Crows fans must stop living in 2012

By Luke / Roar Rookie

Adelaide Crows supporters have a problem. They continue to think that it is 2012.

They have to learn to stop judging today’s teams success by that of a very different group of 22 players. This goes for the media also. I am constantly reading articles, listening to talk-back and viewing it on the television the statement that the Crows are under-performing.

The Crows are performing to a tee to where they are at.

If you take a quick glance at the 2012 team that came oh so close to a spot in the grand final, and compare it to today’s side, the differences are massive. In fact 10 players different.

2012 Crows
B Luke Thompson, Ben Rutten, Michael Doughty
HB Brodie Smith, Andy Otten, Brent Reilly
C Richard Douglas, Scott Thompson, Bernie Vince
HF Rory Sloane, Taylor Walker, Matthew Wright
F Ian Callinan, Kurt Tippett, Jason Porplyzia
FOL Sam Jacobs, Patrick Dangerfield, Nathan van Berlo
I/C Jared Petrenko, David Mackay, Ricky Henderson
SUB Graham Johncock

The 2012 Crows team was filled with players who were mature and had played a large amount of football together. Rutten (225 games), Doughty (231 games) and Reilly (200 games) controlled the backline. Reilly had the best year of his playing career, being selected in the top 40 AA players, Rutten was still quick and fit, and Doughty commanded the Half Back.

The forward line consisted of Callinan (32 games, JJ Liston Trophy winner, four SANFL grand finals and Jack Oatey Medal) was arguably up there with the best small forwards of the competition. Graham Johncock (227 games) roamed the forward and back half, a healthy Jason Porplysia (126 games), and the young and dangerous Kurt Tippett and Taylor Walker floating through the forward line.

The only true similarities can be found in the midfield, Scott Thompson, Patrick Dangerfield, Rory Sloane, Sam Jacobs and Richard Douglas.

These are the guys that we are now building a team around.

In the place of mature footballers who had played a large amount of time together and understood each other’s game, we have amateurs, meant only in reference to their game time.

Our regular back line can now consist of Luke Brown (44 games), Rory Laird (33 games), Daniel Talia (74 games), Brodie Smith (74 games), Matthew Jaensch (64 games) and Luke Thompson (19 games).

The forward line is still a work in progress with maturity in Betts (204 games) James Podsiadly (102 games) Taylor Walker (82 games), but at the same time have not played more than 20 games together. Josh Jenkins (46 games) is still learning the game, Charlie Cameron (6 games) is still young and raw.

Jarrod Lyons, Matt Crouch, Tom Lynch, Mitch Grigg, Brodie Martin, Kyle Hartigan and Sam Kerridge are also regular players in the team. Tom Lynch has the highest game total of these players at 37.

All show promise but they need time to develop and should not yet be judged of such minimal playing time.

This is a team in complete rebuild mode that is still finding its feet among the other clubs. Patience is needed as this group of players develop together and learn each other’s playing style/abilities and understanding of the game plan.

The belief that this team should be playing in a grand final or going deep into September is ridiculous. I think that the fact they have beaten teams above them and better than them on five occasions and lost six games by under two goals is a great sign of improvement and success.

Take a page out of the Port Power’s book and allow for these young players to develop and create their own culture together.

Yes, it is more than possible that they won’t make the finals this year, but wait, take a breath, forget 2012 and assess the team properly before you make a judgment.

The Crowd Says:

2014-08-27T12:35:17+00:00

vocans

Guest


I want to see a Showdown GF.

