World War Cycling: France

By Joe Frost / Editor

After two years of strenuous denials in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, French rider Richard Virenque finally admitted to doping in 2000. The venue for his confession was a French courthouse, Virenque providing evidence for his role in the Festina Affair.

The Festina team were ranked number one in the world heading into the 1998 Tour de France, and Virenque – who had won the King of the Mountains jersey every year since ’94, and come second overall in ’97 – was one of the race favourites.

The 1998 Tour began in Dublin, Ireland, but before a single pedal had been turned over, scandal broke.

Catch up on the rest of World War Cycling
PART 1: World War Cycling: The Prologue
PART 2: World War Cycling: The United States of America
PART 3: World War Cycling: Italy
PART 4: World War Cycling: Doping learnings of America for make benefit glorious nation of Kazakhstan
PART 5: World War Cycling: Spain
PART 6: World War Cycling: Germany and Denmark

On July 8, Willy Voet, a Belgian soigneur for Festina, was stopped by French customs officials as he drove a team car to Calais, intending to get the ferry for England, and then another on to Dublin.

In his book Breaking the Chain, Voet outlines just what he had in two refrigerated bags behind the driver’s seat:

“234 doses of EPO, 80 flasks of human growth hormone, 160 capsules of male hormone, testosterone, and 60 pills called Asaflow, a product based on Aspirin, which makes the blood more fluid.”

However Voet was more concerned about his personal stash, a concoction known as ‘Belgian mix’, which contained “amphetamines, caffeine, cocaine, heroin, painkillers and sometimes corticosteroids”.

Voet had two bottles of the mix – one for himself, and a second which he intended to give to Festina rider Laurent Dufaux, the Swiss having ‘sold’ his soigneur a pet dog in return for 3000 French francs and a bottle of mix.

Voet was arrested, and the Festina team went into damage control, saying the soigneur was not due to be with the team during the Tour, implying the pharmacy in the team car was for Voet’s personal use.

Their lame excuses fell through pretty quickly, as the team’s headquarters were raided, with police finding evidence that doping on Festina was indeed systematic.

After three days in Ireland, the Tour returned to France on July 14, and Festina directeur sportif Bruno Roussel and doctor Eric Rijckaert were arrested. Eventually they admitted to a team-wide doping program, and on July 17 Festina were expelled from the Tour.

But the French authorities were far from done. With Voet having crossed multiple boarders with a car full of performance enhancers and narcotics, this was an international drug-smuggling operation. And there was no way that Festina were the only team breaking these laws.

Over the Tour’s three weeks, multiple teams’ hotel rooms were raided, riders strip-searched, and more arrests ensued.

The peloton were outraged, staging a sit-in and neutralising a stage in an attempt to stop “being treated like cattle”, as 1996 Tour champion and unofficial peloton spokesman Bjarne Riis complained at the time.

That the French police were getting results – finding more evidence of doping on other teams, as well as forcing a number of riders, such as Riis, to dispose of their products lest they be caught red-handed – was beside the point for the peloton, and teams began leaving en masse.

189 riders began the 1998 Tour in Dublin. When Marco Pantani rode onto the Champs Elysees as the Maillot Jaune on August 2, only 96 remained in the race.

And, as we’ve outlined previously, a 2013 French Senate hearing into doping at the ’98 Tour found that Pantani had been using EPO – he was just lucky enough not to have been caught and arrested.

Of course he was not alone in the Senate report – 18 riders were named as having tested positive, with a further 12 considered suspicious. Included on the lists were second and third-place getters Jan Ullrich and Bobby Julich, as well as the green (sprinters’) jersey winner and runner-up Erik Zabel and Stuart O’Grady.

The sanctions? Nothing, with the Senate declaring, “Nobody will face sanctions. We aren’t policemen. We aren’t magistrates. We haven’t noted absolute lies but put-offs and self-censorship.”

In the aftermath of the race members of the Festina team – both riders and back-room staff – went on trial. But while the rest of the team seemed determined to admit what they had done and move on with their careers, Virenque stuck to his guns, maintaining absolute innocence.

As such, he was allowed to join the Italian Polti team and ride in the 1999 Tour de France, where finished in eighth place overall, once again winning the King of the Mountains jersey. He followed that up with sixth overall and a stage win at the 2000 Tour.

Virenque did eventually admit to doping while on the Festina team, at the aforementioned trial in 2000. He was given a nine-month suspension for his admission, which was reduced to six-and-a-half months.

This, for the man who upon learning Willy Voet had been arrested, was alleged to have asked his directeur sportif, “My stuff – what am I going to do now”, and who Voet himself said he first gave performance-enhancing drugs to in 1993.

While he missed the 2001 Tour, Virenque was back in the peloton for the ’02 Tour, winning a stage, before claiming two more King of the Mountains jerseys at the ’03 and ’04 editions.

As for why he stayed quiet on his doping while his former teammates were willing to admit it, Virenque said it was simple – honesty didn’t pay in the peloton:

“Eight idiots from Festina got caught and were expected to tell everything, but it [doping] was an institution in cycling. I didn’t accept it. As I saw it, everyone was trying to make me say the things that everyone knew but that everyone didn’t say.

“What did we do wrong? We got caught. Why this great pursuit of us to make us talk so that we could be punished? That was what I did not manage to understand.

“They wanted nine of us to carry the can. That was why I stayed silent. If I talked I would be suspended. If I didn’t talk, I wouldn’t be suspended.”

While he did end up being suspended, Richard Virenque is perhaps the most successful French rider of the past 25 years, winning the Tour de France’s King of the Mountains jersey seven times between 1994 and 2004, and coming third overall in ’96 and second in ’97.

As for the rest of the Festina team, Voet, Roussel, and three other members of the back-room staff were given suspended sentences and fines ranging from 10,000 to 50,000 French francs (approximately $US1400 to $US7000).

Giving the verdict in December 2000, it was noted the light nature of the punishments came about because “the court took the context into account, in particular the widespread recourse to doping and the deficiencies in the fight against doping”.

Next week: Belgium and Eddy Merckx, the greatest cyclist of all time, who thrice tested positive.

The Crowd Says:

2015-06-24T12:45:06+00:00

Klaas Faber

Guest


Hi damo, "Write an article for us, if you want to reach out & broaden your horizons, show us the way forward, we will learn & a new dynamic may be in the offing, but taking cheap shots at bloggers & the ‘guru’ who put himself out there & entertained us is just that- cheap." Cheap? When asking elementary questions like why an endogenous substance like EPO should be banned in professional sport? Let Joe reply. He's a GURU, right? But Joe continues to dive. He's perfectly comfortable with an arbitrary prohibited list and builds a series on that all but firm ground. It should not come as a surprise that professional riders don't follow his 'rationale'. They make a living out of their performance and of course enhance it through training, and whatever aids are available. It's only 50 years ago that the pope abolished a prohibited list of books. In sport it seems that the Middle Ages are still among us. Let Joe reply, okay? - Klaas

2015-06-24T10:39:31+00:00

damo

Guest


You are out of our league Klaas, that much is clear, but what is also becoming clear is that for such a talent, you are becoming the Floyd Mayweather of 'cycling doping & stimulant effects knowledge' . Stop beating up nobodies to maintain your 'perfect' record. We are all following this series because we find it interesting, we are all clearly learning from you, but your adversarial attitude is not helping. I "googled' you & was impressed, & I'm sure you are part of an on-going crusade to change the way pro cycling views PED's & what constitutes one, etc etc. & again, you are way out of our league, but haranguing amoebas in the pond when you are a fully functioning autonomous life form is just ridiculous. Write an article for us, if you want to reach out & broaden your horizons, show us the way forward, we will learn & a new dynamic may be in the offing, but taking cheap shots at bloggers & the 'guru' who put himself out there & entertained us is just that- cheap.

2015-06-23T08:08:37+00:00

Klaas Faber

Guest


What I want to know is why I (and many, many others) need to spend thousands of hours of study to become an expert, while anyone who's completely comfortable with fake arguments can call himself a GURU. Welcome back to the Middle Ages.

2015-06-23T03:36:11+00:00

delbeato

Roar Guru


they were almost all using it in '98. I think it was Andreu(?) who said he rode a Tour clean around that time and said it was like a death march.

AUTHOR

2015-06-22T15:00:04+00:00

Joe Frost

Editor


I'm completely comfortable with the reasons EPO has been banned, you're not. That's fine, let's leave it at that. What I want to know is why most people who used it have been allowed to go unpunished while a select few have become the scapegoats.

2015-06-22T07:44:09+00:00

Klaas Faber

Guest


Hi Nick, It's an old trick in advertisement to atract attention. Put in a spelling error. Or to check whether the people in the commitee actually really read the Ph.D. thesis they're judging. You're the first one to score that point. Why? It was so obvious. Wasn't I provoking enough? Another bear please.. Cheers, Klaas P.S. attract, committee, etc.

2015-06-22T05:52:43+00:00

NickF

Guest


Or do you mean "Red Bear" vodka. apparently you can get it in rasberry flavouring.

2015-06-22T05:50:51+00:00

NickF

Guest


What is a "bottle of bear", and did Jos really often ride with a bear?

2015-06-21T19:13:29+00:00

Klaas Faber

Guest


Hi Joe, "As for EPO, it was not an arbitrary decision to ban EPO – “EPO makes people better so we’ll bar it” – dozens of people used it and died." "That’s where these disasters and deaths occurred." Previously, I posted here, in your series: "Well, that myth has been thoroughly debunked: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17460263.2011.555208#.VV2i07kw99A Spanish author? Perhaps not credible? He’s Catalan (Bernat) and I find him credible and easy to approach. And you can always talk to the survivors here in NL and B. And Simpson? There’s a recently published confession (in Dutch): http://hetiskoers.nl/twee-doden-een-bekentenis/ Just before the ascent the Dutch rider Jos van der Vleuten gave Simpson two bottles of bear, for which he asked. Tommy knew that Jos often rode with bear hence the request." You're not answering the question. Why? Voet's shopping list is as as good or bad as WADA's prohibited list. About a 1000 convictions per year for party drugs and the like. Kind regards, Klaas Faber

AUTHOR

2015-06-19T18:31:04+00:00

Joe Frost

Editor


Well let's look at what else was in the car, along with EPO: Human growth hormone, testosterone, Asaflow, amphetamines, caffeine, cocaine, heroin, painkillers and corticosteroids. While caffeine, Asaflow and painkillers are probably OK, the rest on that list have good cause to be banned, if not be illegalised. Riders on the Festina team were going to use these substances. So-called doping? No, that's just doping. As for EPO, it was not an arbitrary decision to ban EPO - "EPO makes people better so we'll bar it" - dozens of people used it and died. Athletes with access to team doctors may use these products safely, but what about the vast majority of people participating in sport who don't? That's where these disasters and deaths occurred. What kind of message would it send to amateurs, juniors and aspiring athletes without the necessary budget to use EPO under medical supervision for the winner of the Tour de France to say, "I use EPO, it makes me great. But you can't use it, because it could kill you." (As a side note, how would people who are treated with EPO for legitimate illness feel about that message?) EPO is on the banned list for good reason - the same reason amphetamines are on there. Some athletes chose to ignore those reasons and use them anyway. That's this series' focus - the people, not the drugs.

2015-06-18T08:42:23+00:00

Klaas Faber

Guest


Am I really the first one to comment? Okay. Let me start by emphasizing that this is really an excellent series when replacing 'doping' by 'so-called doping'. Repairing has seldom been that easy. Hats off to Joe. One aside: "After three days in Ireland, the Tour returned to France on July 14, and Festina directeur sportif Bruno Roussel and doctor Eric Rijckaert were arrested. Eventually they admitted to a team-wide doping program, and on July 17 Festina were expelled from the Tour." Doctor Rijckaert refused to admit to facts that he did not commit, so the French kept him in prison. He was released after some hundred days while not receiving the medical care that he needed. Docter Rijckaert died from cancer, possibly/likely because of that. Who knows? Hans Vandeweghe, a Belgian journalist (among others), wrote a book on doping in cycling and devoted it to Doctor Rijckaert. Vandeweghe is anti-doping, has always been. How many athletes died from so-called doping? Pantani? Dopers are people that do anything to win, right? So, what about the current prosecution? You can quote me on the following: some 70-75 years ago these people would have been suited for sending the Jews to the gas chambers. At some time in the past, 80-90% was doping, right? And what was one of the reasons to ban doping? Athletes are role models! Admittedly, a good reason if doping is properly defined. Suddenly, with rather few exceptions, those role models did not exist? Can I now finally have an answer to a really elementary question: what's wrong with performance enhancement using EPO, for example? Kind regards, Klaas Faber, Ph.D.

Read more at The Roar