The coming NRL halfback bonanza

By Lachlan Bickley / Roar Guru

What do Trent Hodkinson, Adam Reynolds, Aidan Sezer, Daly Cherry-Evans, Luke Keary, Chris Sandow, Kieran Foran, James Maloney and Albert Kelly all have in common? Two things actually.

They’re all first-rate NRL halves, and they’re all off contract at the end of 2015.

So they’re all eligible to start fielding rival clubs’ offers as of November 1 this year.

Before considering the implications of this pending bonanza, let’s all agree that for the most part the terms ‘halfback’ and ‘five-eighth’ are irrelevant. Almost no teams play an old-fashioned first and second receiver arrangement with the vast majority preferring a split halves set up with one ‘half’ controlling each side of the field.

So whereas Trent Hodkinson and Daly Cherry-Evans both wear number 7 and are both nominally halfbacks, Hodkinson operates almost exclusively on the left edge of the field for Canterbury and Cherry-Evans is on the right for the Sea Eagles.

Johnathan Thurston meanwhile has alternated between 6 and 7 but his job has remained the same. There is some overlap of course, but for the most part halves have their preferred side of the field.

With that being said, let us assume then that almost all of the players listed above could easily wear number 7 and operate as the primary playmaker for an NRL side.

Regardless of title or number, the importance of halves has in no way diminished in the modern game. Ask the Bulldogs how they fared with mediocre games from Origin halves Josh Reynolds and Hodkinson in the grand final on Sunday. Or picture the directionless Rabbitohs whimpering out of the finals after Adam Reynolds went down to a hamstring injury in 2012 (an episode now well and truly forgotten of course).

At the other end of the spectrum ask a Raiders fan what it is like watching a forward pack regularly put a team in great field position – which they did in 2014 – only for no points to come of it.

There can be no doubt that talented halves are absolutely critical to success in the NRL. That is what makes the signing period that will open on November 1 so fascinating. With ten regular first-graders, including three with Origin experience, one incumbent Test half, and a handful so-called future Origin players, there will be a lot of teams looking to fill a spot before the music stops.

Very few teams can consider themselves comfortable in the halves. Certainly the Warriors and Cowboys will for the time being only require a player to complement their Test halves, and the same goes for the Storm with Cooper Cronk. The Knights feel comfortable with Jarrod Mullen and Tyrone Roberts, and the Tigers will roll the dice that potential becomes reality with Luke Brooks and Mitchell Moses.

However every other team in the competition is either unsatisfactorily represented in the halves or their incumbent players are on this list.

Arguably the pressure is most intense for the Rabbitohs and Sea Eagles, who each find two halves off contract at the end of next year.

The Sea Eagles’ much publicised internal ructions will go a long way to determining if they can keep both Foran and Cherry-Evans. Though even if they can retain them, what sort of team will they be able to put around them? Whatever the internal dynamics at the Eagles one thing is certain: someone is going to come along with a Godfather offer for each of those players.

The Rabbitohs face an equally unenviable dilemma after watching Adam Reynolds – who was reportedly on the outer as recently as eight weeks ago – return to the team to orchestrate an historic win on Sunday night. For now the partnership between Reynolds and wunderkind Luke Keary looks like a match made in heaven, but paying to keep both could prove problematic.

Then in the middle of the table there is a raft of teams who face tough decisions about whether to stick with their current guys or chase a proven commodity such as Cherry-Evans, Foran or Maloney. Teams such as the Eels with Sandow, the Titans with Kelly and Sezer and even the Bulldogs with Hodkinson, whose form post-Origin was uninspiring, must decide whether those players can anchor their future.

Meanwhile, at the bottom of the table the Raiders and Sharks both ended the season road-testing promising juniors in the halves, but both remain very publicly in the market for a big name. Canberra is of course hamstrung by certain perceptions about the club and city (and no doubt some will say by the coach), and the Sharks are limited by the fact that they’re never going to win a premiership.

But both clubs will have oodles of money available in 2015 and will no doubt be making aggressive offers.

The Broncos have already made the first move with respect to the class of 2015. The club announced the re-signing Ben Hunt last week for a reported $400k, which is a remarkably good deal for the club given the season Hunt just enjoyed. Whatever the Broncos are paying Hunt, the timing of the deal – with Anthony Milford and Darius Boyd set to add to an already solid stable of playmakers in Brisbane – demonstrates how important it is to lock-up quality halves.

No doubt some teams will follow Brisbane’s lead and double down on their current players before those players get to listen to rival clubs. But inevitably a few big names will still be on the market come November and the musical chairs will begin.

It used to be that the NRL season would finish and aside from a few dry pre-season updates – ‘this year was the toughest preseason ever‘ – rugby league would go away until at least February.

This year however we can expect that the reckless speculation and innuendo about players signings will continue right through the summer.

Won’t that be fun.

The Crowd Says:

2014-10-08T05:54:20+00:00

mushi

Guest


Lets first tackle the ridiculous assertion that all the talent is flowing into Sydney. Of the 17 man squad that took the field for the Aussies in the anzac test 10 of the 17 were from the 7 non Sydney clubs. For origin it was more even with about 9/16s of all players playing for Sydney clubs which coincides with Sydney having 9 or 16 clubs right? Then look at the dally M top 10 vote getters from 2006 (wiki didn’t have the top ten in 2005 but you are welcome to do your own research.. which would be novel) There are 47 guys that got votes 7 played for Sydney clubs first and now play for non Sydney clubs, 7 the other way around (suggesting a pretty equal flow of players that is slightly in non Sydney clubs favour given the number of clubs) 2 had played outside of Sydney, gone to Sydney and then back out of Sydney and got their votes outside of Sydney. 1 was the opposite (Sydney then outside then back for votes). The others all either player. The others pretty much either stayed in Sydney or out of Sydney giving the over all split of Sydney poached or created = roughly...9/16 whilst the non Sydney number miraculously comes to about 7/16. The problem you speak of is fictional. Your overcrowded reference still doesn’t make sense are basically still saying there are too many clubs for the talent so only park footballers can’t find a gig. Park footballers aren’t supposed to play first grade (also interesting that Thurston and many other Aussie reps are apparently only park footballers in your eyes – can I watch football at your park? As for the travel allowance being a pittance? Isn’t it just to cover their expenses when travelling why would you get more than to offset the costs? Doesn’t a one club town from a rugby league area have more advantage for “travel” as it doesn’t compete with other teams in offering close proximity to family (at least that was the excuse used for Barba and Milford right)? It can use location as a genuine competitive advantage for locals, individual Sydney clubs can’t.

2014-10-08T02:30:03+00:00

Roarsome

Guest


The travel allowance is a pittance. Clubs outside of Sydney need to offer overs to compete with rival potential buyers of clubs just down the road. There's no allowance for that. Hence, rarely, do we see big name signings leave Sydney but rather simply move amongst Sydney clubs. The overcrowded reference means that it mainly the park footballers that leave Sydney for lack of opportunity over anything else. I guess part of the tradeoff, is access to 3rd party deals though I believe there has been movement to limit these also. Unless you're Sam Burgess and the NRL is willing to subsidise your salary.

AUTHOR

2014-10-08T02:05:08+00:00

Lachlan Bickley

Roar Guru


Yeah that was exactly my point about the Broncos. As a one club town they get every dollar of potential third party sponsorship. The Sydney clubs have to compete to get the support of any business owner who might be interested in using a rugby league player for promotions. Way more pie to go around in Brisbane than anywhere else

AUTHOR

2014-10-08T02:02:09+00:00

Lachlan Bickley

Roar Guru


Keary did re-sign with the Rabbitohs at the end of last season but it was only until the end of 2015 http://www.zerotackle.com/nrl/rabbitohs-extend-keary-deal-until-end-of-2015-10843/ Agree on Reynolds. After such a bright start to his career his downturn in form mid way through this year probably left some people disappointed but only because they were holding him to crazy high standards. Still an excellent player as he showed through the finals. Luke Brooks will be another player for whom a sparkling beginning to his career could in fact undermine him later

2014-10-08T02:00:36+00:00

mushi

Guest


I thought they already got a travel allowance? I also love the we need more money because others have to compete in an over crowded market. gold

2014-10-08T01:56:40+00:00

mushi

Guest


The broncos "unfair advantage" is that they have sole reign over large population so they don't have to compete for the third party dollars. Also I love all the "I know of..." so you know of fraud being committed but happily just sit there and let it go on?

2014-10-08T01:55:20+00:00

Renegade

Guest


Please.... what BS. Even the Broncos will tell you they have a monopoly and have it better than anyone else..... why do you think they've been against another Brisbane side for so long?

2014-10-08T01:35:28+00:00

Roarsome

Guest


Yep, all clubs have 3rd party deals just as all clubs have feeder clubs in QLD so there's no BS about Sydney being hard done by. The only thing that's unfair is clubs outside of Sydney not receiving salary cap concessions to attract more quality players away from the overcrowded market that is Sydney. Money that could go to players that have to travel away overnight every second weekend rather than drive an extra 20 min, more relocation costs etc. It would be nice if clubs were allowed to spend a percentage of the money they generate for the league.

2014-10-08T01:31:56+00:00

Worlds Biggest

Guest


Luke Keary re-signed at the end of last season I believe, the Rabbits will need to pay Reynolds well. After being on the outer he has turned his form around and been brilliant. These two compliment each other so well. They also have Cody Walker coming in to provide depth.

2014-10-08T00:55:33+00:00

Steve

Guest


These so called nod and wink set up's you speak of happen at the other 15 NRL club's too. I have no doubt at all, that such deal's happen everywhere. I personally know one player who receives $15, 000 in cash delivered to his front door every 3 months. Salary cap rorting and under the table deals are happening at all NRL clubs, this I have no doubts about whatsoever. So to say that the Bronco's have an unfair advantage over every other club is ridiculous.

AUTHOR

2014-10-07T22:35:12+00:00

Lachlan Bickley

Roar Guru


Which is of course the huge unfair advantage the Broncos have. They can offer guys like Milford and Hunt $400k deals knowing full well that the Thoroughbreds group of Broncos supporters will jump in and top those deals up. There is no doubt that Hunt would have attracted offers of $600k or more and we know Milford turned down $1m a year in Canberra so those third party deals must be impressive. No other club has the capacity to access that sort of outside money. Of course any third party deal that is used as inducement to sign is supposed to be counted as part of the cap but its no doubt a nod and wink set up so the Broncos can instead trot out BS about their superior culture or in Milford's case "bringing him home" forgetting of course that they passed on him when he was 13.

2014-10-07T22:27:31+00:00

Will Sinclair

Roar Guru


I'd expect the $400K for Hunt would not include third party deals.

2014-10-07T21:16:33+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Should be interesting. $400k for Hunt is a steal particularly with all his talk of testing the market. It's either a bulldust figure or makes you wonder if some of the $ figures waived around are fair dinkum. Cowboys don't need a half. They'll have Coote back, Morgan at 6 and Lui as back up.

Read more at The Roar