2014-08-27T12:31:00+00:00

vocans

Guest


Nope, Barney, I've followed what's going on as best I can. I noticed Osborne was improving and Jacobs needs backing up; as does the team if he is injured. I've been hoping that Siggins would step up but felt it was unrealistic to expect him to be ready in 2015. Atkins figures amongst the best players and we do need that speed and spread. There are a few there that I don't expect us to know much vis a vis AFL until after 2015. Nevertheless, it's good news what you say. Hartigan and Shaw should have been ready before them, so I was looking to them, but injuries! injuries! Kelly has fine raps and is not alone. 2017-18 will be interesting. I'm most confident about the Crows mids stock. It's almost like we've got what we need for years to come. I'm hoping the SANFL side will fast track some of them in ways that couldn't be done before. It counts for something to play with the likes of Rutten and Callinan and Reilly and co. especially when they are being introduced to the Crows game and professionalism. I was surprised they haven't won more games, but I think the focus is on development, and they're very young even by SANFL standards. Port are doing well.

2014-08-27T09:30:42+00:00

Barneythecrab

Guest


Vocans- have you had a chance to see any of the sanfl team this year? Jack Osborne is starting to look really good up forward. He is about 207cm and awesome overhead. His goal kicking is starting to straighten up too. I feel like they should really start playing him. I think Siggins is beginning to really develop as a key backman in the form of Rutten. And Atkins is starting to show the form he always promised to have. Heaps of outside speed and tough. What do you think?

2014-08-27T09:19:19+00:00

Barneythecrab

Guest


So Fremantle continued to take the crows lightly even tho they had been beaten twice by them already? So no one took them seriously after they defeated Geelong? What planet are you on? The crows fall down the ladder was due to the exodus, aging and retirement of players. The team is very very different and has a team full of players who have played under 50 games.

2014-08-25T23:32:09+00:00

vocans

Guest


Some good comments here so far. Definitely it's a young team and experience not only fosters skills but also mindset. And there's no other way to get it than by experience. Maybe Talia is an exception because he's had the mindset from about game 5 of his career. It's also been a team hit by significant injuries throughout the year, some of them freakish. Not only are they young they are also missing a couple of big mobile players - and I'm not sure that an injury-prone Shaw, and Hartigan (who's promising but it's too early) are it. Otten will go the way of Truck in terms of pace, and pace is increasingly essential in today's game, especially as present and coming big forwards are also mobile ones. Do the Crows go for Frawley? There is a need for a ready made back in 2015. Tex's lack of pace is also an issue unless the ball is delivered on top of his head or absolutely lace out. His kick and footy smarts are his major weapons. Who will replace Jpod? Jenkins is still learning and he needs to learn what his big body can do that very few others can, and exploit it. He is too often content to see the ball over the line when, as a forward, he should be trying to create, and that body will let him create. He wrestles too often rather than going for the mark, and is too content to 'provide the contest etc'. I think he will get there but he needs to (be allowed?) to take the game on more often. Early in the season contested ball was the issue. That was largely addressed. Late, it is spread and countering spread. The lack of spread means kicking to contests or through congestion which requires absolute accuracy, and the Crows have too often lacked accuracy. Spread means more kicking to space and to players who are clear enough for enough lee way in accuracy. Without proper spread, handball is congested and increasingly under pressure merely to release the ball. The Crows overdid handball as a result. Congestion means forward entries are rushed, take time to build, are easily read, and are therefore often to congested contests. All of this has been a feature of the Crows' lesser and worst footy this year. After a stellar season Smith went off the boil. Henderson is still getting his feet back. CHB was unstable due to injury. as were the backs in general. Consequently, rebound 50s fell way in numbers and, particularly important, in quality. This is a crucial stat in the modern game, because many damaging attacks start there with good half back service in metres gained and accurate passes and buildups. Maybe Sando needs to realise that Adelaide is not Geelong? He has a mix of very clever players (Smith, Henderson, Laird, Betts, and others) who will need to contribute their own style to Adelaide's game. I don't think Sando has had the player options this year to make striking tactical decisions during games. This showed with Ziebell for whom there was no real match up, except perhaps Danger. Injuries affected individual players' momentum as they were in and out of the team (eg Kerridge and Henderson were real losses especially after Van Berlo was out); and this affected overall team momentum. It wasn't only the injuries themselves but their mix and timing. I'm not one who spouts the old saw that 'injuries are no excuse', because they are often very significant, and lists cannot cover all eventualities - just ask Collingwood who are the current and prime example. Injuries have bedevilled the Crows 2 years running - young players need stable teams in which to grow quickly; it takes longer in less stable teams. 2015 will tell us a lot about Sando providing the injuries are at reasonable levels and are not to too many crucial players.

2014-08-25T22:44:01+00:00

andyl12

Guest


Read my post- I think some of those sides underestimated Adelaide- Adelaide wouldn't have won all those games had they been taken seriously. The Crows' fall down the ladder since 2012 is what people like me said would happen back then.

2014-08-25T13:03:40+00:00

Theo Pratt

Roar Rookie


Inconsistency is the word that springs to mind immediately. And I'm not sure that is all down to young players either - Dangerfield probably has the biggest gap between his best and worst football of any player in the team. As a Port supporter I hope we get a Showdown final if we don't get top 4, but I'm also wary of what the Crows are capable of on their day.

2014-08-25T08:26:50+00:00

Luke

Guest


Yeah i love the look of Grigg, M.Crouch, Lyons, Ellis Yolmen and Atkins. Port is def a good yard ahead of us with their development, great development of young players BTW at that club, but the future looks good and def some awesome showdown finals to come.

2014-08-25T08:23:28+00:00

Luke

Guest


Definitely agree Radelaide. The loss of Bailey is massive. I think that Sando is great at bringing the players together and lifting spirits etc but he has not developed a great tactical set yet and would really improve if he had someone like John Worsfald, Choco, or even a Terry Wallace backing him up and giving a few whispers to the ear.

2014-08-25T08:16:32+00:00

Luke

Guest


Your very correct Winston. I think that they have replaced Rutten with Talia, and theres Tex but he is a very different player to Tippet and doesnt cover that loss. Tex is more of a half forward that roams the wing and forward half. Pods is too old to replace Tippet and Jenkins still really learning the ropes and in my opinion not hard enough at the ball.

2014-08-25T08:13:00+00:00

Barneythecrab

Guest


Gotta remember mate that they beat Geelong, Sydney, West Coast and Fremantle twice that year so they still beat top teams other than Hawthorn, Collingwood and North so whats your point? They had an easy draw yes, but they still beat the top teams and the eventual premiers plus fremantle, who supposedly only lost because they were tired.

2014-08-25T08:10:37+00:00

Jack Smith

Roar Guru


Crows have a lot of promise coming. Enticing Crows v Power finals I can see from 2015 onwards.

2014-08-25T07:13:39+00:00

Radelaide

Guest


I believe they had a good mix young and older players, great draw, no injuries, Tippett and Dean Bailey was the true brains in the box (look at Sando the last couple of years just trotts out the same lines. If it's a win they played the Crows way, if it's a loss they didn't and he doesn't know why just that they need to be better). 2012 was the perfect storm of many things going their way and now the coach is all lost and so are the players.

2014-08-25T05:21:30+00:00

Winston

Guest


The difference is in Tex, Tippett and Rutten. You can't lose (as in either lose the player or have them play at a substantially lower level) your 3 strengths and expect to still be at the same level. Unless the next crop can emulate the level those 3 achieved, they won't be going up the ladder any time fast.

2014-08-25T01:23:19+00:00

Dalgety Carrington

Guest


They also won the lottery in their semi, playing a Dockers side that was travelling for the second week in a row. Despite that advantage they were behind for most of the game and only got up late in the game after the Dockers stopped to a standstill (especially Sandilands who was in about his third game back from a long term injury).

2014-08-25T00:24:58+00:00

andyl12

Guest


Adelaide overachieved in 2012, they had a very soft draw that year and won other games because their fellow top sides took them too lightly. Had my Hawks lost the prelim to them that year it would've been an embarrassment for both us and the AFL, especially given the Tippett scandal that surfaced soon after. Adelaide are still a decent side but they can't get higher on the ladder because they don't win consistently.

Read more at The Roar