Talking points from Australia's Ashes tour opener

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Mitch Marsh is heaping pressure on Shane Watson, Mitchell Johnson has rediscovered his fear factor, and Ryan Harris may have missed his chance.

This is what emerged from Australia’s opening match of the Ashes tour, a four-day fixture against county cricket cellar dwellers Kent.

Against arguably the worst side in county cricket on a lifeless deck, Australia enjoyed a valuable hit out.

Every member of their top six chalked up more than 100 runs for the match and keeper Brad Haddin had a reasonable amount of time in the middle.

For the bowlers, Harris got through a couple of long spells unscathed, Johnson looked to have regained some pace, and Peter Siddle showed that he is in decent nick and will be handy insurance for the Ashes.

Only leg-spinner Fawad Ahmed laboured, proving expensive even against a weak batting line-up.

Mitch Marsh has made a big push to play in the first Ashes Test
The equation is now simple – to stand a chance of playing at Cardiff, Shane Watson must bowl in the second tour match against Essex starting on Wednesday.

Even if he does, his position in the Australian XI is less certain than it was just a few days ago.

Watson was impressive with the bat against Kent, with a double of 21 and 81. But Marsh was even better with the blade while also turning in some tidy spells to remind the selectors what a reliable fifth bowler he is.

Marsh missed his opportunity in the first dig when he aimed a swipe at a spin offering and was bowled for 30. In the second innings he displayed his underrated ability to pace an innings.

The 23-year-old all-rounder is best known for his long striking, yet over the past two years he has become an increasingly patient batsman. More and more, Marsh is happy to play with minimal risk early in his innings, soaking up pressure before unfurling more expansive strokes once well set.

As we know, once he gets his eye in he is one of the most scintillating batsman on the globe.

In the second innings against Kent, Marsh was happy to play defensively and bunt the ball around for the first hour of his dig. Even as Watson unleashed at the other end, sprinting to 34 from 25 balls, Marsh kept his ego in check and built a platform.

By the time he reached 24 from 55 balls, Marsh recognised he was primed to make his move. He then blitzed 77 runs from his next 39 balls, launching deliveries all over the ground, before retiring on 101 from 94 balls.

Marsh had earlier demonstrated his accuracy with the ball as he completed a five-over spell, taking 1-6. Last night, he again proved effective, with a spell of 1-16 early in Kent’s second innings.

Watson may be a favourite of the selectors, but Marsh has ensured that they will have to put some thought into the number six spot for the first Test.

Harris didn’t do enough to warrant selection in the first Test
Harris has to hope he gets to face Essex starting on Wednesday or he may well be overlooked for the first Test. Despite showing that his body appears to strong, the veteran seamer was not incisive against a side which boasted only one batsman with a first-class average higher than 33.

At the time of writing this story last night, Harris had match figures of 2-90 from 24 overs. Granted, the pitch was decidedly sleepy, but it seems likely that the Test strips will be of a similar nature.

Roarers will know how highly I rate Harris and that I have argued he can have a massive impact on the Ashes. But he still has to earn selection, given the enormous pace talent at Australia’s disposal and his lengthy absence.

In his last stint in the Test side against India last summer, Harris’ pace and penetration was down. He later said that he had entered those Tests a bit underdone, fitness wise. After six months out of action, time he took to rest his ageing chassis, Harris needs to prove he is back to something close to his peak.

While reports from the ground suggested he found some extra zip in his bowling as the first innings wore on, his overall return was underwhelming. Josh Hazlewood is a certainty for the first Test, and Johnson has joined him in that category after some searing spells against Kent.

Harris now looks to be in a battle with Mitchell Starc for the last pace spot.

Mitch the Marauder may be back
The Johnson we have seen the past 12 months has been significantly less fearsome than the one who vaporised England and South Africa in the 2013-14 summer. Of course, Johnson’s bowling during that period was so extraordinary that it was impossible for him to maintain that standard.

However, it is an absence of venom which has been most noticeable in many of his spells the past year.

Hawk Eye figures show that in the West Indies Tests and last summer against India, Johnson’s average speeds were down 3-4km/h on his levels during his preceding golden period. Not often in those matches did we see him really shake up a batsman. Unresponsive pitches didn’t help but there also seemed to be less malevolent intent behind his deliveries.

The word from Kent has been that Johnson looked truly terrifying, wringing every skerrick of life from the benign surface. He received a resounding endorsement from Kent veteran and former England Test batsman Robert Key.

Even though Key had success in the first dig, making 87, he admitted that the experience of facing Johnson had been startling.

“For a large part of that I thought ‘there is no way I get paid enough to be facing him’,” Key told the media after his innings.

“He’s a different level, isn’t he? The pace that he has, and he gets the odd one to swing, that’s how I think cricket should be played. It doesn’t matter what type of pitch you’re on, that bloke is a serious bowler.”

The fear and panic prompted by Johnson among England’s batsman was the catalyst for Australia’s 5-0 Ashes rout 18 months ago.

The English players will have been cringing as they listened to Key’s comments. Is Mitch the Menace back?

The Crowd Says:

2015-07-01T13:00:06+00:00

clark bushnell

Guest


Sure you do Ronan. Like Ryan hopes Inglis has a big game in SOO 3. I stand by my comments. Mitch is the future. Let him play a few games in England and have some fun first. It's a long series. Plenty of time for Wason to fail.

2015-07-01T03:22:21+00:00

CT

Guest


If he has a successful Ashes I would agree with you. The reason he has spent a lot of his time bench warming is his inconsistency with the red ball. When the ball does not swing he seems lost and tries to compensate with the result being erratic bowling. I will not be sold on Starc until he shows the same class on a flat track as he does on a swinging one.

2015-06-30T10:45:51+00:00

Zim Zam

Roar Rookie


Yes. Well, you live and you learn. And I did look up the economy rates for the tour game - that one's right.

2015-06-30T10:32:19+00:00

b

Guest


Starc was always going to be a GREAT test bowler. He had all the attributes, and his undeniable talent actually worked against him, he spent a lot of time sitting on the test bench instead of bowling with the red ball at any level, never getting to string together test matches. As for replacing Watson in the field, I don't see that as an issue. Watson's reflexes have been looking dodgy in the slips, and out of the slips he is little better than a tree.

2015-06-30T07:53:48+00:00

Broken-hearted Toy

Guest


It would be useful if you did. Memories are tricky beasts and we all fool ourselves if there is something that we want to believe.

2015-06-30T07:17:19+00:00

eee

Guest


Bell Drummond was good in Brisbane 1st grade cricket last season

2015-06-30T06:41:07+00:00

Zim Zam

Roar Rookie


Good point! We can debate until we're blue in the face, and why not, it's fun, but whoever they select, it's going to be a pretty great series. The morning sessions are going to be right in a pleasant evening-viewing slot too.

2015-06-30T06:34:43+00:00

Zim Zam

Roar Rookie


He got 81 runs and hit fours all round the ground. Sounds like form to me. Besides, are you sure that if Watto had taken 50 balls to get to 20, you wouldn't just be talking about how he was just scratching around trying to save his spot instead?

2015-06-30T05:51:27+00:00

CW

Guest


Agree Ronan. Mitch Marsh was a baby when he first played first class cricket in all formats. CA would not have picked him to captain the Aussie U19 side in 2010 if his record was not up to scratch.It must also be said that he suffered a number of season curtailing injuries as well. It is not easy to get any momentum in your game if your are always having injuries or worrying about a recurring injury. Those figures over the past two years show the true talent of this kid.

2015-06-30T05:36:02+00:00

CW

Guest


NOt sure Watto is in best test form. Has admitted he does not know how to approach batting at #6. Showed that against Kent when he came out as if he was playing a T20 or last ten overs of an ODI. Mitch Marsh showed how a test player should approach the situation. A very mature innings from a super young talent.

2015-06-30T05:27:28+00:00

CW

Guest


Hit the nail......With his poor conversion rate over more than a decade I am baffled as to why he is still considered a test batsman. Even more baffling... why he is considered an all rounder. I would say he is someone who rolls his arm over and bowls economically. Not a wicket taking high standard test bowler.

2015-06-30T05:11:59+00:00

CW

Guest


"Protecting Smith from a swinging ball". According to his former coach,Smith is one of our most improved players against the moving ball. As he is now playing the ball at the very last second. A certain remedy to succeed against a swinging ball. How is putting SOS at #3 going to help the team? He has the annoying habit of knicking off far too often to put him in the vital first drop. I would rather have Voges there over Marsh. I rate SOS but can not see a place in the side for him. Agree Clarke should go back to #5.

AUTHOR

2015-06-30T03:19:08+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


I really hope Watson does well but it's a long, long time since he's made runs when a series was on the line and Australia really needed him to stand up. This is far and away my main issue with him as a player.

2015-06-30T02:46:11+00:00

Zim Zam

Roar Rookie


I think the Watson-that-is is a fair bowler and in form with the bat. If the selectors think that's enough reason to go with him, I'm happy, and I'll back him to do well. If not, then good on Mitch Marsh.

2015-06-30T02:34:35+00:00

Zim Zam

Roar Rookie


I'd better resolve to look up everything I ever say, hadn't I? To be fair though he didn't really do that job in the tour game, he had the highest economy rate out of all the quicks, both innings.

2015-06-30T02:32:02+00:00

TheCunningLinguistic

Guest


+1

2015-06-30T02:27:56+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


I think as you have pointed out Ronan that Watson potentially is the better bowler at this stage, but Marsh is catching up and he will get better, Watson wont. Further I think Marsh is surpassing Watson as a batsman in the past few years. Still got a lot of work to do, but that's the issue, Marsh will get better, Watson wont. I say go for the future. The more experience Marsh has at test cricket, the quicker he will develop, and that's best for Australia.

2015-06-30T02:26:57+00:00

13th Man

Guest


i would give Voges an extended run. S Marsh is backup for Rogers if he fails i reckon

2015-06-30T02:24:39+00:00

TheCunningLinguistic

Guest


I agree Ronan. I think that both Joey and Zim Zam are fixated on the Watson-that-was, or the Watson-that-could-be, not the Watson we have. His best days are behind him, and he is not likely to improve. I'll tell you who is though- can you guess? I'm not a Watson hater by any stretch. In the past, he has had periods of brilliance, with balanced periods of poop. Never quite realised his talent, a little bit like Shaun Marsh, but I still have hopes for him. I'm afraid I don't hold out such hopes for Watson- his body isn't up to it. Or maybe it's his mind? Or both? Who knows...

AUTHOR

2015-06-30T02:14:28+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


"I think Watson is still a better bowler than Marsh. It’s a myth that Marsh is vastly more penetrative because he’s got more pace, he’s only got 1 wicket in those four Tests, and he’s not as economical either." I don't think Marsh is a better bowler than Watson but it's incorrect to say he's not as economical - Marsh has gone at only 2.68rpo in Tests, compared to 2.74rpo for Watson. Marsh has shown that he can do exactly the same job as Watson of holding up one end, getting lots of dot balls, and building pressure while the frontliners recuperate.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar