Barriers exist for a reason - to prevent horrible, train-related death

By Lee Rodgers / Expert

‘Some people believe football is a matter of life and death, I am very disappointed with that attitude. I can assure you it is much, much more important than that.’

Bill Shankly, former manager of Liverpool Football Club   

I was reminded of Shankly’s famous quotation when the barriers came down with just 90km gone of Paris-Roubaix 2015, barriers intended to stop people being pulverised by trains traveling at over 150km/hr.

Big trains too, not soft little trains. But trains made of steel and stuff, proper hard, fairly deadly (if you stand in front of them and they’re moving) trains.

The commentators on Eurosport were aghast at the impulsive idiocy displayed by several members of the peloton who squeezed through even several seconds after the barriers had gone down.

Fabian Cancellara even tweeted UCI Rule 2.3.034, regarding level crossings specifically:

It shall be strictly forbidden to cross level crossings when the barrier is down.

Cancellara as Hall Monitor. I like it. Wag that finger.

The French national train company, SNCF, has lodged an official complaint with the police and released a statement to accompany that:

Several riders deliberately crossed a level crossing, which is against all safety regulations. Millions of TV viewers were able to watch this unauthorized crossing which was extremely serious and irresponsible, that could have ended in tragedy. SNCF has decided to lodge a legal complaint and will leave it up to the investigation to determine who was responsible and we regret that such foolhardiness took place.”

Hard to disagree with rules such as ones to stop people getting killed needlessly being in place, and for normal people these rules are great, but everyone seems to be forgetting that these guys are bike racers.

And bike racers, almost to a man, are selfish arseholes – at least whilst on their bikes. And proud of it. They’ll take just about every opportunity they can to get ahead, to sneak an advantage, to dupe a foe or to dope themselves, so why be surprised when a few of them sneak through a close barrier to be sure that they don’t lose time and gain an advantage on others instead?

Double win.

It’s built into the psyche of the professional athlete to jump on every weakness and deficiency of your opponent and to make them pay for it. This is right, if that weakness is a physical weakness – lack of power, cramps, fatigue. However, when athletes are cashing in on unfair advantages – be it in the form of a mechanical, a train barrier coming down or even, more fool you, in the form of having the ethics not to dope, there are enough guys out there that have, do and will continue to take advantage of all this.

It’s the nature of the beast. Like an aggressive dog that will chew up even a child, it’s been bred in these people. Sure they make choices too, but when the choice is so clear to so many – skip the barrier, take the dope – there isn’t then much of a choice is there?

In that moment when those guys ignored the moto rider and sneaked under and around the barrier at that level crossing, you saw a little of what is wrong with professional sports – and indeed much of amateur sports too these days.

It was the propensity of the athlete to sneak an unnatural advantage. It was the heeding of the urge to cheat, to bend the rules, to ignore those willing to abide by the rules to get ahead.

That the race was neutralized to allow those held up to get back on was a decision that did not come from the riders but from the commissaires. I’ve been in enough UCI races in Asia to see how riders behave in similar situations to know that it really is every man for himself and screw any chump that gets left behind.

I’ve seen riders risk life and limb when a traffic cop has inadvertently allowed vehicles on to the race route, as in the 2012 Tour of Thailand where the entire peloton encountered a traffic jam with 3km to go to the line, and riders were hammering at 60km/hr through narrow gaps with cars still moving along.

On the flip side I witnessed a guy leading his category at the Mongolia Bike Challenge last year, who came around a corner and saw a bike but no rider so he stopped, found a guy under a bush and completely wiped out, then rode in with him to the line basically having pushed him for 40km, losing all hope of winning in the process.

That incident stands out, however, in over five years of professional racing.

Professional sports are heralded as a platform for the spectator to see greatness unfold, to see feats that make us wonder a the power of the human spirit. Cue the classical music, hit the slow-mo button and let the magnificence roll.

Yet these same sports deliver up massive contradictions, serving as avenues for the largest, baddest egos to be pumped up and polished by sycophantic fans and commentators, encouraging cheating in all forms, rewarding those who don’t get caught and tying to the stake those who are dumb enough to get busted.

The riders sneaking through the barriers on Sunday was not the worst thing that ever happened but it did reveal something to us that we don’t often see so starkly – that athletes are willing to risk their lives to get a jump.

Until we accept this reality and work to change it, little will change.

The Crowd Says:

2015-04-15T07:35:05+00:00

Rabbitz

Roar Guru


Actually Alex, slowing the leaders or "neutralising things" is the wrong way to go. The rules were apparently clear - thus simply disqualify all those who broke the rules (that is those who cheated).

2015-04-15T05:09:56+00:00

Kate

Guest


The guy leading had every opportunity in the world to stop. What people forget is that cycling races happen on roads that for the other 364 days of the years, service the local population quite well. The level crossing didn't just magically pop up out of nowhere. It's clearly marked beforehand. It's clearly marked on the map. The fact that no-one stopped, no-one even slowed down with caution, that not one rider even put his arm up once they'd realised the barriers were descending just goes to show how there is a widespread mentality within professional cyclists that whatever rules exist in life, they don't apply to them. They spend 100% of their racing lives racing on closed roads. No other traffic, traffic furniture gets removed at great expense so they can put their head down and sprint like there's no tomorrow. The thing that is significant about trainlines in racing is that the Law transcends the UCI rules. It's clear - if you cross an activated level-crossing, you are breaking the law. There are no exceptions. Not even for professional cyclists. People complain that a train even has the right to hold up a bike race - really? Doesn't cycling already impinge enough upon local communities when it rolls through towns? It's just bike racing. It's just Paris-Roubaix. There is national rail network that services a huge population in that country and if pro cycling can't hold itself up for 30 seconds to allow local residents to go about their daily lives, then there's something wrong with pro cycling. If cyclists can accept the variables of random punctures, and weather, then surely the rare occasion when a train passes is just part of cycling.

2015-04-15T02:58:34+00:00

Tom Oliver

Roar Rookie


A really soft decision not to punish a majority of the riders who went through. They know that crossing is there as they cross it every year. They know the rules. That behavior sets a bad example for all young people out there watching. Yes there was a breakaway, yes it is a race but that's cycling

2015-04-15T00:28:43+00:00

Rob Gremio

Roar Pro


No, Simoc, they weren't waiting. The Commissaires had to get out front and slow them down to bring the peloton back together. Remember they were also chasing a breakaway at that point. they were not interested in waiting for those unlucky enough to be stuck behind the railway barrier.

2015-04-14T10:04:42+00:00

Steve

Guest


Crazy behavior that typifies racing mentality across all grades and countries. Those that broke the rules should be punished - but just like buff in league in being illegal it all adds to the event and makes it more exciting!

2015-04-14T10:02:22+00:00

Steve

Guest


Crazy

2015-04-14T09:11:19+00:00

Simoc

Guest


The riders had a tailwind and arrived at the crossing ten minutes ahead of schedule. The riders would wait in any case for the others so there was never going to be an advantage gained. We race every day and never wait for anyone who misses the lights., anywhere. So the pros behave better than us.

2015-04-14T09:05:53+00:00

Scott Pryde

Expert


Alex, The timetable may have already been worked out - the riders were riding well ahead of schedule due to the dry weather and massive tailwind

2015-04-14T08:54:17+00:00

Alex

Guest


The leading guys had absolutely no time to stop so I don't blame them. The organisers have to make it completely clear to the riders, pre-race, that if this event happens they will neutralise things until all are back together. Thus no chance of gaining advantage so no need to take risks. How this hasn't been sorted by now is baffling. More baffling is why they have not figured out the TGV timetable. This race happens every year...

2015-04-14T07:58:41+00:00

Benedict Arnold

Guest


This doesn't surprise the slightest; I'm not even sure if the rider would think it was dangerous. I reckon they know it's wrong but disregard the danger part in preference of a calculated decision. I see Melbourne cyclists do this all the time and they aren't even racing.

Read more at The Roar