Stan Wawrinka's French Open win a little bit of history repeating

By Shyam Sundar / Roar Rookie

Stan Wawrinka shocked the tennis world as he denied Novak Djokovic a chance to complete his Career Slam, thwarting the Serb 4-6, 6-4, 6-3, 6-4 in the finals of the French Open 2015.

In arguably one of the biggest upsets in Grand Slam history, the Swiss produced some of the most breathtaking and aggressive tennis ever seen to subdue the Serbinator and take home La Coupe des Mousquetaires.

But was he expected to win? On paper it was perhaps a big no but numbers, analogy and history tilted the match towards ‘Stanimal’.

The below facts shows why the end result in sport can actually be a complete numbers’ game.

1 and 2 – Wawrinka mirrored his 2014 Australian Open victory in Paris as he defeated No. 2 seed Roger Federer in the QF before stunning top seed Novak Djokovic in the finals.

In Melbourne, he had beaten the No. 2 seed Djokovic in the QF before upsetting top seed Nadal in the finals.

Sergi Bruguera was the last man to beat both the top two seeds enroute to a major. At the 1993 French Open he defeated No. 1 Pete Sampras in QF and No. 2 Jim Courier in the finals.

3 – Nadal lost his third Australian Open final to Wawrinka. Djokovic lost his third French Open final to the Swiss. So caution to all – do not play Wawrinka in your third final at the same major!

Murray could be the next victim (he’s played two finals each at Wimbledon and the US Open).

4 and 5 – Wawrinka clinched both the finals in four sets and rose five positions in the ATP rankings after each match.

8 – Wawrinka would love to be seeded eighth at the majors. He was seeded eighth at the 2014 Australian Open which was his first Grand Slam victory. He was again seeded eighth at this year’s French Open and went on to pick up his second major.

11 – Djokovic and Wawrinka were both aiming to win their first RG title this year, in their 11th appearance. Andres Gomez (1990), Andre Agassi (1999) and Federer (2009) all clinched their first Roland Garros title on their 11th attempt.

Since all numbers here favour Stan, this stat also belongs to him.

28 – Wawrinka has now ended Djokovic’s two separate 28-match winning streaks. He had ended Djokovic’s 28-match win streak in the QF at the 2014 Australian Open and repeated the same yesterday as he stopped the Serb’s unbeaten run at 28 matches.

43 – Djokovic was on a 43-match win streak in major events coming into the French Open finals (only Grand Slams, Masters and World Tour Finals). In 2010-11, Djokovic was also on a 43-match unbeaten run (in all matches) before he lost to another Swiss – Roger Federer – in the 2011 Roland Garros semifinals.

Too many streaks spoil the plot – prior to the 2015 French Open final, Novak was on a 16-match win streak on clay along with his 28-match unbeaten run overall and 43 match unbeaten streak in major events.

At the 2014 Australian Open, Wawrinka defeated the Serb in the QF, bringing Djokovic’s 25-match winning streak at the Australian Open, 28-match winning streak overall and streak of 14 consecutive Grand Slam semifinals to an end.

Rafa out, Swiss rule (Confoederatio Helvetica) – Nadal has lost only two matches in Paris in his entire career (70-2 overall with 9 titles in 11 attempts).

He lost to Swede Robin Soderling in 2009 which resulted in Swiss Roger Federer completing his Career Grand Slam. It was a repeat in 2015 as Swiss native Wawrinka took advantage of Nadal’s loss in the QF to Djokovic, ensuring Swiss rule again in Paris. What this also implies is that a victory over Nadal certainly does not guarantee you the title in Paris.

Australian Open – French Open Double: In my last article I had discussed the Australian Open and French Open double as a near impossible feat to achieve.

This continues to be the most difficult double to attain in men’s tennis, as only three men have done it in the Open Era: Rod Laver in 1969, Mats Wilander in 1988 and Jim Courier in 1992. With all odds stacked against him, Djokovic’s task of winning the double even got tougher.

Career Grand Slam in jeopardy – Djokovic was denied a chance to complete his Career Grand Slam by Wawrinka. Interestingly, the Swiss had also denied Nadal the chance to complete the open era’s first double Career Slam (multiple victories at all Slams) at the 2014 Australian Open.

Out of the six players who have played in excess of 16 Grand Slam finals, only Lendl and Nadal have won their 16th major final (Federer, Sampras, Borg and now Djokovic all lost their 16th title match).

Djokovic was also playing in a No-Nadal final which should have favoured the Serb as Nadal had denied Federer the Career Grand Slam four times (2005-2008) and also stopped the Serb on three occasions (2012-2014).

The French Open is the best place to tick off the Career Slam with both Agassi (1999) and Federer (2009) completing their full set here in Paris, but the Serb ran out of luck. His wait continues….

Stats meter
– Wawrinka will return to the Top 4 in the Emirates ATP Rankings on Monday after joining Federer (2009) as the only Swiss champions at the claycourt Grand Slam.

The Lausanne native added to the Australian Open crown he won in January 2014 (d. Nadal), making him just the sixth active player to win multiple major titles.

– The 30-year-old Wawrinka, who won the boys’ singles title in Paris in 2003 (d. Baker), is the first former junior champion to lift the men’s singles trophy since Mats Wilander in 1988. Only six of the 68 different Roland Garros boys’ champions have gone on to win the men’s singles title.

– At 30 years and 71 days, he is the third oldest first-time Roland Garros champion in the Open Era. He became the oldest champion since Andrés Gómez of Ecuador who won the title in 1990.

He also became the lowest seed to win in Paris since the unseeded Gaston Gaudio (44 ranked) of Argentina beat compatriot and third seed Guillermo Coria in the 2004 French Open final.

– Having fallen to Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in the first round last year, Wawrinka is the first player to return the following year and lift the trophy at the same Grand Slam championship since Federer won at 2003 Wimbledon.

One year earlier, the Swiss had fallen in his opener to Mario Ancic at the All England Club. Wawrinka is also the first man to win Roland Garros after losing in the 1R in the previous year.

– Following his victory over Federer in the QF, Wawrinka became the third active player (after Tsonga and Berdych) outside of the big four (Federer, Nadal, Djokovic and Murray) to have beaten each member of the ‘Big Four’ in major tournaments.

– Incidentally Gustavo Kuerten, who had beaten Stan’s coach Swede Magnus Norman in the 2000 French Open final, presented the winner’s trophy to the Swiss.

– Djokovic’s coach Boris Becker also failed to win Roland Garros (best result SF in 1987, 89, 91).

The Crowd Says:

2016-03-18T20:29:18+00:00

Ritesh Misra

Roar Guru


Hey why did u stop writing. You are awesome

AUTHOR

2015-06-14T14:51:41+00:00

Shyam Sundar

Roar Rookie


Thanks a lot..Maciek..means a lot to me...

2015-06-14T09:38:20+00:00

Maciek

Guest


Awesome article - one of the two best I read on the final between Novak and Stan. Congratulations - your writing career will be AMAZING with such skills.

2015-06-14T09:34:24+00:00

Maciek

Guest


You have to take under consideration that Rafa got injured as a result of Stan's superb play. Having said that, please stop repeating this NONSENSE that Stan won only because Rafa was injured. It sounds weak, sick, stupid, disprespectul, and manipulative, not to mention that also meanspiritied, perhaps unintentionally but still - attempting to deprive a rightful winner - Stan - of the honor of the full victory. Thank you for your attention and appologies. I'm here to serve - helping to make crooked thinking straight again.

AUTHOR

2015-06-13T15:54:46+00:00

Shyam Sundar

Roar Rookie


Novak 16-0 - on clay this season 28-0 - overall unbeaten 43-0 - in major events - Grand Slams, World Tour Finals, Masters - Novak lost to Federer in Shanghai SF last year; Since then he had won 7 major titles - Paris Indoors, WTF, AO, IW, Miami, MC, Rome and 6 matches at Roland Garros; hence the No.43 ......Yes Courier's win was a major upset...

2015-06-13T15:25:17+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Shyam What do you mean 43-0. I thought Novak was 28-0, not 43-0 Courier beating Agassi in the French open final in 1991 was seen as a big upset, Agassi was good on grass, and Courier was just coming on the scene. Courier beat Edberg and Stich along the way to winning in 91.

AUTHOR

2015-06-13T13:46:08+00:00

Shyam Sundar

Roar Rookie


agreed..Novak's numbers coming into the match makes this an UPSET..16-0..28-0..43-0 staggering...defeating Rafa in the QF... Gaudio over Coria...Coria was 22-1 on clay in 2004 going into the match..

2015-06-13T08:13:45+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Or Cash beating Lendl at 87 Wimbeldon

2015-06-13T05:43:39+00:00

duecer

Guest


Interesting numbers, although I would dispute Wawrinka's win being one the biggest upsets in a GS final. He had won the AO against the No. 1 player, has been in the top 10 for awhile and has beaten all the top 4. To me, Thomas Johansan beating Safin at the AO, Del Potro beating Roger at the US, Ashe beating Connors at Wimbledon or Chang beating Edberg at the French were far greater upsets.

2015-06-12T23:43:05+00:00

arturo Garcia

Guest


Please pardon me, but a word of moderation may be the use of a "dark horse" instead. But we must not put moderate words to describe the brutal power of the one handed back hand of Wawrinka. Did you remember the match of Nishikori vs. Wawrinka this year? The racket of Nishikori flew out from his two hands from a blistering cross court back hand from Wawrinka.

2015-06-12T23:26:27+00:00

arturo Garcia

Guest


The accolades and media coverage on the regular tour for the whole year are still concentrated on the Big 4. I remember early this year that I cannot get immediate game high lights or editorial comments on initial tour matches of Wawrinka. The spot light of the media was always concentrated on the matches of the Big 4. Now, the Big 4 cannot walk the path to a trophy on the regular tour and grand slams with bliss and confidence because they know that an ambusher lurks from the shadows with blistering power they will have difficulty to match.

2015-06-12T18:18:00+00:00

JonnyBlaze

Guest


I watched the '14 Aus Open and Stan blew nadal out of the water in the first set and nadal did not look injured at that point. Stan was playing out of this world that day and it didnt matter if Nadal got injured, he would have lost anyway. Stan destroyed Nadal on clay this year as well so please stop the nonsense.

2015-06-12T16:46:12+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Stan is clearly a big game player, who plays well under pressure and likes the big occasion. His Nadal 2014 OZ open win will always be tainted a bit for credibility, as Rafa was injured.

2015-06-12T11:06:55+00:00

Avatar

Roar Guru


Interesting stats there. While I would have loved to see Novak Djokovic finally take out the French Open with Nadal out of the way, Stan was still a deserving winner.

Read more at The Roar