Why has the FFA blocked live FFA Cup streams?

By Michael Georgiou / Roar Guru

With the first round of the FFA Cup done and dusted, the attention has quickly turned to the Round of 16 fixtures that will begin on Tuesday the 16th of September.

There is no doubt that the FFA Cup has been a breakthrough in Australian Football as it aims to boost interaction between community football teams and the A-League sides.

Matches across the round of 32 proved to be thrilling as many fans flocked to support their local team as they aimed to try and make an elusive cup run.

With the unexpected departure of the Western Sydney Wanderers at the hands of Adelaide City, an added hope has been installed on smaller clubs as they aim to forge their way into the quarter-finals of the inaugural competition and one step closer towards the inaugural title.

Much has been documented about the success of the FFA Cup and it is inevitable that the Cup will continue to be successful.

Being an avid Sydney FC Supporter, I keenly tuned into the live stream that was provided by Sydney FC and Melbourne City a few weeks ago. While the stream did prove troublesome at times with the connection struggling, on the whole, the stream provided a diehard fan with the opportunity to watch my team battle it out in a high quality match in Ballarat.

It was nine days before the match was set to kickoff when a member of the Cove (Sydney FC’s Fanatical Fan Base) posted on social media asking if there would be a live stream to the match. I must say I expected no response but I was happily proven wrong.

While the club acknowledged the idea and the benefit this would be for fans, they were unsure as to the ability to set up a stream and whether this would be possible.

Despite this a stream was made available and provided thousands of fans around the world the opportunity to see Sydney FC win a tight encounter.

So thank you Melbourne City and Sydney FC! But now the question must be asked…

Why has the FFA banned clubs from providing live streams to their FFA Cup matches even if they are not being broadcasted by Fox Sports?

Fox Sports has recently announced its schedule for the Round of 16 matches and they will be broadcasting the following matches live.

Tuggeranong United (ACT) versus Melbourne Victory, Vikings Park, Wanniassa, ACT – 7:30pm (AEST)

Sydney United 58 FC versus Sydney FC, TBC (likely Sydney United Sports Centre) Edensor Park – 7:30pm (AEST)

For fans of Adelaide City who eliminated the Western Sydney Wanderers as well as the Brisbane Strikers, Sydney Olympic, Bentleigh Greens, Olympic FC, Central Coast Mariners, Palm Beach Sharks, South Springvale, Adelaide United, Brisbane Roar, St. Albans Saints and Perth Glory – the chance to watch their teams compete will be limited to attending the matches at the ground.

While this, to a degree will encourage people to make the trip to watch their team play, for many fans it will leave them unable to watch and enjoy what is set to be an exciting round of football.

So I ask again, why has the FFA banned clubs with providing live streams to its fans?

It must be noted that Fox Sports does have the right to the FFA Cup and during the matches that they will be broadcasting live, they will be crossing when goals are scored but if I was a fan this would not be enough to satisfy my over the top and slightly excessive needs.

As a fan, I relish watching my team walk out onto the field and for the full duration of the match – I would want to watch every free kick and corner that my team was guilty of conceding.

So still the question stands. Why has the FFA blocked clubs from providing streams to fans?

It seems unfair that the FFA has blocked the ability of clubs to decide whether they will provide their own streams to fans. For a competition in its first year, surely live streams should be made available by those clubs who will not be shown live on Fox Sports.

What do you think Roarers? Should clubs be allowed to provide live streams to their fans or is this a case of the FFA trying to encourage crowds to flock to suburban grounds?

The Crowd Says:

2014-08-29T00:06:04+00:00

Mahler

Guest


Quite obviously you are prepared to settle for second-best. I thought we should be aiming higher but while there are fans out there who will cop any sort of coverage, like the starving thrown a bone, then those in power will continue to treat them with disdain.

2014-08-28T23:43:13+00:00

AZ_RBB

Guest


Wish every game was available live but as Mr Jagger once told me "you can't always get what you want" I'm glad that 2 games will be shown on TV. Great choices too.

2014-08-28T23:42:23+00:00

nordster

Guest


If there was a paywall on dem streams then maybe the clubs may get away with it....fox dont want folks getting used to watching stuff online for free....any more than they already are hahaha. Fair enough on one level, wizzing in the wind looking forward though. Poses a dilemma with the increasing drift of tv viewing online...and what that means for the ability of fox etc to keep propping up sporting leagues too dependent on this revenue stream. A bit of a window to the future me thinks....good luck! Have a look at print media for a preview...

2014-08-28T23:34:24+00:00

Fussball ist unser leben

Roar Guru


"has negated much of the excitement and interest" Would it be fair to say, your excitement & interest level for the FFA Cup is higher today than it was 12 months ago? If 'yes' - fantastic. We're trending upwards. If 'no' - well, you may as well turn off. You're never going to be satisfied. It would be interesting to know how many Ro32 matches in the FA Cup - the world's oldest knock-out competition - are broadcast live across the UK. I'd be surprised if it's all 16 matches.

2014-08-28T23:22:57+00:00

Mahler

Guest


The entire TV coverage of the FFA Cup has been an absolute shambles. I doubt much thinking went into it. The lack of coverage, especially on Fox, has negated much of the excitement and interest (for me, anyway). Hopefully, we will see extended coverage next year.

2014-08-28T22:15:41+00:00

Steve

Guest


Answer right here, close comments. I'm sorry to say but it's a silly article looking to put the FFA to blame, seemingly without any research.

2014-08-28T21:51:34+00:00

Mike

Roar Guru


Agree with you there. While it'd be great to have all the matches live streamed, we have to respect and appreciate FoxSports' involvement. They could've easily said no to broadcasting any matches this season. But they've taken a chance on the inaugural comp, and it has really helped the FFA Cup a lot. I'll happily take 10 high quality broadcasted matches over 32 low quality online streamed matches.

2014-08-28T21:30:52+00:00

Fussball ist unser leben

Roar Guru


"So I ask again, why has the FFA banned clubs with providing live streams to its fans?' Because FoxSports bought all broadcast rights to all the FFA Cup matches. In the past 3 weeks, FoxSports agreed to allow online streaming. For the remainder of the tournament, FoxSports has decided to exercise their sole broadcasting rights. FoxSports TV money is subsidising all the costs for all travelling teams so, it's highly likely, without FoxSports sponsorship there would be no FFA Cup.

Read more at The Roar