McKenzie’s selections descend into madness

By Alex Wood / Roar Guru

Reading the headlines, I thought that Ewen McKenzie’s selections for the Springboks in Perth may have started to enter the realm of the sane, but on closer inspection I fear the Wallabies may be headed back to the asylum.

First, the positives. Finally, we have the correct halves. Nic White has been solid but recently the other Nick (Phipps) finds more opportunities to add value to the team. Particularly when in tandem with Bernard Foley, who I would argue is the one of the best two in the world at flyhalf outside of New Zealand.

We can only hope that it is the end of attempts to shoehorn an x-factor into the number 10 jersey because it simply doesn’t work. Matt Burke wrote an article for the Sydney Morning Herald recently which included a list of great flyhalves – Michael Lynagh, Stephen Larkham and Johnny Wilkinson.

These players were characterised by soft hands, rock solid fundamentals and nerves of steel. None will be remembered for bringing an x-factor. They have also each raised the William Webb-Ellis trophy as the choice flyhalf for their nation, as did Butch James and Joel Stransky, who were of a similar ilk.

Aaron Cruden is the exception world champion number 10 and he would not have made the list but for a one-point victory over France and an injury to another great, Daniel Carter, who again is just not an x-factor guy. These players rely on taking risks and while risks may win games, no team can carry that burden in that position for the length of a knockout style tournament.

Foley is the right choice. And if all of the above is not enough to end the Kurtley Beale or Adam Ashley-Cooper for number 10 campaign (even James O’Connor’s name has been mentioned) perhaps it’s the name that’s absent from the list which says the most.

King Carlos (Spencer) was nothing less than one of the best to ever play the game. That is, for the short periods he maintained form for more than a game at a time. And for a brief period he did, hitting his peak in the 2003 Rugby World Cup where many of us remember his between the legs, no look pass to Joe Rocokoko in the quarter-final between the Springboks and All Blacks.

The more astute will also recall the All-Blacks’ exit from the tournament the following round, to the Wallabies under Larkham.

Neither Cooper nor Beale possess the kind of x-factor that Spencer brought to the table, much less the sound fundamentals that underpinned his game.

Of course nine and 10 are not the only positions on the field. You will never beat the All Blacks if the wrong players are in those jerseys, but this is about selections and we must look at the rest.

Matt Toomua was lacklustre in the first two Tests but it makes sense to give him another chance with different halves, except that Ashley-Cooper, who has been solid, was not afforded the same luxury. He has been pushed to the wing where he is never as effective as in the centres. And in giving Toomua this chance Beale’s x-factor is gone altogether.

How can one value Beale’s x-factor so much as to gamble the Rugby Championship by playing him badly out of position, only to drop him the following week? It simply does not make sense, why force good players out of position only to punish them when they do not perform there?

The selection in the forwards (inclusion of James Hanson through injury notwithstanding) is unfortunately conservative. Make no mistake, McKenzie is not spoiled for choice when you compare Australia to New Zealand or South Africa, but perhaps a new anchor in the front row is called for. Neither Scott Fardy nor Wycliff Palu have made a case for their inclusion thus far.

Dropping Will Skelton from the bench to no-man’s land is beyond comprehension and, against the Springboks pack, a crucial and criminal mistake.

So once again, the Australian rugby faithful must feel the pain of watching a side take the field that is not what it could be. The workings of McKenzie’s mind will remain a mystery, but perhaps the same bull-headedness that made him a world class scrummager is responsible for his perplexing selections.

McKenzie’s selections have an air of ‘something to prove’ about them, as if it’s more important to prove that he better understands his team than the media rather than simply making the obvious choices.

Regardless of Saturday’s outcome, there is something awry at camp Wallaby which must be addressed if we are to be at our best for the rest of 2014 and beyond.

The Crowd Says:

2014-09-06T20:29:32+00:00

bigtree.smallaxe

Guest


These are the best comments I've seen this month. Great analysis. When are we going to see some Australian locks of the standard of Whitelock and Retallick. For such a big tall thug-looking type of a man Retallick was powerful in his runs, skillful in his offloads and yet incredibly graceful in the lineout and kick offs.

AUTHOR

2014-09-06T05:27:43+00:00

Alex Wood

Roar Guru


Thanks Brendan, appreciate your contribution to the chat on this article. I have enjoyed your recent write-ups also so keep up the good work! I must say, I'm not a fan of Jake White's style of rugby; however, at this point I'm more curious than anything to see what the Wallabies would be capable of doing if they put the right squad on the field, with the strongest players in their strongest positions. I can't help but think if that was the case, instead of where we are today we might be in a position where (whether they beat the All Blacks or not) we would be assessing whether the Wallabies could take out the Rugby Championship rather than discussing selections. Regardless of selections, I don't think the Wallabies have shown anything like their full potential as yet and remain optimistic that we may see some great rugby in the coming games. Thanks again, go the Wallabies and we'll see whether we are justified in our comments this evening!

2014-09-06T03:32:41+00:00

Ronaldo

Guest


This article just about nails it. The comments on the selections in the forwards is spot on. The remarks about the back line are also on the money. Finally the opinions as to Link's psyche & his won't to constantly prove he is right when he is patently wrong will be the undoing of this Wallaby outfit. He needs to be sacked now before it;s too late.

AUTHOR

2014-09-06T01:05:41+00:00

Alex Wood

Roar Guru


Thanks Uncle Argyle, great comment and you make some very good points. Larkham was a freak, no doubt about it. What it comes down to what people define as x-factor (and yes, THAT drop goal certainly qualifies). What I was getting at here is Larkham's game, while brilliant, was generally very straightforward. He relied on laser-accurate, expansive passing and as people so accurately describe it "ghosting" through gaps to make his mark. Both of these things made him a dangerous attacking player and he certainly had the fundamentals to back it up (though his tactical kicking was not always fantastic). The difference I see between him and players who are "x-factor" guys, is that he didn't rely on footwork from positions where the kick/pass options would have been better and wasn't known for fancy no look passes or double-touches in complex backline play. His play relied on being an exceptional reader of the game, in the same way McCaw has an eye for the breakdown, Larkham had an eye for the opposition backline and knew how to make the best of it. Appreciate your input, looking forward to the game!

2014-09-06T01:03:14+00:00

AlsBoyce

Roar Guru


Yes, it is really unfortunate that McKenzie doesn't recognise Foley's ability. They do on the other side of the ditch. McKenzie was a prop, but he does have a backline coach.

2014-09-06T00:56:29+00:00

AlsBoyce

Roar Guru


Cooper (and Genia) looked really good when they had Digby Ione (in top form in 2011, mostly) to pass to. Larkham could hit Joe Roff to perfection, and Roff did the business. Foley could hit AAC or Folau for the Waratahs, with the wrap-arounds and Beale subterfuge giving more options. Receivers knowing what to expect, being ready for it, and knowing how to run into gaps are absolutely necessary for ball-players to look good.

2014-09-06T00:45:41+00:00

AlsBoyce

Roar Guru


We would have got Jake-ball of course.

2014-09-05T23:12:46+00:00

Train Without A Station

Guest


Read the forums champ. There's 20 pages of comments on every NRC game from others who have either attended, or watched the TV games/internet streams.

2014-09-05T15:05:35+00:00

Rob G

Guest


x-factor is often used as an excuse for people making mistakes and being inconsistent. Quade cooper almost single handedly lost us RWC quarter final against springboks but its ok, it was just him and his x-factor trying things. He then went a long way to helping us lose the semi....x-factor. The amount of times I've heard people justify it saying they prefer a 10 who tries things...even if they don't come off. Larkham had a better pass and created more gaps/opportunities than quade but its not x-factor because he was consistent.

2014-09-05T14:52:31+00:00

Common Sense

Roar Rookie


That's where you put your 'non tacklers', out of the front line.

2014-09-05T14:38:48+00:00

kibui b

Guest


Carter, Cruden, Sanchez.....maybe Barrett, he is better than the rest.

2014-09-05T13:06:23+00:00

Fred

Guest


Black power! Go to hell xenophobic propaganda site the roar not sure if the moderators realise they are just feeding the impression most people have that rugby is for the white elite! Apparently I can't stick up for my people who happen to own this land on this crummy site! Moderate that ey? Jokers

2014-09-05T12:52:48+00:00

trent

Guest


Agreed WB. Highest try scoring forward too. The guy is in cracking form and is a well rounded player. It does I agree take all forwards working hard at the breakdown to secure ball and allow the pilfer specialists To work their magic.

2014-09-05T12:39:40+00:00

trent

Guest


Please. If you think there could possible be a plan that involves a backrower not making tackles and not putting pressure on the breakdown when we had been dominated badly in that area all game is mad. AndrewWA I agree mate. Higgers had the capability but not the passion to do the dirty work. Seems to be of a similar flavour to 'he who we aren't allowed to mention in a negative light' (pst it's Hooper)

2014-09-05T11:58:25+00:00

ols

Roar Pro


Well you gotta beat them first :)

2014-09-05T11:58:00+00:00

mcxd

Guest


Maybe we can do a phone in vote for whose got the X-Factor ?

2014-09-05T11:52:33+00:00

Mike

Guest


Combesy, kindly do me the favour of watching the game that TWAS referred to before wasting my time with comments.

2014-09-05T11:52:03+00:00

Mike

Guest


Yes, that is why I wrote what I did - through watching the games. And the level of proof I gave was all that TWAS' ill-thought-out comments merited .

2014-09-05T11:51:09+00:00

Mike

Guest


I know exactly what I am talking about RK, and (obviously unlike you) I watched the games. Plenty of people comments on how the GWS scrum went downhill after Robinson went off, against the Vikings in particular. It wasn't just because of the penalties - although they do illustrate the point very well - but from watching what actually happened. Anyone who couldn't see that doesn't know anything about scrummaging . And your childish "fanboi" attempts at insults say far more about you than me.

2014-09-05T11:48:01+00:00

Mike

Guest


"Rugby scribes everywhere keep raising this as solution to the scrum." Indeed they are. Because they know what they are talking about.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar