Genia and Cooper MUST be selected for the World Cup

By Christopher Roche / Expert

Having watched Quade Cooper’s return to the playing field in Round 16 after an extended absence through injury, I have little doubt that Australian coach Michael Cheika was grinning from ear to ear.

I certainly was, for three reasons.

Finally, the Reds look like a rugby team. After a disastrous 2015 rugby season the fans, players and Reds hierarchy finally had something to smile about, with the Reds win against the Force.

Their previous performances have been so bad that even the most faithful of supporters must have been dreading the week-end and having to subject themselves to yet another disaster. If nothing else, you had to admire anyone brave enough to be seen in public in Reds attire – they have been few but fearless.

Secondly, while the game against the Force was a dead rubber, Quade Cooper’s performance was brilliant and his decision not to speak to the media was to be applauded. He wanted his actions to speak for themselves, and so they did. If that’s what he can do after a two-month absence, just think how lethal he can be at the time of the Rugby World Cup, when he has serious game time under his belt.

Thirdly, Will Genia’s game improved immeasurably as a consequence of Cooper’s presence. In fact, it was one of his best performances of the year.

I had the pleasure of coaching Genia some years ago at Brisbane Club Norths and it was apparent that he is a player that thrives on leadership. I suspect that the Reds erred in not including him in their leadership group for 2015, although I understand they wanted to blood others in light of his departure to France in 2016.

However, one must always remember to win the battle right in front of you rather than worry too much about the war, or you might not have an army worth spit to fight with.

Genia and Cooper is the best combination for Australian rugby at this point in time. We have lead-up Test matches to win and the ultimate prize of the Rugby World Cup later this year, and in order to win that cup we need a number of things.

We need a forward pack that can mix it with any other team in the world. Without that we are screwed. There is evidence mounting that we may have the players in certain positions at least, to be able to do this. Whether we have them across the whole forward pack remains to be seen, but there are certainly positive signs.

I have my doubts about one or two of the Australian forwards running around in the Super Rugby competition, who – to use the words of the late, great Queensland coach Bob Templeton – could best be described as ‘a puff of smoke in an empty saddle’, but that is a story for another day.

Assuming we can muster a forward pack capable of taking on and overcoming all-comers, it is essential that we have an experienced halves combination.

Genia and Cooper play marvellously together. Genia without Cooper is a bit like Abbott without Costello. Individually they are very good, but together they are fabulous. They are both 27 years old and have played together for the Reds in the Super Rugby for the last eight years. Genia played his first Super Rugby game in 2007 against the Hurricanes as a 19 year old, while Cooper got his first start against the Crusaders in Round 2 of the same year.

Cooper first played for the Wallabies in 2008 coming off the bench against Italy. Genia’s Test debut was against the All Blacks in 2009. Both men were in the Wallabies squad at the Rugby World Cup in 2011 and their experience of the disappointment of that semi-final defeat is a tremendous weapon to have in the arsenal.

Combinations born and forged over the years like Cooper and Genia are invaluable in pressure-cooker situations, and it doesn’t come any hotter than the Rugby World Cup. Australia has the opportunity to put out a tremendous backline and the more individuals with x-factor the better. Both Genia and Cooper possess this.

But not only do they have individual brilliance, they have the experience and combination so critical in ensuring that decisions made and plays created under the most intense circumstances are pulled off successfully. This is no mean feat.

Add the likes of Matt Toomua, Tevita Kuridrani, Israel Falou, Henry Speight and Kurtley Beale and you have game breakers all over the park. The attack can come from anywhere at any time, so there is plenty to be quietly confident about.

But at the end of the day, it is the quality of the ball that is delivered to the halves that is critical.

Provided the Wallaby forwards can deliver, Genia, Cooper and co. can certainly do the rest.

The Crowd Says:

2015-06-11T02:48:59+00:00

World in Union

Guest


@ PeterK you are SO out of touch it's not funny!

2015-06-10T03:32:37+00:00

HandsOffBlack7

Guest


Doesn't seem to be as busy this week with calls for Quade Cooper to play for the Wallabies - who would've thought that after coming up against a decent team!? He's good against Rubbish, and Rubbish against good.

2015-06-08T01:15:52+00:00

PhilJ

Guest


Quade Cooper definitely RWC material but don't think Genia is and probably won't be again. Trouble is that ABs know how to put Quade Cooper under pressure and if Wallabies meet ABs at some stage then Wallabies need someone else at No. 10.

2015-06-07T03:19:20+00:00

Akari

Roar Rookie


I accept that the other 14 played better but they seemed to have lifted knowing that their efforts were not going to be wasted with JM at 10. I am not sure that the Reds would have won emphatically against the Rebels with Frisby at 10.

2015-06-07T01:07:02+00:00

Mike

Guest


"Baffling" Or perhaps you just ran out of excuses.

2015-06-07T01:05:04+00:00

Mike

Guest


I agree; Larkham should resign as Wallabies attack coach.

2015-06-07T01:02:32+00:00

Mike

Guest


His 2013 test form? Seriously? Benched by Mckenzie in favour of a test rookie for the first two Bleds, then his first start was the debacle vs Boks in Brisbane. he had one good game vs Argentina, then it wasn't until after the loss to England that he started to look good against 2nd and 3rd tier NH nations. He is a good test fly half, but let's not go overboard.

2015-06-06T05:15:39+00:00

Justthetip

Guest


Dave your spot on mate. Some people are so far behind they think their in front. Loving your thoughts.

2015-06-06T04:58:00+00:00

Justthetip

Guest


Get a grip mate you need to have delivered to be a true incumbent. In any other sport quade would be the incumbent.

2015-06-06T01:06:07+00:00

Jerry

Guest


Stomers are more likely to be second, I'd say.

2015-06-06T00:59:57+00:00

Rugby.ftw

Guest


Fair enough, he didn't implode. But he didn't really have his usual effective on a game. Also did you read my comment? I didn't use it as an excuse not to pick him. I said he was over anything (if there was anything to begin with).

2015-06-05T14:21:42+00:00

Graeme

Guest


This is a ridiculous statement. There is nothing in-Australian about somebody wanting their team to knock out their main rivals. If Genia, Cooper, slipper and Simmons all have absolute blinders against the 'tahs then that would be great for Australian rugby. I'd prefer the tahs to win but I also hope that the potential Reds Wallabies have standout games, even if it means the tahs losing.

2015-06-05T13:39:45+00:00

Utah

Guest


Larkham more consistent, better temperament, smarter under pressure. Quade has a long way to go to reach Larkham's heights. And the reason Larkham's position was not questioned during his injury time was because he had comprehensively answered all questions with his play. Regardless of what anyone says, there are still question marks regarding Quade's play against the top sides. Until he answers them he will never be an automatic selection like Larkham was.

2015-06-05T12:33:34+00:00

Adsa

Guest


Give us Reds tragic's a little bit of hope!

2015-06-05T12:18:42+00:00

redbull

Guest


I saw him at an airport once, you wouldn't argue with him

2015-06-05T12:07:32+00:00

redbull

Guest


I do, though I have to admit the longer I stay out of Australia the more tenuous it becomes. I am happy for form players to get the nod. The selection process for the Wallabies seems unfortunately to be more and more political. Toomua then Beale at 10 under EM seemed to be in this vein, though he had known Beale for a while and only lost a title when he went off injured. The rejection of Reds players that he knew by EM was baffling. Seemed to me like he was put in the ring with an arm tied behind his back. Might be one of the few sporting biographies I take a look at. Please stop using "incumbent" when referring to players in the Wallabies just now. The injuries of the last few seasons means there are no incumbents, just those who were standing when the whistle went.

2015-06-05T11:50:42+00:00

rugby time

Guest


Yes keep looking backwards. Some big name players had good seasons years ago .Wallabies got to the ranked position they in now looking back . If they not carefull they might turn around and see whats in front of them

2015-06-05T11:49:08+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


That means no 9 or 10 can be picked on your logic.

2015-06-05T11:48:16+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Foley has 26 handling errors from 14 games. Cooper has 0 from 3 games. Foley is also averaging 3.5 tackles per game and 1.5 missed. Cooper is averaging 4.5 and 0.5 missed.

2015-06-05T11:46:32+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Akari if you honestly think that, then you hardly paid attention to the 14 players around McIntyre. Players were actually committing defenders, forward were effective at the ruck and Genia was delivering quick ball. The 14 other players performed much better than they did in any game Frisby tried to play 10. Most importantly, how many actual line breaks or opportunities did McIntyre unlock?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar