Three dead in a week: The tragedy continues in American high school football

By Simon Smale / Roar Guru

On Wednesday this week, a 16-year-old high school student died while playing American football in New York State.

Tom Cutinella died after what was described as “typical contact” with an opponent during a game at Shoreham-Wading River High School.

Astonishingly, his death was the third in a dark week for high school football in the States, after Demario Harris and Isaiah Langston, both 17, died in Alabama and North Carolina respectively last Friday.

When I read about this, I was dismayed that three teenagers could die playing a sport that they loved.

But upon closer examination, I was appalled to discover that on average, 12 kids die each year at high school playing American football.

The statistics are damning. A study conducted by the National Centre for Catastrophic Sport Injury Research, Annual Survey of Football Injury Research 1931-2013 showed that in the period between 1960 and 2013, 66 per cent of all deaths directly attributed to American football happened at High School level.

That’s a total of 686 children.

And that’s not all. In the same period, ‘indirect’ football deaths (defined as deaths from over exertion or complications relating from non-fatal injuries) accounted for 502 High School player deaths, also 66 per cent of all fatalities of this manner.

That’s a total of 1,188 deaths of children at school, playing American football, in 53 years.

In 2013, there were 8 deaths attributed to playing American football at all levels. All of them occurred in high school. All 9 of the indirect deaths recorded last year also happened at school – 7 heart related conditions, 1 anaphylactic shock and 1 stoke.

On average, per 100,000 people who play the sport at High School, 0.71 die doing so.

As a huge fan of American football, I was shocked. These are huge numbers, and I couldn’t believe that kids were pushing themselves so hard that they were literally dying to play the sport.

Depressingly, this high death-rate is replicated in the rates of serious, catastrophic injuries in other similar contact sports around the world.

The RFU-funded Catastrophic Injuries in rugby union – An assessment of the Risk by Dr Colin Fuller, contains some statistics from other sports.

Catastrophic in this instance is defined as “fatalities and brain/spinal cord injuries that result in permanent significant neurological deficits.”

Sport Location Incidence of Injury (per 100,000 people)*
Rugby union England (1956-2002) 0.84
Rugby union Australia (1976-2002) 4.40
Rugby union NZ (1976-2005) 4.20
Rugby union USA (1970-1996) 3.30
Rugby league Australia (1984-2002) 1.90
Australian Rules Australia (1986-2003) 0.43
American Football – High School USA (1982-1997) 0.98
American Football – College USA (1982-1997) 2.10

According to these statistics, American Football is not even the most dangerous sport.

So what do these three deaths mean? And more importantly, what can be done?

It will certainly draw focus back onto the safety of contact sports for athletes both young and old.

There are plenty of people with a lot more information and know-how than me debating what can be done to avoid these shocking, freak events. A simple internet search shows the level of research into making the sport safer.

At high school level, contact sport can be inherently risky due to the potentially different stages in physical development of the players. In Scotland recently, the first XV rugby team of Glenalmond College were withdrawn from playing two matches last season due to mismatches in physique – a move that was widely praised by parents.

Perhaps this is an option in America too – although it would take a brave decision to abandon matches or tell kids not to play based on their physique, when sport is an activity that should be practiced by all.

The superintendant of Shoreham-Wading River High School, Steve Cohen said that an investigation would be held, including a review of the team’s protective equipment.

Perhaps the fact that so much padding is worn gives the players a false sense of security? Spear tackling, when players tackle using their helmet as a battering ram, has been outlawed in high school and college football since 1976, but it’s still all too easy to get into the wrong position when making a tackle.

However, adding protection has helped reduce injuries in other sports, such as hurling, where helmets have reduced head injuries tenfold since becoming mandatory.

No matter what is done, the instances of these injuries needs to be reduced. Any death on a football field is a tragedy. Twelve per year at high school is simply too many.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2014-10-14T07:51:54+00:00

Simon Smale

Roar Guru


Hi Mushi, no I think the stats include anything related to the sport, including deaths in training.

2014-10-07T04:28:58+00:00

mushi

Guest


do the stats only cover in game deaths ie anything from a CTE related death is disregarded?

AUTHOR

2014-10-05T21:24:10+00:00

Simon Smale

Roar Guru


That's an interesting article Professor... The thing that I took most out of it as that in 1994 "injuries due to mismatches of strength and skill had ceased". Obviously at school boy (high school) level these discrepancies are always going to exist which is why there are proportionally more injuries/deaths. It also touches on your point PhillNZ in that rugby as more dangerous in the 1970's and 80's. Interesting stuff, thanks for posting it!

2014-10-05T11:12:48+00:00

Professor Rosseforp

Guest


An interesting discussion on rugby union that emphasises the damage to vertebrae and its long-term effects, even if the player is not killed or paralysed: http://www.nature.com/sc/journal/v40/n11/full/3101349a.html

AUTHOR

2014-10-05T07:26:32+00:00

Simon Smale

Roar Guru


And of course, 66% of people know that you can use statistics to prove anything if you want to. ;-)

AUTHOR

2014-10-05T07:25:33+00:00

Simon Smale

Roar Guru


Brady-Aj I absolutely agree. And believe me when I say that I am not one of these drum beating people who demand that everyone is wrapped in cotton wool and that all contact sports should be banned until people are over 18. I'm a passionate union fan and Packers fan myself, and am probably "guilty" of celebrating huge hits from Clay Matthews and the like as much as anyone... One of the stats that I should have written in but discarded was that deaths in American Football have been falling from the 1960's, and at a considerable rate. Honestly, my article was more of an emotional response to having 3 kids killed in a single week at that level... I think you would find the Annual Survey of Football Research article I referenced interesting, purely because of the majority of deaths at high school level... And I think that better minds than mine are probably trying to deal with the question as to how to reduce those deaths all the time. I don't think I mentioned soccer in the article, but in any case I would argue that soccer isn't all that safe myself compared to the other sports, and all sports carry their own risks (although I think that the rumoured court litigation in the states concerning the heading of balls a little ott). I think the article where I got most of my information from did include soccer in Australia at a value of 0.17/100,000... Something like that, but please don't get the wrong idea that I hate all contact sports!

2014-10-05T06:28:30+00:00

PhillNZ

Guest


Watching a soccer match is not the same as playing a game of rugby Union. Rugby Union is one of the most dangerous fun sport to play , why mainly because young kids between 14-18 have not developed physically in relationship to the power of the scrum also the different angles that players put themselves into the contact area and the fact that you can be hit from different angles. Then add tackles. Its all about coaches knowing what to look for and training techniques. Rugby Union and Rugby League are a collision sport from under 16 and up , that's different from my era when it was just contact sport . Now with that being said we had a horrendous fatalitty and broken neck stage from the late 7o's and early 80's , hence the changing of the rules and de powering the scrum.This year there was one death from concussion and 7 players with serious neck injuries add to that the heavy concussion toll that rugby is now acting upon to stem the flow of concussions. Rugby is a dangerous sport but they, the rugby unions, try not to publicize it.

2014-10-05T06:27:50+00:00

Brady-Aj

Roar Pro


I stand corrected, miss read the dates. But still my piont is anyone can twist anything to make anything look bad you could have all the deaths occur between 1970 to 1990 (which was when I was playing at high school 80s and it was very dangerous then, I still have scares on my back to prove it) and no deaths to 2005. Maybe you were just highlighting something you have read and it is sad reading. But being heavily involved in Rugby Union in Victoria and Green Bay Packers Fan I get my back up pretty quickly it gets a tiresome listing to people tell you how dangerous your sports are and how safe soccer is.

AUTHOR

2014-10-05T05:54:39+00:00

Simon Smale

Roar Guru


Actually the stats for rugby union from NZ were from the period 1976-2005... I have no idea what the stats are from 2005-2013, and just taking just an isolated year could be used to prove anything, if I'd looked at 1990 for American football I could tell you that nobody died playing the game... I'm not doubting that you can prove anything with statistics, and these statistics were in the report that is referenced in the article. Also the point wasn't to say that rugby was more or less dangerous than American football, just that 3 kids died in a week playing a game at school. I wanted to see if American football was that much more dangerous than any other comparable sport, and i found that it's not. If anything, I found that interesting and worrying in equal measure... But then again, it's not even any more dangerous than going to work in the UK, Australia and a whole host of other western countries...

2014-10-05T04:51:18+00:00

Brady-Aj

Roar Pro


these facts are on findings that are almost over twenty years old for NZ 1970-1996. Im sure I could cherry pick different facts from certain years to prove that it is more dangerous to go watch a soccer match in Europe than it is to play rugby in NZ in 2014. what was the rate in 2013 for NZ rugby?

AUTHOR

2014-10-05T01:18:11+00:00

Simon Smale

Roar Guru


The rate was 0.71 deaths per 100,000. Interestingly that is considered a tolerable risk in terms of health and safety statistics (between 0.1-2 fatalities per 100,000) This is lower than the average work related fatality rate in the many countries, including UK (0.8/100,000), Australia (2.6/100,000) and Portugal (8.7/100,000). Indeed you actually have much more chance of being killed by a car in the UK as a pedestrian (3.7/100,000). So yes in a sence, you're right, this is a tiny percentage. But I thought it was still depressing to hear that kids are dying when playing sport at high school.

2014-10-05T01:00:34+00:00

Silver Sovereign

Guest


12 dead out of how many thousands playing each month? Got to provide proper context. I would think 12 is a very tiny percentage

2014-10-04T23:58:33+00:00

c

Guest


so much for "contact sports" and their excitement. as the world becomes more aware modifications will have to be made to "contact" in these sports if they wish to continue to thrive.

AUTHOR

2014-10-04T22:33:59+00:00

Simon Smale

Roar Guru


Ye I know RT, it seemed a bit odd. I think part of the issue there is what constitutes a "catastrophic" injury. Different countries consider different things and different sports consider different problems etc. The statistics on the mortality of American football are very detailed, and not many other unions either have this type of detail in their data or any detail at all. If all the statistics were organised by the same body according to the same criteria then it would be easier to draw conclusions. I was just struck as to how many kids die every year at high school. The only info I could find on people dying in Union were isolated cases relating to Second Impact Syndrome, and no real statistics. Probably not something that respective bodies want advertised too much...

2014-10-04T21:48:00+00:00

RT

Guest


I would not have thought rugby would have been more dangerous than American football. Doesn't seem right to me.

Read more at The Roar