When is it time for the Cavs to panic?

By Ryan O'Connell / Expert

The Cleveland Cavaliers currently sit in fifth spot in the Eastern Conference, nursing a 19-15 record for a winning percentage of 0.559, and superstar LeBron James will not play for the next two weeks due to an assortment of injuries.

Though those numbers and LeBron’s health should not induce an all-out anxiety attack, there were high expectations for the Cavs this season, and they don’t appear close to achieving them.

Though lofty expectations like a 0.750 winning percentage, a domination of the East, and Cleveland’s first NBA title may have all been completely unrealistic to begin with, it comes with the territory of signing the best basketball player in the world and another top-ten talent, in LeBron James and Kevin Love respectively.

Considering the Cavs have played less than 50 per cent of their 82-game regular season, it’s still too early to adjudicate on those expectations anyway, for the Cavs may still achieve them.

However, what can’t be denied is that the Cavs haven’t looked impressive, even before LeBron was forced to miss games. Which raises the inevitable question: is it time to panic?

To answer that question, the Cavs front office needs to have an ‘honesty policy’ with themselves.

Forgetting the media hype around the team preseason, what was the franchise’s actual realistic objective for the team this season? Was it ‘championship or bust’? Or was there a recognition that a title may take a season or two, and the objective this season was to be building towards that?

LeBron himself has often said that this Cleveland team will be a ‘process’, and suggested that while a championship is the ultimate goal, it may not come this season.

Whatever the objective, the team’s current on-court performance should be measured against it. And if the front office can make a change that will help the team achieve that objective, they should do it. That’s not panicking, that’s doing your job as an executive.

So, do the Cavs simply need more time to gel, or is there something fundamentally wrong with the team, and a change required?

Much has been written and said about Cleveland’s ‘struggles’ this season. Ball movement of offense, and rim protection on defence, have been widely identified as the chief concerns.

The former should, hopefully, be fixed through patience and persistence. There is a lot of offensive talent on the roster, and it would appear – on paper – that it should eventually work together seamlessly. The Cavs have ball-handling, passing, perimeter shooting, post play and offensive rebounding all covered.

They could do with a little less selfishness at times, but considering that is actually LeBron’s wish, and the stature he holds on the team, that will no doubt come as well.

The Cavs offense is certainly one area where the coach should have a lot of impact, and with the weapons at David Blatt’s disposal, he needs to make this work, for other coaches would kill to have this array of talent.

For mine, the team simply needs a little more time together – along with a clear offensive identity – and it will be absolutely fine on that end of the floor. Though if the offense is still an issue come playoff time, or at worst, early next season, Blatt will be under enormous pressure to hold onto his job, and rightfully so.

On defence, however, it’s a different story, mainly because I’m not sure ‘time’ or coaching will solve anything. This is an area where the roster may simply need an upgrade.

Nearly halfway through a season is a sub-optimal time to sign a quality free agent. It goes without saying that almost all players are well and truly locked up by now, and that’s before you even consider the fact that the Cavs have a niche need.

Veterans Jermaine O’Neal and Emeka Okafor have been mentioned as potential pick-ups, and both would do a solid job providing the Cavs with what they are lacking. Yet considering their age and/or injury concerns, neither would be a guaranteed solution.

If the Cavs can’t land a free agent, and legitimately want to win this season rather than wait until the off-season to solve their rim protection issues, then the front office is going to need to make a trade. That’s where things get a little tricky.

To get quality they’ll have to give up quality, and whom on the roster do they deem expendable? The Cavs need to be careful that they don’t strengthen one area of the roster by significantly weakening another. If so, all they’ll be doing is filling up a leaky bucket.

Overall, if the question is ‘when is it time for the Cavs to panic?’, the answer is ‘never’. Yet that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t make changes if it’s for the short and long-term benefit of the franchise.

The key is, do you wait until the off-season to make an addition, and potentially sacrifice a title this year? Or do you roll the dice and make a move now? And if so, what’s that move?

Questions, questions, questions. Yet for the time being, there are no answers.

The Crowd Says:

2015-01-09T03:48:11+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


Yep they have moved it which is why they are now stuck in retred mode. The "torrent of #1 picks" meant the actual #1 overall picks they've gotten which any other fornt office on earth surely would have turned into a decent team. Given the projected increase in the cap (and the number of teams below it now) salary dumps aren't as valuable as they were before.

2015-01-08T23:33:11+00:00

Mark Pybus

Roar Guru


I thought they used that pick in the Mosgov trade? I still think they have an exception from the Keith Bogans thing but now need to find a team that is willing to dump salary. Plus they have Haywards massive expiring contract. Other than that I don't see them moving a James Jones or Joe Harris for anything of value.

2015-01-08T20:57:43+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


I think they're now stuck in the miami heat retred mode of picking up aging or injured big men and hoping for the best. One part i liked about the waiters trade is that at least they got a pick, which is a cheap potential rotation palyer that they can pick up with out hurting their use of exemptions. These trades are part of why I don't understand Bron going home - this orgnaisation is Knicks terrible without the massive market to back it up. Lets face it the only thing keeping the Cavs relevant is the torrent of #1 picks.

AUTHOR

2015-01-08T08:13:49+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


I can only assume they're not done? Don't know what other assets they have now to use though.

2015-01-08T07:44:25+00:00

Shaun Mancini

Roar Pro


Both trades so far have been panic trades. I know they needed to remove Waiters because he doesn't fit and was unhappy and what not but for JR Smith? Really? A dude that will bring the exact same thing on and off the court. The Cavs were keen on Shumpert but had to take Smith to get him. The Knicks won that little battle for sure. I knew they were going aggressive for a C and Mozgov is decent and will do a job but 2 first rounders? Denver were always taking that. 2 trades down and they haven't made any ground on Chicago, Atlanta, Toronto and Washington

2015-01-08T04:30:38+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


I need a typist

2015-01-08T04:29:57+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


I get trading the two first rounders for the ace... not sure it works as well for the 7 though. also they should have asked Baltt how he was going to use love. The probably could have gotten Ryan Anderson much cheaper

2015-01-08T03:42:44+00:00

Mark Pybus

Roar Guru


So is that 4 first round picks dealt for Love and Mosgov? Feels like they are going all in with an ace/seven hand and hoping for the best.

2015-01-08T03:26:42+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


Given they only upgraded their rim protection for half the game and didn't upgrade in an overall sense just "replaced" Andy V. so basically they ar ethe team they were before expect with a better wing defender and no remaining assets.

2015-01-08T01:59:08+00:00

mpc

Guest


The Cavs should hire Pop. With Pop and King James, they would be unstoppable.

AUTHOR

2015-01-07T21:55:06+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


They upgraded their wing defense and rim protection. So they addressed some needs. Just not sure how far it actually moves the dial though.

2015-01-07T21:52:34+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


Two first rounders including one which could be a high pick in 17 if anything happens to Marc Gasol (but that’s fine because big guys with bad backs get healthier as they get older right....) that’s a high price for a mid career big who struggles with fouls. Mozgov can only really give them a consistent 20-25 minutes because of his foul rate that still leaves 23-28 minutes of small ball? Steep price.

AUTHOR

2015-01-07T21:21:03+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


Ok, the Cavs are getting Mozgov. Makes things are little clearer. http://sports.yahoo.com/news/sources--cavs-acquire-timofey-mozgov-from-nuggets-205848251.html

2015-01-06T21:34:22+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


Pelton on ESPN is raving about it claimng that smith is better at what he does (spark plug scoring) than waiters. What he leaves out is that - they don't need a bench scorer -they've got shot creators so surely any coach can manage their minutes in the palyoffs to ensure one is on the floor with the second unit at all times. He then leaves out the age, contract and chemsitry issues that make Smith a massive negative and something the Knicks had to pay (shump) to get rid of. I would have thought you could get a rotation big for Waiters which would be far more helpful. I have come around to the thinking that Shump is probably an upgrade over Waiters - even if front offices probably value Waiters more, but when your a team suffering chemisty and coaching issues don't bring in Earl Smith III

2015-01-06T09:22:39+00:00

Ryan OConnell

Guest


I said they shouldn't panic. They totally panicked. What the hell is this trade? I'm baffled!

AUTHOR

2015-01-06T09:21:23+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


Shumpy is a good perimeter defender, but they weren't horrible in that department. To give up a valuable trade asset in Waiters to get that back, makes no sense to me. At all.

2015-01-06T09:07:40+00:00

Squidward

Roar Rookie


I think they panicked Shrumpy yes. Smith no. He's a liability unless LBJ pulls him into line

2015-01-06T04:06:57+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


Surely they are buying out Smith and this trade was for Shumpert?

2015-01-06T04:06:11+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


Love isn't soft no guy that bangs for 13 rebounds per 36 miutes over their career can be soft. He's just not a rim protector, that doens't mean he doesn't "play" defence as his metrics have always suggested he's about netural to plus guy (remember rebounding on D is a defensive play). There is just a celing on how effective he can be cleaning up penetration. If he didn't actually play D his numbers would be horrible givne his inability to cherry pick

2015-01-06T03:37:38+00:00

Swampy

Guest


Wow this could be awesome - I always thought Kobe Bryant would be the first person to kill a teammate on court (Swaggy P) - but it's evening up now - I put Lebron right there with Smith the cadaver. -- Comment from The Roar's iPhone app.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar