300 sleeps to the Rugby World Cup (Part 1)

By Gavin Melville / Roar Pro

With 300 sleeps until the tournament’s kick-off, what’s the pecking order for the 2015 Rugby World Cup?

The pools
Group A: England, Fiji, Wales, Uruguay, Australia
Group B: Scotland, Japan, South Africa, Samoa, USA
Group C: NZ, Tonga, Georgia, Argentina, Namibia
Group D: France, Italy, Ireland, Canada, Romania

So who are the likely winners?

New Zealand
NZ stand imperious above all other rugby nations. They have barely been defeated since their last World Cup win in 2011. They have the core of experienced players who have won a World Cup before, know each others’ games very well, and play the game for the team not for themselves.

They look invincible.

However, things can go wrong. The principle threat to New Zealand is ‘The Virus’. This pops up at times when the All Blacks lose or look like they might lose.

The second biggest threat is the refereeing, which can surprise the All Blacks by not giving them all the decisions they want. That said, these threats are minimal.

England
When they beat New Zealand in 2012, things looked on the up for England. Coach Stuart Lancaster had a plan and it seemed to be working.

Since then, poor performances in the big games let them down – Wales in 2013 and Ireland in 2014 outplayed England in the Six Nations, and the Southern Hemisphere ritually humble England at Twickenham to put paid to Lancaster’s myth that Fortress Twickers is the new Camelot.

The All Blacks beat them 3-0 in New Zealand recently in a tour which was designed to show England they could beat anyone.

England look good up front but, hampered by injury and ‘too much choice’, are struggling to pick a stable, cohesive, fearsome backline. With Manu Tuilagi, they fear no one, but its very unlikely they’ll get seven injury-free games in a row from the big centre.

However, do not underestimate the power of home advantage. England have good kickoff times, home field and local knowledge. Should England get going they’ll have an incredibly huge partisan support, a jingoistic press, and a nationalistic pride surging behind them, making them a juggernaut.

South Africa
The Boks are playing hot and cold at the moment. Sometimes their vast experience is brought to bear, applying a steady hand to the tiller for their youthful energy and exuberance to thrive resulting in astonishingly controlled successful performances. Sometimes the older guys in the team look clapped-out and the youngsters clueless.

They beat New Zealand in a thriller but looked utterly bamboozled against Ireland.

If they get the right blend to derive a high-standard consistency, then they’ll be in the mix for a medal. If it fails to gel, then they could be in for more trouble than they reckoned with in their group. Scotland are on the up and bring a massive support, Japan are nobody’s mugs these days, although still a cycle away from being serious.

Australia
To say Australia is in flux would be a massive understatement. The Aussies jettisoned Robbie Deans as coach in 2012 under crowd and press lobbying, and Ewen McKenzie in 2014 for player pressure. There’s no money in the biscuit tin and there’s no apparent prospect of any arriving soon – any new ideas can’t seem to catch the public attention and competition for recreational money is intense.

Still, Michael Cheika is a charismatic and successful chap who can get the Wallabies believing in their undoubted back-line talent and rolling in the right direction.

But it’s all a little late. For a British October World Cup, all their pack need to beef up 10 kilograms or so, drill their set-piece technique and work on their mental prep to cope with potential defence-favouring breakdown refereeing.

Ireland
These lads are doing quite nicely. A close one against New Zealand, a Six Nations win with a tough finale in Paris, and big win over the Boks all point to the Irish coming up on the rails nicely.

The retirement of Brian O’Driscoll has not held them back and many of their other players look like they’ve stepped up from the shadow into the limelight. Jonathan Sexton, in particular, looks head and shoulders above any other stand-off half in world rugby on his day.

Can they keep the momentum going? There’s the challenge. Against New Zealand in 2013 they had the game won and frittered it away. If they’ve learnt from that, as a unit, then they’ll be there or thereabouts. If not, then they’ll spark-up and fade away like a match.

Squad depth might be an issue, especially in the forwards. Keeping their talismanic pack leaders fit and energetic looks the biggest challenge.

France
In 2007 they lost to Tonga and self-destructed. But in 2011, they bonded like no other team and came within a whisker of winning the Cup.

This is the French – form means nothing, style means everything.

They look to have settled on a #10 now in Camille Lopez, which has got to help. They have the same big brutality in the pack as ever, they can play in mud or on the top of the ground. They can run and they can shove. They can be fluent and they can control the game.

But some days they can’t.

The French see the Irish as mercurial. But to everyone else, the French suit that adjective perfectly.

Capable of turning up in September after 10 consecutive losses and winning the thing, who knows how the French will perform. A good Six Nations and they’ll be rampant to start with.

Wales
Wales have all the notes, but not necessarily in the right order.

A barnstorming 2013 Six Nations and many successful Lions looked like leading Wales into the promised land of contenders.

But continual losses to the big boys is sapping energy and morale, despite what their management are saying.

One of the usual excuses – disharmony between nation and region – has been removed to be replaced with a new one – crowd on our backs. The usual nonsense excuses appearing after embarrassing losses. They have been on the brink of self-destruction before; sometimes they tumble in and sometimes they pull back and thrive.

Wales must move onwards from their usual parochial target of Six Nations champs and look to different desires of World Cup. Their plan of team outing worked last time and I expect them to come back fit and bonded from the cryogenic chambers of Poland prior to the big event.

This will help. But it might not help enough.

Other Tier 1 nations
Scotland are on the up, scoring tries for fun. Italy are on the way down and are close to despair. Argentina are faltering and seek a new identity, having grown out of their massive-pack phase.

These nations might do well in the competition, success for them though will likely be measured in terms of getting out of the group or reach the semis. They’re unlikely to have the depth of squad to win it and would need all their first 23 fit throughout to stand a chance.

On today’s attritional rugby field, this is an outside bet.

Despite stated ambitions, I suspect satisfaction for these teams will be measured in terms of coming second in their groups. Or not, as the case may be.

Tune in tomorrow for the Tier 2 nations, as well as a best guess at which nation will be crowned World Champions.

The Crowd Says:

2014-11-24T12:55:55+00:00

RodMac

Roar Rookie


Why are you here?

2014-11-22T13:36:50+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


Unlike NZ of course, who tore up the tournament...oh hang on.

2014-11-22T11:39:24+00:00

john

Guest


Yes, Further to my email. People look around and say "the ABs don't score tries like they used to" They're right - they don't. But people forget they used to win games 50-35, 55-30, 30-25 etc. Their defense wasn't flash hot at all. They don't score as many tries as they used to, but they also don't leak anywhere near the types of scores they used to in the past. The games tightened up all over the park. As we saw in the 07 WC final, you can win games without scoring a try. I think we all just have to appreciate the closeness and ultra competition that is International Rugby. It would break my heart as a Kiwi fan for RM and those senior plays if they lost a really hard fought game to a better team on the day and they were labelled "chokers" - that would just be really sad. My line of thinking is that no tier 1 result would be an upset - with the quality of kickers we have in the game today, if you give up say 5 penalties within your 50m (which isn't uncommon), you can expect to concede 12points. That's huge.

2014-11-22T10:23:04+00:00

Nathan Sanders

Guest


john, it used to be very surprising in Super rugby for a lesser side to beat one of the bigger teams, now no one even thinks twice if say the Lions or Rebels beats the bigger sides, because it happens fairly often every season now... this I believe is due to so many games being played, wearing out players/injury. The same is now happening to international rugby. Has anyone else noticed that there are very few thrashings? Sure, France got beaten badly in Australia, however they were far from a full strength side and clearly in their surrender mood. Games between the 6 nations and the 4 nations sides are now usually decided by 3-4 points and I expect things to get even more competitive once the 18 team super rugby format comes into play, leveling the playing field even more with more games and even more travel for the SH.

2014-11-22T09:22:47+00:00

In Brief

Guest


Not true - the final of the last world cup had more ball movement than this year's entire state of origin series. It also had great defence and intense pressure. The number of tries doesn't mean that much. Also, tier 2 countries fared very well. Romania pushed Scotland, Tonga beat France, Canada had a great tournament and Russia scored some great tries.

2014-11-22T05:36:07+00:00

WQ

Guest


You got that right Rugby Tragic, I don't think I would sleep for months!!

2014-11-22T05:25:25+00:00


I doubt taking team A lightly is because you beat team B, those are mere assumptions you are making. Jake White took Ireland lightly in 2004, and that had nothing to do with beating the All Blacks, We took Wales lightly in their second test this June after beating them comfortably in the first, had nothing to do with beating NZ.

2014-11-22T04:57:01+00:00

Birdy

Guest


As normal with these things the truth is somewhere in the middle. England were neither brilliant (nor did they think they were) the day after they beat the ABs in 2012 nor are they dreadful now because they've lost the last 2 close games to the ABs and Boks. It's nonsense that England got 'complacent' after the 2012 win. After the first 'who saw that coming' flush of media coverage in the couple of days after the match the overwhelming tone of the coverage and certainly the mood music coming out of the camp was it's a one off and we need to maintain and push beyond those standards. I don' think top international players think like First XV imagines - they're too worried about their place in the side to just sit and coast, particularly when so many places are up for grabs. As it happens I've long thought this RWC would arrive 12-18 months too early for England. That's been compounded by the last 10 months when, for various reasons, mostly to do with injuries England haven't been able to bed down likely partnerships, particularly in the centres. However, I hope people start writing them off, particularly in the SH. My dream is for the Aussies to stroll out at Twickenham in 2015 the way they did in Marseilles in 2007. England will have a very formidable pack and, with a little luck with injuries, a better backline than most expect. Whether that will be enough to lift the RWC I doubt, but if I was the opposition I would like to avoid them.

2014-11-22T04:36:27+00:00

Wardad

Guest


And people call you the unready !

2014-11-22T04:35:43+00:00

Wardad

Guest


The postage stamp sized book was good value ...

2014-11-22T04:34:45+00:00

Wardad

Guest


Frozen north of the shoulders eh ? Or is it the lack of success from that frozen clime thats the problem ?

2014-11-22T04:33:08+00:00

Wardad

Guest


Yes I am afraid he should have spent more than one semester at clown college .

2014-11-22T04:30:18+00:00

Wardad

Guest


That was Barnes in the Brissie test ,I know cos I watched him let Geniatals get away with whatever he wanted and could literally see it click in his head that this was so .

2014-11-22T03:30:47+00:00

Rugby Tragic

Guest


Ha!, that's no dream, that's WQ's nightmare ... mine too!

2014-11-22T02:45:31+00:00

Popeye

Guest


Maybe replay the highlights tape of Englands 2014 FIFA WC, wouldn't take long ;-)

2014-11-22T02:23:38+00:00

Sir William Webb Ellis

Guest


Dream on WQ

2014-11-22T02:11:35+00:00

WQ

Guest


I bet you would rather watch a nil all draw in some friendly game of soccer?

2014-11-22T02:08:26+00:00

WQ

Guest


England are clear favorites Magic Sponge, with South Africa, Australia and also France. These are all Teams on the way up. New Zealand are finished, as usual they have peaked to early and if they make it through their pool, will choke in the quarter final.

2014-11-22T01:31:59+00:00

john

Guest


Anyone can beat anyone. I wouldn't be surprised if the ABs lost in the semis/final. Honestly. There is a fine line between winning and losing..all it takes is a missed tackle, bad referring decision etc. Now if the ABs were demolished 50-5 in a semi, then Id be surprised. But Rugby nowadays is so close and competitive. I don't really understand how anyone can be surprised if any one of the tier 1 teams beat each other.

2014-11-21T23:42:31+00:00

USrugger

Guest


Bryce took himself out by an unbelievably inept display. And this is not a comment on who won or lost, or would've won or lost. (The Boks know the basic schoolboy rule: Take it away from the ref! They failed.) Bryce was as bad as anything ever seen.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar