By the numbers, Mitchell Starc is top of the world

By Geoff Lemon / Expert

If you crack a window open and hear a distant rumbling, it’s nothing to do with Formula 1. It’s Mitchell Starc heading towards the Melbourne Cricket Ground, and he’s picking up speed.

Rounding out the pool stage with 4/14 against Scotland, Starc leads the 2015 World Cup with 16 wickets. Of the pack behind, all but Mohammed Shami have bowled six innings to Starc’s five.

He has the best bowling average, his wickets costing 8.5 runs each. He effectively has the best strike rate, taking a wicket every 13.8 balls. The only better strike rate belongs to Afghan batsman Nawroz Mangal, who bowled a solitary over for the tournament that saw Mitchell Marsh hole out at deep midwicket.

Even including fortunate part-timers whose overs count in single figures, Starc’s economy rate of 3.67 sits sixth overall. Drop the trundlers and he’s a literal fraction behind Afghan seamer Mirwais Ashraf (3.66) and Kiwi spinner Daniel Vettori (3.21).

(For those talking up Michael Clarke’s all-round potential, his five devastating overs against the Ghan have so far bagged him the Cup’s lowest economy rate of 2.80. Keep it going.)

The game’s biggest tournament has confirmed Starc as world-class. Everything has clicked. His run-up is smooth, his action relaxed and efficient. His approach looks effortless, yet the ball sails from his hand at 150 kilometres per hour.

Pitched short, it leaps. Pitched full, it swings and jags. That moment of ultimate bowling triumph, when the stumps splay and glowing bails shoot into the air like embers spat from a burning log: right now that is Starc’s zone. Ten of his 16 wickets this World Cup have been bowled, almost double his career rate.

It’s too early in that career for meaningful analysis: beware the perils of a small sample size. But this World Cup and its lead-up season have left some raw numbers that are too compelling to resist enjoying them while they last.

With the standard qualification of 1000 ODI deliveries, Starc currently has the best bowling average (18.62), and the best strike rate (23.1) in ODI history. Ever. That’s worth a toast, at least.

Strike rates are helped by playing comparatively little – Brett Lee in 15th is the first on that list with over 100 games. But the lowest averages include Joel Garner, Andy Roberts, Colin Croft and Dennis Lillee, greats from a low-scoring era.

Then there’s a number where sample size has no influence. Five times in his 38 games, Starc has a five-wicket haul. Wasim Akram had six in 356 games. Glenn McGrath had seven in 250.

Starc is already 10th on that list, level with Richard Hadlee from 115 games and Shaun Pollock from 303. The anomaly is enormous.

The guy likes taking bags. In a niche stat that shows his shock value, Starc has four wickets or more on debut against six other nations, a feat that only New Zealand’s Mitchell McClenaghan has matched. Starc has best figures of at least four wickets against every team he’s played except Zimbabwe.

All this from a player who has thus far been timid and erratic in Test cricket. Starc hasn’t figured out Tests – there is comfort to the shorter game’s finite structure and clearer measures of success. But Australia hasn’t figured Starc out either – in 15 Tests he’s been dropped 13 times. Only his first two games were back-to-back.

So confused was Brendon Julian by the emergence of this left-arm stud bowler that he announced Mitchell Johnson as man of the match against Scotland. Lucky the correct Mitch was standing by.

Starc is standing by for the knockouts too, calibrated and ready to go. Australia fine-tuned a few things against Scotland, including Clarke managing Rob Taylor’s testing spell to cruise to 47.

For a while, as rain threatened to consign Australia to third place in their pool, some online commenters criticised Clarke for opening the batting in place of David Warner. It was ludicrous, especially at seven runs per over. Blame the umpires who blew 45 minutes of play for a minute’s drizzle.

Kevin Pietersen on commentary was an unlikely ally. “Pup’s not your natural aggressive player, so for him to come at the top of the order is actually brilliant for his confidence. He can just hit one through the cover for four, he can hit one off his legs for four, and every single time he times the ball well, beats the infield, it’s a boundary.”

“That just gives you confidence as a player. So for Australia going forward, their skipper coming in and striking at a hundred tonight without too much pressure is good for their game.”

The only captaincy question was around their star bowler. While trying to sink New Zealand for 150 recently, Clarke took Starc from the attack for five crucial overs. New Zealand added 39 and got close enough to win.

In this game, Scottish tailenders Josh Davey and Michael Leask enjoyed eight overs of merry run-scoring, taking 51 before the first rain delay. Only afterwards did Starc appear, wrapping up the last two wickets in four balls. That’s the kind of tournament he’s having.

Had rain affected the result, holding him back would have been the critical call. That’s also the kind of tournament he’s having. Economical, dangerous, hugely influential, and busting up a set of stumps every 14 balls. The numbers are only a side-effect.

A version of this article was first published on Wisden India.

The Crowd Says:

2015-03-18T10:47:30+00:00

Nudge

Guest


Yep spot on, I reckon you have it in for Clarke. And going by your previous articles, I'm not the only one that thinks this way. Read what others have had to say. Also, if what I said upset you that much Geoff that you had to run to the mods and get my post withdrawn, you have to run straight to the chemist and grab a hole heap of sensitive pills.

AUTHOR

2015-03-17T22:42:45+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


Which is a ridiculous thing to say because it would be inconsistent with everything else I've written about Clarke's preparation. Your reasoning is that I have some vendetta against Clarke - a claim you've made a number of times, and which is also ridiculous. Not sure it could be any clearer.

2015-03-17T12:46:30+00:00

Spooky

Guest


This is awkward

2015-03-17T12:23:33+00:00

Nudge

Guest


Just for the record, all i said was that it was lucky that the Scottish game wasn't washed out because Geoffs article would have been how Micheal Clarke was totally selfish by opening the batting himself, and not opening with Warner and getting the game over as soon as possible. Not sure how he got it all, all twisted. Anyway never mind, we move on.

2015-03-17T11:31:41+00:00

Nudge

Guest


Good on you Tom and you are spot on mate

2015-03-16T23:31:37+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


Some of the commentary during the ODI's this summer prior to the WC has actually shown a lot of what the problem that the 4 men out instead of 5 has caused. That is that the commentators can basically look at the field and work out what the bowler is going to be bowling. The batsmen know that too, so they can be there waiting for it. And if you try a change up to catch them unawares you have to make sure you beat them with it or it will be a gift boundary. With 5 our you could have a more general field that would allow you to bowl bouncers, yorkers, quick balls and slow balls, straight balls and wide balls. The loss of just one outfielder telegraphs bowling plans to the batsman more. That means that it's not just good enough to bowl lots of variety, you have to be good enough that you can bowl a ball that the batsman is pretty much expecting, but bowl it well enough that they still can't do much with it.

2015-03-16T13:30:16+00:00

Tom from Perth

Roar Rookie


I don't think this is a purple patch, as he's been stellar throughout his (albeit brief) ODI career. It's spanned a few years so hopefully he'll get even better.

2015-03-16T13:29:20+00:00

Tom from Perth

Roar Rookie


Fair go, I'm not sure I've read anything by Nudge that's unrelated to cricket. He's certainly not the type to "talk about imaginary vendettas" either.

2015-03-16T09:32:35+00:00

Tom from Perth

Roar Rookie


Good man - they'll remember it for decades.

AUTHOR

2015-03-16T06:23:07+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


Interesting point. There are a few bowlers with excellent figures among the carnage. Maybe the rejigged rules make it harder to hide those half-bowlers: Perera, Behardien, Russell. Perhaps all-rounders in future will need to be top-six batsmen who can bowl, like Maxwell, rather than bottom-five players who can club. Faulkner can hold his spot on bowling chops alone, so he's an exception. I reckon the four-men-out rule makes a bigger difference to spinners, who take a lot of their ODI wickets in outfield traps, and use boundary riders to manipulate a batsman's shots. Vettori's had a blinder, Ashwin and Shakib have been good, but there's barely another spinner in the top 50 wicket-takers. The two new balls probably don't help.

2015-03-16T03:47:33+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


I agree that there have been lots of runs scored, and overall more 300+, 350+ and even 400+ scores than ever before. I'm not arguing that. Just that out of that there have been articles and comments suggesting it's a case of there being almost nothing a bowler can do about it. But in actual fact we've seen Starc, and a few other bowlers, do incredibly well in this world cup. So basically, you need to have 5 very good bowlers, and can't try to get through 10 or 20 overs with some more part-time bowlers, and you have to be on top of your game, because if you have a bit of an off night and don't bowl well, then you are going to go for plenty. But there is still just as much possibility of a bowler getting on top if they bowl really well. That's why I'm not worried about things being too much in favour of the bat. If the best bowlers in the tournament were averaging 30+ at economy rates of 6+, then I wouldn't think that was so good. But the fact that having the skills and executing them well with the ball can still get you really good rewards I think suggests that the game is fine.

AUTHOR

2015-03-16T03:29:48+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


I hope that was a joke, Dave...

AUTHOR

2015-03-16T03:28:41+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


It's borne out in this tournament though Chris - Starc is a massive anomaly. We've had 25 innings of 300 or more in this World Cup. That's from 39 games. The average winning margin between Full Member sides is 89.8 runs, or 5.2 wickets. Only 6 of their 19 games have been won chasing. All up 17 games have been won by a side putting up 300+ and defending it, and three have been won by teams chasing over 300. I might run up some more of these numbers for an article.

AUTHOR

2015-03-16T03:18:48+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


We've got a few more besides, Goodfella. Behrendorff has a ton of wickets in a handful of Shield games. Bird isn't the youngest but still has some prospects. Siddle might still offer support. I reckon you need half a dozen top-line quicks to guarantee a good bowling era, so you can cover for injuries and varying conditions.

AUTHOR

2015-03-16T03:15:15+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


Hello Tom - I'd love to read critical analysis, but it's not always in plentiful supply. Agreed about positive stories, I think we all fall into the trap of overly negative topics at times. They're a bit more readily available. Though sometimes they do need writing. Starc is a very good news story, I was staggered by those stats on five-wicket hauls. Not sure if he's just had a purple patch, but if he could keep going at his current rate he'd smash all the tallies. Waqar's world record for five-fors is only 13.

AUTHOR

2015-03-16T03:08:17+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


Nudge, if someday you feel like chatting about the game, I'd enjoy that. If you'd rather talk about imaginary vendettas, no one benefits. Let's move on.

2015-03-15T19:34:36+00:00

Nudge

Guest


G'day Tom, actually heading to the quarter final this Friday so pretty pumped.

2015-03-15T15:12:44+00:00

Tom from Perth

Guest


Yep. The selectors need to show faith in Starc.

2015-03-15T15:10:46+00:00

Tom from Perth

Guest


You getting censored mate? Bloody hell. You're right - Ronan takes critical analysis in his stride. Did you take the kids along to one of the WC matches? I've been meaning to take the missus but we didn't have the best selection of matches here in Perth. A much better piece Geoff than the one on Clarke. Not just because I agree with what you say here - it's great to read positive journalism.

2015-03-15T14:01:09+00:00

dynamitedave

Guest


Starc is bowling really well. If only Clarke had of used the game to open the batting with mitchell Johnson. We all know when he gets runs he gets wickets......Would have primed him up nicely for the finals.. Instead he selfishly plays himself, when in all likelihood he is not going to be needed in the finals.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar