What to make of the Wallabies backline?

By Prince Symbol / Roar Pro

I literally spat out my snack when I read the Wallabies team that was announced yesterday.

This was at first because I finally read a Wallaby team-sheet with Adam Ashley-Cooper’s name rightly next to the number 13. Finally some sanity! His selection is an important part of the only way we can beat them. We have to attack with ball in hand.

But then, after another quick glance, I noticed Bernard Foley’s name was out of place.

Hang on a minute, could McKenzie have done the unthinkable and dropped the man of the moment, the brilliant ball-in-hand general that has led the Waratahs to success in 2014, the incumbent Wallabies No. 10 to the bench?

Too right he did. Surely this is a misprint I thought.

No, no. Kurtley Beale, the Waratahs’ No. 12 had been named at fly-half and what a surprise that was. I still can’t believe it.

Having argued for some time that Beale should be the Wallaby No. 12 ahead of Matt Toomua, I immediately didn’t know how to take this selection.

Ideally the Phipps, Foley, Beale, Ashley-Cooper, Folau and Horne combination is what I truly think is the best option for the Wallabies right now, with of course Pat McCabe, but I didn’t think the Waratahs halves would be completely ignored.

I certainly didn’t think Beale would be selected at No. 10. He hasn’t played with a No. 10 on his back for quite a while after all, whereas Toomua has played there all season. So why hasn’t McKenzie simply picked Toomua at fly-half and Beale at inside centre?

I think it is partly because Foley had a relatively quiet series against France, partly because Beale was in superb form against the French, and partly because McKenzie won’t budge on Toomua as a defensive No. 12.

He won’t budge because he likes Toomua’s defence and although that is understandable, I can’t help but think that a Foley-Beale combination is still the superior option. After-all, with McCabe and Horne on the wings either could easily defend at 12 and both are stronger defenders than Toomua.

It seems McKenzie has opted for simplicity. There will be no shuffling of positional play while he is the coach it seems.

The problem, as I see it, is a lot of Beale’s superlative play has come from the fact that he has been defending as a second fullback for the Waratahs. This season Folau has relied heavily on Beale to link with him at the back when nothing has been on, mainly because Beale has better traditional fullback traits, i.e. a better kicking game and a better link game.

Folau of course is the superior leaper and off-loader in traffic. I think between them they are the perfect full-back. But if Beale is to stay in the front line, his talents won’t be fully utilised and Folau may be exposed for the outside centre that he really is.

Folau being an outside centre playing at fullback is not a criticism. It is a good thing because Ashley-Cooper plays a role on the left side in phase-ball attack while Folau hovers on his preferred right side. Both play their best rugby at outside centre in attack, left and right respectively, and between them I think they give us the perfect outside centre.

So really, all three need to be on the field for us to have an advantage. The only missing cog is Bernard Foley. Between his flat attack and calmness under pressure, combined with Beale’s creativity from a bit deeper, they are the perfect no 10. Well, not quite, but as close as we’ve seen for a while.

But Foley isn’t there, so hopefully McKenzie will allow part of the Waratah structure to filter through. For this to work Toomua needs to attack and defend at No. 10.

This will allow either Horne or McCabe to defend at 12 in order to allow Beale to partner up with Folau at the back in defence. Also, it will allow Beale to be the second receiver in structured and phase play attack where he has always played his best rugby.

I must say it could work and I hope that McKenzie is planning to do it.

The other thing that needs to happen is for the All Blacks to get off to a flyer. This will be a blessing in disguise because the conservative nature of McKenzie’s game plan will have to be put to bed. The quicker the All Black’s get ascendancy the quicker McKenzie will be forced to sub on Phipps for White and Foley for Toomua.

This article is about the back-line but I might add that we also need Skelton on for Simmons and McCalman or Higginbotham on for Fardy as quick as possible. For me this is the key because these guys are our only realistic chance of us getting on top of them up front.

If we can get these four or five benchies on the field for the majority of the second half we could actually play enough rugby to win. Hopefully this will result in McKenzie picking a team that better reflects the way things have gone in 2014 for Bledisloe 2.

For me the surprising thing was that he seems to have already started to change his tune by picking Ashley-Cooper at 13 and Horne and McCabe on the wings (at least until Speight is fit), as well as Beale in the starting line-up.

He just wasn’t completely bold enough. He needs to send White and Toomua packing for Phipps and Foley. I’ll add Skelton and McCalman or Higginbotham for Simmons and Fardy to that list also thank you very much. Baby steps though it seems.

The Crowd Says:

2014-08-14T06:31:50+00:00

Peter Breckenridge

Roar Guru


TBH your article appears Tahs focused. while that is a good thing, as when the Brumbies won their 2 (notice 2 :-) ) SR trophies, the Wallabies were laden with Brumbies. But you seem to miss the fact that large backs use KB as a doormat. Basteraud did it, Nadolo did it, this puts the whole team under pressure. I don't know what games you watched, but Toomua is a great defender in the mid field. remember his dominance over Beale/Foley in Canberra earlier this year? Clearly not. he has to be either 10 or 12. my guess is that he will probably actually take a lot of the 10 responsibilities of KB to free KB up. McCabe should have been a starter all year for the Brums, I just wonder if it is about managing his injuries? I think the back 3 is interesting, it seems to indicate an intent to run. none of the back 3 are known kickers, by that I mean return kickers. I think this team is going to run it. For that you need a tough player like Toomua to complement KB. look at the great Wallabies side they have all had that. Tim Horan outside Michael Lynagh and Steven Larkham. that worked just as Toomua outside KB will work.

2014-08-14T05:39:00+00:00

Jags

Guest


@rob from brumbie country I remember when a crusaders side won the super 12 unbeaten and then pretty much all of the back line became all blacks. They got beaten by the wallabies. They changed it the next game then it became one win each.

2014-08-13T17:59:38+00:00

Matthew Skellett

Guest


Yeah I have that feeling too Xeno I think the Wallabies will pull off such a victory that everyone on planet rugby will want to shake EM's hand vigorously

2014-08-13T15:14:04+00:00

WallaTah

Guest


Hi Xenomorph. I just wanted to say two things.... 1. I agree with you on Beale. Being a Tah supporter, and watching most of their games this year, he and Foley interchanged their roles often and the numbers that they wear (esp Beale) do not define them on the field. 2. You seem quite clued in, so really I hope your last sentence comes true!

2014-08-13T10:22:57+00:00

Xenomorph

Guest


Beale is awesome. He will light this RC on fire.

2014-08-13T10:12:18+00:00

Xenomorph

Guest


Dont worry about it Fan. Beale is not a 12 and Toomua plays 12 very well. I swear you guys are going to get a shock. Australia will win this test.

2014-08-13T10:10:03+00:00

Xenomorph

Guest


It is. The guy behind the Rocky Horror Picture Show is a Kiwi.

2014-08-13T10:05:55+00:00

Xenomorph

Guest


I think if Ewen is banking on Cooper coming back and that is the reason he selected "the next best thing" then hes a very poor coach. But I think he picked Beale for a reason that had nothing to do with Quade, winning this test.

2014-08-13T09:38:56+00:00

PiratesRugby

Guest


That's funny. Nice one.

2014-08-13T09:24:30+00:00

bigbaz

Roar Guru


So he doesn't even get a full season before you reckon he's in decline.you are either a very hard marker or a very silly one. I will back link .i think you just jumped the shark.

2014-08-13T09:07:27+00:00

PiratesRugby

Guest


Foley is a second rate fly half who is playing the best football of his career. Good on him but he's still second rate. He was a filler until QC got fit again. Beale has some tremendous skills but he's hardly a leader. He's failed at flyhalf before. Putting him at 10 is the point where people will say Link jumped the shark. When a coach uses the term "x-factor" you know something is amiss. I reckon Link jumped the shark after the Test against France in Melbourne.

2014-08-13T09:02:55+00:00

Jimbo

Guest


Cynical maybe, but if so, McKenzie has come up with a brilliant strategy to get the best out of Beale - i.e. put you money where your mouth is Kurtley! If Beale delivers, he earns his place. If he fails, adios! Either way he solves the problem.

2014-08-13T08:22:38+00:00

Crazy Horse

Guest


With Beale running sideways at 10 it's just as well that AAC is at 13 because the wings won't have enough room to do anything.

2014-08-13T06:13:44+00:00

Thanks,warra-ta

Guest


This may be cynical, but KB in the run on team might stop him looking at his 'other options'. He's not been happy coming off the bench.

2014-08-13T05:18:40+00:00

MrT

Guest


Isn't it always the way...? Forwards win games, backs determine by how much...

2014-08-13T05:03:53+00:00

Rob na Champassak

Roar Guru


'Does anyone know how Dan Palmer has been travelling in Europe?' He has retired from professional rugby. I believe he will act as an assistant coach at the Canberra Vikings in the NRC this season. Edit: Whoops, this has already been responded to below :)

2014-08-13T04:59:54+00:00

Pravin

Guest


I think 9. Phipps (60 mins) White (20 mins) 10. Foley 11. McCabe or Horne 12. Beale 13. Ashley-Cooper 14. Toomua (defense oriented) 15. Folau

2014-08-13T04:58:39+00:00

bigbaz

Roar Guru


And here was me thinking that was a NZ play/song.

2014-08-13T04:58:07+00:00

jameswm

Roar Guru


If Beale's defence is so sus, how come the Tahs were the best defensive team in the comp this year? 12 is a lot more exposed defensively than 10, too. Did the Crusaders and other teams forget to run at Beale? Was it not part of the game plan? I remember someone telling everyone on here before a Tahs game that his 12 (maybe it was McCabe, can't remember) would run over Beale all night. In the end, Beale didn't have to tackle him once. As I said yesterday, picking your 5/8 based on his defence is like picking your prop based on his passing.

2014-08-13T04:52:17+00:00

jameswm

Roar Guru


Are you suggesting Kepu isn't our best TH prop?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar