Magic Beans: Brendan Rodgers' transfer failings

By Evan Morgan Grahame / Expert

When he traded his family’s cow for that fabled bag of beans, walking home even gullible Jack must have been developing that sinking feeling in the pit of his stomach.

The cow, beloved but no longer lactating, was gone and all he had gotten in return was a pouch filled with these pills of uncertainty.

If they were magic (they were), then he’d done the deal of the century. If they weren’t, his mother was going to be very displeased.

He was teetering on a balance beam, with feather beds and cotton candy on his left, and a perilous void on his right. When he got home, beans in hand, his enraged mother flung them with contempt out of the kitchen window and sent Jack to bed.

As it turned out for Jack, his mother was a poor judge of bean, they were indeed of the magical genus and the beanstalk that shot up next to the house eventually led, via theft, conspiracy and murder, to a life of luxury for them both.

But what if the beans hadn’t been magical? What if they’d been a bunch of old chickpeas, dry and infertile? They’d have been pecked up by a passing chicken, and Jack and his mother would have likely descended into miserable poverty. Jack gambled, unwisely really, on the dubious word of the bean seller. He came up trumps, and bully for him.

As Brendan Rodgers signalled for Mario Balotelli to trudge off the pitch in the 79th minute against Chelsea, his team trailing by a goal and looking toothless, tired and stymied by the Italian’s very presence, the Liverpool manager must have felt like Jack on that balance beam, slowly leaning into that perilous void.

His own gamble, the fiery Balotelli, has been the metaphorical chickpea and not the magical bean that the club had hoped he’d be. Brendan’s magical bean was now laying on a couple of tidy assists for his new teammates in Barcelona.

Luis Suarez had been a similar gamble for Liverpool, one that the club had made before Brendan Rodgers had arrived. Coming from the Dutch league, long a source of flatteringly deceptive strikers, with a very patchy disciplinary record, the Uruguayan was no sure thing. But he turned out to be one of the best strikers ever to play in the Premier League, and for Liverpool he quickly went from being the undetermined bean to the cow, the prized asset.

So, when his departure became an inevitability, it was Rodgers who played the part of Jack, walking to the market with his cash cow that, although a little bit bitey, was sure to command a high price. He traded the cow, and in Balotelli, Lazar Markovic, Dejan Lovren and the others, he got in return a handful of ordinary beans that look unlikely to sprout any time soon.

Liverpool’s title challenge was a fairytale, but the storied journey has not continued into this season. Tottenham had given Liverpool a helpful lesson in how not to spend all the nice, new money you’ve just gotten for your best player. After Gareth Bale’s sale, Tottenham bought so freely that theirs then became an issue of squad integration; they didn’t even necessarily opt for quantity over quality. Christian Eriksen, Erik Lamela and Paulinho were all considered quality players when they brought them in.

It was more a matter of too much of a good thing, and this team of strangers played disparately and incoherently. It still plagues them to a certain extent now, theirs is an unsettled squad full of players that should be better together than they are. The moral was thus: you can’t make up for the departure of a single stunning individual with players en masse.

Unfortunately, this is just what Liverpool did after Suarez left, bringing in eight players all of whom, you could argue, expected to start. Such an influx of new faces, even if all of them hit top form immediately, would be incredibly difficult to integrate seamlessly. And if a few of them suddenly begin playing terribly, as has happened with Lovren and Balotelli, then the task is made immeasurably harder.

Lovren has already shown himself bafflingly inept when playing against muscular strikers this season, and his performance on Saturday against the haughtily subversive Diego Costa was no different. He has looked horribly shaky in possession, and is no doubt hindered by the equally tremulous presence of the badly waning Steven Gerrard in front of him. An ample replacement for Daniel Agger, Lovren is not.

Balotelli has been similarly ill at ease. Yet to score in the league for Liverpool, the Italian’s broodiness and surly demeanour has done very little to warm him to the fans. Shooting wastefully, rarely showing the energy or willingness to make repeated runs, Balotelli does not fit the system that Rodgers purpose-built for Suarez. Which should come as no surprise, as they’re utterly different types of strikers.

Why Rodgers continues to play this way is anyone’s guess. Markovic has barely featured, and one wonders what the point of spending £20 million to secure him was. Emre Can has been only sporadically effective and, in spite of his deflected strike that opened the scoring against Chelsea, he is not a player who will invigorate Liverpool’s spluttering attack.

Adam Lallana has actually been fairly good when he’s been given the chance to play, but opportunities for the England international have been limited by injury and non-selection. Rickie Lambert, overjoyed when he signed for his boyhood club, might now be regretting the decision, with his occasional substitute appearances largely unsatisfying.

Divock Origi, the young Belgian striker purchased from Lille in the summer then loaned back to them for this season, has scored five goals so far in France, just over a third of what Liverpool have managed as a team, so there’s that to look forward to.

None of the signings brought in to replace Suarez can be called unbridled successes, with some already looking like complete write-offs. And it’s been made worse by the recent prosperity of teams like West Ham and Southampton, teams that are both sitting above Liverpool on the table, and that also brought in a number of players this off-season.

West Ham spent considerably, with Alex Song, Enner Valencia, Aaron Cresswell, Diafra Sakho, Cheikhou Kouyate and Carl Jenkinson some of the names to arrive at Upton Park. All have become automatic starters, all have bedded in very nicely indeed and all are jointly responsible for the Hammers’ lofty position.

Southampton experienced a staggering exodus during the summer, brushing it off without even flinching. Their new signings, Graziano Pelle, Dusan Tadic and Saido Mane have all found life in England rather fun. As these two clubs have demonstrated, it isn’t impossible to do what Liverpool tried to, and the fact that Rodgers had considerably more money available, as well as the tempting carrot that is Champions League football to offer, makes their plight even less defensible.

When you think about it, the only players signed by Rodgers that have been successful at Liverpool are Philippe Coutinho and Daniel Sturridge. With this in mind, it’s no wonder that Liverpool have been leaky at the back for the last two years. This sort of project is one that elite managers must take on every few years; Louis van Gaal is currently struggling through such a transition at United.

Teams must eventually dissipate and be rebuilt, stars will wantaway, club legends will retire and managers must be prepared for dramatic restructuring. When a manager is fortunate enough to have a sizeable kitty at his disposal, he can go out and tempt fate on a magic bean or two, but he can’t blow it all on kernels that never sprout.

Jack, and his mother, were lucky rather than smart. Brendan Rodgers has not been either, and with his team in danger of dropping into the bottom half of the table by the end of the week, Liverpool’s season is now being pecked up by hungry chickens.

The Crowd Says:

2014-11-12T04:02:13+00:00

mintox

Guest


Most of the comments I've read have largely been based on perceived notions of Liverpool recruits being failures on the basis that if they're not winning every game and putting man of the match performances each week they must be rubbish. Liverpool have not played badly in most games, and their inability to win stems more from their failure to create dangerous options than from being outplayed. Earlier in the season they had a couple of losses that could be put down to poor defending and I can see in game improvement over the past few weeks but they still look poorly organisef from set pieces which if anyone has coached before would realise that this takes time to work on, time which they possibly don't have with Champions League games and League games every 3 or 4 days. Of the recruits, Moreno, Manquillo, Can, and Lallana have been good without excelling (Can is still coming back to fitness and played well against Chelsea). Balotelli has been unfairly maligned, he's worked hard on holding the ball up and bringing others into the game, he's definitely improved this aspect of his game but Rodgers has left him up front on his own and this doesn not appear to be what he's good at, nor is his strength getting on the end of aimless crosses. Rarely has be been put through on goal in space or 1 v 1 with a defender. The only two players I would criticise from their transfer dealings are Lovren who seems to be far too gung-ho at abandoning his position to win the ball and Markovic who was better against Real Madrid but still needs to prove his ability. But at the same time he reminds me of when Sterling came into the team and showed very little regard for keeping the ball safe. If Rodgers has proven one thing it is he can improve young players. In the end Rodgers needs to find out how to play the players he has in a system that works for them. Gerrard lacks the game intelligence to play at defensive midfield and you could see Chelsea midfielders actively running at him with the ball knowing he would be beaten or out of position and Balotelli needs support. Plus Glen Johnson just needs to not play ... ever!

2014-11-10T07:57:38+00:00

Nicholas Hartman

Roar Guru


I've read that Balotelli was at the bottom of a very long list of replacements for Suarez. They didn't get any of their more favoured targets (including Alexis Sanchez, who'd rather live in London than Liverpool) and so when it came to it, they decided to go after Balotelli. Though I think's it very misguided to apportion much blame on Balotelli misfiring on Balotelli, and indeed on Liverpool's poor form this season as whole. Much bigger problems to deal with at Liverpool before getting to Mario

2014-11-10T01:53:20+00:00

Fadida

Guest


Southampton must be overjoyed with how the season had played out. Ransacked by two big boys looking for an easy leg up. Their ex-manager having a nightmare at White Hart Lane, and their ex players not exactly setting the world on fire at Anfield. Karma for Rodgers after his comments about Spurs spunking their Bale money. It may be early days but Liverpool seem to have done even worse with their spending. I wonder if Rodgers did the old "I've put the names of those who will let us down in these envelopes"? Has he got enough envelopes? :)

2014-11-09T22:28:13+00:00

Radelaide

Guest


I think Balotelli got bought on the back of that WC goal he scored against England, possibly Gerrard got in Rodgers ear after seeing it up close, but that's the problem with mad Mario, he doesn't have a long attention span.

2014-11-09T21:02:47+00:00

pjbudd

Guest


There is such a fine line when we judge success or failure in the transfer market, much the same as success on the field in a game. At the weekend it seems that journalists everywhere are sticking knives into Brendan Rodgers for losing to Chelsea after making all the changes against Real Madrid in midweek. But how narrow is the line? A few seasons ago with no goal line technology the equalizer is unlikely to have been awarded and plenty of other referees may have awarded Gerard the penalty late in the game. It isn't as though the team lost by a hatful and Chelsea really do not look invincible despite the many claims of world media this season. It is understandable that there is a fascination with the perceived success or failure of transfers and the impact they make and so we see daily ramblings on the subject mainly in relation to Manchester United and Liverpool whilst at the same time admiring Southampton from afar. The south coast is a long way from the pressure cauldrons of Old Trafford and Anfield where instant gratification is both expected and demanded. In United's case there is the rejection of any notion that it might take some time to rebuild a side that had been in decay but in 2012 was masked by the fact that rival teams just couldn't get their act together. Meanwhile on Merseyside, the team has steadily been climbing the slippery slope towards the top again where many older Liverpool fans feel the club should always be, as though it is some divine right due to the club's previous success. What we do learn from history is that great teams come and go and that building dynasties requires the right mix of staff both on and off the field. When the ingredients aren't right, it just doesn't happen. Last season's tide of emotion almost carried Liverpool to the place they have dreamed of since Premier League inception and despite the deaprture of Suarez there is plenty to be optimistic about with the many new arrivals as is the case at Old Trafford. The Christmas / New Year period tends to throw up some very unusual results when matches are crammed in between the various holidays and not all teams perform how we believe they should at holiday times. Therefore, the time to really begin to judge the immediate success or failure of new signings and whether the team is heading in the right direction is arguably about 8 weeks away. Only then will we see whether the millions spent really brought magic beans or just another tin of chick peas.

Read more at The Roar