest


In 3 weeks you'll go missing.

2014-08-07T01:01:52+00:00

superba

Guest


Victor is out injured .For the first two tests.

2014-08-07T00:53:54+00:00

superba

Guest


I'd like to see that .☺

2014-08-06T23:54:26+00:00

Chivas

Guest


I don't rate him in the same vein as others. If you can't acknowledge his short comings or the points I am making, then that is perfectly ok. I don't understand the over the top love in people have for him. Example. When a box kick was put up. Folau caught it. The commentators come out with shouldn't kick the ball when Folau is around. Warratah supporter posts, silly to kick to Folau. Metres gained after kick by Folau 0. Ball recycled slowly. Apart from the ignorance around the purpose of the box kick, it has got to the point his name is used to create excitement in Australia. So as I have said before. He is a rock when being kicked to and has good hands. He does not have electrifying pace, but with his size he is effective and is a danger if he can get into a one on one... and definitely a weapon if faced with someone like Dagg in defence. But that said, I don't think he is currently the match winner or game changer in tests that Pocock was. It is not because he doesn't score two tries or even one which he never looked like getting in either of his last two games, but for reasons i mentioned. Most metres run really isn't the point. I don't think Dagg set the world alight with his running. He is a playmaker with a large boot, something Folau is not. But I don't rate Dagg above Folau.... although he gives his side a very effective exit strategy. I also don't rate Nadolo above Folau although I would suggest his runs on the weekend bearcat few more and were more important metres made than Folau's runs. However the reason Folau was kept quiet was because the Crusaders and Brumbies actually had a strategy to diffuse him as a threat. Once the threat has been removed, he no longer makes a mark. He hasn't worked out that part of his game. So perhaps instead of demanding everyone trip over themselves in their expressions of love, you might actually allow a different view to be shared... Or not. Now you want to attribute AAC's tries to Folau. Well how dies anyone argue with that. As I say some see what they want to see. I think AAC is a damaging fearless runner who has busted holes through opposition defences before and did so again on the weekend. That was how he went over, not because everyone was thinking about Izzy.

2014-08-06T23:25:57+00:00

Rusty

Roar Guru


ABs lost there if I recall ...

2014-08-06T23:08:50+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


Like Rhodesia? ;)

2014-08-06T23:03:53+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Thanks for the article. RC season is upon us! The Boks played smart Rugby last year and looked promising in June. The ABs pack looked a bit tired at first but their 23 man game prevailed. WBs showed grit and composure. - The AB v Boks should be a knife fight, with both teams trying to find moments of weakness. ABs will want to see their younger players lift their game. Boks 9/10 will need to play at a new level - The AB v WB should be a sequel of Dunedin. An improving WB and relentless AB. For the WBs, the pack and tough backline in contact is key. ABs will probably expect more phases in defence, and ruck work - which they will be ready for. - The Boks v WBs also interesting. Boks will try to play more like Antipodeans. WBs will try to play with power, more like the Boks - The refs are stricter around ruck against defence teams. We will see how they deal re yellow cards.

2014-08-06T22:40:59+00:00

Harry Jones

Guest


I hope he is making biltong

2014-08-06T20:34:18+00:00

AlBo

Guest


I wonder what people expect of Izzy when he plays? He made the most meters of anyone in the final @ 129 (50 more than Dagg, 20 more than Nadolo) and the most offloads (5). He also made all his tackles. I'm almost positive that both of AAC's tries (at least one) were off the back of defenders holding off for Izzy lurking behind. How does that equate to not looking much? It's as if he has to score two tries in a match before people acknowledge his contribution. I've never seen a player in my life who's talents are so quickly brushed off by opposition supporters.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar