Four starting changes and the longest Wallabies bench ever

By Brett McKay / Expert

Wallabies coach Michael Cheika hasn’t quite gone as far as I thought – or as far as I hoped, on Tuesday – but I do like that he’s gone some way to shaking the side up ahead of their Test against Ireland in Dublin, in the early hours of Sunday morning, AEDT.

Cheika has made just the four changes to the XV that ran out against France in Paris.

Lock Sam Carter – who I’m told missed the France Test due to a concussion injury – has come back into the starting side in place of James Horwill.

Young flanker/lock Luke Jones will play his second Test at blindside, in place of Melbourne Rebels teammate Sean McMahon. Jones made his debut in June, in the second Test against France in Melbourne.

Brumbies flyer Henry Speight will make his long-awaited Wallabies debut on the left wing, also in place of a teammate, in this case ‘fro-bro’ Joe Tomane. And the teammate replacement theme continues, with Matt Toomua coming back in at inside centre for his tenth Test of the year, in place of Brumbies midfield partner Christian Lealiifano.

Of the replacements, well, it really is ‘everyone gets a game’ time, with eleven players named on an oversized bench suddenly in need of reinforcement. I genuinely can’t recall 11 players ever being named on a bench for any Australian team; someone please correct me if it’s happened before.

Regardless, and obviously, three players will be trimmed from the extended bench.

Or will they?

Perhaps this is a cunning plan to negate the second-half scrummaging issues? Finishing the game with a four-man front row and three locks would certainly eradicate most of the issues that have plagued the Wallabies late-game scrum in recent weeks.

It may just be crazy enough to work.

Among the changes, I’m really happy to see Western Force prop Tetera Faulkner recalled to the bench, and I do hope he survives the cull. As I mentioned on Tuesday, I think it’s important that as much time can be given to fringe props as possible.

It is the only way to test where they’re at in terms of international competition is to try them out and this Test would be an appropriate time to try Faulkner again.

Horwill can probably count himself a touch unlucky to lose his starting spot to Carter, though since learning this week of Carter’s concussion injury, perhaps we actually read too much into Horwill’s promotion to the starting side last weekend in Paris in the first place.

I hope that missing the starting team will keep Horwill’s fires burning within, because I think he has played reasonably well on this tour.

The extended bench has probably given Will Skelton a reprieve for now, but I’m not sure how can make the final matchday 23. Even his impact around the ground – what is supposed to make up for his evident scrummaging and lineout deficiencies – was lacking last weekend in Paris, and Horwill just doesn’t deserve to dropped from the team completely, in my humble opinion.

It’s bittersweet news around McMahon. Not that he’s been replaced in the starting side after two Tests, but that room couldn’t be found for him on such a big bench.

And while I’m happy to see how Luke Jones goes in the Test side again, I have to admit to being a little surprised that he’s starting. I’m also a little surprised – disappointed, actually – that Matt Hodgson has been left out completely.

However, as I’ve written this week, Australian rugby does have to maintain an element of trust in Cheika’s chosen direction for the side – even though the issues in attack and defence are there to see. After suggesting he just try stuff in my earlier article, I can’t readily complain when he does just that.

In time, Jones could potentially become that hard-nosed aggressive ball carrier that Cheika wants in his forwards. He certainly has a bit of mongrel in him already, and hopefully he’s learned how to channel that from his brief taste of international rugby thus far. Jake Schatz, too, probably should have played more Test rugby than he has, but injuries rarely pick a good time to strike.

Out wide, I’m happy to see Toomua back at inside centre. Lealiifano had as good a game in the Wallabies no.12 in the third Bledisloe as I think I’ve ever seen him play in the position, but sadly he’s offered little by comparison in the two Tests on tour. Toomua back in midfield brings both more organisation defensively, as well as some familiarity for Bernard Foley one spot in.

On Foley, I suggested on Tuesday that both Foley and Nick Phipps were playing like they were fatigued after a long season, and I absolutely stand by that. However, Toomua back at 12 can be that literal missing piece from all the attacking familiarity that has been developed in 2014.

The only question might be one of how Toomua will go under the new flatter attacking method, but along the theme of trying stuff, there is only one to find out.

Henry Speight was always going to debut on this tour, and I’m really happy for him after a stop-start season. Does it matter that he’s been named on the left wing when I can’t recall him wearing anything other than no.14? Again, there’s only one way to find out.

And that just leaves the bench backs. I thought Will Genia and Quade Cooper should’ve started this game, but they won’t and that no longer matters. They did both have an impact last weekend in Paris, and should again in Dublin this weekend. Genia obviously will hold his spot, and so should Cooper. But will he?

And I ask that because I just wonder if you can have Cooper and Kurtley Beale on the same bench.

That’s not rhetorical, by the way, I’m genuinely wondering about it. If Cooper is the designated midfield cover, does Beale or Rob Horne offer more in terms of back three coverage?

So who misses out? Skelton for sure, for me, and I can flip a coin between Robinson and Alexander, given Faulkner can play either side.

Beale or Horne? Now that I’m committing words to print, Beale wouldn’t have been put on a plane just to train in the UK, would he. Rob Horne, then, loses the contentious call.

The Crowd Says:

2014-11-22T02:46:58+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


That's untrue he is non-existent. In 2013 he had the highest pilfers in international rugby. Now one season doesn't mean he is the best, but to be able to outdo every other international player in a season shows he is adequate.

2014-11-22T02:22:37+00:00

kombiutedriver

Guest


Yep ....... That is pretty obvious.

2014-11-21T22:04:57+00:00

John

Roar Rookie


I think the British army has been a lot more successful than our French friends

2014-11-21T22:02:41+00:00

John

Roar Rookie


Agreed, the treatment from Ewen was...interesting. Especially for a young and upcoming talent.

2014-11-21T21:57:15+00:00

John

Roar Rookie


Yup if it's broke don't fix it. Sorry did I get that wrong. Let's not keep persisting with average players like Horwill. Genia has shown nothing to warrant taking the starting jersey off Phipps. Brett's suggestion that he would play against Ireland is mental.

2014-11-21T21:53:36+00:00

John

Roar Rookie


You are right Brett! why aren't their selection practices conforming to media practices/deadlines! This is unacceptable. Come on mate.

2014-11-21T21:35:21+00:00

John

Roar Rookie


Nailed it. C.f cooper

2014-11-21T21:31:02+00:00

John

Roar Rookie


Mate you've lost the plot. Back under your rock lad.

2014-11-21T21:28:46+00:00

John

Roar Rookie


You are right Combesy, KB can play 10, 12, 15 and at a pinch on the wings. Qc covers 10 and at a pinch. Can see why it's such a bad thing having a versatile player like Kb on the bench.

2014-11-21T21:25:29+00:00

John

Roar Rookie


Who had the most turnovers in the 2013 super season? I think Quade was in the top two or three.

2014-11-21T21:04:29+00:00

handles

Guest


Not used to such scathing sarcasm from The Voice of Reason!

2014-11-21T20:54:18+00:00

John

Roar Rookie


How about Matt Gilead v Scotland. Or Quade Cooper generally?

2014-11-21T15:48:27+00:00

Justin3

Guest


Not saying he should at all, just he will

2014-11-21T15:44:21+00:00

AndyS

Guest


It's funny, this discussion reminds me enormously of others I had some years back regarding front rowers. The official thinking at the time ran that scrumming wasn't really important, it was their play around the ground that mattered. I guess that notion must have been right on the money; after all, the various players involved had long careers over multiple coaches. One of them even won a JE Medal, coincidentally in the same year England destroyed our scrum credibility for ten years and counting...

2014-11-21T15:44:13+00:00

Justin3

Guest


Ok because relying on twenty mins of stats is so useful???

2014-11-21T15:01:28+00:00

Chivas

Guest


Really... So you have never seen him burst through the ruck area. See him take it up more effectively in close than any other 7 you care to mention. His support play and linking in congested areas is pretty strong too. His energy and the fact he still makes big plays like pilfer doe forcing penalties is also pretty solid. i don't think Hooper is as one dimensional as you and NW suggest. I tend to think some fans are one dimensional in terms of thelinking and understanding of the game. Tell me Yogi how you and NW are so right and three Wallaby coaches can be so wrong. Would it not tend to suggest those making comments like yours may actually be missing something...

2014-11-21T13:58:42+00:00

All Bent Out of Shape

Guest


Yes, the awards mean nothing. Although hes good at Super Rugby he isnt at test level despite the awards and selection as first choice and captain. Hooper is almost non-existent at test level. WOW.

2014-11-21T13:58:15+00:00

cs

Guest


WoobliesFan, can you not say anything calmly?

2014-11-21T13:49:37+00:00

All Bent Out of Shape

Guest


You dont understand how people think they know more about rugby than the top rugby minds on the planet? Surely you can see how some dude knows more than the last 3 national coaches of Aus.

2014-11-21T13:44:36+00:00

All Bent Out of Shape

Guest


You dont need one then either.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar