The Ashes: England steal Australia's confidence

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Ben Stokes was plumb lbw. The England all-rounder, battling to counter Mitchell Starc’s pace, was late on a delivery which struck him on the knee roll in front of middle stump.

Hawk Eye showed it crashing into middle and leg. That mattered little because the Australians had not reviewed the not-out decision of umpire Marais Erasmus.

Their initial appeal had been so muted you would have thought the ball was missing the stumps by a mile or that Stokes blatantly had edged it.

Had the Australians appealed robustly or challenged the decision, England would have been 5-177 with a lead of 299.

Given the propensity of this England side for batting collapses, particularly lower order ones, Australia might have managed to inject some life back into the Test.

Instead, a dismissal stared them in the face and they paid it no mind. It reflected the manner in which England had dented the confidence of the Australians with their persistent bowling and fluent batting.

When Stokes’ pad was rapped it was as though Australia were not expecting a wicket.

When England bowled yesterday morning, it seemed every second ball their fielders were ‘oohing and aahing’ or putting hands to their heads in indication they felt a wicket nearly had been earned.

They seemed to believe breakthroughs were imminent and were willing their bowlers to make them… now.

This excitable demeanour in the field contrasted starkly with that of the Australians. The tourists bowled far better than in the first dig and showed no lack of endeavour. Absent, though, was a modicum of exuberance or optimism.

It always seemed that if England were to regain the Ashes they would need to make a sprinting start to the series. Australia were in far better form, had the superior team man-for-man and needed only a series draw to keep the Urn.

But, for all that, they continued to be a side which was considerably less potent on slow, foreign pitches and which had a poor history with the Dukes ball.

England needed, as quickly as possible, to make Australia feel like their bumbling 2013 selves not their rampant 2013-14 incarnation.

In that moment, when Stokes was out but was allowed to stay at the crease, it appeared England had achieved this task.

Had that delivery unfolded at Perth or Melbourne 18 months ago, amid another demolition job by the home side, every Australian on the field may well have been leaping in raucous appeal.

Back then, every time the ball left the hand of an Australian bowler the fielders appeared to be anticipating a celebration. This is the epitome of momentum, an intangible but invaluable force to have on your side in any sport.

Pretty much from the moment that Brad Haddin’s shoddy glovework handed Joe Root a reprieve on day one, England have owned the momentum. Almost every pivotal moment has seemed to swing their way, as so often seems the case when one side is dictating the direction of a match.

At this point, it seems unlikely Australia can avoid going to Lord’s anything but 1-0 down.

They can, however, go some way to robbing England of the momentum they have grabbed so gleefully. Ending this match on a positive note, regardless of the result, is crucial for Australia.

Should they allow England to romp to a rousing victory, the home side will be difficult to reel back in.

The Crowd Says:

2015-07-12T17:57:46+00:00

SDHoneymonster

Guest


@Chris Kettlewell - it's perversely because we get a lot of rain that the pitches have ended up so dry! A lot of the Test grounds, in an attempt to lose less time to the rain, have installed incredibly high-tec drainage systems and that has lead to much drier pitches and more abrasive squares (which is why reverse swing is also far more of a factor in England than it is in Australia, as the ball scuffs up more). Groundsmen have pretty much confirmed that it's had a bigger effect than they thought it would. You could conceivably consider playing two spinners at grounds traditionally associated with seamers nowadays, like Edgbaston and The Oval.

2015-07-12T11:13:52+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


Mmmh, I find him to be a tiresome bore, although his outlandish statements occasionally make me chuckle.

2015-07-12T08:49:34+00:00

Nick

Guest


I think Cook and Root are already in pretty good form judging by their performances this year!

2015-07-12T08:34:19+00:00

Nick

Guest


I should add that it normally takes a great Australian side to win a series in England. The greatest Aussie side of all time won four on the bounce between 1989-2001, but apart from that Australia haven't won a full 5 or 6 test series in England since the early 1960's. Is the current aging team good enough?

2015-07-12T08:28:54+00:00

Nick

Guest


Ironically the problem has been caused by the drainage systems installed at all the test grounds over the past ten years in order to counter the rain. The new systems have proved far more effective than had ever been anticipated which has led to shorter delays after rain but a constant problem with dry pitches - and not just in years when the Aussies tour.

2015-07-12T07:39:21+00:00

Broken-hearted Toy

Guest


Yes, but Watto's standards are very low now. If Marsh gets a 40, he will have done well!

2015-07-12T07:38:26+00:00

Broken-hearted Toy

Guest


Always makes me laugh when the talk is of the risk of replacing a player who is adding nowt to the team. I thought Watson should have played this match as they'd need his bowling experience, but he needed to be fielding at mid-on or mid-off to be talking to Haze or Starc about how to bowl over here. Daft to just plonk him in first slip he needs to be gone from there as they need to get someone new used to it.

AUTHOR

2015-07-12T07:37:04+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


The only "young" player (25yo or younger) in domestic cricket who has been good across both of the past two Shield seasons has been Burns. And he's labouring in count cricket at the moment.

2015-07-12T07:35:50+00:00

Broken-hearted Toy

Guest


Spot on about Lynn. Shaun Marsh is not a useful long-term prospect.

AUTHOR

2015-07-12T07:34:47+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Haha that is a fair effort there Art!

AUTHOR

2015-07-12T07:34:17+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


I'm not sure Warner needs to start sledging again to switch back on but he hasn't looked the same player since he's gone back into his shell as a batsman (or maybe he's gone into his shell in reaction to not seeing them well, who knows?)

2015-07-12T07:33:14+00:00

Broken-hearted Toy

Guest


AUSI, Warner's problem is that he has started thinking. Look at the stuff he's coming out with lately. He's psyching himself out. Needs to stop thinking. Back to Sehwag's mantra - See ball, hit ball.

AUTHOR

2015-07-12T07:32:20+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Australia certainly mucked up their use of the DRS in the last Ashes in Eng and haven't started well here.

AUTHOR

2015-07-12T07:31:02+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Johnson was definitely better in the second dig but saying he was "very good" is extremely kind in my opinion.

AUTHOR

2015-07-12T07:30:06+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


There has been regular reports in media out of the Aussie camp that Siddle has been a standout in the nets. He has a solid enough record in England the question is whether he'll have enough penetration.

AUTHOR

2015-07-12T07:26:22+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Warner looks way out of touch at the moment, even his fifty yesterday was as scratchy as they come.

AUTHOR

2015-07-12T07:25:03+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


And that was exactly how it played out Gezza

AUTHOR

2015-07-12T07:23:00+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


I think Australia would benefit greatly from the steel that Nevill could add at 7. For NSW he often really grinds out an innings happy just to get the runs rather than look pretty.

AUTHOR

2015-07-12T07:21:32+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Chris it's hard to remember the last time Watson played an influential innings when Australia really needed it in a Test.

AUTHOR

2015-07-12T07:19:38+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


"i actually liked how haddin played this test, he grinded for his score and didnt try to swing at everything as soon as he came out." All that went to pot in the second dig though!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar