The Curious Case of Chris Sandow

By Lachlan Bickley / Roar Guru

So this article starts with Daly Cherry-Evans but I promise it isn’t really about him.

At this point its fair to say we’ve all had a gutful of that story. Instead this is about a player who is now a candidate to take on the job that Cherry-Evans has preemptively vacated on the Gold Coast, the off-contract Chris Sandow.

I wrote last year about an imminent NRL halfback bonanza as no less than nine experienced first grade halves all became free agents for the 2016 season. The future of some of those players was settled relatively quickly.

Albert Kelly was moved on by the Titans, Adam Reynolds and Luke Keary both signed extensions with the Rabbitohs and Aidan Sezer signed with the Raiders (cut to Raiders fans holding their breath until after Round 13).

However the two Sea Eagles halves were always the main attraction in this game of trading places and while their respective futures were nominally settled early in the season, it was always generally understood that Cherry-Evans might do an about face.

Now that he has indeed changed his mind we will most likely see the remaining three players – James Maloney, Trent Hodkinson and Sandow – find a home for 2016 in short order. Of these the case of Sandow is by far the most interesting.

Maloney and Hodkinson are both largely known quantities. Maloney gives you creativity and elite goalkicking but awful defence while Hodkinson is a solid defender but not so much with the playmaking. Both have played Origin and both will do a fine job for whoever they play.

Chris Sandow however is altogether different. Eight years (seriously he’s been in the league for eight seasons) and 150 games into his first grade career its still not clear whether he is even a first grade standard player.

Sandow can be a breathtaking attacking player. At times it seems like he is selecting his playmaking options from a menu that no other player even has access to. Sometimes this works out well – a surprise chip chase and regather, a 40/20 from deep in his own half, a magical two man cut-out pass that arrives at exactly the same time as a steaming winger.

And sometimes it works out less well. A surprise chip chase that is no surprise to the fullback who is ready and waiting. A 40/20 from deep in his own half except that it goes out on the full near halfway. A magical cut out pass that arrives at exactly the same time as the bloke in the front row’s beer arrives at his mouth.

The problem is that Sandow seems to have no capacity to choose his moments. He’s like a toddler with no ability to regulate his own behaviour. In basketball terms Sandow is a heat check guy, a bench gunner.

When he’s on, as he was last Friday, he is scorching but when he’s off he is north of the Wall cold. The difference of course in basketball is that if your heat check guy is cold you just put him back on the bench. NRL coaches don’t have that luxury.

For this reason Sandow divides fans and commentators alike. Phrases like “off the cuff” and “he plays direct” and “he just plays what he sees in front of him” are routinely used to describe him. Brad Fittler said in commentary on Friday night “I love the way he plays”. All of which is completely understandable because Sandow plays with zero conscience.

The modern NRL is a highly structured game and for the most part halves are responsible for executing a high percentage game plan. The idea is to complete your sets, win the “grind” in the middle of the field and then attempt to capitalise on-field position.

Chris Sandow instead seems to treat this game plan like a new years resolution – nice idea in theory but all rather tedious and in the end essentially disposable.

So of course people like Brad Fittler and Andrew Johns love to watch him. Who doesn’t want to do all the fun things like no look passes and chip kicks? He probably reminds them of what it was like for them to play in youth competitions where they got by on raw skill, before the structure and game planning of first grade drained some of the fun out of the game.

But game plans are designed for a reason. The standard of defence in the NRL is substantially higher than even reserve grade or under 20s and in the long run gambling doesn’t pay. At times the great halves like Johnathan Thurston make it look like they’re making it up as they go along. However this is deceptive.

Much like a jazz maestro the brilliance of an improv performance is that it is grounded in mastery of the fundamentals. I think it is fair to say there is a genuine question as to whether Sandow is interested in mastering the fundamentals of an NRL game plan. It is this perceived lack of dedication to the hard, boring parts of his craft that infuriates his critics.

And then we get Sandow’s most profound weakness, his god-awful missed tackle rate. While Sandow may not own the record for most tackles missed (that dishonour goes to James Maloney) Sandow attempts far fewer tackles than Maloney making his missed tackle rate far worse.

Indeed over the last season and a half Sandow has missed nearly 30per cent of the tackles he has attempted (for Maloney the figure is closer to 18%). This puts enormous pressure on his teammates and provides a let-off valve for the opposition.

One thing that has helped Sandow’s defence in recent years though is the ban on shoulder charges. In his early years the four foot tall Sandow had an infatuation with attempting shoulder charges. This was, it must be said, spectacular when effective but more often than not simply provided amusement for opposition fans as he ping ponged backwards from the player he was attempting to tackle.

At his best Chris Sandow is a charismatic spark plug of a player. At his worst he is a tire fire. His attack veers from extraordinary to cringeworthy while the best case result for his defence is that he is that not a liability.

In the end though there are sixteen NRL halves job and probably only ten or so genuinely creative attacking halves available at any one time so someone will take a chance on him. For this we should all be grateful for the one thing you can say of Chris Sandow is that he is never boring to watch.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2015-06-11T21:59:59+00:00

Lachlan Bickley

Roar Guru


Hi Folks, thanks everyone for reading and commenting. I note now that just a week after I published this story Sandow has gone off the deep end suggesting he be allowed to just play his own style of unstructured footy, which is exactly the problem I tried to highlight....

2015-06-06T02:01:50+00:00

Gus Paella

Guest


So you and Richie have a similar thought process on things (the "right" way) and many of us wouldn't understand the level of insight you have?

2015-06-06T01:41:50+00:00

Ryan Eckford

Roar Guru


I am referring to the thought process of people, not whether he would have agreed with me on this particular issue. It is the thought process.

2015-06-05T09:29:23+00:00

Gus Paella

Guest


Ryan, I'm interested where did Richie agree with you?

2015-06-05T04:36:32+00:00

Ryan Eckford

Roar Guru


I think the main problem with Chris Sandow is the ability of his coach(es) and to a lesser extent his teammates to understand the way he sees a rugby league field. Sandow has got an incredibly good rugby league IQ, and he sees things on a rugby league field very differently to the vast majority who have played the game at this level. What I think Brad Arthur, or any other coach who coaches him now and into the future has to do (and they have to understand this and commit to this) is to allow Sandow full/majority responsibility to decide the team's game plan. Sandow must be treated as a senior player and a leader of the team, and actually shown some respect. Right now at the Parramatta Eels, Arthur has shown that he cannot give a 'special' talent like Sandow any of this, and to be better than an also-ran/ordinary coach, he must be able to give incredible talents more rein and trust the inputs, both in-game and in theoretical discussions, of his key players, which in any rugby league team are the fullback, five-eighth, halfback and hooker. Sandow good be as good as Andrew Johns, but only if everyone in his team, including the coach and his teammates, actually try to start understanding him, because right know, no one at the Eels, or probably at any other NRL club for that matter, understands him. Too many clubs demand structure, structure, structure, and that is to the cruel detriment of special talents like this today. I doubt anyone reading this comment will understand, and I don't expect anything more than 50% agreement on this issue, or on any other issue for that matter, as for those who sees things in the way that I see it, for example the late great cricketer, commentator and journalist Richie Benaud, are more often than not see things in the way that is ultimately right.

2015-06-05T03:52:05+00:00

Kowalski

Roar Rookie


Yep. They've got the class and the unpredictable spark. Plus Hunt's defence has been good of late.

2015-06-05T03:50:22+00:00

Jamieson Murphy

Roar Guru


I think Sandow would excel if he had a genuine halves partner to steer the team around the park (like Foran). You take away responsibility of game management from Sandow and let him chime in with his natural game when he sees an opportunity, his form will go through the roof.

2015-06-05T03:42:42+00:00

matth

Guest


You could not have described Chris Sandow better. Well done.

2015-06-05T03:42:10+00:00

matth

Guest


That's why JT and Ben Hunt are so good. They have the best of both worlds. I see Cronk and Reynolds as identical robots.

2015-06-05T02:22:28+00:00

Danny

Guest


Chris Sandow is the most exciting halfback in the game, bar none. Yes, it can come unstuck but you are on the edge of your seat (one way or another) every time his team has the ball. Compare him to the so-called "great" halfbacks --- Cooper Cronk, Daly Comaneci, Adam Reynolds --- and they are B.O.R.I.N.G. Sure, they give their team direction, kick well and execute the game plan but when we the last time one of those players made you jump out of your seat? As to his poor defending, there are plenty of players whose defence is suspect and games aren't won or lost on a few missed tackles by Sandow. .When he was at Souths, if the forwards dominated their opposing pack, he would win them games but if his forwards were monstered, Souths would invariably lose (as most teams do when their pack is beaten) and Sandow would be the scapegoat.

2015-06-05T01:54:42+00:00

zim

Guest


I think the reasons you mentioned for Sandow being an exciting player are the exact reasons he would be a bad signing for the titans. They need someone mature and structured to play next to Elgey and teach him the game. Maloney would be a great signing for them. I think they should also try and throw some money at David Shillington to get an experienced forward up there.

2015-06-05T00:58:58+00:00

theHunter

Guest


Every half operates well when the forwards are on and though Eels have a great pack, Sandow seems to play well when his spine backline is firing. He is a 'go-forward', kinda 'jumpy' player and his backs should know him and read his game. Like just run an odd line or signal for a cross kick or chip kick. Get excited with him. He plays very well with his forwards but the backline need to gel with him.

2015-06-04T23:46:00+00:00

Kaks

Roar Guru


There are plenty of creative players who are flourishing in league Sandow's problem is that he is not consistent enough to play at the top. When he is on, he is nigh on impossible to stop. But those games are too and far between. Benji Marshall was/is a creative player, however he is capable of doing/knowing when to do the percentage plays and being able to perform on a consistent basis (lets forget his last year at the tigers) On top of that, Sandow is a turnstile in defence. He will have the odd big hit that goes on the highlights reel but other than that he is a speed bump on the way to the try line

2015-06-04T22:12:56+00:00

Birdy

Guest


Sandow is a great attacking weapon, a match winner. Who knows with the interchange being lowered next year his defensive lapses could be overlooked when playing alongside Foran, but to put him alongside Elgey would put too much unwanted pressure on the titans. Surely the Titans have the money and the sence not too have to take such a risk.

2015-06-04T22:12:05+00:00

Eden

Guest


I remember sandow pop a 48m field goal in the last minute to win it for souths over my chooks a few years ago. The distance and the poor positioning to set it up meant it was so unlikely that he would get it, but it was one of those instinctual moments and he just creamed it. I agree with the article that sandow is fun but not a percentage player. Like Ben Roberts or Gael monfils. It's a shame that the elite level of league is so structured that it irons out those creative creases. He could still offer value next year if the interchange is dropped to 8

Read more at The Roar