Five reasons why Nat Fyfe will not win the Brownlow

By Jamie Radford / Roar Pro

One only has to stand in the crowd at any AFL game to realise the general football public rarely see eye-to-eye with the umpires.

The raucous calls of “ball”, followed by the vociferous disapproval of one set of supporters or another constantly echo around the ground while the ball is in play.

A glance at the big screen shows the same discontent as the camera zooms in on an unsuspecting fan gesticulating wildly, screaming his or her disapproval of any given decision.

As it is on game day, so it is with the Brownlow Medal.

Favourites seldom win. It may not be as rare an occasion as the majority of a crowd agreeing with a decision at the MCG on a Saturday afternoon, but only four favourites have managed to take home ‘Charlie’ on the AFL’s night of nights this century – Ben Cousins (2004), Adam Goodes (2005), and Gary Ablett Jr (twice, in 2009 and 2013).

This year, as last, a betting agency paid out on the raging hot favourite early. In 2014 it was ‘The Little Master’ Ablett, while this year Crown Bet paid out on the heir apparent Nat Fyfe in May.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing, so it is surprising a betting agency would be willing to take the same risk this year given what happened to Ablett in Round 15, 2014 against Collingwood.

Nat Fyfe is, and deserves to be, the raging hot favourite for the 2015 Brownlow Medal. However at around the $1.60 mark at most betting agencies, there are plenty of better things to spend your hard earned on, particularly when history (and some other evidence) suggests he might actually be at long odds to take home Charlie.

Here are five reasons Nat Fyfe will not win the Brownlow Medal.

History
Since a number of Brownlow winners were at double-figure odds, with Jason Akermanis (2001) and Chris Judd (2010) paying $15, and Shane Woewodin (2000) and Adam Cooney (2008) $13 for their respective wins.

In 2010, when Judd collected his second medal, Dane Swan was a raging hot favourite. The following year, Judd was favourite and Swan won with a record 34 votes.

The same applies to many of the other ‘player of the year’ awards given out by various media outlets and the two associations – players and coaches. Rarely does a player taking out any of these awards in any given year also win the Brownlow.

Since 2000, only four times out of a possible 42 has a winner from either the AFL Players Association, AFL Coaches Association or the Herald Sun player of the year awards also collected the Brownlow.

Injury
Until he injured his shoulder against Collingwood in Round 15 last year, Gary Ablett Jr was considered a certainty to take out the 2014 Brownlow Medal. Until that injury he was leading the Brownlow count comfortably, polling an amazing 22 votes to narrowly go down by only four votes to eventual winner Matt Priddis.

As was the case with Ablett, Fyfe was (and still is) the raging hot favourite. However the cork to his quad that he coincidently sustained in Round 15 against Hawthorn has been compounded by a groin injury. The two concurrent injuries have led to a substantial drop in form over the last three weeks, and has forced him to miss his first game of the year, against Gold Coast.

Although he is a deserved favourite, according to Champion Data Fyfe was not as far ahead of the pack in Round 15 as Ablett was at the same stage of the season in 2014. Even a lean month could bring him back to the field, and as groins can be notoriously troublesome at times, he may miss more than just the one week.

Fremantle coach Ross Lyon will take no risks with his best player, and has said he will go by whatever the club doctor says – whether that be one week’s rest or six.

MRP
Fyfe plays on the edge and has been fined twice already this season by the Match Review Panel. Any further indiscretions on the field will result in an automatic one-week suspension, meaning he will be ineligible to win the Brownlow.

In 2014 Fyfe almost became the second player to top the medal count after being ruled ineligible due to suspension, finishing a solitary point behind winner Priddis.

Could he become that second player this year?

David Mundy
An impediment to winning the Brownlow in a top side is that there are obviously more quality players, therefore Brownlow votes will be shared among more players.

While Nat Fyfe’s early season form has had the football world in a frenzy of adulation, fellow Docker David Mundy has quietly gone about having his own best season to date. He is averaging 26 disposals per game compared to 24 last year, and is taking more marks, making more tackles, and scoring more goals.

Although Fyfe is averaging two more disposals per game, all their other statistics this season are very similar.

In rounds 1, 2, 5, 6 and 8, Mundy was exceptional and it would not surprise to see him pick up Brownlow votes in any or all of those games.

And over the last month while Fyfe has struggled, Mundy has arguably been Fremantle’s best player in a winning side, and will most likely pick up a few more votes during this period.

Mundy polled 10 votes last year, showing he does attract the attention of the umpires, and the fact that he is getting more free kicks this year than last leads one to wonder how many votes he may have taken off Fyfe.

Other players
There are a number of players who have had outstanding seasons in 2015. Priddis has arguably had a better season than he did in 2014, averaging two more disposals per game. Sam Mitchell has also had a very consistent season, averaging over 30 disposals per game compared to 27 last year, while Patrick Dangerfield may not be as consistent as previous years, but has had a number of games that would have caught the eyes of the umpires.

Scott Pendlebury, Trent Cotchin, Dayne Beams, Dan Hannebery and Jack Steven have all had outstanding years and would more than likely be leading their respective clubs’ best and fairest.

Then there is Todd Goldstein. The North Melbourne big man has been a stand-out this season, and it would certainly be hard for the umpires to miss him. Although no ruckman has won the Brownlow since Scott Wynd in 1992, in the 20 years previous to Wynd’s win, eight ruckmen took out the award. It would be no surprise to see Goldstein become the first ruckman since that time to top the medal count.

While Nat Fyfe will no doubt be in the running for the 2015 Brownlow Medal, it is hardly the lay down misère that many are making it out to be. It is often said that a week is a long time in footy, and with seven to go before the end of the home-and-away season anything can happen.

Then of course there is the undeniable fact that umpires and the footy public rarely see eye to eye, and since most of us think Fyfe is a good thing to take out Charlie, he more than likely will not.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2015-08-04T10:13:01+00:00

Jamie Radford

Roar Pro


Don't know about case closed just yet. Hanners now only 15 points behind Fyfe in Coaches Award, and Champion Data has Goldstein on 29, Fyfe 21 Hanners 19, and who knows how the umpires are seeing it. Yep Fyfe deserved favourite, but each week he misses the less his chances will be, and doubtful he will be risked this week given Freo play Saints in Melbourne. Still deserves to be favourite, but as I said, don't know about case closed.

2015-08-04T09:48:49+00:00

Michael Huston

Guest


I think Dan Hannebery and Matt Priddis are the only possible threats to Fyfe, and even they will be a fair way behind Fyfe. I look at it this way: Forget statistics, forget history, forget precedent. Just look at the games. There have been too many games where Fyfe was undoubtedly BOG, whereas even some of Hanners and Priddis' games you could toss a coin between, say, Hanners and Kennedy, or Priddis and Gaff. Fyfe plays a type of game that stands out head and shoulders above his competition, much like Goodes in his prime, so you don't need to worry about the umpires not noticing him. I have it going Fyfe, then Priddis, then Hannebery. If the votes fall the way I think it may, I've got Fyfe on anywhere between 26 and 33 votes thus far, polling in between 11 and 13 games, and either seven or eight 3-voters. Next I've got Priddis, with anywhere between 17 and 27 votes thus far, polling in between 10 and 12 games, and either two or five 3-voters, depending on the umpires that day. Then I've got Hanners, with between 15 and 20 votes thus far, polling in between 6 and 9 games, and five definitive 3-voters. If all of that is correct (which there's little chance of actually turning out exactly that way), then Hannebery has no chance. The only way Fyfe could possibly lose is if Priddis gets the maximum amount of votes he could possibly receive, and Fyfe missing out on a massive 6 votes he could/should receive. So, props to Hanners for an outstanding season, as five dead-set best-on-grounds is a huge accomplishment considering he's sharing a field with the likes of Josh Kennedy, Luke Parker, Jarrad McVeigh, Kieren Jack and Buddy Franklin, and his team hasn't performed around him at various stages of the season. But he's got no chance. And then there's Priddis. The reason I have him anywhere between 17 and 27 is because that's the minimum and maximum he should receive. You have to take into account Josh Kennedy, who has a few big bags that will snag a few BOGs, and then there's Gaff, who, for all we know, could attract the eye of the umpires more than Priddis. Soooo... case closed.

2015-08-03T00:59:19+00:00

13th Man

Guest


Fyfe only has to avoid suspension to win the brownlow. Goldstein? he has played well but it would be unlikely that a Ruckman would poll enough votes in a side that hasn't won that many games. Sam Mitchell? well if he won it would be a joke, has kneed Fyfe and Tex Walker injuring both of them. Priddis? yes he has played very well, better than last year i would've thought but due to West Coasts rise he has not had to carry the midfield anymore. Gaff, Yeo and Shuey will all take votes off him Mundy will get as string of two votes when Fyfe gets 3 i think.

2015-08-03T00:06:08+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Nah. If you get them all in one game and it spreads into an average, that one games still only gets 3 votes max. An average dilutes his performance and gets Goldy less votes, not more. Average is irrelevant.

AUTHOR

2015-08-02T22:28:29+00:00

Jamie Radford

Roar Pro


2015 averages Goldstein 45 HO, 15 disposals (8 contested), 4 tackles, 113 fantasy points Sandilands 43 HO, 12 disposals (7 contested), 1 tackle, 84 fp Naitanui 33 HO, 12 disposals (9 contested),4 tackles, 86 fp I think Goldy has them both covered.

2015-08-02T12:10:56+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


He'll get about10. Sandi will get about 12. Nic Nat? About8. Yet Nic is the 2nd best of the 3. He will be the best.

2015-08-02T11:08:52+00:00

Johnny

Guest


Having lost only two games I think Fyfe may poll a lot of votes. Umpires do think differently than what Champion Data produce but his constant playing under the umpires eyes and dominance in the strongest winning team so far, may just give him an edge. But then there are stories like this every year thee is a raging favorite. Umpires do dislike a few Freo players but nit Fyfe! And they read papers and websites too!

2015-08-02T08:40:07+00:00

jax

Guest


Nothing is impossible but it's hard to see Pridda getting suspended. I can't be sure but I don't think he has ever been suspended? He's one of the fairest players going around.

2015-08-02T07:52:01+00:00

Bill

Guest


Keep enjoying that empty premiership cupboard Don.

2015-08-02T07:14:49+00:00

BigAl

Guest


delusional prescience and/or irresponsible medication at play here

2015-08-02T05:06:24+00:00

Doc Disnick

Roar Guru


I agree with you both, but at the same time, WC have won a lot more games, and by big margins. This usually results in the 1,2,3 votes for all to spread around. With closer games, the umps are incline to give the 2nd vote often to a player in the losing team. I don't see this happening much in many of the WCE games.

2015-08-02T04:59:37+00:00

jax

Guest


It will be interesting to see how Goldie polls. He should get a lot of votes

2015-08-02T04:48:15+00:00

Alan

Guest


Up until the round in which Ablett did his shoulder, Gold Coast were in the eight with 8 wins and 6 losses. Hardly in a losing side. In 2010 when Judd won his last Brownlow, Carlton finished 8th with 11 wins and 11 losses. Yes it was an upset which means you can't count players like Goldstein out. He's been the best ruckman so far this year and by far the best and most consistent player at North. Not too many players taking votes away from him. I'm not saying Fyfe shouldn't be favourite and yes, does deserve the Brownlow (so far) but the umpires don't always see what we see.

2015-08-02T02:58:03+00:00

jax

Guest


It will be interesting to see whether the umpires give Priddis or Gaff the 3's. I expect both of them will be collecting a lot of 3 & 2 votes between them.

2015-08-02T02:45:32+00:00

Bill

Guest


North are 6th on the ladder. Goldy has been the difference between us winning games we could of lost.

2015-08-02T02:26:04+00:00

Jamie

Guest


He is, but as Jax pointed out above (which I failed to mention in article), Gaff has lifted his game to a new level and will certainly be fighting Priddis for votes.

2015-08-02T02:21:58+00:00

Jamie

Guest


You're right about Gaff and Mundy argument, but Mundy did poll 10 votes last year and his free for averages are up this year. Don't think he would win but I still reckon Mundy will vote fairly highly. Not sure about how Gaff will be viewed by umpires. He did poll six votes last year and considering how much better he has been this year might be a bit of a bolter.

2015-08-02T00:57:49+00:00

LordBrucie

Guest


Often over rated in some areas, especially such as this. I don’t think the situation helps and in particular who knows anything?

2015-08-02T00:42:43+00:00

Balthazar

Guest


I think this year Priddis has more competition from Yeo and Gaff. You can't argue that Mundy will take votes off Fyfe (which he won't - he never scores highly at the Brownlow) and not say the same for Priddis. Presumably Mitchell will knee someone again - he can't seem to stop himself - and get suspended. I think Fyfe's position is similar to both Judd and Swan when the umpires try to compensate and "right the wrong" from the previous year. Champion data many not have Fyfe that far ahead but he is untouchable in the coaches award. I reckon the only thing stopping him is his potential for another brain fade

2015-08-01T23:56:07+00:00

Doc Disnick

Roar Guru


One would have to think Priddis is good value. In fact, I might even go as far as saying the umps may favour him to prove they were right about awarding him the chocolates last year. Like you said Jamie, he is playing better than last year, in a team which is playing some pretty impressive football.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar