Confessions of a West Coast Eagles fan in denial

By Ryan Buckland / Expert

The long subtitle of this column is ‘How I learnt to stop doubting and get swept off my feet by the West Coast Eagles’. The short version is ‘Mea culpa’.

I am a fan of West Coast, and have been since as long as I can remember. My family have been all in on the Eagles since their inception in the late 1980s, and given I came into existence at the same time, well, I associate quite strongly with the west’s inaugural team.

The 2005 grand final, and the broader rivalry with the Sydney Swans that stretched over the years surrounding it, was what got me into football in the weird way that I am.

I’ve been there for the rise, the fall, the really big fall, the re-rise a couple of years back, and the latest fall of 2013.

West Coast’s 2014 season, the first under new coach Adam Simpson, was mediocre at best. The Eagles finished ninth on the table, and I was convinced this side was about to enter a mini re-build under their new tsar. If John Worsfold couldn’t get the best out of this group, perhaps a new group was required. When that didn’t happen in the offseason, I was pretty down on West Coast’s prospects. And not just on this website.

“Is there a risk West Coast slip into the bottom six?” I tweeted to the Fox Footy Roundtable season previews in March. I don’t know why I did that, because for one, who tweets at a TV show?

Once Eric MacKenzie went down in the preseason, I thought they were toast. Mitch Brown a full back? Please. Then he went down. And the Eagles were left with a guy some in the West call ‘Doughnuts’ McGovern to man the key defensive post. They were stuffed. I had screen caps to prove it.

Once Josh Kennedy destroyed his elbow, I said they should consider writing off this season, build some more depth through the middle of the ground in the draft, and have another crack next year. Hawthorn and Fremantle would be another year older, and, well, maybe Coach Simpson could eek out some incremental improvement from an average list.

Sharrod Wellingham is overrated.

Will Schofield is underrated as a stopper, but just don’t give him the ball, please?

Nic Naitanui played one good year.

Josh Kennedy is going to be double teamed all year.

Jeremy McGovern might turn into a good utility player, but he needs time.

Luke Shuey and Andrew Gaff are seagulls.

Josh Hill and Jamie Cripps are nice players, and so is Mark Hutchings.

Shannon Hurn hasn’t looked the same since he took over as captain.

Jack Darling is hurt.

Matt Priddis couldn’t possibly back up from a shockingly-underrated-until-it-wasn’t 2014 season.

Scott Selwood is a glorified tagger.

What is Brad Shepphard?

Xavier Ellis is the worst trade in our club’s history. Jamie Bennell is taking up cap space.

Chris Masten is a washed-up pick three.

Matt Rosa and Sam Butler have been great servants, but maybe it’s time to move on.

Dom Sheed is a bust.

Eliot Yeo looks interesting, but where does he fit?

Patrick McGinnity? You’re kidding right?

Mark LeCras will probably win the John Worsfold Medal as a midfielder.

Callum Sinclair and Scott Lycett are solid, B-grade ruckmen. Our mids are used to having Dean Cox.

Our drafting has been good, but you don’t want to Watts up your whole list…

I love Simmo’s game plan, but gee the talent level isn’t there to make it work.

They were pulverised by Fremantle in Round 3, and I threw in the towel. They’re toast, won’t finish in the eight, and the team at Subiaco should start testing the market for players like Gaff and Shuey. A contending team would love them, and be happy to trade away a couple of high draft picks. I mean our players are alright, but aren’t going to get us anywhere anytime soon.

And then it started. West Coast won, and won well. I built an irrational fear that what I was seeing unfold before me – and yes, I’ve watched every Eagles game this season – was the product of good fortune, a weak schedule, and streaky performance after streaky performance. The Eagles, my Eagles, aren’t that good.

Sports fans, I was wrong. West Coast are good. Very, very good.

Maybe it was my desire to seem impartial, in what is my first go as a (semi) professional sportswriter.

Maybe I’m a typical West Coast Eagles fan, not happy with anything less than a premiership every season.

Maybe I got a little too caught up in Fremantle’s 9-0 start, and subsequent good-enough-to-win-most-weeks-against-most-teams, and that I stood out like a shag on a rock with my call on them in 2015, and am thus far being proven correct.

Maybe they’re not actually this good.

Wait. Maybe they’re not actually this good?

I picked Fremantle in the derby, and not just because of the outs for West Coast. I picked Fremantle because they are a better, more seasoned and proven football team. I still think it will be a Fremantle/Hawthorn grand final, although the weekend’s result threw a bit of a spanner in the works of that one.

See, if Fremantle had knocked off the Eagles, the Hawks would have been mighty difficult to dislodge from that second spot. The Hawks have the Power, Lions and Blues to round out the home-and-away season. West Coast have the Dogs, Crows and Saints. Its still very possible that the Hawks overcome the Eagles and book in a home final, but Sunday’s result was the equivalent a few sand bags against a rising tide.

It made the first quarter of the game really important. The pre-game on Fox centred on the return of Fremantle’s ‘blast’ in recent weeks, a reference to the Dockers’ tendency to overwhelm opponents in the opening 20 minutes throughout the first nine rounds.

But rather than getting blasted, the Eagles did the blasting. The first goal came in 30 seconds, with six possessions to nothing. Before the Dockers touched the ball, the Eagles were up by six. It didn’t take long for it to be 36, and the game was all but over.

The second quarter was a nil-all draw, which meant it was advantage West Coast heading into the second half.

At first, I thought it was some kind of Ross Lyon Jedi Mind Trick. In the west, all of the talk had been it was in Fremantle’s best interest to ‘allow’ or ‘facilitate’ a West Coast victory. It centred on the idea that Fremantle should do everything within their power to avoid having to play Hawthorn in Melbourne. The best way for that to happen was for Hawthorn to finish third – the chances of which were enhanced should West Coast win this game.

It’s a garbage argument, but after observing the two teams in that first, the thought crossed my mind. Nat Fyfe was playing forward. Michael Barlow was, inexplicably, playing on the half back flank. Danyle Pearce wasn’t getting the ball. Alex Silvagni was playing. Aaron Sandilands was mincing the two young West Coast rucks, but it wasn’t translating to quick forward-50 entries. And, well, we aren’t that good.

Then, the second half happened.

Lyon had pulled the pin on his substitute at half time, dragging Barlow and injecting Hayden Crozier, who is thought of as an emerging small forward. He went for all-out attack, and it felt like it was working. The new-old Fremantle was back, and it was a question of when, not if, the game would level out.

Fremantle launched into West Coast, obliterating them around the clinches, stopping their run on the outside, and winning general play. Nat Fyfe played like early-season Nat Fyfe, bobbing up at what felt like every contest and eviscerating those around him. It looked like there was no stopping him. 14 of his 26 possessions came in that third quarter, and he threatened to win the game by himself.

The whole side lifted. The ball was camped on Fremantle’s half forward line. No matter how hard the Eagles tried, the ball kept coming back. It was the Dockers’ game to lose.

Except it wasn’t like that at all. West Coast won the quarter, resisting the attacking thrusts of their opponent time after time after time. The quarter ended with the score line 3.4.22 to 3.5.23. The Eagles had resisted an all-out assault, and came out with a larger lead. They won the damn quarter.

It manifested itself in a remarkable statistic, albeit one that I only have for the full game. The Eagles only touched the ball 77 times in their own half of the ground, but scored 104 points; Fremantle had it 134 times, and scored 80 points. That would make it 1.35 points per possession for West Coast to 0.60 points per possession for Fremantle.

That quarter of football said a lot about West Coast under Simpson. And it made me believe what I’ve tried ever so hard to deny all season. West Coast can win the flag this season.

But it’s not just this season that I’m excited about.

Sharrod Wellingham is an emerging half back flanker, a role he’s well suited to.

Will Schofield blanketed one of the best forwards of this generation, and has been doing so week in, week out this season.

Nic Naitanui is a bloody good ruckman.

Josh Kennedy is the best spearhead in the game.

Jeremy McGovern should win Comeback Player of the Year.

Luke Shuey and Andrew Gaff are more than seagulls.

Josh Hill and Jamie Cripps are among the most damaging small forward pairings in the game in this scheme.

Mark Hutchings is still a nice player (sorry, Mark).

Shannon Hurn is leadership personified.

Jack Darling is my hero.

Matt Priddis could win the Brownlow again.

Scott Selwood is a glorified tagger. But who cares? He’ll be Geelong’s problem in 2016.

Brad Shepphard is a unique player, thriving in a unique system.

Xavier Ellis and Jamie Bennell are handy recruits, destined to be role players. But that’s okay.

Chris Masten has been reborn as a vampire wingman.

Matt Rosa and Sam Butler are plugging holes, with aplomb.

Dom Sheed is not a bust.

Eliot Yeo looks like a 15-year player.

Patrick McGinnity? You’re kidding right?

Mark LeCras is a new type of player, a wingman that kicks goals like a key forward.

Callum Sinclair and Scott Lycett might be more than adequate.

Our draftees have been good. Really good in fact. And they can’t break into the side.

Simpson’s game plan, built on dare, hard work and structural heuristics, is a blend of everything that’s great about Hawthorn and Fremantle. The ball pings around, and when West Coast are on, they are irresistible. When they don’t have the ball, their opponents better make sure they score, because if they don’t West Coast makes them pay. But then the ball goes into the middle of the ground, and you just know West Coast will win the clearance.

That Hawthorn came to town and took the four points doesn’t diminish what West Coast has done this season. It took the first 100-tackle effort in the Alastair Clarkson era to stop the Eagles’ outside game. Tackle count is a terribly misleading statistic out of context, but in this game, it was a measure of how hard Hawthorn had to work to close down the Eagles’ space. Hawthorn gave them nothing, in full knowledge that victory in last weekend’s game was on the critical path to their chances of a top two berth. The inevitable rematch will be fascinating.

After their derby victory, I’ve been convinced that the Eagles are building something special. And not just in 2015 (I’ll do my best to keep my fandom bottled up, but consider yourself warned: come grand final week, I may not be able to help myself), but in 2016, 2017, 2018 and beyond.

Remember, they have been playing without a real key defender, while their forward line has been dented by injury all season. Add a one-on-one defender of the ilk of Eric Mackenzie to this team, and we could be looking at the league’s best defence – even better than their cross-town rivals.

Are we witnessing the emergence of football’s next superpower? While it may be a little too soon to say, it’s a good time to be a West Coast fan.

And that’s something that has taken me far too long to realise.

The Crowd Says:

2015-08-22T01:22:06+00:00

Chris from the NT

Guest


Count this WCE member as a reformed doubter. After the loss against the Dogs in round 1 I could be quoted as saying we need to look for a decent coach. I still don't see us making the Grand Final, but this has been a WCE season I'll remember. I owe Adam Simpson an apology.

2015-08-21T05:44:37+00:00

Luke

Guest


Patrick McGinnity seems to cop flack but I'd go to war every game of the season with him.

2015-08-20T11:37:46+00:00

Zenm

Guest


I agree with your assessment of Selwood. I think you understate just how much Sinclair has improved (marking particularly). Strongly disagree with your assessment of McGinnity (and Simmo would seem to agree with me).

2015-08-20T05:36:42+00:00

Dean N

Guest


I'll just add that about 70% of the Eagles team have played in 5 finals with the last in 2012.

2015-08-20T04:53:22+00:00

Hazey the Bear

Roar Rookie


Tongue was firmly implanted in cheek for that one, Ryan.

2015-08-20T04:52:51+00:00

Hazey the Bear

Roar Rookie


Dean, I think absolutely that West Coast is a top four side. By that very admission, you've been convinced more than a lot of pundits who've commented on the Eagles' success this year! I'm not sure your arguments hold water in the grand scheme of things. I think Dean N addresses the Hawthorn dilemma well enough. However, the one concession I'd make is that West Coast hasn't had the recent finals experience that Freo and Hawthorn have. If they adjust well enough, however, they've got a shot just like any of the others. They could go out in straight sets, they could sneak through - anything is possible. It all depends on what happens on the day.

2015-08-20T04:50:17+00:00

Brian

Guest


No nerves here 08,13 & 14 are already in the bag - anymore just a bonus. Whenever our next rebuild begins this group have done more then enough to justify themselves.

2015-08-20T03:32:39+00:00

jax

Guest


The difference between Port 2014 and WC 2015 is that Port fell away dramatically after the midway point of the season while the Eagles keep gathering momentum despite their injuries. Port 2014 reminds me a bit of Freo 2015 with the difference being that Freo has won most of their games even after their form tapered off a little, that is an important distinction.

2015-08-20T03:27:57+00:00

WhereIsGene

Guest


Best thing about supporting a team contending for a flag that you barely expected to make the finals is you feel like there is nothing to lose. You're likely to be a lot less nervous heading into September than Freo, Sydney & Hawthorn supporters.

2015-08-20T03:27:46+00:00

Dean N

Guest


You do realize that the loss to Hawthorn was without Nic Nat and Sinclair and they even lost McGovern in the last quarter. The Bulldogs loss was a long time ago and came after the loss of Brown in the first Quarter. The loss to North was in Tasmania in ridiculous conditions and had a lot more to do with luck than football. Finally Hawthorn lost to.................Essendon, Port and GWS all of whom the Eagles beat. I'll say it again, the Hawks lost to Essendon at the MCG. By your logic if they can't beat Essendon at the MCG what chance of beating the Eagles there? In contrast West Coast beat the Tigers at the MCG, something that the Hawks were not able to do..

2015-08-20T03:16:57+00:00

jax

Guest


Each to their own Dean. Some people are slower on the uptake than others. If Nic (or Sinclair) had played against the Hawks I believe WC would have won, they were leading with 7m left and that was with Yeo in the ruck in Q4 due to injuries. WC can most definitely beat the Hawks at home. The Hawks will be better prepared next time but so will WC. WC thrashed Sydney and convincingly beat Freo on the weekend. WC easily accounted for the Tigers, Crows and Pies after they had just pushed Hawthorn and Freo all the way. Just this past Monday night Buckley said that WC is the best team the Pies have faced all year and Hardwick was glowing in his praise of WC's system after he played them at the G. The Dogs beat WC way back in R1 which was a very long time ago. WC were leading North most of the day in the Hobart Hurricane but lost by 10 points when they fell away in the final quarter and North lifted. WC's percentage screams that they are a very good football team. There are a lot more positives to draw on than negatives. You can remain fixated on the Hawks but I will keep enjoying WC's season. Of course WC can go all the way. I'm not sure how anyone can write off a team sitting in 2nd place so easily.

2015-08-20T02:59:28+00:00

Dean

Guest


Great, you're as good as the top 4 sides, what more do you want people to say? West Coast aren't a realistic Grand Final chance because you'll almost certainly have to beat Hawthorn at some point and you can't do that at home, let alone at the MCG as a Qualifier or Grand Final. Eagles even lost to the Bulldogs and Kangas in Melbourne. Given the draw, I'd say West Coast would be about about 4th best team in the comp. Hawks, Freo, Sydney, West Coast. Lost to Bulldogs and Kangas in Melbourne, but at the moment, I'd still rate them below the Eagles. Is that the type of recognition the Eagles are after? Or do they want people to think they're genuine premiership contenders?

2015-08-20T02:37:10+00:00

jax

Guest


"The issue with Freo on the weekend was poor disposal efficiency. They regularly butchered the ball when in open space." Coincendially most teams that have played WC have had the same problem. Is it coincidence or are WC causing it? Maybe a bit of both?

2015-08-20T02:33:25+00:00

jax

Guest


Welcome to the bandwagon Ryan. I really enjoyed the article. WC can go all the way, but I'm not expecting them to. Like you, I'm looking forward to the years ahead as I think WC are building towards a period of sustained success. Their best can beat anyone which is why I wouldn't write them off. They can just as easily get beaten if they aren't switched on so I'm not going to build them up either. I decided some weeks ago to put my virtual cue in the rack and just enjoy the rest of 2015 and ride this wave for as long as I can. If WC bows out in straight sets it won't faze me very much as they have already exceeded my expectations this year. Each win we get from now on is just icing on a cake and a little more exposure and experience for the group. I couldn't be any prouder of what WC has achieved this year.

2015-08-20T02:19:12+00:00

GazzaW

Guest


Runs around packs getting chips

2015-08-20T02:00:45+00:00

Balthazar

Guest


Plenty. They'll have a lot more to play for. And a more match fit back 6

2015-08-20T01:56:56+00:00

Balthazar

Guest


Looks like the doggies have lost a couple now too. Will change my tips back

2015-08-20T01:54:49+00:00

slane

Guest


We generally view seagulls as scavengers. If you call a player a seagull it means they don't win their own ball and just scavenge cheap touches on the outside.

2015-08-20T01:54:22+00:00

Dean N

Guest


It took me until WC beat Port in Adelaide to start to believe but when they obliterated Geelong with 40 shots to 14 that I was convinced that this team was a real contender. We still have to negotiate two more difficult games but at least Nic Nat and LeCras will be back for them. Even if the Eagles slip to 3rd spot I am not too concerned as then we will likely face the Dockers at home in a Prelim. If they can't beat us without Nic Nat, LeCras, McGovern and Schofield (for half the game) then what hope do they have when they return?

2015-08-20T01:38:07+00:00

JohnD

Guest


Can someone please tell me what a Seagull is?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar