Aussies set to be tested by the Windies' pace attack

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Australia’s next two Test opponents, the West Indies and England, are battling in the Caribbean. This is what I learnt about these sides from the first Test, which ended in a draw on Saturday.

The West Indies’ pace attack will cause Australia more problems than their spinners
Australia are famously vulnerable against spin on dry decks. While those are the pitch conditions they will face in the two Tests in the West Indies in June, the home side’s pacemen look to be a bigger threat.

The last time Australia toured the Caribbean, off spinner Shane Shillingford made merry against them. Right now though, the West Indies have no legitimate spin option.

Beanpole left armer Sulieman Benn has been dropped after taking 2-200 against England at Antigua. He proved innocuous despite a dusty deck on which even English part timer Joe Root was effective.

That leaves leg spinner Devendra Bishoo to play in the second Test and likely to front up against Australia. In his 11 Tests, Bishoo has rarely looked like a bowler capable of success at international level.

Although Bishoo is accurate for a wrist spinner, he does not rip the ball like most leggies and so gets minimal drift, loop or turn, making him a relatively straightforward proposition for most Test batsmen. As much was evident in his last Test outing, against Australia in Bridgetown three years ago. Unable to take advantage of a parched surface, Bishoo was countered with ease by the Aussies en route to returning match figures of 1-169 from 53 overs.

Alongside canny spin bowling, the biggest issue for Australia’s batsman has been countering the swinging ball. Well, the West Indies’ quicks had the Kookaburra swerving both when it was fresh and when it was weathered at Antigua.

The reverse swing they gained with the older ball was not startling and is unlikely to have Australia’s batsmen fretting. However, the manner in which they hooped the new ball will certainly have been noted by the Aussies.

Aggressive opening bowlers Jerome Taylor and Kemar Roach combined for 10 wickets for the Test while operating at up to 145kmh and 148kmh respectively. Most significantly, both were able to bend the new ball through the air, particularly Taylor who gained some outrageous late out-swing at times.

Australia’s Test middle order remains a soft spot and the Windies will know that wickets with the new ball can help them expose that shortcoming. If Roach and Taylor can continue moving the ball in the way they did at Antigua then Australia’s top order will undergo a robust Test in June.

England’s opening partnership is a major weakness
Alastair Cook is mired in a deep form trough which extends back almost two years, while Jonathan Trott looked horribly out of form in his return to Test cricket last week.

The English captain is the most important batsman in his side. England love to play grinding, safety-first cricket, so when Cook make runs and anchors their innings, his batting colleagues are in their element. But he has now gone 18 Tests without a ton, starting from the beginning of the 2013 Ashes series 21 months ago. During that period he has made just 923 runs at an average of 29.

Teams have realised that by denying Cook opportunities to score square of the wicket on the offside they can completely shackle him. He continues to labour against full deliveries aimed at or just outside off stump.

In the first innings at Antigua, Cook was on 11 when he was undone by a full ball from Kemar Roach which straightened a touch through the air. He left a sizeable hole between bat and pad through which the ball flew from an inside edge on to his stumps.

In the second dig he aimed a half-hearted defensive prod at a pitched-up delivery from Jerome Taylor which kissed the outside edge and flew into the mitts of gully, dismissing him for 13.

Cook’s ongoing fragility against full balls will be of particular pleasure to Australian quick Ryan Harris, who has tormented him by operating on that length.

While the skipper has been floundering the past 21 months, England have tried a host of players as his opening partner. For the 2013 Ashes series they dropped Nick Compton and introduced youngster Joe Root, who made way for Michael Carberry, who was quickly replaced by Sam Robson, who has now been jettisoned for veteran Trott.

A career number-three batsman, Trott has been handled the difficult task of adapting to facing the new ball while also dealing with the pressure and scrutiny of a comeback following mental health problems.

While it was ferocious short balls which caused his downfall in Australia, Trott’s lack of balance cruelled him against the Windies. Twice in the Test the former first drop was out nicking full out swingers from Taylor.

On both occasions, Trott’s eyeline was tilted towards the offside as the bowler released the ball, which caused him to lean in that direction while playing his strokes. His poor balance at the crease was evident throughout the 20 balls he faced for the match, during which he scored just four runs.

It largely has been overlooked that, prior to his breakdown in Australia, Trott had been in decline as a batsman for several years. After a rampant start to his Test career, the South African-born batsman has averaged just 35 with the bat since June 2011, with only three tons in his past 31 Tests.

On the back of a such a long lean spell, it will be a tremendous challenge for him to succeed in his new role as opener, particularly against Australia’s dominant pace attack.

England’s opening partnership is shaping as a massive weakness heading towards the Ashes.

The Crowd Says:

2015-04-27T00:31:39+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Change the quality of the opposition and they turn into innocuous sooks.

2015-04-26T17:48:37+00:00

Armchair Expert

Guest


I'd like to be "trundling hacks" like Broad and Anderson, Don, they've both bowled alright in the current Windies series.

2015-04-26T10:40:11+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


The first bit still counts...history is bunk. We outplayed them last series in England. The rain just robbed us of the little urn. The other part was a continuation of my stoush with CW. I was wondering why you bought into that.

2015-04-26T10:31:12+00:00

Nudge

Guest


Don, you been on the p!ss. Not sure how Broad and Anderson have come into this conversation

2015-04-26T08:41:02+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Don't know what yesteryear has to do with today. So many people address the present with a story about the past. The players are not the same. Those two quicks are trundling hacks now. Do you think winning past Ashes makes Broad a nicer person? Strange.

2015-04-26T08:15:36+00:00

Nudge

Guest


You've obviously forgotten the result of the past 3 ashes series in England Don.

2015-04-26T06:55:13+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


You asked...I answered. Didn't know you wanted an argument. Have you seen him bat? He runs away. Don't know who is weaker...Anderson or Broad.

2015-04-26T02:05:21+00:00

CW

Guest


We disagree again my West Aussie jousting partner. Broad may be disliked by you and many others. But the bloke has my respect for his competitive spirit, tenacity and passion. He has been a thorn in our side thru his ability to conjure a wicket when England most need it. Not sure where you get the " scared and embarasses himself " comment from.

2015-04-25T15:07:12+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


He's just one of cricket's most unpleasant people of all time. Never a thorn in the Aussie's side. He is scared and embarrasses himself, his country and his supporters with that lack of courage. I hope he gets a game in the Ashes.

2015-04-25T09:40:03+00:00

Pom in Oz

Roar Guru


I agree with you 100% regarding the yelling "f__off". Totally unnecessary and should be removed from the game. I also think the Samuels' salute send off was pretty funny and non abusive. However, just because abuse occurs in the other games you mention (which I note are all contact sports), doesn't mean to say it's ok for cricket.

2015-04-25T08:28:19+00:00

Sanjay Poojar

Guest


Most wellcome my friend, not like Mr Ronan. What meaning of troll ? I hope it not rasist comment

2015-04-25T04:46:41+00:00

CW

Guest


He is a ginge . What do you expect? Agree about his ability. Needs more time in county cricket, His bowling is not up to test standard as yet. His batting lacks consistency.

2015-04-25T04:43:19+00:00

CW

Guest


What is all this hooha over Broad's review in the Grenada test match? He had every right to review it as England were nine down. Why is this bloke always been villified? He copped heaps over his no walk in the last English ashes. Who walks these days? Adam Gilchrist did. But he was the exception rather than the rule. Besides the umpire should have walked him. But did not. From memory those two umpires put on a lamentable display. Several unbelievable howlers. We all called Broad a cheat. Tough call imo. I am not a Pom but I thought he got treated very unfairly over that incident. Now the poor bloke only has to look the wrong way and he cops it. Lay off him. He is always a thorn in any Aussie side. July's Ashes will not be any different. We can lay bets on that.

2015-04-25T04:32:34+00:00

CW

Guest


WE were both wrong. Bancroft started FC cricket 2013/14. So he has just finished his second season. No signs of any syndrome with him. Just plenty of runs and sure signs of maturity. I would have him ahead of Silk.Tipping him or Joe Burns to take Rogers spot after the ashes.

2015-04-25T04:07:50+00:00

Billy S

Guest


When a batsman mouths off to a bowler it may be seen differently because the batsman is returning a serve as opposed to a bowler starting the "conversation" because the guy played and missed a few deliveries. Not sure. People often say it didn't happen with previous generations which is easy to say when there were no stump mics but after reading a number of biographies, it apparantly happened a lot. Maybe the difference besides the mics is they were less theatrical about it.

AUTHOR

2015-04-25T02:57:53+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


I disagree, I don't think that's a "big" difference as when a Test bowler gets smashed out of the attack by a batsman chances are he won't be bowling again for a long while (or in T20/ODIs perhaps not again in that match). The captain will be reticent to bring them back on to bowl at that same batsman unless it's a last resort. Often the bowler won't get a chance for revenge. I think we've gotten far too precious about what is said between cricketers on the field. From what I've seen/heard/read there is regular sledging in soccer/AFL/basketball/baseball/union/league etc etc and in those sports you also see brawls which is something you don't see in cricket. Cricketers are better behaved on the field than players in pretty much every other professional team sport so why do we spend so much time whingeing about minor on-field incidents? If a players yells "f--- off" in another players face then absolutely that is wrong, but those kind of incidents are in a minority. Instead people want to invent "boorish" incidents like they did after Australia's World Cup win or they get knickers twisted over harmless actions like Marlon Samuels saluting Stokes or the Aussies making fun of Faf by barking at him. I say, just enjoy the cricket and stop looking for reasons to be outraged, which seems to be a growing pastime in modern society.

2015-04-24T23:26:33+00:00

Pom in Oz

Roar Guru


Big difference is that when the batsman is out, that's the end of the battle, so there's no need for a send off. At least when the bowler is smashed to the boundary and gets a spray from the batsman, he still has a chance to get his revenge. I really think the ICC should clamp down on send offs and I mean that for all nationalities of bowlers. It's a terrible look for the game. Even Davey Warner said that it was an unnecessary part of the game after the first test against India.

2015-04-24T13:05:49+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


I doubt that he will have second season syndrome. Next season will be his fourth. He almost doubled Silk's average last season.

AUTHOR

2015-04-24T11:04:59+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Sanjay is a troll, and a transparent one at that.

2015-04-24T11:00:38+00:00

CW

Guest


"Courage and match savvy". Ok. So Silk in your view does not have courage and match savvy? So now we are debating the merits of Bancroft and Silk. Had enough of Marcus Harris Don? I will also reserve my judgement on Bancroft until I have seen another shield season from him. I have already posted that he,imo, will play for Australia in the near future. Will, he like Silk, have the dreaded second season syndrome? He started this past season like a man in a hurry. A couple of centuries in his first handful of games? Then he went off the boil. That is telling me he lacked match savvy and the maturity to concentrate for long periods. Then out of the blue he got it back with his brilliant double ton. When you use the word courage do you mean mental strength? To score a hundred, a FC ton in particular, you needs buckets of mental strength. Both of them can concentrate for a long time. So both will be invaluable to Australia in the years to come. as for Silk's lack of scoring shots or ability to score quickly. Check out a few of his T20 efforts. Even surprised me.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar