AFL clubs reject 17-5 fixture model

By Roger Vaughan / Wire

The AFL’s 18 clubs have overwhelmingly rejected the main proposal for a new fixture.

League chief executive Gillon McLachlan said there was too much uncertainty around the 17-5 model and clubs liked the current setup.

The fixture was one of the main topics at Thursday’s meeting of the league and the 18 club chief executives.

Several fixturing ideas were discussed, but the 17-5 idea was the main one.

Under that proposal, clubs would play each other once – 17 rounds – and then split into three conferences of six for the last five games before the finals.

“Maybe it was a bad day to be presenting it,” McLachlan said.

“Everyone thinks the season is going really well … everyone feels the current fixture is working pretty well.

“We came away with some strong feedback … the clubs really like the certainty in the current fixture.”

McLachlan said clubs are worried that showcase games like Showdowns and Western Derbies might not happen twice a year under the 17-5 idea.

It would create headaches for membership and planning for team travel.

“They like the 11-game membership package (and) they like the certainty of knowing all 22 rounds,” McLachlan said..

“They like the certainty of being able to plan their travel.

“Logistical and commercial challenges, quite rightly, those are the real issues of our clubs.”

He added there was “zero” chance of any major changes to the fixture structure next season.

“We think it’s a good (alternative) that deals with some of the challenges of the current fixture,” McLachlan said.

“But it obviously raises different challenges and that was the feedback today.”

Despite Thursday’s setback, McLachlan remains a fan of the 17-5 idea.

“I like … that every club plays each other once,” he said.

“Then you break out into very contested brackets of six and you’d have tight games – every game would mean something.

“You could actually really have a progression from home and away into playoffs into finals, that sorts the wheat from the chaff in a pretty contested way.”

Meanwhile, McLachlan said the league was on the verge of announcing the results of a review of the pre-draft bidding system for father-son and academy players.

The Crowd Says:

2015-05-17T12:11:50+00:00

13th Man

Guest


I really don't like it. it is effectively a 10 week finals series. and if you are 7th or 8th after 17 rounds by percentage then the highest you can finish is 7th or 8th. And the 14th team should not get pick 1.

2015-05-16T23:41:40+00:00

VivGilchrist

Guest


Great idea. It's fair, but it will never get approved because it doesn't maximise $$$$$$$$.

2015-05-15T14:32:25+00:00

Frank R

Roar Rookie


Split into 2 conferences of 9 teams. Play each other twice in the conference and once against the teams in the other conference. Top 4 of each conference play off in the final eight. That way most derbies and blockbuster games can be maintained.

2015-05-15T07:16:14+00:00

Sneaky Russian

Guest


You can't be serious, 36 games! By a third of the way through a 22 game season we know who the best 2-4 teams are and who the worst couple are. Imagine the monotony if the season dragged on for an extra 14 rounds!! Not sure if 17-5 is right but it's a step in the right direction. Maybe take a leaf out of NFL, play everyone once 17 round season - less is more!

2015-05-15T04:18:14+00:00

josh

Roar Rookie


or make the draft a lottery, Last gives you more chance of getting Pick 1 but doesn't guarantee it.

2015-05-15T04:17:01+00:00

josh

Roar Rookie


it should be play each other alternating Home and away each season. To be fair it doesn't really matter for most Victorian teams.

2015-05-15T03:59:19+00:00

onside

Guest


Scrap NAB or preseason competition, plus all that Irish faux International stuff Full season 36 games, every team plays each other twice. Combat tanking by rewarding sides that finish higher,(say third last instead of last). Meaning teams on the bottom part of the ladder have to fight for a priority draft pick.

2015-05-15T03:48:37+00:00

DB

Guest


The main problem I have with the 17-5 system is that if you play them home does that mean you have to play them away the next time. If not that's unfair and if so it may mean you can have as little as 8 home games which is also unfair

2015-05-15T02:08:12+00:00

Ryan Buckland

Expert


I wrote about this proposal last year: http://www.theroar.com.au/2014/07/24/since-asked-shorter-afl-season/

Read more at The Roar