Watto, hell hath no fury like a cricket-loving public scorned

By Mitch Sabine / Roar Rookie

Shane Watson, I share a relationship with you akin to the one I shared with my ex-girlfriend: toxic.

In the heady good times, you promise so much. The dead-rubber hundreds, the blistering cover drives and the sensational looking twenties, thirties, eighties and nineties.

There must be no other batsman in history who scores more better-looking low scores than you, Watto.

Then come the all-too-often bad times, where I throw the remote at the ground in disgust, swearing incessantly at the TV as you throw your wicket away in the most imaginative ways possible.

Wafting outside off on 40-odd? Check.

Slashing at a good length ball that should be left alone? Check.

Countless LBWs, in a variety of different ways? Check.

Holing out to deep mid-on with 81 runs on the board, despite the ocean of greenery surrounding the fielder and another dead-rubber 100 within reach? Check that one off too.

You just can’t control yourself, can you?

I can’t take this anymore Shane, I’m done. You’ve got to go.

I told myself every Test match for years that there was something about you, an itch that was yet to be scratched. That magic word that guaranteed your selection for so long: potential.

But Shane, you’re 33 years old. I’m a 24-year-old man in the prime of his life. I just can’t keep doing this. The time for potential has long passed, and the selectors still insist on calling you a ‘genuine all-rounder’.

But you don’t bowl with the same nagging accuracy and upright seam you used to. You barely even take wickets these days.

When I looked up your statistics a few weeks ago mid-argument with my mate over the legitimacy of your selection, it felt like when I found messages from another man on my ex’s Facebook.

71 wickets? You promised so much more, Watto.

And what was with Wednesday? You looked set, and if there was ever a day you were going to score another one of your teasing dead-rubber hundreds, it was Wednesday.

The wicket was a road. The bowlers less venomous than a green tree snake. Mohammed Shami was bowling his party pies in the most delicious of areas.

Yet you betrayed me again. I cringed as the ball left your bat, sailing into the deep. You ripped my heart apart again, Shane. I’ve given you too many chances. For every good time we have, I can think of another five which hurt me to the core.

Remember back in 2009, when you scored your first hundred against Pakistan at the MCG?

I remember the smile on my face that day, abusing my friends through a drunken haze, proclaiming how you were different than they’d all said. I waited 10 months for your next one Shane.

A few wickets here and there kept me around for the next three years while I waited for your third, which finally came against England at The Oval. Another in The Ashes just months later provided me with the same false hope as the holiday I took with my ex a couple of months before we split.

“Maybe he is different,” I thought to myself. I was happy for a few weeks. Optimistic.

Now, after scores of 10, 83, 43, 9, 40, 25, 14, 33, 52, 17 and Wednesday’s 81, I feel stupid again. We had some good times, Shane, but I need stability.

“Where are you gonna find someone else like me?” I hear you ask. Honestly, I don’t know. The Shield ranks are pretty barren right now, but I’ll make do.

Maybe I’ll experiment. People have told me Shaun Marsh is the goods, but he reminds me too much of you. I like Joe Burns. He has potential.

But for now, I’m happy by myself. I think the rest of Australia is too.

Goodbye, my Watto.

The Crowd Says:

2015-01-08T21:19:26+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


I don't care where he bats as long as the best batsmen are batting where they want, and that the new comer is afforded a good chance to develop down the order. I'm almost certain that's why he's batting at 3.

2015-01-08T09:52:45+00:00

Mark

Guest


I actually relate to what you're saying Mitch, and find it a bit rough of NickW to request deletion, just because he doesn't like it, and you're apparently a "no-name". As a tongue-in-cheek piece, it has merit, and I feel the same way you do- Watson has basically been clinging to his position, and teasing us with glimpses for the last decade. I'm a Shane Watson fan, but just want to see him consistently score runs, with the occasional hundred mixed in. His numbers aren't really good enough for a number 3, yet for a number 6 bat you'd happily take that. As a comparison, Steve Waugh batted at 6 for the start of his career (when he was a bit of an all-rounder) and he averaged less than 40 with the bat, and over 40 with the ball. At this stage, Watson averages over 35 with the bat, and under 35 with the ball. Another basically number 6 all-rounder more recently was Symonds, who ended his career averaging 40 with the bat and 37 with the ball . . similar numbers. Symonds played basically half the number of tests as Watson, and has half the centuries (2) and roughly half the 50s . .. so very similar conversion rate. Waugh at that point of his career also only had 3 hundreds. Bottom line is, if Watson was producing these numbers as a number 6 bat, Aust should be pretty happy. But because we've got him at 3 (and also view him as someone with great talent) he is expected to produce more with the bat. Forgetting about his conversation rate of 50s to 100s, his numbers are actually very good for an all-rounder. The frustration comes from the fact that we expect more of him, whereas someone like Langer/Rogers/Katich/whoever else was always viewed as someone who squeezed the most out of their talent. To sum up, Mitch, I appreciated your piece and know where you're coming from. Why these other posters took it so seriously I'm unsure.

2015-01-08T05:59:24+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


And I think you've totally missed my point. The point of going in a different direction would be to find somebody better. As nobody else has an equal record (except Burns and Voges who is older), that's why they keep Watson around. Perhaps Lynn but he hasn't played FC cricket this Summer. You have to consider that Watson's drop from his FC average to his Test average is one of the lower drops between averages (Clarke, Smith, Warner and Marsh are the only current instances of batsman to lose 2 runs of less). Whilst statistics don't tell the whole story, if the average drop in test average from FC average is 10 runs for the current players (this is excluding players who have only played 1 or 2 matches) for a player, then I would not be expecting any player to average more than 33, which is less than Watson. In which case they are scoring less runs and are pointless replacing him.

AUTHOR

2015-01-08T05:50:07+00:00

Mitch Sabine

Roar Rookie


you both totally missed my point. I love shane Watson as a player, but he's 33 and in my opinion it's time to go in a different direction. but after yesterday and today, there's no way the selectors will. it's just another reminder of how good he CAN be.

AUTHOR

2015-01-08T05:47:03+00:00

Mitch Sabine

Roar Rookie


then you go and do that! why shane, why!?

2015-01-08T04:08:27+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


But players aren't picked based on the amount of potential they fill. They are picked based on results and as Nick notes, his results are up there (mostly better) than any replacement.

AUTHOR

2015-01-08T00:51:31+00:00

Mitch Sabine

Roar Rookie


thanks for your kind words. just somebody who's watched and played numerous sports for a very long time, who doesn't like seeing potential unfulfilled. it was meant to be tongue in cheek, pointing out the support that I've put behind watto over the years only to have him let me down time and time again. cheers.

2015-01-07T23:37:03+00:00

NickW

Guest


Dreadful article. Who are you? Check out his averages in Test / FC against everyone bar the top 3. I can't stand articles like this from no-names. Delete this Roar.

Read more at The Roar