Watchable Socceroos must keep calm and make the semis

By Tony Tannous / Expert

Our Socceroos are watchable again, and appear to be on the rise, but a slip-up in Thursday night’s quarter final against a Chinese side that has been making quite the splash at this tournament would mean this campaign is rightly viewed as a failure, despite the early promise.

Make no mistake, the pressure is on Ange Postecoglou and his team to deliver a result in Brisbane, and if they can reproduce what they have for large parts of the opening three games then they should be too strong for Alain Perrin’s men.

But the Socceroos can’t afford to carry too many poor performers, as they did against South Korea.

While there was much noise made about the fact the Roos dominated possession and created the majority of the chances, tactically Uli Stielike’s men did what they wanted to, and had few weakness on the pitch.

The Socceroos, meanwhile, started slowly, succumbing to Korea’s early press, then appeared to play in a stressed manner in search of an equaliser that would have seen them top the group.

Tim Cahill’s running debate with the referee after he came on, and his manager’s mood after the game, where he brought up the state of the Brisbane pitch, summed up the pressure the team appeared under.

Thrown off course, they must show that they have regained their composure.

As much as we are enjoying seeing a more proactive Socceroos under Postecoglou, Thursday night is very much about the mental preparation and the team’s ability to handle the expectation that they should at least make the semi final.

The senior heads like Cahill, Mile Jedinak and either Matt McKay, Mark Milligan or Mark Bresciano must stand up, while the others with the experience of the World Cup behind them like Mat Ryan, Alex Wilkinson, Mathew Leckie, Ivan Franjic and Jason Davidson can’t be too far behind.

Perhaps the biggest test is for the back five.

While there have been signs of improvement from the uncertain work in Brazil, there have still been early lapses in concentration at set pieces in all three games that they might not have recovered from against better opponents.

Perhaps the biggest concern against Korea was in the fullback areas, where the likes of Lee Kuen-ho and Kim Jin-su on the left and Han Kyo-won and Kim Chang-soo on the right dominated Franjic and Aziz Behich respectively.

While Perrin has chopped and changed his wide men in the the group phase, one of the consistent themes between Yu Hai, Wu Xi, Sun Ke, Hao Junmin and Wu Lei has been the sheer work rate, speed and penetrating forward runs between defenders.

The Roos fullbacks have to be very alert.

Postecoglou has some decisions to make and my sense is Davidson, who played well against Oman in Game 2, and provides good defensive cover, might get the gig on the left.

The leg injury that ruled the chronically unlucky Chris Herd out of the tournament means that Franjic will retain his right back spot, but he has to do a better job.

If Perrin has his tactical cap on he might switch Sun Ke over to left and target the loose defensive positions Franjic can find himself in.

Conversely, the Socceroos, with Leckie and Robbie Kruse back in the fold in the high wide positions, will aim to limit the potential of the fullback being exposed by pressing China’s defence high.

Unlike the group phase, starting well will be important, and one of the key objectives of pressing high will be to limit the supply to and from screening midfielders Cui Huikang and Zheng Zhi, from where much of China’s crisp forward distribution comes.

The Roos will also need to be mindful of the speed of China in transition, and Trent Sainsbury’s job in pushing high and stopping the central striker, likely to be Gao Lin, will be critical.

All the while the sweeping of Wilkinson, in for the suspended Matt Spiranovic, and Ryan, will be important. If the Socceroos are to control this, the work of the midfield both from a pressing and ball circulation perspective will be critical.

This is where Postecoglou has the toughest decision to make. Jedinak appears to be ready to come back in, and it would sensible if that’s via a straight swap with Milligan.

While the latter had a great game against Oman, there is no room for both Jedinak and Milligan in Posteocglou’s new midfield which features just one holder. We’ve seen over the last two games that Milligan is best when he operates as a sole six, where he has the space to receive and distribute, and can control opponents.

We’ve seen in previous friendlies however that Milligan’s not suited to one of the twin eight roles ahead of the six, which requires a more dynamic and mobile type of midfielder. It would be a massive surprise if in-form Mass Luongo isn’t one of the two number eights.

The other spot is more interesting. James Troisi played there against Kuwait while McKay has started in the two games since Jedinak was injured. There has been a push for Bresciano but I must admit I’m not convinced about his legs for the sustained Roos pressing game.

In attack Kruse is key. His ability to drive beyond the defence with and without the ball, wide and between defenders, adds so much to the Socceroos attack. He is a big reason for the evolution of the Roos attack since Brazil, and looms as a key creative factor to break down a stubborn Chinese rearguard.

Meanwhile, Leckie has perhaps been less effective here than Brazil because the Socceroos are controlling games rather than relying on the transition he executed so ruthlessly last June.  

I’m expecting the Socceroos to be switched on and have too much quality, but if their composure and concentration isn’t spot on then Perrin’s men have enough threat to make it an uncomfortable night.

The other quarter finals

South Korea versus Uzbekistan
If Korea are anywhere near the level they displayed against the Socceroos on Matchday 3 they will be too strong.

They will be expected to make a bit more of the running here and if they can repeat the early press they showed against the Roos, Uzbekistan will find it tough.

The Uzbeks beat Saudi Arabia in the do-or-die match on Sunday but weren’t overly impressive, relying on the counter. Korea will be switched on to this.

Iran versus Iraq
I’ve been really impressed by Iran and struggle to see Iraq getting too close in Canberra.

Carlos Queiroz’s side is arguably the best defensively with Morteza Pouraliganji and Seyed Hosseini very strong, but in Askhan Dejagah, Sardar Azmoun, Reza Ghoochannejhad and Masoud Shojaei they have potency in attack.

They mightn’t always control possession, but they get in behind teams and create good chances, and the two old stagers in Andranik Teymourian and Javad Nekounam are steady foils, having had very good tournaments.

Japan versus United Arab Emirates
As good as Omar Abdulrahman, Ali Mabkhout, Ahmed Khalil and Mohamed Abdulrahman have been, Japan should be too strong.

Makato Hasebe, such a dominate figure against Jordan on Tuesday, has a key role in getting close to Omar Abdulrahman, and if he does the UAE’s supply will be limited.

Provided it’s not too hot in Sydney tomorrow, Japan’s pressing should be too much for the Emirati defence, and while they haven’t really been tested, they’ve been creating plenty in attack, with the foundation being the defending from the front.

The Crowd Says:

2015-01-23T01:23:36+00:00

hindsight

Guest


watchable? what game have you been watching, PS4 FIFA World Cup? Angie mid-field & tactics haven't shown up and he started with the wrong team against SK by even starting with Milligan let alone as captain! in the group stage not at any time did we maintain pressure in the crucial middle 3rd, the goals we did scored were mainly from crosses from the flanks and not from a highly structured possession/passing system (i.e. Japan), against China last night we were lucky they defended deep and yet were still couldn't break down their defensive patterns, we turned the ball over too easily (i.e. Jedinak), failed to keep the ball on the ground, not enough diagonal runs, lacked patience & creativity which highlights that we lack of a good No.10, was glad to see Bresciano back in the side but even he was short of a run

2015-01-22T21:55:44+00:00

fadida

Guest


I knew what you meant. And I agree to a large extent actually. I'd like to see him in the squad

2015-01-22T11:30:39+00:00

whiskeymac

Guest


Agree 're Korea but it was a close run thing for the Koreans. So far this game seems similar except there's more at stake. Too early to say jedinak is China's best player so far?

2015-01-22T07:15:00+00:00

James Anderson

Roar Guru


Troisi's touch has been terrible, and in the games he has started he has been very poor this tournament. Matt McKay can create chances, and has a much safer touch in possession. Plus, (although not the most dangerous player) he can offer a smart pass here and there, and will almost never lose the ball. Therefore, without two screening midfielders, he is a much more reliable player than Troisi, and works well with Luongo.

2015-01-22T07:05:18+00:00

James Anderson

Roar Guru


"tactically Uli Stielike’s men did what they wanted to, and had few weakness on the pitch." I disagree completely. A team full of the quality that Korea has doesn't go out against the Socceroos looking to score a quick goal then park the bus and concede large amounts of possession. Stielike is a fantastic coach and would be dissappointed in the way his team responded to going 1-0 up. In all fairness though, I think Australia was simply the stronger team of the night, and whilst we weren't allowed to play our game due to their defensive structure, Korea also weren't able to play their game due to our dominance and high pressing when off the ball. I agree that they had few weakness on the pitch, but I can't see Stielike coming away from that game confident in his team's performance. We dominated possession and should've won the match.

2015-01-22T07:01:50+00:00

fadida

Guest


No. He'd be thinking we dominated, gave away a poor goal and missed some sitters

2015-01-22T06:12:13+00:00

Batou

Guest


Agree (mostly, although there are many roles in midfield and goal scoring is only part of it), hence saying that I would prefer Antonis to start there. But I think Ange will opt for Troisi instead.

2015-01-22T05:59:09+00:00

Qantas supports Australian Football

Guest


@ fad you were too literal with my original comment of Mooy. I originally stated that Mooy was like Pirlo as a player, in that vein, strong on the ball, creative with it, and he can score goals, not that he was going to be as good as Pirlo. But, as always, you deliberately take my original comment out of context to score a political football point over me. So be it---so I ran with it. And now I will call him my little Pirlo, not yours perhaps, as you would rather to have an aging old Brisbane Roar player who can't hit the side of a barn with a bag of rice, as your little midfield darling. btw we do all remember what you had called him... So stay with it---don't try now to change the Oracles to save your reputation.

2015-01-22T05:23:03+00:00

fadida

Guest


My scapegoat? The only scapegoat I read about here is Matt Mackay, and he's your permanent one. I actually like Mooy but your assessment is so over the top. And I agree on Antonis BTW, but that chance to play him is probably gone

2015-01-22T03:49:53+00:00

Qantas supports Australian Football

Guest


I'll go for six nil---a double hat-trick for MacKay---so I won't be accused of being too negative, or anti MacKay as one of our esteem Roar annalists once described me as. There you are gents, I'll put my house on it... Buggar the new Pirlo...

2015-01-22T03:32:46+00:00

Qantas supports Australian Football

Guest


Batou---that is precisely the point. McKay offers zero goals threat. The days of midfields to just provide assists are long gone. There will be moments in a game that a midfielder will find himself in a position to score---at that time---you don't want one who can't even hit the target. Give me a Mooy or an Antonis to be there for that moment---to finish---not one who can't even hit the target.

2015-01-22T03:28:21+00:00

langou

Roar Guru


I think they score. 2-1 for me

2015-01-22T03:19:36+00:00

Titch

Guest


Just like Sth Korea did, China are gonna soak it up and hit us on the break. It's imperative we score first.

2015-01-22T03:18:16+00:00

Qantas supports Australian Football

Guest


I'll back my Pirlo to score a goal over your scapegoat any day of the week :)

2015-01-22T02:59:17+00:00

Franko

Guest


In for 3-0 Australia (goes without saying we must score and score early, the longer it takes the more the pressure builds)

2015-01-22T02:57:11+00:00

The Bear

Guest


I'll join you. 2 nil win to the Soceroos.

2015-01-22T02:44:17+00:00

oly

Guest


First line summed up my feelings perfectly: Our Socceroos are watchable again. While I'd love us to win the Asian Cup, even if we don't I still think there is a lot to be positive about.

AUTHOR

2015-01-22T02:30:31+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Cheers Batou, I'm pretty confident that Ange would have recognised he got out-thought for much of that game

2015-01-22T02:20:57+00:00

AR

Guest


I'll hang my head out there... AUST 3-0

2015-01-22T01:54:09+00:00

Fadida

Guest


Agree completely Melange. Ironically many people have said that one of the players who should have started, Kruse, missed just about the easiest chance. Had he scored the after-the-event-wisdom stories would be irrelevant! The other 2 who apparently should have started, Leckie and Cahill, were totally anonymous when they came on. One suspects that had no changes been made and we lost a game we totally dominated the same "experts" would have criticised the coach for not understanding tournament play and causing his players to be tired! It really is a lose- lose for the coach. And of course he should have picked Aaron "the new Pirlo" Mooy, according to some great minds :D

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar