Gary Ablett is still the best, but he's not the most valuable

By Tony Loedi / Roar Guru

These ‘best AFL player’ lists have become rather boring. Everybody knows Gary Ablett Jr is the best – he has been for years. Let’s try something new and rate a player’s current value, rather than their current skill level.

For instance, let’s pretend every team in the AFL has the chance to pick either Gary Ablett or Lance Franklin to join their club, not just for this season but for the rest of their careers.

Which player do you think most teams would pick? Considering Franklin is three years younger than Ablett I’m tipping most teams would go with Buddy.

The great Bill Simmons of Grantland writes an NBA player trade-value column every year. This season he rated 22-year-old superstar Anthony Davis more valuable than LeBron James, based on the fact Davis is just starting his career while LeBron is nearing the end of his.

Ablett is the LeBron of AFL. It’s easy to make that comparison, with both players dominating their respective fields for over a decade. The parallels don’t stop there however, as the two superstars share an eerily similar career path.

They both turn 31 this year, were both drafted by their hometown teams, have each won two premierships/championships, and both players switched teams – somewhat controversially – in 2010, with one taking his talents to South Beach, the other to Southport.

Now, just as LeBron’s career is winding down, so too is Gary’s, while superstars like Nathan Fyfe and Dyson Heppell are only just beginning their’s, making them a more valuable football commodity.

Although Ablett could conceivably play into his mid-30s, it wouldn’t be at the level we’ve become accustomed to. How many more Gary-esque years does he have in him? Two? Maybe three? I’m fully expecting and I’m sure Suns fans are hoping by that stage players like David Swallow and Jaeger O’Meara would have passed him by.

To determine which player holds the most value, I’m taking into consideration a player’s potential and ability. I’m not factoring in contracts, as this becomes too messy. We have a fair idea of the salaries Buddy Franklin and Gary Ablett are on, as their deals were highly publicised, but for the rest of the league it’s purely speculation.

On a side note, how great would it be if every player’s contract became public? I’m sure the players would hate it, as all big contracts would be even more heavily scrutinised, but for fans and journos it would make for some great talking points.

Anyway here are the players more valuable than Ablett:

1. Nathan Fyfe – 23 years old
2. Lance Franklin – 27 years old
3. Joel Selwood – 26 years old
4. Scott Pendlebury – 27 years old
5. Dyson Heppell – 22 years old
6. Patrick Dangerfield – 24 years old

Fyfe getting the nod as the most valuable player will be no surprise. On current ability, very little separates the top four, however Fyfe’s tender age gets him over the line.

Heppell and Dangerfield make the list based on their age and potential to improve. Remember this isn’t a ‘who’s better than Gary’ debate, it’s simply a list of the players who have more to offer from this point onwards.

The next group of players are close but not quite there:

Josh Kennedy – 26 years old
Travis Boak – 26 years old
Robbie Gray – 26 years old
Dayne Beams – 25 years old
Tom Rockliff – 25 years old

This time next year the above five players should all be more valuable than Gary Ablett but at this stage the majority of clubs would pick Ablett.

This final group features the next generation of superstars:

Luke Parker – 22 years old
Jeremy Cameron – 21 years old
Jaeger O’meara – 21 years old
Chad Wingard – 21 years old
Marcus Bontempelli – 19 years old

Although the vast majority of teams would choose Ablett over this group of youngsters, that wouldn’t be a wise decision for clubs rebuilding. For teams like Melbourne, St Kilda and the Western Bulldogs – who are years away from contending – it wouldn’t make sense to choose 31-year-old Ablett over a potential superstar in the making.

Of course every team values each player differently, but Gary Ablett is no longer the most valuable in the league. The baton has been passed to Nathan Fyfe.

The Crowd Says:

2015-04-02T23:24:42+00:00

Jrod

Guest


Not sure the bulldogs agree with you, look at the $ spent....

2015-04-01T01:07:57+00:00

Gecko

Guest


Yes, Sandilands might scrape into the top 200.

2015-04-01T01:05:45+00:00

Gecko

Guest


Roughead is 28. Tom Hawkins is a year and a half younger. After those two, I can't think of any other key position players who'd be a chance even for the top 20 most valuable players (using Tony's criteria). It's interesting there are heaps of potential key position stars (Boyd, Cameron, Patton, Hogan, Daniher, Taylor Walker, Natanui, Carlysle) but none are dead certainties to be stars. The latter three may arrive this season and be ensconced in Tony's top 20 by the end of 2015.

2015-04-01T00:46:38+00:00

Gecko

Guest


Yes, Wingard out, swapped for Ollie Wines.

2015-03-31T14:04:22+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


As a Freo boy, I'd say there is a player, not as good as Fyfe but definitely more valuable; Aaron Sandilands.

2015-03-31T10:16:16+00:00

Old Pete

Guest


You're kidding leaving Luke Bruest at 24 years old off these lists-#1 pick in the comp as a dangerous and deadly small forward.

AUTHOR

2015-03-31T07:02:41+00:00

Tony Loedi

Roar Guru


I give up

2015-03-31T06:06:15+00:00

Katfish

Roar Guru


so its a list of the best players in the competition com the end of the year?

AUTHOR

2015-03-31T05:59:39+00:00

Tony Loedi

Roar Guru


That depends on your interpretation of value. Nowhere in the article does it say value to his side. Also I'm factoring in a LOT of development and also Gary Ablett's decline. Ablett = near the end of career VS Fyfe = not even in his prime yet. I think know which one is more VALUABLE

2015-03-31T05:22:48+00:00

Katfish

Roar Guru


but that's how you're doing it, also factoring in a bit of development. But still, that's not a measure of a players 'value'

AUTHOR

2015-03-31T01:59:06+00:00

Tony Loedi

Roar Guru


No, they pick the best players on current skill level of which Ablett is still best.

2015-03-31T01:31:04+00:00

Katfish

Roar Guru


Thats the same method used by the roar team to create a list of the best 50 players

2015-03-31T00:31:30+00:00

Tim Holt

Roar Guru


Agree on Fyfe, but, if we are talking valuable, i cannot go past Jarryd Roughead.. A vindicated key forward, who can play effectively as a big ruck rover, in the ruck, and even key back

AUTHOR

2015-03-31T00:27:06+00:00

Tony Loedi

Roar Guru


Good players but I wouldn't be picking them ahead of the ones in the article

AUTHOR

2015-03-31T00:24:58+00:00

Tony Loedi

Roar Guru


I'm a Roo supporter I know how good Harvey's going, but what he is doing is pretty exceptional. Gary could do it but the odds are he won't be playing at age 37.

AUTHOR

2015-03-31T00:21:53+00:00

Tony Loedi

Roar Guru


Katfish, This isn't about who's more valuable for their team. Imagine every player is a free agent and every club is starting from scratch, which player would you pick?

AUTHOR

2015-03-31T00:19:26+00:00

Tony Loedi

Roar Guru


Better than Fyfe?

2015-03-30T23:30:24+00:00

Wilson

Roar Guru


I got to ask what about Dustin Martin? where does he sit has been one of the best players for the Tiger over the last 2 years and What about Isaac Smith? for the Hawks who last year was tag more often then Mitchell and Hodge cause other teams class him as to dangerous not to tag.

2015-03-30T22:42:19+00:00

Robert

Guest


Heavily weighted with on ball players. Most valuable should be more than statistics, such as versatility. Surprised someone like Roughead isn't in your list.

2015-03-30T22:31:41+00:00

Franky

Guest


You're making a pretty big assumption there about what Ablett is going to deliver in the future. For starters, the Suns think he has plenty of footy left in him, having offered him a contract extension through to the end of 2018. Then you look at the up and coming midfielders the suns have, which should allow Gaz to play more in the forward line and extend his playing career. Look at Boomer Harvey, he's still going and he's 37 this year. Ablett won a Brownlow medal 18 months ago. Assuming his shoulder comes good, I see no reason why his form will drop off any time soon. Go back 3 years, the best case scenario that anyone could predict was that his form would hold steady. Instead he's taken it to another level again. In 5 years time, I reckon Ablett in the forward pocket will be offering more than Selwood and Pendlebury, and maybe even Buddy depending on how his body holds up

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar