Captain Clarke is the man for turmoil

By Brett McKay / Expert

How many times in the last week or so have you read a comment or heard someone say, ‘Michael Clarke has really grown in my estimations’, or something similar?

It was an interesting discussion on the ABC‘s Offsiders program on Sunday morning that made me think about this.

The point was made that it’s a rare occurrence in any of the major Australian sports that the captain or a star player would become the face of the team or the game in a time of crisis.

More Cricket:
» LEMON: Hughes in the foreground as Test cricket begins
» Baggy Greens need to play hard but fair for 408
» Michael Clarke to play in first Test
» MS Dhoni to miss first Test, Virat Kohli Indian captain

More often than not, it’s the coach or the CEO, and other times it might just be a spokesperson. Even in cricket, this is true.

But when Australian cricket has been at its most vulnerable over the last fortnight, Michael Clarke has been front and centre in this still raw time of grieving, as the game still comes to terms with the death of Phillip Hughes.

A good mate of mine, who hasn’t necessarily been the biggest fan of Michael Clarke the player, never mind Michael Clarke the captain, made this admission late last week as our Sydney Day 1 group discussed our now-adjusted plans.

“My opinion of M. Clarke has also increased in the last week. Has he finally become the man/captain that those in the know always said he was?”

And it’s certainly true that Clarke has performed exceptionally in this time, in the face of what must have been – and still will be for some time – a very tough time personally.

But why does this surprise still exist? What more does Clarke have to do to win people over, considering his performances in several trying personal times in recent years?

It seems it’s still ‘cool’ in some quarters to find fault with Clarke for whatever reason, but to me at least, he’s been pretty dependable on the field when things haven’t been going that well off it.

The obvious starting point would be returning to Wellington in March 2010 only a day or so out from the First Test against New Zealand, having left the tour to return home to Sydney and attend to the breakup of a relationship.

With all sort of scrutiny and questioning around his preparation, Clarke walked into the sheds on the first day on 100 not out off 141 balls, and having raised the second fifty in just 39 balls. He’d go on to make 168, the highest score among his 13 Test tons to that point, a 253-run fifth-wicket partnership with Marcus North helping to set up a 10-wicket win.

Three more centuries and 22 months later, and there was the bizarre criticism that he didn’t go on and make ‘big hundreds’, and that to that point still hadn’t recorded a Test double hundred. I recall at the time there even being some derision because he knocked back a lucrative contract renewal with his then life-long bat sponsor, instead using a clean bat for the Test.

Now twelve months into his captaincy, the suggestion was also that Clarke was still only worried about looking after himself.

Having rolled India on the first day, Clarke remained undefeated through to the third day, by which stage he declared with Australia leading by 468 and with Michael Hussey just raising an unbeaten 150. Clarke made his majestic 329 not out, and Australia won the SCG’s 100th and what would be Sachin Tendulkar’s last Test in Australia by more an innings.

Three years, nine centuries, and more than 2500 runs further down the track again, and the questions were back. Heading into the Third Test against South Africa in Cape Town, Clarke hadn’t made more than 24 in his last eleven innings. Never mind that he’d made 148 in the one before that, and 113 in the one before that.

Clarke had already been roughed up by Dale Steyn and Morne Morkel in the first two Tests, but Morkel took it up several notches at Newlands peppering Clarke throughout the first day and hitting him on the forearm, elbow, shoulder and helmet. With next to no sleep and what would later be diagnosed as a shoulder fracture, Clarke on Day 2 reached what is now widely recognised as his best century, finishing on 161 not out.

And now we head to Adelaide to start the summer, with an altogether different kind of turmoil.

Clarke has lost his best mate, a man he’s emotionally and publicly referred to as “my little brother”, and he’s also the owner of the National Hamstring, injury to which was about to rule him out of action on the day Phillip Hughes was felled.

Oh, and he’s barely made a run since Newlands.

But amidst all that has gone on of late, and the round-the-clock attention Clarke is now receiving in Adelaide in the lead-up to the Test, I can’t think of anyone I’d rather send out to bat.

Clarke has proved himself to the doubters – again – and the way he’s handled himself in what is obviously a tough emotional period is clearly inspiring his teammates. You can hear that in Brad Haddin and Shane Watson’s words over the weekend.

I said last week that I was sure Clarke will play at the Adelaide Oval, and I’m also quite sure that his superb leadership throughout all this will get all his teammates on the field tomorrow, too.

The Australian team isn’t at anywhere near the depths Allan Border endured as captain, but Clarke is becoming similarly dependable when the chips are down. I’m not a betting man, but if I was, I’d be backing the skipper to do the job again in Adelaide.

The Crowd Says:

2014-12-11T01:04:42+00:00

Enrock

Guest


Yes, that's a good point. Even though there aren't as many "purists" around, cricket is still deep within the public psyche when it comes to summer in Australia & the Captain is highly regarded. I do remember Howard used to joke but I believe the phrase originally came from a different Prime Minister - possibly Hawke? Anyway, top article mate.

2014-12-09T04:52:36+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


I never had a problem with Clarke's "broken...arm" comment. He did that in defence of Mr Nice Guy, George Bailey, who was being constantly bad mouthed. Leadership, mateship, strength. Clarke did not instigate and it was not ugly. In fact, it would have stayed on the ground if not for invasive media that brought it to public attention. Can you imagine our perception of the squeaky clean heroes of the past if we had stump cam then?

2014-12-09T03:30:45+00:00

Wal

Roar Guru


Fair enough I just never saw them involved in the ugly sort of spats I mentioned above. I have never had a problem with a bit of talk to try and unsettle an opponent. Some just take it to far. Once captain both Taylor and Smith kept a lid on it for the majority of the time.

2014-12-09T01:36:30+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


You really think Graeme Smith and Mark Taylor weren't as verbal as Clarkey? Smith was always at people and a constant whinger early in his career. Yours is a misperception.

2014-12-08T23:54:33+00:00

Wal

Roar Guru


I think a lot of the perceptions around Michael Clarke (mine included) are based on not rising above some incidents as opposed to any instigation on his behalf. Jimmy Anderson incident was just plain ugly, and yes Anderson might be a grub, but surely a captain should rise above that. He obviously said something to Steyn, and add Katich and the common thread is Michael Clarke. As I say he may not have started any of these incidents but as Captain my opinion is he should not inflame them. The Captains I admire the most, John Smit, Jean Devilliers, Richie McCaw, John Eales, Mark Taylor, Stephen Flemming, Grahme Smith etc just aren't involved in these incidents. Like your friend my opinion of him has grown immeasurably and I hope he can now go on become a great leader of men on top of a great cricketer.

2014-12-08T14:29:26+00:00

Yasir Bhat

Guest


Michael Clarke the best captain of the lot.Big fan of him because of what he has achieved and he has yet to be achived. Big fan of Clarke from Kashmir,India

2014-12-08T14:05:50+00:00

Tom from Perth

Roar Rookie


Excellent article

2014-12-08T14:03:33+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


The Whitlams' song, "Blow up the Pakkis".

2014-12-08T12:58:53+00:00

Maggie

Guest


Haha! You might be right, all depends how much Christmas pud they all eat and what shape they come back in next year. But there is a LOT of cricket to go first, particularly here in Sydney with a stack of World Cup matches to come. Wonder what the team song for Afghanistan sounds like? Hope they do get a chance to sing it!

2014-12-08T12:26:49+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


That's right, Maggie...and just as a little pre-season practice, I'd like to suggest the purple people might sing more often than the Swannies this year.

2014-12-08T11:58:05+00:00

Maggie

Guest


Indeed Don. Your Dockers and my Swannies sing their songs 5 MINUTES after a win. What on earth was the problem with asking the Oz cricketers to finally get around to singing their song 5 HOURS after their win???

2014-12-08T11:32:59+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


I've always thought that Maggie. They all wanted to keep drinking and Clarkey had a burgeoning love life he wanted to flame. Why couldn't they sing the song before they got off their faces? Then the non-drinkers could have gone home.

2014-12-08T11:28:11+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


I actually think Pete is also SFL...on the other medication.

2014-12-08T11:27:31+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Will Watson be LBW before or after he gets 14, Pete?..(he asks, expecting Pete to be thinking about the answer).

2014-12-08T05:53:07+00:00

jamesb

Guest


Yeah , Im sorry about that, I probably didn't explain it the right way. It sort of makes it look like a left field suggestion. Obviously a deceased 12th man is not going to play. But I was thinking more as an honorary tribute.

AUTHOR

2014-12-08T05:16:53+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Um.......... hmm.. I don't imagine the rule book would say anything about it either way James, because I can't imagine too many deceased people being named to play! But... there is certainly a degree of acceptance around ceremonial naming of a 13th man. Back in the day, Bob Hawke used to name himself 13th man in his PMs sides, for example...

2014-12-08T05:16:30+00:00

Maggie

Guest


As 'anyone' with a modicum of good judgement would know, there was only one person who was divisive when Katich physically attacked Clarke - and it wasn't Michael Clarke.

2014-12-08T04:45:46+00:00

jamesb

Guest


Hey Brett, With Phil Hughes been named as 13th man, I was just wondering: In the rule book, can a deceased player be named as 12th man?

AUTHOR

2014-12-08T04:05:35+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


I'll save my flaming for breakfast in Darlinghurst... ;-)

2014-12-08T03:52:40+00:00

coops

Roar Rookie


Great article mate. I resemble that remark! At the risk of being flamed, let me attempt to defend my completely judgmental remarks! I like my Australian captains in the mould of AB and S. Waugh; tough, uncompromising and genuine leaders and men who inspired their whole team to achieve greatness to the point where any of their team mates would gladly step in front of the bullet without question if they even got a sideways glance from the captain. In all honesty, I just never got this feeling from Clarke. He outwardly appeared divisive (Katich... anyone? anyone?) and appeared to be more concerned with his hair product contract rather than the baggy green. As I said, I appreciate that I am/have been judgemental on someone I don't even know. I also believe that the way he has carried himself in the last fortnight proves beyond reproach that he is the man to be leading our cricket team today. I have nothing but the utmost respect for his care of the Hughes family and the way on which he has undertaken his duties as Hughes best mate and the Australian cricket captain. The kind of inspirational leadership I've been seeking from him for years!!! (let the flaming begin!)

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar